JTCS Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Guo-Wei He
Tea E. Acuff
William H. Ryan
Mark B. Douthit
Michael J. Mack
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by He, G.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Mack, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by He, G.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Mack, M. J.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:73-81
© 1994 Mosby, Inc.


SURGERY FOR ACQUIRED HEART DISEASE

Determinants of operative mortality in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: Emphasis on the influence of internal mammary artery grafting on mortality and morbidity

Guo-Wei He, MD, PhD, Tea E. Acuff, MD, William H. Ryan, MD, Richard T. Bowman, MD, Mark B. Douthit, MD, Michael J. Mack, MD


Dallas, Tex.

From the Cardiothoracic Surgery Associates of North Texas, Medical City Dallas Hospital, Dallas, Tex.

Received for publication Aug. 16, 1993. Accepted for publication Nov. 24, 1993. Address for reprints: Guo-Wei He, MD, PhD, Director, Cardiovascular Research, The Albert Starr Academic Center for Cardiac Surgery, St. Vincent Heart Institute, 9155 S.W. Barnes Rd., Suite 240, Portland, OR 97225.

Abstract

Coronary artery bypass grafting has been performed for elderly patients (>=70 years) with increasing frequency. From January 1986 through June 1993, 1399 elderly patients underwent isolated coronary bypass grafting. Of these patients, 823 had saphenous vein grafts alone and 576 had internal mammary artery grafting, including unilateral (n = 546) and bilateral (n = 28). Overall operative mortality was 8.86%. Operative mortality for unilateral internal mammary artery grafting (6.41%) was lower than for saphenous vein grafting only (9.96%, p = 0.021) and bilateral internal mammary artery grafting (21.43%, 6/28, p = 0.018). Fewer patients undergoing internal mammary artery grafting had postoperative complications (low cardiac output, intraaortic balloon pumping, and neurologic complications) than patients having saphenous vein grafting only. To determine risk factors for mortality and the influence of internal mammary artery grafting on the outcome, we analyzed 55 variables (27 preoperative, 15 intraoperative, and 13 postoperative) by univariate analysis. Significant variables (age, gender, height, weight, surface area, diabetes, obesity, body mass index, history of congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, or arrhythmia, functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction, stenosis of the left anterior descending or right coronary artery, emergency operation, reoperation, number of grafts, perfusion time, and bilateral or right internal mammary artery grafting) were included in a stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis. The logistic regression demonstrates that those preoperative (history of congestive heart failure or myocardial infarction, low ejection fraction, female gender, and old age), intraoperative (long cardiopulmonary bypass time, emergency operation, reoperation, and use of right internal mammary artery grafting), and postoperative (postoperative complications) variables are independently associated with higher mortality. This study reveals the high-risk groups in elderly patients undergoing coronary bypass and suggests that a left internal mammary artery graft in combination with saphenous vein grafting may achieve a lower operative mortality and morbidity than other procedures in selected elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. (J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG1994;108:73-81)

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been performed for elderly patients (>=70 years) with increasing frequency because of the increasing number of elderly patients in the general population, the increasing safety of CABG in general, the increasing prevalence of coronary artery disease, and the higher mortality rate after acute myocardial infarction. Go Go 1,2 The operative mortality and morbidity for patients older than 70 years of age undergoing isolated CABG are higher than those in younger patients. Go Go 3-12 A large experience from the Cleveland Clinic identified that the risk factors for operative mortality are age 75 years or older, cigarette smoking, left ventricular impairment, and female gender. Go 13 On the other hand, although superior patency rates and low mortality of internal mammary artery (IMA) grafting have promoted the use of left IMA grafting in either young patients or elderly patients, little has been known about the influence of IMA grafting, particularly the role of bilateral IMA grafting, on operative mortality and morbidity in the elderly. Go 14 The present study was designed to investigate high-risk groups in elderly patients undergoing isolated CABG with emphasis on the influence of IMA grafting on outcome in these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 1986 through June 1993, a total of 6360 patients underwent isolated CABG. Of these patients, 1399 were elderly (>=70 years old) with a mean age of 75.13 ± 0.10 (range 70 to 93.0) years. Patients who had a concomitant valve operation or resection of ascending aortic aneurysm were excluded from this study. Among these patients, 823 had saphenous vein grafts alone and 576 had IMA grafting including unilateral (n = 546) and bilateral (n = 28) IMA grafting with or without additional saphenous vein grafting. A computerized cardiac surgery registry based on the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database provided the basis for this study. Operative death was defined as any in-hospital death (<=30 days and >30 days within the hospital) and any death that occurred after discharge from the hospital but within 30 days after operation.

The clinical characteristics were recorded by cardiologists. The criterion of obesity was based on the body mass index. Body mass index was calculated by dividing measured body weight in kilograms by the height in meters squared. A body mass index greater than 27.5 kg/m 2 (over 120% "normal" body mass index) was considered as obesity. Go 15 Perioperative myocardial infarction was defined as new Q waves and was diagnosed by cardiologists or surgeons.

Catheterization data
All patients underwent preoperative left-heart catheterization and coronary angiography. Patients were grouped into categories of single, double, and triple vessel disease. Significant coronary artery disease was defined as 70% or more stenosis in any view of the right, left anterior descending, or left circumflex artery or their major branches. Left main artery disease was defined as 50% or more stenosis. Left ventricular ejection fraction was calculated according to left ventriculography. Left ventricular function was classified as normal (ejection fraction >= 50%) and mild (ejection fraction 40% to 50%), moderate (ejection fraction 30% to 39%), or severe (ejection fraction <30%) dysfunction. Stenosis of the left anterior descending or the right main coronary artery was classified as 0% to 50%, 51% to 70%, 71% to 90%, 91% to 99%, and 100% stenosis.

Operative technique
A similar operative technique was used throughout this experience. For patients undergoing IMA grafting, after the sternotomy, the left IMA was mobilized from the chest wall. Low-voltage electrocoagulation was used to avoid thermal damage to the IMA. The IMA was mobilized from its origin to the distal end close to the bifurcation. The IMA pedicle was then wrapped with a gauze swab immersed in papaverine solution. In patients undergoing bilateral or right IMA grafting, the right IMA was then mobilized by means of a similar technique. After heparinization, the IMAs were divided distally and free flow was examined. The decision of grafting diseased coronary arteries with which IMA or saphenous vein grafts was made according to the individual surgeon's preference. Coronary anastomosis was performed with continuous 8-0 Prolene suture (Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, N.J.) for IMA grafting and 7-0 suture for saphenous vein grafting using magnification. Moderate systemic hypothermia was used. Myocardial protection was achieved by antegrade and/or retrograde infusion of cardioplegic solution and topical cooling. The proximal anastomosis was performed on bypass for saphenous vein grafting. The sternum was closed with interrupted 18-gauge stainless steel wires. The fascial tissue and subcutaneous tissue were closed with running absorbable suture and the skin was closed with continuous subcuticular suture.

Indications for IMA grafting
Left IMA, as the primary arterial conduit, was used for left coronary branches, particularly for the left anterior descending artery. In general, selection of patients for a second IMA graft was primarily preferred for younger patients with good ventricular function. Thus there were only 28 patients who underwent bilateral IMA grafting (2.0%) throughout this experience. In these patients, a right IMA would be grafted to the mid or distal right coronary artery or alternatively be placed on a large obtuse marginal artery or left anterior descending artery. Use of the distal branch of the IMA was avoided if possible. Free right IMAs were used to graft onto the distal right coronary artery or obtuse marginal branch of the left coronary artery in three patients.

Statistical analysis
The correlation between preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables and operative mortality was tested by univariate analysis; the comparison of operative mortality and morbidity between the patients having IMA grafting and saphenous vein grafting were also analyzed. After the univariate analysis, logistic regression was used to further test significant variables in a multivariate situation. Univariate testing of discrete variable comparisons was performed with {chi}2 analysis or Fisher's exact test. The unpaired t test was used on continuous variable comparisons. Stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis was then used to further test significant variables in a multivariate situation. Go Go 16-22 Any variables that had trends to be associated with operative mortality (p < 0.2) were also included in stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis. To investigate the influence of IMA grafting on the operative mortality, we included IMA grafting, unilateral, bilateral, and right IMA grafting in the logistic regression model to test the significance. The univariate analysis and the logistic regression were performed with the SAS program (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C.) in an IBM-compatible personal computer linked with a VAX computer (Digital Equipment Corp., Maynard, Mass.). A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Mortality
Overall operative mortality was 8.86%. Operative mortality for unilateral IMA grafting (6.41%) was lower than that for saphenous vein grafting (9.96%, p = 0.021) and bilateral IMA grafting (21.43%, 6/28, p = 0.018). GoTable I lists the characteristics for patients receiving IMA and saphenous vein grafts. The causes of death are listed in GoTable II.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Characteristics for elderly patients ( > 70 years)IMAgrafting or having saphenous vein grafting only
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Cause of operative mortality
 
Univariate analysis
To determine the risk factors correlated to the operative mortality in the elderly patients, we performed univariate analysis for 55 variables including 27 preoperative, 15 intraoperative, and 13 postoperative variables (see appendix). GoTables I, GoIII, and GoIV list the significant variables for the operative mortality. The average age of operative survivors (75.03 ± 0.11 years) was younger than that of deceased patients (76.17 ± 0.39 years, p = 0.0055), although the higher mortality in the patients older than 80 years (20/155, 12.9%, versus 104/1244, 8.36%) did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.061). Female patients had higher mortality (11.68%) than male patients (7.27%, p = 0.005). Other preoperative variables associated with the operative mortality were weight, height, surface area, body mass index, diabetes, history of congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction or arrhythmia, New York Heart Association class, left ventricular ejection fraction, and stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Perioperative (intraoperative and postoperative) variables associated with the operative mortality were emergency operation, reoperation, number of grafts, use of bilateral IMA grafting, use of right IMA grafting, perfusion time, intraaortic balloon pumping, postoperative complications (including any of the postoperative complications listed under GoTable I), postoperative low cardiac output, reoperation for bleeding, perioperative myocardial infarction, neurologic complications (transient or permanent stroke), and stroke (permanent).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III. Significant preoperative variables for operative mortality in elderlypatients undergoing CABG according to univariate analysis
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table IV. Significant perioperative variables for operative mortality in theelderly patients undergoing CABG by univariate analysis
 
Multivariate analysis
Significant preoperative variables (gender, age, height, weight, surface area, diabetes, obesity, body mass index, history of myocardial infarction, history of congestive heart failure and arrhythmia, New York Heart Association class, left ventricular function, ejection fraction, left anterior descending artery stenosis, and right coronary artery stenosis) and intraoperative variables (emergency operation, reoperation, number of grafts, bilateral or right IMA grafting, and perfusion time) were included in the multiple logistic regression analysis for the operative mortality. The postoperative complications, as a single variable, were also included in the logistic regression analysis. Those variables (age >=80 years, obesity, and IMA grafting) that had a trend to correlate with the operative mortality (p < 0.2) in the univariate analysis were also included. Smoking history was included in the logistic regression analysis because of its important influence on operative mortality in the elderly according to the literature. Go 13 The logistic regression analysis demonstrated that postoperative complications, long perfusion time, history of congestive heart failure, emergency operation, left ventricular ejection fraction, reoperation, history of myocardial infarction, use of right IMA grafting, female gender, and old age were independently associated with increased operative mortality (GoTable V).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table V. Stepwise multiple logistic regression for operative mortality in theelderly patients undergoing CABG
 
Morbidity
Postoperative morbidity is listed in GoTables I and GoIV. GoTable I compares the morbidity between the patients having IMA grafting and those having saphenous vein grafting only. The patients undergoing IMA grafting had fewer postoperative complications, such as low cardiac output, insertion of an intraaortic balloon pump, pulmonary complications, ventilatory support for more than 5 days, and neurologic complications. However, no difference in the prevalence of perioperative myocardial infarction, sternal infection, requirement for blood transfusion, or reoperation for bleeding was noted.

DISCUSSION

High mortality has been reported in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Go Go 3,4 Therefore, to identify risk factors for operative mortality in elderly patients is important to improve operative results. Despite the fact that in some studies old age is defined as 65 years or older, Go Go 9,13 we used 70 years or older as the definition in the present study, because it is used in most studies. Go Go Go Go Go 3,4,6,11,12 Although IMA grafting has become a routine procedure for CABG, few reports on its effects on operative mortality in elderly patients have been published. Go Go 13,14 In addition, although left IMA grafting in elderly patients has been reported to have superior results, Go 14 to our knowledge the role of bilateral IMA grafting in elderly patients has not been fully studied. A recent report Go 23 has suggested that the operative mortality for bilateral IMA grafting (3.1%) is lower than that for unilateral IMA grafting (6.4%), but the study did not compare the operative mortality and morbidity between patients having IMA and saphenous vein grafting. In a previous study, we Go 24 have investigated the effect of bilateral IMA grafting on operative mortality in patients having CABG and found that old age (>=70 years) is a risk factor for operative mortality in patients having bilateral IMA grafting. Therefore, we designed the present study to retrospectively investigate the risk factors for operative mortality in elderly patients having CABG with emphasis on the influence of IMA grafting on operative mortality and morbidity.

In the present study, the overall operative mortality of 8.86% was comparable with that in other studies. Go Go 14,23 The operative mortality in the patients having unilateral IMA grafting (6.41%) was significantly lower than that in patients having bilateral IMA grafting (21.43%, p = 0.018) or saphenous vein grafting only (9.96%, p = 0.021). Although from some aspects patients having IMA grafting were in better preoperative condition (fewer patients had congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, or emergency operation, and ejection fraction was higher), no difference in functional class, diabetes, and left main stenosis was observed. On the other hand, more patients having IMA grafting were obese. Also, longer aortic crossclamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times in patients undergoing IMA grafting reflect a more complicated operative technique and more grafts performed (3.49 ± 0.04 versus 3.15 ± 0.03, p = 0.0001). Despite these risk factors, fewer patients undergoing IMA grafting had operative or postoperative complications, such as postoperative low cardiac output, neurologic complications, or pulmonary complications, and fewer required intraaortic balloon pumping or ventilatory support for longer than 5 days. These are the major postoperative complications. Therefore, the lower operative mortality and postoperative morbidity in this study support the use of unilateral IMA grafting in elderly patients although the patient selection was not randomized. In this study, the elderly patients undergoing bilateral IMA grafting had a high operative mortality. However, the number of this subgroup is small (28 patients) and this reflects our attitude in the use of bilateral IMA grafting in elderly patients. Like others, we do not choose bilateral IMA grafting as the primary operation for elderly patients because the major benefit of this procedure is high long-term patency rates and this is obviously less important in elderly subjects. Therefore, from this study, we cannot simply conclude that bilateral IMA grafting increases operative mortality in elderly persons, but we do address its possibility, even though in our total patient population of 6360 patients who underwent isolated CABG during the same time frame selected bilateral IMA grafting does not increase the operative mortality. Go 24

To further study whether increased operative mortality is correlated to the use of the bilateral IMA or simply correlated to the use of right IMA grafting, we investigated the effects of right IMA grafting in elderly subjects by including both bilateral and single right IMA grafting in the multiple logistic regression analysis. The logistic regression identified that right, but not bilateral, IMA grafting is an independent risk factor. An important factor in our patients having right IMA grafting (including bilateral and single right IMA grafting) is that seven of those 41 patients received a right IMA for their reoperations and four of them died (4/7 versus 4/34, p = 0.006). Two of them died of a cardiac cause, one of pulmonary complications, and one of infection. In the other four patients having right IMA grafting who died after the first operation, the causes were cardiac in one, pulmonary complications in one, and other causes in two. Thus, in this subgroup of 41 patients undergoing right IMA grafting, four of eight patients in whom operative mortality occurred underwent reoperation. In these reoperative patients, the right IMA was used as a "secondary choice" because of lack of grafting conduits. For those patients having right IMA grafting as a "primary choice" (n = 34) for their first operation, the operative mortality (11.76%, 4/34) was not significantly different from that in patients having unilateral IMA or saphenous vein grafting (8.61%, p = 0.52). As mentioned earlier, in our patients younger than 70 years, bilateral IMA grafting does not increase operative mortality. This also suggests that in our study group of patients aged 70 years or more, use of right IMA grafting, although not as favorable as it is in younger patients, only increases operative mortality in reoperative patients. However, further study on this is necessary because of the rather small number of the right IMA grafting subgroup and the preselection as determined by the surgeon.

Among the risk factors correlating to the operative mortality, identified by the stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis (GoTable V), history of congestive heart failure or myocardial infarction and low ejection fraction refer to detrimental reserve of the heart and reflect damaged cardiac function. Interestingly, New York Heart Association functional class did not enter the regression model. This obviously suggests that the ejection fraction is a more important index than functional class.

Another variable correlated to operative mortality was cardiopulmonary bypass time. Despite the fact that unilateral IMA grafting had longer cardiopulmonary bypass time but lower operative mortality, long cardiopulmonary bypass time is the strongest risk factor among the preoperative and intraoperative variables (p = 0.0001, GoTable V). A long cardiopulmonary bypass time is related to (1) long aortic crossclamp time and (2) long reperfusion time. Usually, a long aortic crossclamp time reflects the complexity of the operation and a long reperfusion time implies in part that the heart requires longer support by cardiopulmonary bypass. Therefore, long cardiopulmonary bypass time may more importantly reflect the cardiac functional status after ischemia. As seen in the present study, aortic crossclamp time was not correlated to operative mortality even in the univariate analysis. In our previous studies on the risk factors for operative mortality in patients having bilateral IMA grafting Go 24 and aortic valve replacement, Go 25 we also found that long cardiopulmonary bypass time was either a stronger predictor than long aortic crossclamp time Go 25 or the variable entered into the logistic regression model rather than crossclamp time. Go 24 Therefore, we believe that in predicting operative mortality, long cardiopulmonary bypass time is more important than aortic crossclamp time.

Emergency status is a widely recognized risk factor associated with the operative mortality in previous studies. Go Go 6,26 In the present study, this variable is also a strong independent risk factor for elderly patients undergoing CABG (p = 0.0001, GoTable V). The operative mortality was 22.03% (26/118) in the patients who had emergency CABG compared with 7.62% (p < 0.001) in the patients treated electively.

Another factor independently correlated to operative mortality is reoperation (GoTable V). As shown in GoTable IV, operative mortality was significantly higher in patients who had reoperations than in those who did not (8.01% versus 17.60%, p < 0.001). As aforementioned, the influence of reoperation is particularly important in patients having right IMA grafting. However, even in patients having left IMA or saphenous vein grafting only, reoperation carries a higher operative mortality. Overall, 22 of 125 patients who had reoperation died. Operative mortality was particular high (2/7) in the patients who had a second reoperation.

A less important factor for operative mortality in elderly persons undergoing CABG is female gender (operative mortality was 11.68% versus 7.27% in the male, p = 0.005). This variable entered into the regression model as an independent factor. However, this is a rather weak predictor (p = 0.0137) compared with other factors (GoTable V). Similar to the Cleveland Clinic experience, Go 13 we also found the influence of age on operative mortality in elderly subjects as an independent but weak factor (p = 0.044 in the regression model). This is also indicated by the fact that the operative mortality (12.9%) for the patients older than 80 years was not significantly higher than that for the patients whose age was between 70 and 80 years (8.36%, p = 0.061).

In conclusion, the present study identifies various preoperative (history of congestive heart failure or myocardial infarction, low ejection fraction, female gender, and old age), intraoperative (long cardiopulmonary bypass time, emergency operation, reoperation, and use of right IMA grafting), and postoperative (postoperative complications) variables as risk factors for elderly patients (>70 years) undergoing isolated CABG. Therefore, the present study suggests that in the elderly patients with those risk factors, particular care should be taken to reduce cardiopulmonary bypass time and postoperative complications. In patients with the aforementioned risk factors and the likely inability to mitigate long cardiopulmonary bypass time or complications, the surgeon may be wise to reassess the presumed benefit of CABG for each patient. A left IMA grafting in combination with saphenous vein grafting may achieve a lower operative mortality and morbidity than other procedures in selected elderly patients undergoing CABG.

Appendix: APPENDIX

Variables examined by univariate analysis for operative mortality in elderly patients undergoing isolated CABG.
Sex, age, age >=80 years, weight, height, body surface area, smoking history, family history of coronary artery disease, diabetes, obesity, body mass index, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, history of myocardial infarction, history of congestive heart failure, history of arrhythmia, angina, New York Heart Association functional class, ejection fraction, left ventricular function (classified by ejection fraction), number of vessels diseased, left main disease, right main artery disease, conduit on right coronary artery, left anterior descending stenosis, left anterior descending distal disease, conduit on left anterior descending, previous percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, emergency operation, reoperation, individual surgeons, Aortic crossclamp time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, number of grafts, graft to left anterior descending, type of cardioplegia, route of cardioplegia, IMA grafting, unilateral IMA grafting, bilateral IMA grafting, right IMA grafting versus others, right IMA grafting versus other IMA grafting, left ventricular aneurysmectomy, postoperative complications, operative complications, postoperative low cardiac output, perioperative myocardial infarction, infectious complications, sternal infection, neurologic complications, permanent stroke, intraaortic balloon pumping, reoperation for bleeding, blood transfusion, pulmonary complications, and renal failure.

References

  1. Kovar MG. Elderly people: the population 65 years and over. Health United States 1976-1977. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare Publication HRA 77-1232. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office,1977.
  2. Heart facts, 1983. Dallas: American Heart Association, 1983.
  3. Rose DM, Gelbfish J, Jacobowitz IJ, et al. Analysis of morbidity and mortality in patients 70 years and over undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass surgery. Am Heart J 1985;110:341-6.[Medline]
  4. Faro RS, Golden MD, Javid H, et al. Coronary revascularization in septuagenarians. J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG 1983;86:616-20.[Abstract]
  5. Roberts AJ, Woodhall DD, Conti CR, et al. Mortality, morbidity, and cost-accounting related to coronary artery bypass graft surgery in the elderly. Ann Thorac Surg 1985;39:426-32.[Abstract]
  6. Montague NT, Kouchoukos NT, Wilson TA, et al. Morbidity and mortality of coronary bypass grafting in patients 70 years of age and older. Ann Thorac Surg 1985;39:552-7.[Abstract]
  7. Edmunds LH, Stephenson LW, Edie RN, Ratcliff MB. Open-heart surgery in octogenarians. N Engl J Med 1988;319:131-6.[Abstract]
  8. Horneffer PJ, Gardner TJ, Manolio TA, et al. The effects of age on outcome after coronary bypass surgery. Circulation 1987;76(Suppl):V6.
  9. Gersh BJ, Kronmal RA, Frye RL, et al. Coronary arteriography and coronary artery bypass surgery: morbidity and mortality in patients ages 65 years or older—a report from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study. Circulation 1983;67:483-91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Tuman KJ, McCarthy RJ, Najafi H, Ivankovich AD. Differential effects of advanced age on neurologic and cardiac risks of coronary artery operations. J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG 1992;104:1510-7.[Abstract]
  11. Knapp WS, Douglas JS, Craver JM, et al. Efficacy of coronary artery bypass grafting in elderly patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1981;47:923-30.[Medline]
  12. Davis EA, Gardner TJ, Gillinov AM, et al. Valvular disease in the elderly: influence on surgical results. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;55:333-8.[Abstract]
  13. Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery in the elderly. Cleve Clin J Med 1988;55:23-34.[Medline]
  14. Gardner TJ, Greene PS, Rykiel MF, et al. Routine use of the left internal mammary artery graft in the elderly. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;49:188-94.[Abstract]
  15. Baron R. Nutrition. In: Krupp MA, Schroeder SA, Tierney LM, eds. Current medical diagnosis & treatment. 26th ed. Norwalk: Appleton & Lange, 1987:797.
  16. Armitage P, Berry G. Statistical methods in medical research. 2nd ed. London: Blackwell, 1987.
  17. Cox DR, Snell EJ. Analysis of binary data. 2nd ed. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1989.
  18. Manly BFJ. Multivariate statistical methods. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1988.
  19. Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Loop FD, et al. Perioperative risk of bilateral mammary artery grafting: analysis of 500 cases from 1971 to 1984. Circulation 1986;74(Suppl):III37-41.
  20. Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Gill CC, et al. Mitral valve replacement combined with myocardial revascularization: early and late results for 300 patients, 1970 to 1983. Circulation 1985;71:1179-90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Loop FD, et al. Replacement of aortic valve combined with myocardial revascularization: determinants of early and late risk for 500 patients, 1967-1981 Circulation 1983;68:1149-62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. He G-W, Hughes CF, McCaughan B, et al. Mitral valve replacement combined with coronary artery surgery: determinants of early and late results. Ann Thorac Surg 1991;51:916-23.[Abstract]
  23. Galbut DL, Traad EA, Dorman MJ, et al. Coronary bypass grafting in the elderly: single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafts. J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG 1993;106:128-36.[Abstract]
  24. He G-W, Ryan WH, Acuff TE, et al. Risk factors for operative mortality and sternal wound infection in bilateral internal mammary artery grafting. J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG 1994;107:196-202.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. He G-W, Acuff TE, Ryan WH, et al. Aortic valve replacement: determinants of operative mortality. Ann Thorac Surg [In press].
  26. Parsonnet V, Dean D, Bernstein AD. A method of uniform stratification of risk for evaluating the surgery in acquired adult heart disease. Circulation 1989;79(Suppl):I3-12.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
C.-Y. Ng, M. F. Ramli, and Y. Awang
Coronary Bypass Surgery in Patients Aged 70 Years and Over: Mortality, Morbidity, Length of Stay and Hospital Cost
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 2004; 12(3): 218 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. J. Dabal, J. R. Goss, C. Maynard, and G. S. Aldea
The effect of left internal mammary artery utilization on short-term outcomes after coronary revascularization
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2003; 76(2): 464 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
C. Muneretto, A. Negri, G. Bisleri, J. Manfredi, A. Terrini, M. Metra, S. Nodari, and L. D. Cas
Is total arterial myocardial revascularization with composite grafts a safe and useful procedure in the elderly?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2003; 23(5): 657 - 664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
Y. Zitser-Gurevich, E. Simchen, N. Galai, and M. Mandel
Effect of perioperative complications on excess mortality among women after coronary artery bypass: The Israeli Coronary Artery Bypass Graft study (ISCAB)
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2002; 123(3): 517 - 524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
W. D. Boyd, N. D. Desai, R. J. Novick, F. N. McKenzie, D. F. DelRizzo, and A. H. Menkis
Use of Cardiopulmonary Bypass in High-Risk Patients Is a Predictor of Adverse Outcome
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, July 1, 2000; 4(2): 86 - 91.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Ricci, H. L. Karamanoukian, R. Abraham, K. Von Fricken, G. D'Ancona, S. Choi, J. Bergsland, and T. A. Salerno
Stroke in octogenarians undergoing coronary artery surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2000; 69(5): 1471 - 1475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Yamamuro, B. W. Lytle, S. K. Sapp, D. M. Cosgrove III, F. D. Loop, and P. M. McCarthy
Risk factors and outcomes after coronary reoperation in 739 elderly patients
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2000; 69(2): 464 - 474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
M RICCI, H L KARAMANOUKIAN, J BERGSLAND, and T A SALERNO
Good outcomes from cardiac surgery in the over 70s
Heart, January 1, 2000; 83(1): 103e - 103.
[Full Text]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
K. A. Eagle, R. A. Guyton, R. Davidoff, G. A. Ewy, J. Fonger, T. J. Gardner, J. P. Gott, H. C. Herrmann, R. A. Marlow, W. C. Nugent, et al.
ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association task force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to revise the 1991 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1999; 34(4): 1262 - 1347.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
D. J. Miller, L. E. Samuels, M. S. Kaufman, R. J. Morris, M. P. Thomas, and S. K. Brockman
Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in Nonagenarians
Angiology, August 1, 1999; 50(8): 613 - 617.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. R. Doty, J. D. Fonger, J. D. Salazar, P. L. Walinsky, and N. W. Salomon
EARLY EXPERIENCE WITH MINIMALLY INVASIVE DIRECT CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING WITH THE INTERNAL THORACIC ARTERY
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 1999; 117(5): 873 - 880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. M. Craver, J. D. Puskas, W. W. Weintraub, Y. Shen, R. A. Guyton, J. P. Gott, and E. L. Jones
601 octogenarians undergoing cardiac surgery: outcome and comparison with younger age groups
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 1999; 67(4): 1104 - 1110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
W.-S. Suen, C.-K. Mok, S.-W. Chiu, K.-L. Cheung, W.-T. Lee, D. Cheung, S.-R. Das, and G.-W. He
Risk Factors for Development of Acute Renal Failure (ARF) Requiring Dialysis in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery
Angiology, September 1, 1998; 49(9): 789 - 800.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. Oster, J. Graff, W. Knake, and R. Widera
Minimally invasive coronary revascularization in elderly patients
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 1998; 66(3): 1073 - 1075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Ivanov, R. D. Weisel, T. E. David, and C. D. Naylor
Fifteen-Year Trends in Risk Severity and Operative Mortality in Elderly Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Circulation, February 24, 1998; 97(7): 673 - 680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
L. M.G. van de Watering, J. Hermans, J. G.A. Houbiers, P. J. van den Broek, H. Bouter, F. Boer, M. S. Harvey, H. A. Huysmans, and A. Brand
Beneficial Effects of Leukocyte Depletion of Transfused Blood on Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery : A Randomized Clinical Trial
Circulation, February 17, 1998; 97(6): 562 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A. Starr, A. P. Furnary, G. L. Grunkemeier, G.-W. He, and A. Ahmad
IS REFERRAL SOURCE A RISK FACTOR FOR CORONARY SURGERY? HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION VERSUS FEE-FOR-SERVICE SYSTEM
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 1996; 111(4): 708 - 717.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. L. Kay, G.-W. Sun, A. Aoki, and C. A. Prejean Jr
Influence of Ejection Fraction on Hospital Mortality, Morbidity, and Costs for CABG Patients
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1995; 60(6): 1640 - 1651.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
G.-W. He, T. E. Acuff, W. H. Ryan, Y.-H. He, and M. J. Mack
DETERMINANTS OF OPERATIVE MORTALITY IN REOPERATIVE CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 1995; 110(4): 971 - 978.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Kitamura, M. Endo, F. Yamaki, G. Ohtsuka, H. Nishida, and H. Koyanagi
Long-Term Results of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Elderly Japanese Patients
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 1995; 60(3): 576 - 579.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
N. M. Katz, R. L. Hannan, R. A. Hopkins, and R. B. Wallace
Cardiac Operations in Patients Aged 70 Years and Over: Mortality, Length of Stay, and Hospital Charge
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 1995; 60(1): 96 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Guo-Wei He
Tea E. Acuff
William H. Ryan
Mark B. Douthit
Michael J. Mack
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by He, G.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Mack, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by He, G.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Mack, M. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS