JTCS Click here to go to SJM website.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Irving L. Kron
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kron, I. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kron, I. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Education

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;136:398-399
© 2008 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Evolving Technology

The National Institutes of Health funding for cardiothoracic surgical research

Irving L. Kron, MD*

Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Va

Received for publication May 9, 2008; accepted for publication June 2, 2008.

* Address for reprints: Irving L. Kron, MD, Professor and Chairman, University of Virginia Health System, Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Lee Street, Room 2753, Box 800679, Charlottesville, VA 22908. (Email: ilk@virginia.edu).

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


See related article on page 392.

 

Ratcliffe and colleagues have made an important contribution about the state of research for cardiothoracic surgeons (see page 392). They have appropriately concluded that per capita funding by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for cardiothoracic surgeons is less than that of the NIH as a whole. They have done a very careful analysis of the reasons for this. The bottom line is that there are two major issues.

The first is that there had been a change related to grant review in that surgical grants were reallocated to nonsurgical study sections. The concept here was to have more disease-oriented study sections. In practice, this meant that clinical investigators would not get appropriate peer review. Cardiothoracic surgical research is truly translational research. It takes . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.