JTCS Concomitant Website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:640-641
© 2008 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Invited Commentary

Discussion

The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Dr Mark J. Krasna (Baltimore, Md). This study purports to measure sweat output after thoracoscopic sympathectomy with a technique not previously described. Dr Bonde, I congratulate you on making it here through your visa issues, and I did get a chance to look quickly at the manuscript before the meeting.

The technique described is actually elegant, and the trial of that small a number is to be commended as a good prospective evaluation. The procedure in clinical terms is generally more than 95%, even 98%, successful, so it is not 100% clear to me how this information can be used in clinical practice.

I have a couple of questions. As we know, most reports on thoracoscopic sympathectomy have demonstrated such a high success rate that the only limitation is in fact compensatory sweating. Compensatory sweating in different institutional reports has ranged from as low as 30% to a more typical 60% and even 80%. It seems that in your series even those patients who had compensatory sweating did not have a significant amount of sweat output, which is remarkable. So my first question is, how do you account for such a low incidence and low volume of compensatory sweating?

I think another question needs clarification is the surgical technique involved. In a recent review of thoracoscopic sympathectomy techniques throughout the world, there is a great disparity between what people call a T2 and a T3 sympathectomy. Can you clarify for us exactly where the cuts were made along the sympathetic chain? It is my impression now that I've seen the manuscript that you actually cut over the second rib and over the third rib, which some people would call simply a T2 sympathectomy and not a T2–T3. If you can, please clarify that. Otherwise, I enjoyed your presentation. I think . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Article

An objective assessment of the sudomotor response after thoracoscopic sympathectomy
Pramod Bonde, Nnamdi Nwaejike, Colin Fullerton, Judith Allen, and James Mcguigan
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2008 135: 635-641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.