JTCS Click here to go to SJM website.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Carolyn E. Reed
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gates, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, S. b. F. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gates, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, S. b. F. A., Jr.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:148-152
© 1994 Mosby, Inc.


GENERAL THORACIC SURGERY

Prevalence of p53 mutations in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

Christopher E. Gates, MDa (by invitation), Carolyn E. Reed, MDa (by invitation), Jonathan S. Bromberg, MD, PhDa,b (by invitation), Eric T. Everett, PhDc (by invitation), Paul L. Baron, MDa (by invitation), Sponsored by Fred A. Crawford, Jr., MD


Charleston, S.C.

Supported in part by the American Cancer Society Clinical Oncology Career Development Award (P.L.B.).

Address for reprints: Paul L. Baron, MD, Department of Surgery, The Medical University of South Carolina, 171 Ashley Ave., Charleston, SC 29425.

Abstract

Squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus has an uneven geographic distribution with a strong prevalence in the South Carolina Lowcountry. Although many environmental influences and some genetic factors have been implicated in its development, the molecular events required for tumorigenesis have not been defined. Point mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene are the most commonly noted genetic defect in human tumors. Our study shows that p53 point mutations occur more frequently in patients with esophageal cancer from this region than in patients from other areas of the world where the disease is prevalent. (J THORACCARDIOVASCSURG1994;108:148-52)

Esophageal cancer is an aggressive tumor of the gastrointestinal tract that claims more than 10,000 American lives each year. Go 1 Although its overall prevalence worldwide is only6.4 per 100,000, Go 2 in several locations it is much more common. Coastal South Carolina has one of the highest rates in the world. In this geographic region the rate of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus in black men, in particular, is more than four times the global average. Go 3

Although environmental exposures to such substances as tobacco, alcohol, opiates, aflatoxin, and caustic agents have been most frequently implicated in the development of esophageal cancer, Go 4 the inherited syndromes of tylosis Go 5 and Li-Fraumeni Go 6 may support an underlying genetic predisposition for its formation in some cases. Despite the growing epidemiologic data, the precise mechanism by which these influences generate or promote the genetic events required for tumorigenesis have not been delineated.

One area of intense interest has been the p53 tumor suppressor gene. Point mutations in this gene have been found in more tumors across the spectrum of human malignancies than in any other gene. Go 7 Several recent studies not only have reported p53 point mutations but, more important, have correlated these genetic lesions to the patients' endogenous and environmental influences. Go Go 8,9 Our study was designed to determine the frequency of p53 mutations in patients from the Lowcountry of South Carolina who have squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus and to analyze the characteristics of these mutations to determine if they support a role for p53 in the process of tumorigenesis in these individuals.

METHODS

Tumor samples
Tumor biopsy specimens were obtained at esophagoscopy and either grown in tissue culture or cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen. Total cellular ribonucleic acid (RNA) was isolated by the acid guanidium phenol/chloroform method of Chomczynski and Sacchi. Go 10 The RNA was reverse transcribed into complementary deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) by random primers and the Maloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase.

Polymerase chain reaction
(PCR): PCR Go 11 was performed with oligonucleotide primers that flank a 606 base pair region of p53 from codon 120 in exon 4 through codon 321 in exon 9. This region has previously been shown to contain the majority (98%) of described point mutations. Go 12 The PCR products were identified and purified on 2% agarose gels.

Cloning and sequencing
The initial eight cases had the gene-cleaned, blunt-end fragment cloned into the Sma 1 restriction enzyme site of pBluescript II KS + plasmids. Recombinant plasmids were verified by restriction analysis and sequenced according to the Sanger dideoxy chain termination method with vector-specific primers. Go 13 The subsequent seven cases were directly sequenced by a modification of the same method. All data were verified by repeating the PCR and sequencing at least one other time.

RESULTS

Fifteen different squamous cell tumors were sequenced (GoTable I). Ten specimens had at least one point mutation and three of these specimens had two point mutations each(Fig 1). Eight of 11 black patients (72.7%) had point mutations and two of four white patients (50%) had them. Thirteen bases underwent mutation, of which eight were transitions (61.5%) and five (38.5%) were transversions. All but one mutation led to an amino acid change, and this one produced a stop codon. Only two amino acid changes were strictly conservative and both of these occurred in patients with a nonconservative second mutation. Four mutations were at arginine residues and three had cysteine as the resultant amino acid. Two others had an aliphatic for basic side chain substitution and two resulted in the loss of a phenylalanine residue while one produced it. Specimens RA and HL were from cultured cells and showed no mutations. The other 13 specimens were from cryopreserved tissue.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. p53 Point mutations
 


View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. A representative point mutation: Sample EH, anti-sense strand, beginning with codon 280 reads: CTC TCT GAC. The accepted sequence is CTC TCT GGC. This G to A transition at codon 282 in the anti-sense strand corresponds to a C to T transition in the sense strand, which results in an arginine to cysteine missense mutation in the p53 protein.

 
DISCUSSION

Tumorigenesis occurs when a cell loses its well-regulated growth cycle and clonally expands beyond the control of the host. This is believed to require a critical series of molecular events that cause the cell to divide and escape from normal proliferative control. Go 14 Squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus may follow this model. This cancer is of particular interest because epidemiologic data suggest many environmental exposures Go 4 that may be associated with an increased risk for its formation. Moreover, its uneven geographic distribution suggests that specific social, dietary, or heritable characteristics of a region may be involved in its development. Go 15

Although some studies have proposed a role for a c-ras gene activation Go 16 and others have suggested hst-1 or int-2 gene amplifications, Go Go 17,18 one area of intense interest is the p53 tumor suppressor protein. The p53 protein has been extensively studied because it may play an important role in the negative regulation of cell growth. It appears that wild-type p53 functions by blocking the progression of cells through the G1 phase of replication. This function may be achieved by oligomers of p53 that bind to specific sequences of DNA and serve as transcription regulators for the expression of particular genes. Go 7

Several other investigators have reported p53 mutations in esophageal cancer from other areas around the world. Tamura, Go 19 Furihata, Go 20 and their associates have reported p53 mutations in 38% and 34% of squamous cell esophageal cancers from Japan. In addition, Huang and colleagues Go 21 from Baltimore reported on a loss of heterozygosity in 55% of p53 genes from esophageal tumors against a background loss of heterozygosity of 15% in other genes. Hollstein and coworkers Go 22 reported p53 mutations in five of 14 cases (36%) of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus from southern France. Casson and colleagues Go 23 from the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas, found only one p53 mutation in 10 (10%) cases of squamous esophageal cancer. Our report of 10 of 15 tumors (67%) with p53 mutations is the highest rate of such mutations reported to date.

For a protein to perform its function, it must fold to a specific conformation, the structure of which is determined by the amino acid composition. If one compares the p53 sequence among many species, one finds that four domains are highly conserved. Go 24 These domains likely represent the biologically active Go 12 site or at least are necessary for proper conformational folding of the protein. Thus any significant change would disrupt the critical steric relationships and, consequently, alter its function and stability. In this study, six of 10 tumors with mutations had at least one mutation within one of these domains. Among the four other tumors, one produced a stop codon and the other three had mutations that have previously been described in human esophageal tumors.

Another related finding is the nature of the amino acid changes. Eleven of the 13 total mutations had changes affecting the charge, size, or reactivity of the amino acid side-chain. Such nonconservative changes are necessary to alter the conformation of a protein. Thus these single amino acid changes in p53 may produce significant alteration in the protein's function and stability. Indeed, the half-life of wild-type p53 is 20 minutes, whereas a single mutation characteristically increases the half-life to approximately 12 hours. Go 25

A great deal of interest has been generated in whether specific mutations can implicate the etiology of a tumor. All 15 patients in this study had a significant history of tobacco use. Tobacco smoke contains a variety of mutagens that may result in a characteristic pattern of gene mutations. Go 22 Recent data show that smoking may be a principal cause of p53 mutations. In patients with head and neck cancer, 78% of smokers had p53 point mutations compared with 14% of nonsmokers. Go 8 Overexpression, a marker of p53 mutation, was detected by the CM-1 polyclonal antibody in 33% of lung adenocarcinomas. This correlated well with the patients' smoking history, because all cells with overexpression came from smokers (23/58, 40%), whereas cells without overexpression came from nonsmokers (0/12, 0%). Go 9 Moreover, the sites and types of mutations do not occur randomly. Go 26 G to A transitions are often found in patients with histories of tobacco use. Five of the 13 mutations in our study were G to A transitions. This transition has been suggested to be the result of DNA alkylation of deoxyguanosine to 0 Go 6-methyl-deoxyguanosine, which pairs with thymidine instead of cytosine. This may be induced by methylating nitrosamines, which are present in significant amounts in tobacco smoke. Go 22

The CpG dinucleotide is a frequent site of spontaneous mutations in which 5-methylcytosine deaminates to thymidine. Go 27 This event is thought to be responsible for the high frequency of transitions that are seen at this site and seems to account for many germ-line mutations that cause human genetic disease. Go 28 Two of the eight black patients with mutations had a mutation at a CpG dinucleotide site. Squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus is disproportionally prevalent in black men in the South Carolina low country. At this time, however, no specific reason for this has been elucidated. A prevalence of germ-line p53 mutations could increase the likelihood for the development of cancer. This would partially explain the racial difference seen in this region.

As in all studies, p53 mutations are not found in all of the specimens. Technical concerns may have prevented us from detecting a p53 mutation. Sampling error is possible because of the heterogeneous nature of biopsied tissue. Despite the significant number of tumor cells within each specimen, there are still many normal cells whose p53 may provide the source for falsely negative results. In addition, a mutation could have occurred outside the analyzed sequence. Although 98% of all previously described mutations have occurred within the analyzed region, it is possible that a specimen could have a significant mutation outside the region.

Clearly, not all squamous cell carcinomas of the esophagus necessarily have p53 mutations. Several reasons may explain this. First, the target sequence for the p53 protein may, in fact, undergo mutation such that wild-type p53 is unable to bind it and perform its suppressor function. Go 29 Second, a cellular or viral oncogene product may serve as an inhibitor of function of wild-type p53. This is best described in cervical car cinoma, where the E6 product of the human papilloma virus inhibits p53 function. Go 30 Third, another molecular event may produce a similar phenotypic change that provides sufficient alteration to permit tumorigen esis. Recently a p90 protein (mdm-2) has been found that co-immunoprecipitates with p53. It is proposed that this protein functions by binding with oligomers of p53 and together they bind nuclear DNA, producing the regulatory function. Go 31 Among these tumors (human sarcomas) that had mdm-2 gene amplification, no mutations of p53 were found. Go 32 Thus amplification of the mdm-2 protein has the similar phenotypic effect of a p53 mutation.

In summary, this study shows a large percentage of p53 mutations in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus from the South Carolina Lowcountry. The frequency of these mutations is greater than those from other regions where the disease is prevalent. The specific mutations and their resultant amino acid changes support a role for p53 in the process of esophageal cancer tumorigenesis. Further studies are indicated to determine if specific mutations correlate with prognosis, as is now being elucidated for other tumors with p53 involvement. Go 33

We are grateful to James Norris, PhD, for his support and assistance in producing this study.

Appendix: DISCUSSION

Dr. Harvey I. Pass (Bethesda, Md.).
Have you done studies of the surrounding tissue, along with the tumor, with regard to p53 expression?

Dr Gates
. We have done a monoclonal antibody test looking at the surrounding tissue both in the immediate area and 10 cm away from the tumorous tissue. What we found is that these monoclonal antibody studies suggest that some of the normal cells have the p53 mutations. This observation supports a field defect in p53, which has been suggested by other studies.

Dr. Martin F. McKneally (Toronto, Ontario, Canada).
Can you discuss the larger picture of what you were attempting to do apart from defining the molecular events?

Dr. Gates.
I think the larger picture is improved therapeutic strategies, therapies such as what Dr. Roth will be doing in Houston, where a complementary strand of DNA will be placed in the cells, which will bind the mutant p53 and thereby inhibit its function in cellular replication. Also, understanding that different tumors have different p53 mutations and that not all tumors have p53 mutations will be relevant for the management of these patients.

Dr. Valerie W. Rusch (New York, N.Y.).
How many of these specimens had you put in cell culture? Since you are using RT-PCR, it seems unnecessary to put any specimens in cell culture, a technique that could alter your results.

Second, did you examine p53 alterations at the protein level? In lung cancers a greater number of alterations have been found at the protein than the RNA level.

Dr. Gates..
In answer to your first question, we have entirely departed from cell culture techniques, and this appears to be working much better with more reliable results. In answer to the second question, no, we have not done any protein studies, per se, looking for alteration in p53 configuration, half-life, or structure. This could certainly prove to support our contention that p53 mutations are involved in esophageal carcinogenesis, and such studies will be addressed further in the future.

Dr. Mark B. Orringer (Ann Arbor, Mich.).
Dr. Rusch has made an important point that I would only reemphasize, that PCR techniques are more reliable than cell culture for demonstrating the genetic abnormalities in patients with thoracic malignancies. I also want to point out that the subspecialty of general thoracic surgery has clearly established a leadership role within thoracic surgery in using molecular biologic techniques to better define our patient population and potentially apply the genetic findings to clinical practice. The p53 oncogene is but one of these recently identified in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Others are now being demonstrated as we start to map which oncogenes may be important in both esophageal and lung cancer. In our laboratory, for example, we have also found that N-aminopeptidase and sucrase isomaltase are common oncogenes in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Such genetic characterization of these tumors may potentially provide prognostic information once we have better correlated survival with specific oncogenes. As we expand on the use of this information that Dr. Gates has presented, in the near future we can envision sending biopsy tissue of esophageal cancer both to the pathologist for routine histologic evaluation and also to the tumor biology laboratory, where mapping of the oncogenes of each tumor will reveal which cancers have the better prognosis. Perhaps as we learn to link monoclonal antibodies to these proteins, we will have a new weapon against systemic metastases. We are entering a new and exciting era of general thoracic surgery, and I congratulate Dr. Gates and his associates for a very fine piece of work.

Footnotes

From the Departments of Surgery,a Microbiology and Immunology,b and Medicine,c The Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, S.C. Back

Read at the Seventy-third Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Chicago, Ill., April 25-28, 1993. Back

References

  1. Boring CC, Squires TS, Tong T. Cancer statistics for African Americans. CA Cancer J Clin 1992;42:19-38.[Medline]
  2. Parkin DM, Laara E, Muir CS. Estimates of the worldwide frequency of sixteen major cancers in 1980. Int J Cancer 1988;41:184-97.[Medline]
  3. Brown LM, Blot WJ, Schuman SH, et al. Environmental factors and high risk of esophageal cancer among men incoastal South Carolina. J Natl Cancer Inst 1988;80:1620-5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Yang CS. Research of esophageal cancer in China: a review. Cancer Res 1980;40:2633-44.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Ashworth MT, Nash JR, Ellis A, Day DW. Abnormalities of differentiation and maturation in the oesophageal squamous epithelium of patients with tylosis: morphological features. Histopathology 1991;19:303-10.[Medline]
  6. Santibanez-Koref MF, Birch JM, Hartley AL, et al. p53 Germline mutations in Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Lancet 1991;338:1490-1.[Medline]
  7. Levine AJ, Momand J, Finlay CA. The p53 tumor suppressor gene. Nature 1991;351:453-6.[Medline]
  8. Field JK, Spandidos DA, Malliri A, Gosney JR, Yiagnisis M, Stell PM. Elevated p53 expression correlates with a history of heavy smoking in squamous carcinoma of the head and neck. Br J Cancer 1991;64:573-7.[Medline]
  9. Westra WH, Offerhaus GJA, Goodman SN, et al. Overexpression of the p53 tumor suppressor gene product in primary lung adenocarcinoma is associated with cigarette smoking. Am J Surg Pathol 1993;17:213-20.[Medline]
  10. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid-guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 1987;162:156-9.[Medline]
  11. Eisenstein BI. The polymerase chain reaction. N Engl J Med 1990;322:178-83.[Medline]
  12. Hollstein MC, Sidransky D, Vogelstein B, Harris CC. p53 Mutations in human cancers. Science 1991;253:49[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1977;74:5463-7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Fearon ER, Vogelstein B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell 1990;61:759-67.[Medline]
  15. Day NE, Munoz N. Esophagus. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF, eds. Cancer epidemiology and prevention. 1st ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1982:596-623.
  16. Ruol A, Stephens JK, Michelassi F, et al. Expression of ras oncogene p21 protein in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 1990;44:142-5.[Medline]
  17. Tsuda T, Tahara E, Kajiyama G, Sakamoto H, Terada M, Sugimura T. High incidence of coamplification of hst-1 and int-2 genes in human esophageal carcinomas. Cancer Res 1989;49:5505-8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Kitagawa Y, Ueda M, Ando N, Shinozawa Y, Shimizu N, Abe O. Significance of int-2/hst-1 coamplification as a prognostic factor in patients with esophageal squamous carcinoma. Cancer Res 1991;51:1504-8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Tamura G, Maesawa C, Yasushi S, Satodate R, Ishida K, Saito K. p53 Gene mutations in esophageal cancer detected by polymerase chain reaction single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. Jpn J Cancer Res 1992;83:559-62.[Medline]
  20. Furihata M, Ohtsuki Y, Ogoshi S, Takahashi A, Tamiya T, Ogata T. Prognostic significance of human papillomavirus genomes (type-16, -18) and aberrant expression of p53 protein in human esophageal cancer. Int J Cancer 1993;54:226-30.[Medline]
  21. Huang Y, Boynton RF, Blount PL, et al. Loss of heterozygosity involves multiple tumor suppressor genes in human esophageal cancers. Cancer Res 1992;52:6525-30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Hollstein MC, Metcalf RA, Welsh JA, Montesano R, Harris CC. Frequent mutation of the p53 gene in human esophageal cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990;87:9958-61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Casson AG, Mukhopadhyay T, Cleary KR, Ro JY, Levin B, Roth JA. p53 Gene mutations in Barrett's epithelium and esophageal cancer. Cancer Res 1991;51:4495-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Soussi T, Caron de Fromentel C, May P. Structural aspects of the p53 protein in relation to gene evolution. Oncogene 1990;5:945.[Medline]
  25. Hinds PW, Finaly CA, Quartin RS, et al. Mutant p53 DNA clones from human colon carcinomas cooperate with ras in transforming primary rat cells: a comparison of the "hot spot" mutant phenotypes. Cell Growth Differ 1990;1:571-80.[Abstract]
  26. Benzer S, Freese E. Induction of specific mutations with 5-Bromouracil. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1958;44:112-9.[Free Full Text]
  27. Coulondre C, Miller JH, Farabaugh PJ, Gilbert W. Molecular basis of base substitution hot spots in Escherichia coli. Nature 1978;274:775-80.[Medline]
  28. Cooper DN, Krawczak M. The mutational spectrum of single base-pair substitutions causing human genetic disease: patterns and predictions. Hum Genet 1990;85:55-74.[Medline]
  29. Kern SE, Kinzler KW, Bruskin A, et al. Identification of p53 as a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein. Science 1991;252:1708-11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Werness BA, Levine AJ, Howley PM. Association of human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 E6 proteins with p53. Science 1990;248:76-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Momand J, Zambetti GP, Olson DC, George D, Levine AJ. The mdm-2 oncogene product forms a complex with the p53 protein and inhibits p53-mediated transactivation. Cell 1992;69:1237-45.[Medline]
  32. Oliner JD, Kinzler KW, Meltzer PS, George DL, Vogelstein B. Amplification of a gene encoding a p53 associated protein in human sarcomas. Nature 1992;358:80-3.[Medline]
  33. Harris CC, Hollstein M. Clinical implications of the p53 tumor-suppressor gene. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1318-27.[Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
E. Okuda, H. Osugi, K. Morimura, N. Takada, M. Takemura, S. Fukushima, M. Higashino, and H. Kinoshita
Detection of p53 Gene Mutations in Human Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomas Using a p53 Yeast Functional Assay: Possible Difference in Esophageal Carcinogenesis Between the Young and the Elderly Group
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2001; 7(3): 600 - 606.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Carolyn E. Reed
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gates, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, S. b. F. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gates, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, S. b. F. A., Jr.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS