JTCS Click here to go to SJM website.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:375-376
© 2007 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease

Discussion

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Dr Joseph S. Coselli (Houston, Tex). Scott, congratulations on an outstanding presentation and for bringing this information from a multicenter clinical trial to us. I believe that your report will be a seminal investigation into an evolving technology that stands to forever alter the way we therapeutically approach descending thoracic aortic pathology. Although I believe that aortic stenting is here to stay, we must shun the pressure of industry-driven initiatives and pursue good science and good medicine with, of course, industry support. We need to shoulder the responsibility of being the patient’s primary advocate.

You and the coauthors importantly infer the problems associated with a nonrandomized multicenter trial. I continue to have problems with the control group. Most of the control subjects, 53%, were historically and retrospectively acquired. Not all institutions contributed patients to this cohort. Data on aortic characteristics were unavailable in many of the open reconstruction control patients. Proximal and distal aortic diameters and aneurysm length, for example, were reported in less than 35% of this cohort; even aneurysm diameter data were missing in 10%. The data support that the open repair group did not end up with more advanced disease because they had larger aortic diameters and were more likely to be symptomatic.

After endograft repair, 17% of the . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Article

Endovascular stent grafting versus open surgical repair of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms in low-risk patients: A multicenter comparative trial
Joseph E. Bavaria, Jehangir J. Appoo, Michel S. Makaroun, Joel Verter, Zi-Fan Yu, R. Scott Mitchell Gore TAG Investigators
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2007 133: 369-377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.