|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:755-761
© 1994 Mosby, Inc.
SURGERY FOR ACQUIRED HEART DISEASE |
Zürich, Switzerland
From the Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery a and Department of Internal Medicine, b Zürich University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland.
Received for publication Oct. 18, 1993. Accepted for publication May 10, 1994. Address for reprints: Ludwig K. von Segesser, MD, FACS, Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zürich, Switzerland.
Abstract
Proper management of dissections of the descending thoracic aorta with intimal disruption close to the left subclavian artery and retrograde extension of the dissection into the aortic arch or the ascending aorta is controversial, because the standard approach for ascending aortic aneurysms is surgical repair, which is difficult to achieve through a median sternotomy if the predominant aortic lesion is located in its descending part. Sixteen patients with descending thoracic aortic dissection, intimal disruption close to the subclavian artery, and extension of the dissection into the aortic arch or the ascending aorta are described here: Eleven patients underwent surgical repair including 9 emergency (82%) and 2 elective (18%) procedures. Retrograde aortic dissection included the aortic arch in 11 of 11 patients (100%) and the ascending aorta in 7 of 11 (63%). Pericardial effusion was present in 1 of 11 patients (9%) and mild aortic regurgitation was found in 1 of 11 (9%). Repair of the ascending aorta and arch with transaortic closure of the entrance tear in the descending thoracic aorta was performed in 4 of 11 patients (36%) via a median sternotomy. In 6 of 11 patients (55%) a lateral thoracotomy was used for repair of the descending thoracic aorta and closure of the entrance tear. Hospital mortality occurred in 1 of 11 patients (9%) and there was 1 late death. Paraplegia occurred in 1 of 11 patients (9%). Five patients with descending thoracic aortic dissection, intimal disruption close to the subclavian artery, and extension into the ascending aorta but without ascending aortic aneurysm (diameter 4.2 ± 0.2 cm), pericardial effusion, or aortic incompetence were treated medically without early mortality. These results are compared with those achieved in 120 patients operated on during the same period for type A (89/120) and type B (31/120) aortic dissections. Considering the technical difficulties of simultaneous repair of dissections of the ascending and the descending thoracic aorta, we recommend that descending thoracic aortic dissection extending into the arch or the ascending aorta be managed in accordance with the site of the predominant lesion. Replacement of the arch with a varying portion of ascending aorta via a median sternotomy is recommended in patients with enlarged aortic diameter, pericardial effusion, and/or aortic insufficiency. Predominantly distal dissections with dilated descending thoracic aorta and/or distal complications are best approached via a lateral thoracotomy. (J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG 1994;108:755-61)
In accordance with Crawford,
1 aortic dissection is defined as a splitting process that occurs in the aortic media. The dissecting process may be either acute or chronic. In the past, various classifications have been suggested to describe the patterns of aortic dissections. In the sixties, DeBakey and associates
2,3 identified four types of aortic dissections. Both types I and II originate from the ascending aorta. Type I extends into the arch and distal aorta whereas type II is confined to the ascending aorta. Type III dissections begin in the descending aorta, with type IIIA extending toward the diaphragm and type IIIB extending below it. In 1970, Dubost, Guilmet, and Soyer
4 suggested a classification referring to the site of the intimal tear only. Four groups were identified: group A for patients with the intimal tear in the ascending aorta, group B for patients with the intimal tear in the transverse aortic arch, group C for patients with the intimal tear in the descending thoracic aorta, and group D for patients with the intimal tear in the abdominal aorta. At about the same time, Daily and colleagues
5 classified, regardless of the site of the intimal tear, dissections involving the ascending aorta as type A and all other dissections as type B. The latter approach, which was later denominated the "Stanford classification," has been most widely used in recent years because of its close relationship to clinical practice: type A dissections require in general primary surgical repair of the ascending aorta whereas type B dissections are mostly confined to medical initial treatment and surgery is recommended for handling of complications only. All classifications cited evolved before safe surgical techniques for the replacement of the aortic arch were developed. In the meanwhile a number of techniques for inspection as well as safe repair of the ascending aorta and the aortic arch emerged.
6,7 As a result, an increasing number of intimal tears extending into the aortic arch and also aortic dissections originating from intimal tears in the aortic arch were identified and simultaneous repair of the aortic arch was recommended by several authors.
8-11 Furthermore, there is increasing evidence that aortic dissection may develop not only in an antegrade but also in a retrograde fashion.
4,5,12
However, proper management of descending thoracic aortic dissection with intimal disruption close to the left subclavian artery and retrograde extension of the dissection into the aortic arch or the ascending aorta is controversial. Although the standard approach for a dissection involving the ascending aorta (Stanford type A) is nowadays surgical repair, a number of distal complications occurring in concurrent descending aortic dissections originating from an intimal tear close to the subclavian artery are difficult to manage through a median sternotomy. These difficulties, which are particularly troublesome in the acute phase as well as the case report of (Stanford) type A aortic dissection "without" intimal rupture which finally evolved in a (Stanford) type B aortic dissection,
13 prompted the present review.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Case histories of 16 patients with descending thoracic aortic dissection, intimal disruption close to the subclavian artery, and extension of the dissection into the aortic arch or the ascending aorta observed during a 7-year period are presented here. Demographic data and extent of dissection in this group of patients are given in
Table 1. Eleven patients underwent surgical repair, including 9 of 11 emergency (82%) and 2 of 11 elective (18%) procedures. Retrograde aortic dissection included the aortic arch in all 11 patients (100%) and the ascending aorta in 7 of 11 (63%). Pericardial effusion was present in 1 of 11 patient (9%) and mild aortic regurgitation was found in 1 of 11 (9%).
|
So that the surgical techniques used as well as the results achieved in these 11 patients could be evaluated, the corresponding data for 89 consecutive patients with classic Stanford type A dissection defined as aortic dissection of the ascending aorta and 31 patients with classic Stanford type B aortic dissection operated on throughout the same time frame are given herein. Emergency procedures were necessary in 64 of 89 (72%) patients with type A aortic dissections and 13 of 31 (42%) patients with type B aortic dissections.
Type A aortic dissection
The surgical procedure selected for repair of type A dissections has evolved over time and is similar to that reported by other groups.
6,7 Surgery is now directed to the repair of the dilated aortic segments, closure of the primary intimal tear, and, if necessary, aortic valve repair or replacement. Standard exposure of the ascending aorta and the aortic arch is through a median sternal splitting incision. An external iliac artery and the right atrium are cannulated after full systemic heparinization (activated clotting time > 480 seconds) and connected to the heart-lung machine, which is primed with clear fluid as is standard in our institution.
14 In acute cases with significant pericardial effusion the iliac artery is cannulated before the sternotomy is performed. After the onset of cardiopulmonary bypass the coronary sinus is cannulated and cooling is started. Ventricular fibrillation is initiated, the aorta is crossclamped, and blood cardioplegic solution is given in a retrograde fashion. After a longitudinal aortotomy, the ascending aorta is thoroughly inspected. The intimal tear is identified and the competence of the aortic valve is evaluated. If the aortic valve is intact or if it can be repaired, it is left in place and the intimal tear is studied. In patients with normal aortic diameters local repair of the ascending aorta is evaluated, whereas in patients with dilated ascending aorta a graft repair is performed. French glue
8 is used to seal the dissected ascending aorta before suturing is started. Core cooling down to 18° C is continued while the proximal anastomosis is completed either for a composite graft, if the aortic valve has to be resected and the aortic sinuses enlarged, or for a straight graft to be inserted in the supracoronary position with or without aortic valve replacement, if the aortic sinuses are of acceptable quality. When deep hypothermia is reached, extracorporeal circulation is discontinued and the aortic arch is opened. If the entrance tear reaches into the aortic arch or if primary or secondary tears are located in the aortic arch, hemiarch or total arch replacement is performed. If there are no intimal tears in the aortic arch, the distal anastomosis is made in an open fashion and extracorporeal circulation is resumed after proper venting. This group of patients included all those having a dissected ascending aorta and the entrance tear in the ascending aorta or arch but not those with dissections originating from the descending thoracic aorta, which are the purpose of this paper and therefore reported separately.
Type B aortic dissection
The standard approach for repair of type B aortic dissection is a lateral thoracotomy or thoracophrenolaparotomy. Partial cardiopulmonary bypass for proximal unloading and distal protection is initiated before aortic crossclamping. For this purpose the external iliac vein and artery are cannulated on one side and connected to a heparin-coated perfusion system (Duraflo II, Baxter Bentley, Irvine, Calif.) after low systemic heparinization (Liquemin, Roche, Basel, Switzerland: 100 IU/kg body weight). Distal circulatory support is started with a pump flow corresponding to 50% of cardiac output as determined by thermodilution and adapted after aortic crossclamping to maintain adequate proximal and similar distal perfusion. During perfusion, the activated coagulation time (Hemochron, International Technidyne, Edison, N.J.) is kept above 180 seconds.
15 Staged segmental repair of the dilated descending thoracic aorta and if necessary the thoracoabdominal aorta is performed beginning proximally, the aortic clamps being replaced distal to the completed anastomoses.
16 Use of French glue, sealed prostheses, and reimplantation of large intercostal arteries as well as reimplantation of visceral and renal arteries are routine. Shed blood is recovered in all groups by a red cell spinning device and pumped back to the patient (Autotrans: Dideco Spa, Mirandola, Italy). More recently, heparin-coated cardiotomy reservoirs have been used during perfusion.
17,18 So that stagnant flow in the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit can be avoided, recirculation through a shunt in the operating field is started immediately after weaning. Graft inclusion is used systematically. If necessary, a piece of glutaraldehyde-preserved equine xenopericardium
19 is implanted for this purpose. More recently, systemic hypothermia
20,21 has been used to improve spinal cord protection during the procedure. This group of patients included all those with dissections originating from the descending aorta excluding those with extension into the arch or the ascending aorta.
Descending thoracic aortic dissection extending into the arch or the ascending aorta
Surgical approach in these patients is selected in accordance with the predominance of the aortic segments involved. In patients with a large ascending aorta, aortic incompentence, or pericardial effusion/tamponade, the approach described for type A aortic dissection is selected, including peripheral arterial cannulation, median sternotomy, total cardiopulmonary bypass, repair of ascending aorta, and transaortic repair of aortic arch and proximal part of descending thoracic aorta.
In patients with a small ascending aorta, absence of aortic incompetence, and pericardial effusion, but complicated dissection of the descending thoracic aorta, the approach described for complicated type B aortic dissection is selected including peripheral cannulation, lateral thoracotomy, partial cardiopulmonary bypass with low systemic heparinization, and resection of the entrance tear through the descending thoracic aorta and/or distal aortic arch, respectively. The detail of the procedures performed is given in
Table II. According to these guidelines, repair of the ascending aorta and arch with transaortic closure of the entrance tear in the descending thoracic aorta was performed in 4 of 11 patients (36%) via median sternotomy. In 7 of 11 patients (54%) lateral thoracotomy was used for repair of the descending thoracic aorta and closure of the entrance tear.
|
Data analyses
Continuous variables are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Comparison of continuous variables was made by Student's t test for paired or unpaired variables where applicable. Univariate analysis of descriptive data was performed by Fisher's exact test (Solo: BMDP Statistical Software Inc., Los Angeles, Calif.). Statistical significance was confirmed by the probability value (p < 0.05).
RESULTS
Descending thoracic aortic dissection extending into the arch or the ascending aorta
Eleven patients underwent repair of non-A/non-B type aortic dissection including 9 emergency (82%) and 2 elective (18%) procedures. Retrograde aortic dissection included the aortic arch in all 11 of 11 patients (100%) and the ascending aorta in 7 of 11 (63%). The presence of a large ascending aorta in 4 of 11 patients (36%), and/or mild aortic regurgitation in 1 of 11 patients (9%) directed surgery to the repair of the ascending aorta and arch with transaortic closure of the entrance tear in the descending thoracic aorta in 4 of 11 patients (36%) via median sternotomy. No aortic valve replacement or composite graft was necessary in this group. In 7 of 11 patients (54%) lateral thoracotomy was used for repair of the descending thoracic aorta and closure of the entrance tear. There was 1 hospital death (1/11, 9%; cause of death was bleeding) and 1 late death. Paraplegia occurred in 1 patient (9%), who died after 7 months.
In the subgroup of 5 patients with predominantly distal aortic dissection, small ascending aortic diameter, absence of pericardial effusion, or aortic incompetence, which was primarily confined to medical treatment, there was no early mortality and all patients were discharged from our hospital. One late death unrelated to the aortic dissection was observed in this subgroup (1/5; 20%) after 12 months of follow-up. Diagnoses at readmission were pneumonia and subarachnoidal hemorrhage.
Type A aortic dissection
Surgery for type A dissection was performed in 89 patients. The ascending aorta was replaced in 65 of 89 patients (73%) without and in 24 of 89 (27%) with the aortic arch and the entrance tear was closed simultaneously. Four of 89 patients (5%) underwent simultaneous aortic valve replacement and 30 of 89 (34%) required the implantation of a composite graft. Mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 115 ± 51 minutes for patients without arch repair as compared with 111 ± 29 minutes for patients with arch repair (no significant difference). Mean aortic crossclamp time was 73 ± 26 minutes for patients without arch repair as compared with 56 ± 21 minutes for patients with arch repair (p < 0.05). In the latter group, circulatory arrest duration accounted for 19 ± 13 minutes. Hospital mortality was 20 of 89 patients (23%) for type A dissection and 19 of 64 (30%) for emergency as compared with 1 of 25 (4%) for elective procedures. Over the analyzed 7-year time frame, hospital mortality decreased from 8 of 18 (44%) in the first year to 0 of 17 (0%) in the last year (p < 0.002).
Type B aortic dissection
Surgery for type B aortic dissection was performed in 31 patients. Repair of the descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aorta was again combined with simultaneous closure of the entrance tear. Mean duration of partial cardiopulmonary bypass was 64 ± 28 minutes and mean aortic crossclamp time was 37 ± 21 minutes. For type B dissection, there were 3 hospital deaths (10%), including 2 deaths among 13 patients (15%) having emergency procedures as compared with 1 death among 18 patients (6%) having elective procedures. Paraplegia and paraparesis occurred in 1 patient each (total: 2/31 patients; 6%).
DISCUSSION
Patients with descending thoracic aortic dissection, intimal disruption close to the subclavian artery, and extension of the dissection into the aortic arch or the ascending aorta require individual evaluation for optimal management. Replacement of the arch with a varying portion of ascending aorta via median sternotomy is recommended in patients with enlarged aortic diameter, pericardial effusion, aortic regurgitation, and/or mobile intimal ascending aortic contour, as in patients with type A aortic dissection. Predominant distal dissection with almost intact, relatively small ascending aorta and already thrombosed false ascending aortic lumen is treated like type B aortic dissection. The patients with dilated descending thoracic aorta or complications caused by dissection of the descending aorta are best approached via a lateral thoracotomy or thoracophrenolaparatomy, whereas medical treatment may be considered in patients having a relatively small ascending aorta, absence of pericardial effusion or aortic regurgitation, thrombosed false ascending aortic lumen, and stable descending aortic dissection.
This management evolved from the surgical difficulties encountered during repair of acute dissections of the descending thoracic aorta through a median sternotomy in patients with small and almost intact ascending aorta. We have now observed a number of patients in whom no entrance tear in the ascending aorta or the aortic arch could be found and in whom the primary lesion was more distal. A case of type A aortic dissection without an entrance tear in the ascending aorta or the aortic arch which finally evolved as a type B dissection was also described by Lui, Menkis, and McKenzie
13 in 1993. The therapeutic difficulties encountered as a result of the wrong surgical approach, as well as the unnecessary repair of an only minimally affected aortic segment, eventually without repair of the primary lesion (i.e., without resection of the entrance tear), and the potential harm resulting from such a questionable procedure, warrant careful evaluation of patients with ascending aortic dissection originating from the descending aorta. Although there are few reports on concomitant repair of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, and descending thoracic aorta,
22 there is, to the best of our knowledge, no larger series published reporting on successful one-stage repair of the entire dissected aorta in the acute phase. The surgical approach selected for repair of the ascending aorta and aortic arch is different from that for repair of a thoracoabdominal lesion. Hence, in any case with dissection of the ascending aorta or arch and entrance tear in the descending aorta, the selected surgical approach is a trade-off. Under these circumstances the simple therapeutic scheme given by the Stanford classification suggesting primary surgical treatment for all type A dissections as opposed to primary medical treatment for all type B dissections no longer applies to all aortic dissections. We have termed these dissections that obviously do not fit the Stanford treatment groups non-A/non-B aortic dissections (Fig. 1).
|
We recommend evaluation for patients with an entrance tear in the descending thoracic aorta and retrograde dissection of the aortic arch or the ascending aorta (non-A/non-B aortic dissections) as a function of the predominant lesion. Primary surgical treatment appears to be indicated in cases mimicking type A aortic dissection and include patients with aneurysm of the ascending aorta or arch (Fig. 2, left), aortic regurgitation, pericardial effusion, and/or mobile ascending intimal aortic contour. In patients with predominantly distal disease, small ascending aorta, and small aortic arch, as well as thrombosed proximal false lumen and absence of pericardial effusion and aortic regurgitation, primary medical treatment should be considered similar to that for patients with type B aortic dissections (Fig. 2, right). Furthermore, if the descending thoracic aortic dissection is complicated by pleural effusion, rupture, or inadequate distal perfusion, repair of the descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aorta will yield superior results to surgery of the ascending aorta without resection of the entrance tear in the descending thoracic aorta. Proximal unloading and distal perfusion with cardiopulmonary bypass using more biocompatible equipment
15-18 allows high perfusion pressures in the ascending aorta to be avoided, with limited blood loss. At the same time, improved tolerance of distal ischemia can be achieved with hypothermia.
20,21
|
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. E. W. Kirsch Editorial comment: Classification of aortic dissection: back to the future? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, November 1, 2011; 40(5): 1084 - 1086. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Kaul Spontaneous retrograde dissection of ascending aorta from descending thoracic aorta - a case review Perfusion, May 1, 2011; 26(3): 215 - 222. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Estrera, P. Shah, T.-Y. Lee, A. D. Irani, and H. J. Safi Repair of Retrograde Type A Aortic Dissection after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Using the Modified Elephant Trunk Technique Vascular, April 1, 2009; 17(2): 116 - 120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Sun, R. Qi, Q. Chang, J. Zhu, Y. Liu, C. Yu, H. Zhang, B. Lv, J. Zheng, L. Tian, et al. Surgery for Acute Type A Dissection With the Tear in the Descending Aorta Using a Stented Elephant Trunk Procedure Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2009; 87(4): 1177 - 1180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. H. Lin, T. T. Huynh, P. Kougias, J. Huh, S. A. LeMaire, and J. S. Coselli Descending Thoracic Aortic Dissection: Evaluation and Management in the Era of Endovascular Technology Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, February 1, 2009; 43(1): 5 - 24. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Swee and M. D. Dake Endovascular Management of Thoracic Dissections Circulation, March 18, 2008; 117(11): 1460 - 1473. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Miele, D. J. Eschelman, S. McNulty, R. Choudry, E. Rodriguez, J. Diehl, and D. Marelli Successful aortic fenestration to treat prolonged motor paralysis of the lower extremities after repair of type A aortic dissection J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2005; 130(2): 599 - 601. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kaji, T. Akasaka, M. Katayama, A. Yamamuro, K. Yamabe, K. Tamita, M. Akiyama, N. Watanabe, K. Tanemoto, S. Morioka, et al. Prognosis of Retrograde Dissection From the Descending to the Ascending Aorta Circulation, September 9, 2003; 108(2011): II-300 - II-306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-H. Park, K. Sung, K. Kim, T.-G. Jun, Y. T. Lee, and P. W. Park Ascending aorta replacement and local repair of tear site in type a aortic dissection with arch tear Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2003; 75(6): 1785 - 1790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Tominaga, K. Kurisu, Y. Ochiai, A. Nakashima, M. Masuda, S. Morita, and H. Yasui Total aortic arch replacement through the L-incision approach Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2003; 75(1): 121 - 125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Moffatt and R. S. Mitchell Endovascular Stent Management of Thoracic Aneurysms and Dissections , January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1191 - 1204. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Hanafusa, H. Ogino, H. Sasaki, K. Minatoya, M. Ando, Y. Okita, and S. Kitamura Total arch replacement with elephant trunk procedure for retrograde dissection Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2002; 74(5): S1836 - S1839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bednarkiewicz, G. Khatchatourian, J. T. Christenson, and B. Faidutti Aortic arch replacement using a four-branched aortic arch graft Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, January 1, 2002; 21(1): 89 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Imanaka, S. Kyo, H. Tanabe, H. Ohuchi, H. Asano, and Y. Yokote Acute retrograde aortic dissection during operations for ruptured Stanford type B dissection J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2001; 121(6): 1215 - 1216. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. O. de Salazar and J. L. Izaguirre Cerebral perfusion and transcranial Doppler Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2000; 69(1): 319 - 319. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. Baumgartner, B. O. Omari, A. Pandya, A. Pandya, and D. M. Bethencourt Local Transverse Arch Repair for Type A Aortic Dissection Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1997; 64(5): 1331 - 1332. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hata, M. Zuguchi, H. Saito, and K. Tabayashi Stent Angioplasty for Renovascular Disease Associated With Acute Aortic Dissection Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 1997; 63(1): 244 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kazui, Y. Tamiya, T. Tanaka, and S. Komatsu EXTENDED AORTIC REPLACEMENT FOR ACUTE TYPE A DISSECTION WITH THE TEAR IN THE DESCENDING AORTA J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 1996; 112(4): 973 - 978. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. K. von Segesser, E. Lorenzetti, M. Lachat, U. Niederhauser, M. Schonbeck, P. R. Vogt, and M. I. Turina AORTIC VALVE PRESERVATION IN ACUTE TYPE A DISSECTION: IS IT SOUND? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 1996; 111(2): 381 - 391. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |