JTCS Speed Up Your Browser
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Giovanni Battista Luciani
Winfield J. Wells
Vaughn A. Starnes
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Luciani, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Starnes, V. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Luciani, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Starnes, V. A.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111:348-358
© 1996 Mosby, Inc.


SURGERY FOR CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE

ONE-STAGE REPAIR OF INTERRUPTED AORTIC ARCH, VENTRICULAR SEPTAL DEFECT, AND SUBAORTIC OBSTRUCTION IN THE NEONATE: A NOVEL APPROACH

Giovanni Battista Luciani, MDa,c, Ruben J. Ackerman, MDb,d, Anthony C. Chang, MDa,c, Winfield J. Wells, MDa,c, Vaughn A. Starnes, MDa,c


Los Angeles, Calif.

Received for publication March 2, 1995. Accepted for publication April 26, 1995. Address for reprints: Giovanni Battista Luciani, MD, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Verona, O.C.M. Piazzale Stefani 1, Verona, 37126, Italy.

Abstract

Background: One-stage repair of interrupted aortic arch, ventricular septal defect, and severe subaortic stenosis represents a surgical challenge. Techniques that use extracardiac conduits to bypass the subaortic area or involve transaortic or transatrial resection of the conal septum have shown limitations and have failed to reduce the high mortality rate associated with subaortic obstruction.Methods and results: A new operative approach was used in nine neonates (2.1 to 3.9 kg) who underwent one-stage repair of interrupted aortic arch (type B, eight patients; type C, one patient), ventricular septal defect, and severe subaortic stenosis. All patients had severe subaortic stenosis according to preoperative echocardiography (mean ratio of subaortic to descending aortic diameter, 0.63 ± 0.08). With a transpulmonary (seven patients) or transatrial (two patients) approach and without resection of the conal septum, the ventricular septal patch was placed on the left side of the septum to deflect the conal septum anteriorly and away from the subaortic area. There were no early or late deaths. Median intensive care unit and hospital stays were 17 days (6 to 47 days) and 21 days (10 to 55 days), respectively. On follow-up echocardiography (1 to 29 months, median 12 months), no patients had significant residual subaortic obstruction and one patient had mild residual arch obstruction (20 mm Hg). Growth of the subaortic region was demonstrated in all patients (mean ratio of subaortic to descending aortic diameter, 1.20 ± 0.10; <0.001).Conclusions: Relief of severe subaortic stenosis during one-stage neonatal repair of aortic arch interruption and ventricular septal defect can be accomplished successfully without resection of the conal septum.

Interrupted aortic arch (IAA) with ventricular septal defect (VSD) is an uncommon lesion, accounting for 1.5% of all congenital heart disease. The prognosis for untreated infants is extremely unfavorable, with at least 90% dying within the first year after birth.Go 1 Since the first reported successful palliative procedures, the recent advances in neonatal cardiac surgery have made it feasible to perform anatomic repair of IAA-VSD within the first month after birth.Go 2

Critical subaortic stenosis (SAS) as a result of posterior malalignment of the conal septum, frequently associated with IAA-VSD,Go 1 presents a complex surgical management problem. In most series, subaortic obstruction accounts for the majority of early and late deaths and necessary reoperations.Go Go 2-9 Significant controversy persists regarding the optimal surgical treatment of SAS.Go 2 Staged approaches that addressed the IAA first and then the intracardiac defects often proved unsuccessful.Go 6 A series of palliative and reparative procedures that used extracardiac conduits aimed at bypassing the level of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction resulted in considerable rates of early mortality and need for reoperation.Go Go Go Go 6,8,10-12 Promising early results were later reported with techniques that entailed resection of the posteriorly displaced conal septum to minimize SAS.Go Go 13,14 Nevertheless, the risk of aortic valve injury and the technical problems connected with transaortic or transatrial resection of the conal septum were not negligible in these reports.Go Go 2,14 Further, these techniques did not result in improved early and late survival.Go 2

At Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, the approach to IAA-VSD was that of primary repair at the time of presentation. We present our results with a novel surgical technique for the treatment of neonates with IAA-VSD and critical SAS, which consists of transpulmonary approach to the VSD and subaortic region without resection of the posteriorly displaced conal septum.

Methods

Patients
Between July 1992 and January 1995, 24 neonates (<30 days of age) at Childrens Hospital Los Angeles were found to have IAA-VSD. All underwent surgical reconstruction of the aortic arch within the first month after birth, either as part of a biventricular repair (IAA-VSD, 11 patients; IAA–atrioventricular septal defect, five patients; IAA–truncus arteriosus communis, two patients; IAA–double-outlet right ventricle, two patients) or as the first-stage procedure toward a definitive univentricular palliation (IAA–VSD–hypoplastic left ventricle, three patients; IAA–double-outlet left ventricle, one patient). We report here on all consecutive patients who had IAA, malalignment VSD, and critical SAS.

A retrospective review of the patients' clinical, laboratory, and surgical data was conducted. The data gathered included the following: (1) anatomic diagnosis, (2) Apgar scores at birth, (3) age and weight at the time of surgical repair, (4) associated congenital anomalies, including DiGeorge syndrome, (5) lower-limb preoperative transcutaneous arterial oxygen saturation, (6) duration of preoperative and postoperative mechanical ventilatory and inotropic support, (7) preoperative and postoperative echocardiographic data, (8) surgical method of the one-stage IAA-VSD-SAS repair, (9) duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, (10) postoperative duration of intensive care unit stay and total hospital stay, with medications on discharge, (11) postoperative complications and additional procedures to treat associated anomalies, and (12) follow-up data, including clinical status, medications, and echocardiographic findings.

Prematurity was defined as birth before the 36th week of gestation. Hypocalcemia was defined as a serum calcium ion level of <4.0 mg/dl, as measured in three consecutive random blood samples. Complete DiGeorge syndrome was defined as the coexistence of dysmorphic facial features (including hypertelorism, carp-shaped mouth, micrognathia, and notched ear pinnae) with hypocalcemia, low (<400 cells/mmGo 3) T-lymphocyte CD4- count, and IAA. Partial DiGeorge syndrome was defined as the coexistence of the dysmorphic facial features with hypocalcemia and IAA in the absence of any deficit of the CD4+ T-lymphocyte subpopulation.Go 15

Echocardiographic methods
All patients underwent transthoracic two-dimensional and color Doppler echocardiographic examinations with a Sonos 1000 machine (Hewlett-Packard Corp., Andover, Mass.) equipped with a standard 5.0 MHz transducer probe. The echocardiographic examinations were performed on admission and then again at follow-up.

The following data were recorded for each patient before and after the corrective operation: (1) diameters of subaortic region, aortic valve anulus, ascending aorta, and descending thoracic aorta, (2) presence of transpulmonary, subvalvular aortic, transvalvular aortic, and aortic arch gradient; and (3) residual VSD. Echocardiographic evidence of IAA-VSD with balanced ventricular anatomy and a subaortic diameter (SAD) 6 or more standard deviations (SDs) below predicted values for body surface area (Z value H-6) were used as inclusion criteria for the analysis.

Because of the presence of a nonrestrictive VSD, the severity of the subaortic and aortic valvular stenosis could not be assessed by Doppler examination of the LVOT, and anatomic parameters were used instead. Measurements of the aortic anulus diameter were done from the parasternal long-axis view in early systole at the hinge point of the valve leaflets. SAD was assessed from the standard parasternal long-axis view by measuring the distance from the most posterior edge of the conal septum to the most anterior edge of the opposite left ventricular free wall in both systole and diastole (Fig. 1). This was normalized to the diameter of the descending thoracic aorta (DTA) at the level of the diaphragm in systole and diastole, from the subcostal sagittal view as reported elsewhere.Go 14 For all parameters, at least three cardiac cycles were considered and the results were averaged.



View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Parasternal long-axis view of the LVOT during diastole in a patient with IAA-VSD-SAS. The posterior displacement of the conal septum causing subaortic obstruction is evident. LA, Left atrium; LV, left ventricle; Ao, ascending aorta; RV, right ventricle.

 
A standard value of the normal SAD in neonates has not yet been uniformly accepted. In our study, the values of SDs relative to the SAD of each patient were obtained by means of the nomograms elaborated by the University of Alabama at BirminghamGo 16; these are based on calculations by Sievers and associates.Go 17 Accordingly, the aortic root proximal diameter was arbitrarily used in the calculation of the "normal" SAD; it was found to be equivalent to the corresponding echocardiographic measurements. The values of SDs relative to the diameter of the aortic anulus were calculated with the aid of nomograms previously published by the Congenital Heart Surgeon Society multiinstitutional study on IAA-VSD.Go 2

Surgical technique
Through a median sternotomy, the anterior-superior mediastinum was explored for presence of thymic tissue. The thymus was resected in toto before incision of the pericardial sac to allow adequate exposure of the brachiocephalic vessels and transverse aortic arch. Thorough dissections of the origin of the brachiocephalic vessels, the branch pulmonary arteries, and the descending thoracic aorta 1 to 2 cm distal to the isthmic region were completed. Selective ascending aortic and pulmonary arterial cannulations were performed with a 14F intravenous catheter and a 10F arterial cannula (Bard, Inc., Tewksbury, Mass.), respectively. A single straight 16F venous-return cannula (Research Medical, Inc., Midvale, Utah) was inserted through the right atrial appendage (Fig. 2). After occlusion of the two branch pulmonary arteries, cardiopulmonary bypass (100 to 120 ml · kg-1 · min-1) was established and deep hypothermic (18º C rectal temperature) circulatory arrest was induced. Continuous cold (0º to 4º C) saline solution irrigation of the pericardium was used to maintain myocardial temperature between 4º to 8º C.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Technique of one-stage repair of IAA-VSD-SAS. Thorough dissection of the origin of the brachiocephalic vessels, the branch pulmonary arteries and the descending thoracic aorta 1 to 2 cm distal to the isthmic region was completed. Selective ascending aortic and pulmonary arterial cannulation was performed with a 14F intravenous catheter and a 10F arterial cannula, respectively. A single straight 16F venous-return cannula was inserted through the right atrial appendage.

 
The surgical repair of the arch interruption and VSD was carried out during a single period of circulatory arrest with the brachiocephalic vessels occluded. After drainage of the circulation, the cannulas were removed from the field. The ductus was divided and the proximal end of it was oversewn with running 7-0 Prolene monofilament sutures (Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, N.J.). All ductal tissue was carefully resected from the aorta. Any aberrant subclavian artery was divided at this point. A vertical incision was performed, extending from the base of the right carotid to the proximal ascending aorta. An end-to-end anastomosis of the ascending to the descending thoracic aorta was then completed with a continuous 7-0 Prolene monofilament suture (Fig. 3). No prosthetic or autologous material was used in any patient to repair or augment the aortic arch.



View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Technique of one-stage repair of IAA-VSD-SAS. After drainage of the circulation, the cannulas were removed from the field. The ductus was divided and the proximal end of it was oversewn with running 7-0 Prolene monofilament sutures. All ductal tissue was carefully resected from the aorta. Any aberrant subclavian artery was divided at this point. A vertical incision was performed, extending from the base of the right carotid to the proximal ascending aorta. An end-to-end anastomosis of the ascending to the descending thoracic aorta was then completed with a continuous 7-0 Prolene suture.

 
The VSD and SAS were addressed through a transpulmonary approach (Fig. 4). A transverse pulmonary arteriotomy, approximately 5 mm above the valve, was performed and the margins of malalignment VSD were exposed (Fig. 5). The defect was closed with patch of Dacron tissue (Meadox Medical, Inc., Oakland, N.J.); the patch was anchored with interrupted, pledget-reinforced 5-0 Tevdek mattress sutures (Deknatel, Inc., Fall River, Mass.). The original features of the technique consisted of (1) tailoring the patch to the shape of the defect but downsizing its area, to avoid bulging toward the LVOT, and (2) positioning the stitches relative to the apical portion of the VSD patch on the left side of the conal septum, to promote deflection of the displaced septum away from the LVOT (Fig. 6). The pulmonary arteriotomy was closed primarily with a continuous 6-0 Prolene suture. Finally, the atrial septum was exposed through a small right atriotomy and the defect was repaired primarily with a continuous 6-0 Prolene suture. The perfusion was resumed with a single 12F arterial cannula (Bard) inserted in the ascending aorta and a single venous-return cannula in the right atrial appendage. Rewarming was continued to achieve a rectal temperature of 36º C.



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Technique of one-stage repair of IAA-VSD-SAS. The VSD and SAS were addressed through a transpulmonary approach.

 


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Technique of one-stage repair of IAA-VSD-SAS. A transverse pulmonary arteriotomy was performed approximately 5 mm above the valve and the margins of malalignment VSD were exposed.

 


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Technique of one-stage repair of IAA-VSD-SAS. The original features of the technique consisted of (1) tailoring the patch to the shape of the defect but downsizing its area, to avoid bulging toward the LVOT and (2) positioning the stitches relative to the apical portion of the VSD patch on the left side of the conal septum to promote deflection of the displaced septum (dashed line) away from the LVOT.

 
During our early experience with this repair, the VSD and SAS were approached through a right atriotomy in two patients who showed moderately severe LVOT obstruction (ratios of systolic SAD to DTA of 0.68 and 0.69) on preoperative echocardiography. Thereafter, any patient with SAD (Z value H-6) was treated through a transpulmonary approach. Currently, this technique has become routine at our institution for any patient with IAA and malalignment VSD, regardless of the presence or absence of severe SAS.

Inotropic support with dopamine and dobutamine was uniformly used to facilitate weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass. The sternotomy wound was electively left open to allow cardiac decompression in all patients; a silicone elastomer patch (Silastic; Mentor, Inc., Goleta, Calif.) was used to close the skin incision temporarily. Postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis with cefazolin sodium (75 to 100 mg · kg-1 · day-1, intravenously administered) was adopted in all patients. Transition to broader-spectrum antibiotics was done on an individual basis as clinically indicated.

Follow-up
All patients had a follow-up clinical assessment between October 1, 1994 and January 31, 1995. The follow-up transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiographic examinations were performed at a mean follow-up time of 14 ± 9 months (range 1 to 29 months). On this occasion, postoperative measurements of the LVOT dimensions were repeated. In addition, the Doppler peak instantaneous gradient calculated from the Bernoulli equation was used to detect any residual subaortic obstruction.

Statistics
All data are expressed as mean values ± SD. A two-tailed, paired Student's t test was used for comparison of discrete variables when appropriate. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patients
The patient population consisted of six male and three female neonates, with weights ranging from 2.1 to 3.9 kg (median 3.3 kg) and ages at operation ranging from 2 to 23 days (median 6 days). Two patients were premature neonates and six were born at term. All patients were intubated shortly after birth for respiratory distress and mechanically ventilated until the time of surgical repair. All were found to have ductal-dependent congenital heart defect and thereafter started on a regimen of prostaglandin E1 infusion at doses ranging from 0.03 to 0.08 µg · kg-1 · min-1. The duration of prostaglandin E1 therapy, ranging from 1 to 10 days, corresponded to the time elapsed from admission to surgical repair Go(Table I). Seven of the nine patients were placed on regimens of intravenous dopamine (range 5 to 10 µg · kg-1 · min-1) and dobutamine (range 5 to 10 µg · kg-1 · min-1) for a period of 2 to 8 days.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Preoperative clinical data (n = 9)
 
One or more associated noncardiac anomalies were present in eight of nine patients. Dysmorphic facial features and hypocalcemia were detected in seven patients: four had partial DiGeorge's syndrome and three had the complete form. Additional malformations included cleft lip and or palate in three patients, duplicated ureter system in two patients, and duodenal atresia, Ladd intestinal band, and complete tracheal rings in one patient each.

Preoperative echocardiographic findings
All patients had situs solitus of the atria and concordant atrioventricular and ventriculoarterial connections. Eight patients had a Celoria-PattonGo 18 type B defect and one patient had a type C IAA. All patients had malalignment VSD caused by posterior displacement of the conal septum into the LVOT and causing SAS (Fig. 1). Additional morphologic features were a patent foramen ovale in nine patients, an aberrant subclavian artery in two patients (one right and one left), a hypoplastic ascending aorta in two patients, and a bicuspid aortic valve in one patient.

The mean diastolic ratio of SAD to DTA was 0.75 ± 0.04 (range 0.68 to 0.80; GoTable II). Previous studies have shown normal ratios to range between 1.00 and 1.50.Go 14 The mean systolic ratio of SAD to DTA was also markedly abnormal, with a mean value (0.63 ± 0.08) consistent with previously accepted echocardiographic and angiographic indices of severe SAS Go(Table II).Go Go 14,19 The subaortic diameter ranged from 2.7 to 4.0 mm, corresponding to values between 7 and 10 SDs below normal.Go 16 In addition, aortic valvular stenosis (mean aortic anulus diameter of 5.1 ± 0.6 mm, range 4.0 to 6.0 mm) and moderate hypoplasia of the ascending aorta (severe in two patients) were found in all patients Go(Table II). There was no semilunar valve incompetence on preoperative ultrasonographic examination.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Preoperative echocardiographic data (n = 9)
 
Repair of IAA-VSD-SAS
All patients underwent primary repair of the IAA-VSD-SAS 1 to 10 days after admission to the intensive care unit. No patient had undergone previous surgical or interventional procedures. The mean circulatory arrest time was 44 ± 9 min (range 31 to 58 min), and the total perfusion time was 49 ± 20 min (30 to 96 min). Associated procedures were performed in four patients; these consisted of ligation of an aberrant subclavian artery in two patients (one right and one left aberrant subclavian artery) and homograft patch augmentation of the ascending aorta in two patients with a severely hypoplastic (<3 mm diameter) ascending aorta. All patients in the current series survived operation and were discharged in good clinical condition. There were no late deaths 1 to 29 months after surgical repair.

Postoperative course
The need for inotropic support with dopamine and dobutamine at low to moderate doses generally lasted a week after operation Go(Table III). One patient had two episodes of cardiac arrest necessitatng emergency reexploration of the sternotomy wound and open-chest cardiac massage; a low-dose infusion of epinephrine was added for a total of 24 hours to the preexisting inotropic support to achieve hemodynamic stability. This patient recovered rapidly, and later echocardiographic examination demonstrated normal left ventricular function. He was discharged on the tenth postoperative day in good clinical condition.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III. Postoperative clinical course (n = 9)
 
For all patients, the closure of the sternum was completed in the intensive care unit 1 to 5 days (median 2 days) after the original surgical procedure. No superficial or deep wound infections were observed in our series. Ventilatory support need ranged from 4 to 7 days in most patients (78%; GoTable III). Three patients, however, had prolonged respiratory failure necessitating 2 to 6 weeks of mechanical ventilation. The causes of respiratory insufficiency in these patients included vocal cord granuloma necessitating treatment by laser (one patient), preexisting bilateral phrenic nerve palsy palliated with surgical plication of the right hemidiaphragm (one patient), and bronchopulmonary dysplasia in one patient, who was operated on initially as a premature, 2.1 kg neonate. Additional complications were pericardial effusion requiring surgical drainage (one patient), chylothorax requiring chest tube insertion (one patient), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia treated with cephalosporin and aminoglycoside antibiotics (one patient). All patients showed significant (<4.0 mg/dl) hypocalcemia in the immediate postoperative period. The hypocalcemia was severe (<3.0 mg/dl) and responded poorly to high-dose (10-15 mg · kg-1 · hr-1) calcium-chloride continuous intravenous administration in seven patients (78%) with documented preoperative hypocalcemia. All patients recovered appropriate serum calcium levels, however, two with the aid of oral calcium supplementation. Two patients, one with a previously palliated jejunal atresia, required Nissen fundoplication of the stomach and permanent gastrostomy tube placement for treatment of documented gastroesophageal reflux. The duration of intensive care stay averaged 2 weeks, and total hospital stay averaged 3 weeks Go(Table III). All patients were discharged in good clinical condition on regimens of oral furosemide and digitalis.

Follow-up
No patient showed signs of heart failure, and rhythm was sinus in all patients at follow-up clinical assessment. All were on regimens of oral furosemide and digitalis. Only one patient, who was operated on as a premature 2.3 kg neonate, was found to have decreased peripheral pulses on physical examination.

Follow-up transthoracic two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography 1 to 29 months (14 ± 9 months after discharge) confirmed relief of the SAS in all patients (Fig. 7). The peak systolic subaortic gradient did not exceed 20 mm Hg in any patient (mild SAS; GoTable IV). One patient with a preoperative aortic annular diameter of 2.7 mm and bicuspid aortic valve showed mild aortic stenosis on postoperative Doppler interrogation (peak gradient of 30 mm Hg). No patient had aortic or pulmonary valve insufficiency. Hemodynamically relevant residual VSDs were not detected (tiny VSDs were present in four patients; GoTable IV). Residual mild (15 mm Hg) aortic arch obstruction was detected in only one patient. Normalization of the indices of SAS was invariably observed (systolic ratio of SAD to DTA, 1.00 to 1.32), suggesting adequate growth of the subaortic region after the operation (Fig. 8) in all patients. The postoperative mean systolic ratio of SAD to DTA was significantly greater than the corresponding preoperative value (1.20 ± 0.10 vs 0.63 ± 0.08, p < 0.001; GoTable IV). No patient required reoperation or reintervention.



View larger version (144K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Parasternal long-axis view of the LVOT during systole in the same patient after one-stage repair of IAA-VSD-SAS. The anterior deflection of the conal septum by the VSD patch allows successful relief of the subaortic obstruction. LA, Left atrium; LV, left ventricle; Ao, ascending aorta; RV, right ventricle.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table IV. Follow-up echocardiographic data (n = 9)
 


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Plot of preoperative and follow-up (postoperative) systolic measurements of the SAD normalized to the DTA at the hiatus. Each line represents a single patient's data. Normalization of the size of the subaortic region after repair was achieved in every patient.

 
Discussion

Diagnosis of SAS
Previous experience showed that SAS is the primary determinant of the increased mortality risk and need for reintervention after repair of IAA-VSD.Go Go 2-9 The ability to foresee the need for relief of the subaortic obstruction at the time of primary repair and the prevalence of recurrence of this lesion after repair remains inadequate, however, because of the lack of uniform diagnostic criteria. The use of physiologic parameters such as preoperative subaortic pressure gradients has proved unreliable because of the presence of a nonrestrictive VSD, so anatomic measurements must be employed instead. In our series, the estimates of the subaortic diameters were drawn from the level of maximal narrowing. Both the systolic and diastolic diameters of the subaortic region, normalized to the diameter of the descending thoracic aorta at the diaphragmatic hiatus, were considered in each patient, in agreement with previous work by Bove and associates.Go 14 It was suggested that systolic ratios less than 0.6 and diastolic ratios less than 1.0 are indicative of severe SAS and mandate relief of the obstruction.Go Go 14,19 Further clinical work also maintained primary repair of IAA-VSD to be contraindicated when the subaortic diameter is less than 4 mm.Go 20

In compliance with both proposed criteria, the degree of SAS in our patients was severe. In fact, although only two patients had initial systolic ratios between 0.6 and 0.7, the remaining seven patients showed values between 0.4 and 0.6. In addition, before the operation all patients demonstrated diastolic ratios less than 1.0 and absolute values of subaortic diameters less than 4.0 mm (7 to 10 SDs below normal). The complexity of the left-sided obstructive lesions in our patient population was also substantiated by the invariably diminutive size of the aortic anulus (4 to 7 SDs below normal) and ascending aorta.

Recent clinical work by Geva and associatesGo 21 suggested that preoperative echocardiographic parameters useful in predicting the occurrence of SAS after repair of IAA-VSD are cross-sectional subaortic area, type B morphology of IAA, and presence of an aberrant subclavian artery. In that review, the linear measurements of the subaortic diameter did not correlate with postoperative appearance of SAS. Because these authors failed to consider the type of surgical therapy (if any) adopted against the SAS, the implications in terms of the need for reduction of the SAS are unclear. The subaortic cross-sectional areas were not routinely gathered in our study. Although eight of nine patients in our series had type B arch interruption before the operation and two had an aberrant subclavian artery, no patient had significant residual SAS at follow-up.

The need to determine which patients with IAA-VSD will require intervention against the SAS remains stringent, but uniform criteria to measure the subaortic region are still lacking. It therefore seems reasonable to identify a parameter other than the ideal anatomic measurement that may be easily quantified and referred to for the purpose of comparing different clinical series and predicting outcomes after surgical intervention.

Relief of SAS
The early attempts at staged repair of this complex lesion by reconstructing the arch and banding the pulmonary artery were marked by lack of success.Go 6 These findings were essentially confirmed by a recent multiinstitutional retrospective review, which identified staged or primary repair of the IAA-VSD complex without concomitant procedure to alleviate the SAS as a risk factor for early death.Go 2 Both the unresolved LVOT obstruction and the possible progressive hypertrophy of the conal septum in patients with or without pulmonary artery banding could explain these observations.

A series of palliative and reparative procedures aimed at bypassing the level of intracardiac obstruction was subsequently proposed. Although palliative interposition of prosthetic grafts between the DTA and the main pulmonary artery (6) or left ventricular apex (10) resulted in improved early survival, the need for reoperation limited their application. More recently, primary repair of IAA-VSD-SAS in neonates was reportedly performed with the pulmonary valve and proximal pulmonary trunk used to reconstruct the systemic outflow and the right ventricle–to–pulmonary artery continuity reestablished with a conduit.Go Go Go 8,11,12 Although these techniques achieve a biventricular repair, the approach failed to reduce the high operative mortality rate (33% of the reported cases) and to overcome the need for reoperation associated with extracardiac conduits. An alternative strategy proposed was that of converting the physiology to univentricular circulation by means of a modified Norwood palliative procedure.Go 22 The persistently high mortality rate and the complications connected with the univentricular circulation, including the need for multiple reoperations, make this option attractive only in case of coexisting aortic valve atresia.Go 2

Significant improvement in perioperative survival and greater success in relieving the LVOT obstruction were reported with one-stage anatomic repair and associated myotomy or myectomy of the posteriorly displaced conal septum.Go Go Go 6,13,14 Transaortic resection of the conal septum proved technically difficult because of the diminutive size of the ascending aorta and aortic valve,Go Go 6,14 so alternative access to the subaortic area was proposed through a transventricular approach.Go 13 Although such a procedure is easier from a technical standpoint, the detrimental hemodynamic consequences of an infundibulotomy on the neonatal heart has limited the application of procedures of conal enlargement through the right ventricular outflow tract. Finally, transatrial resection of the conal septum during one-stage repair of IAA-VSD was proposed by DeLeon and coworkersGo 13 and Bove and associatesGo 14 to treat severe forms of SAS. Although overall survival in these limited series was acceptable (only one late death occurred in the series of Bove and associatesGo 14), the prevalence of postoperative complications remained high. This technique was associated with a significant occurrence of complete heart block (16% in the series of DeLeon and coworkersGo 13) and intraoperative aortic valve injury (17% in the series of Bove and associatesGo 14). Given the small size of the cardiac chambers, it is conceivable that a transatrial resection of the conal septal tissue may be technically challenging, even when the muscle is anchored with a suture and retracted toward the right atrium.Go 14 The proximity of the septum to the aortic valve makes this technique intrinsically hazardous to the aortic semilunar valve. Further, larger-scale analysis of the results of one-stage IAA-VSD repair with myotomy or myectomy, although demonstrating a lower prevalence of recurrent subvalvular obstruction, showed increased early and midterm mortality rates, averaging 50% at 5 years.Go 2

Our approach to the management of IAA-VSD has been that of primary repair at the time of presentation, and we have successfully adopted a new technique to treat critical SAS. Because the malalignment of the conal septum with the resulting SAS is responsible for the in utero involution of the ascending aorta and aortic arch (fourth aortic arch), there is reciprocal development of the pulmonary artery and ductus arteriosus (sixth aortic arch). The degree of SAS is therefore directly proportional to the size of the pulmonary trunk and inversely proportional to the size of the ascending aorta. Two considerations follow: (1) relief of the subaortic obstruction is necessary to promote growth of the left side of the heart–aorta complex, once the arch continuity has been reestablished, and (2) in case of severe SAS, a transpulmonary approach to the repair of the intracardiac defects may be technically easier.

In agreement with these considerations, we exposed the VSD and subaortic region through the pulmonary artery trunk. We thereby managed to relieve even extreme degrees of subaortic obstruction without resection of the conal septum, thus minimizing the potential for aortic valve injury. In fact, by placing the apical VSD patch stitches on the left ventricular side of the crista supraventricularis and by downsizing the patch itself, we believe that the conal septum may be deflected away from the subaortic region. Previous work by Jonas and coworkersGo 2 suggested that septation of the ventricular chambers in and of itself may promote deviation of the conal septum toward the right ventricle by recovering differential ventricular pressures during systole. On the basis of this consideration and of the added risk of early mortality associated with myotomy or myectomy of the subaortic muscle during one-stage repair of IAA-VSD, it was recently recommended that no concomitant procedures other than arch augmentation be performed at the time of surgical intervention.Go 23 Although we agree that this mechanism may be responsible for some dynamic changes during the systolic ejection phase, we are convinced that adequate relief of the SAS cannot be achieved without reestablishment of a laminar flow through the LVOT. In fact, we maintain that the oblique orientation of the VSD patch in our technique is critical in keeping the spur of conal septal tissue away from the subaortic area, thereby recreating a smooth-surfaced outflow tract. It is conceivable that the persistence of the unresected conal muscle, even in the presence of a repaired VSD, may sustain turbulent flow causing progressive hypertrophy of the displaced septum and persistent or recurrent SAS.

Clinical results
The reported early and midterm mortality rates for one-stage repair of IAA-VSD-SAS vary from 14% to 80%, with persistent or recurrent LVOT obstruction as primary cause of death. The survival with our novel approach to treatment of neonates with IAA-VSD-SAS, with no early or midterm deaths, compares favorably with those in all previously published series. In addition, the absence of procedure-related complications, including complete heart block, semilunar valve insufficiency, and residual VSD, validates the safety of our method.

Although the requirement for intensive care after corrective surgery was generally prolonged (mean ventilatory support of 2 weeks and intensive care unit stay of 3 weeks) because of the severity of associated anomalies, the cardiovascular system itself recovered much faster. The occurrence of complete or partial forms of DiGeorge syndrome in patients with IAA-VSD is well established.Go 17 The overall long-term outlook for these patients becomes relevant in planning for the repair of complex cardiovascular anomalies in the neonatal period. Only 25% of all patients with complete DiGeorge syndrome are affected by severe immunodeficiency necessitating bone marrow transplantation; most patients have mild or minimal immunodeficiency associated with acceptable long-term survival. Further, prediction of which patients affected by DiGeorge syndrome will not recover adequate immune function is still difficult.Go 17 On this basis, we believe it is justified to afford all patients with DiGeorge anomaly complete repair of associated cardiac defects.

The recurrence of significant SAS (peak gradient G25 mm Hg) after repair of IAA-VSD has ranged from 17% to 67% in most series, with 20% to 70% of patients requiring one or more additional surgical procedures to relieve the obstruction. In contrast, follow-up echocardiographic examination of our patients invariably revealed successful repair of the aortic arch, with adequate growth of the subaortic region and no recurrence of significant subaortic obstruction.

Limitations of the study
The major limitations to the our study include its retrospective and nonrandomized nature. In addition, a larger number of patients and a longer follow-up are needed to assess the durability of the current results.

Although our experience is limited in number, it is the largest (nine consecutive patients) reported by a single institution with a uniform surgical technique to treat IAA-VSD and critical SAS.Go Go Go Go Go 3-6,8-11,14 Even though longer-term than previously presented experiences,Go 14 however, our follow-up remains too short to establish definitive guidelines for the optimal surgical approach to IAA-VSD-SAS.

Recent multiinstitutional series have attempted to overcome the limitations imposed by the size of the population and length of follow-up.Go Go 14,23 Because preoperative and postoperative diagnostic findings are so critical in identifying factors predictive of outcome, however, the heterogeneous nature of the multiinstitutional database and the lack of standardized diagnostic criteria greatly flaw the potential significance of these studies.

Conclusions
We described a new approach to the surgical treatment of the neonate with IAA-VSD and critical SAS. Through a transpulmonary approach and without resecting the conal septum, severe forms of LVOT obstruction were relieved, resulting in excellent survival and negligible incidence of complications. Now that this technique has proved safe, it may be extended to all patients with IAA and malalignment VSD, regardless of the degree of subaortic narrowing.

Footnotes

From the Departments of Surgerya and Pediatrics,b University of Southern California, and the Divisions of Cardiothoracic Surgeryc and Cardiology,d Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif. Back

References Go 3,Go 4,Go 8,Go 10,Go 12,Go 14, and Go 21. Back

{dagger}References Go 3,Go 4,Go 8,Go 9,Go 14, and Go 21. Back

References

  1. Van Praagh R, Bernhard WF, Rosenthal A, Parisi LF, Fyler DF. Interrupted aortic arch: Surgical treatment. Am J Cardiol 1971;27:200-11.[Medline]
  2. Jonas RA, Quagebeur JM, Kirklin JW, Blackstone EH, Daicoff G, and the Congenital Heart Surgeons Society. Outcomes in patients with interrupted aortic arch and ventricular septal defect: a multiinstitutional study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:1099-113.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Norwood WI, Lang P, Castaneda AR, Hougen TJ. Reparative operations for interrupted aortic arch with ventricular septal defect. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983;86:832-7.[Abstract]
  4. Scott WA, Rocchini AP, Bove EL, et al. Repair of interrupted aortic arch in infancy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988;96:564-8.[Abstract]
  5. Sell JE, Jonas RA, Mayer JE, Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW, Castaneda AR. The results of a surgical program for interrupted aortic arch. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988;96:864-77.[Abstract]
  6. Ilbawi MN, Idriss FS, DeLeon SY, Muster AJ, Benson DW, Paul MH. Surgical management of patients with interrupted aortic arch and severe subaortic stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg 1988;45:174-80.[Abstract]
  7. Iwahara M, Ino T, Nishimoto K, et al. Clinical features of aortic arch anomaly with malalignment ventricular septal defect. Ann Thorac Surg 1989;48:693-6.[Abstract]
  8. Menahem S, Brwan WJ, Mee RB. Severe subaortic stenosis in interrupted aortic arch in infancy and childhood. J Cardiac Surg 1991;6:373-80.[Medline]
  9. Hazekamp MG, Quagebeur JM, Singh S, et al. One stage repair of aortic arch anomalies and intracardiac defects. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1991;5:283-7.[Abstract]
  10. Norwood WI, Lang P, Castaneda AR, Murphy JD. Management of infants with left ventricular outflow obstruction by conduit interposition between the ventricular apex and thoracic aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983;86:771-76.[Abstract]
  11. Yasui H, Kado H, Nakano E, et al. Primary repair of interrupted aortic arch and severe aortic stenosis in neonates. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1987;93:539-45.[Abstract]
  12. Metras D, Kreitmann B. Severe subaortic stenosis in interrupted aortic arch [Letter]. J Cardiac Surg 1992;7:283-4.[Medline]
  13. DeLeon SY, Ilbawi MN, Roberson DA, et al. Conal enlargement for diffuse subaortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;102:814-20.[Abstract]
  14. Bove EL, Minich L, Pridjian A, et al. The management of severe subaortic stenosis, ventricular septal defect, and aortic arch obstruction in the neonate. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;105:289-96.[Abstract]
  15. Hong R. The DiGeorge anomaly. Immunodefic Rev 1991;3:1-14.[Medline]
  16. Anatomy, dimensions and terminology. In: Kirklin JW, Barratt-Boyes BG, eds. Cardiac surgery. 2nd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1993:3-60.
  17. Sievers HH, Onnasch DG, Lange PE, Bernhard A, Heintzen PH. Dimensions of the great arteries, semilunar valve roots, and right ventricular outflow tract during growth: normative angiocardiographic data. Pediatr Cardiol 1983;4:189-96.[Medline]
  18. Celoria CG, Patton RB. Congenital absence of the aortic arch. Am Heart J 1959;58:407-13.[Medline]
  19. Minich LL, Snider RA, Bove EL, Lupinetti FM. Echocardiographic predictors of the need for infundibular wedge resection in infants with aortic arch obstruction, ventricular septal defect and subaortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1992;70:1626-7.[Medline]
  20. Goldmuntz E, Baffa JM, Weinberg PM. Evaluation of the subaortic region in interrupted aortic arch [Abstract]. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19:233.
  21. Geva T, Hornberger LK, Sanders SP, Jonas RA, Ott DA, Colan SD. Echocardiographic predictors of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction after repair of interrupted aortic arch. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:1953-60.[Abstract]
  22. Jacobs ML, Chin AJ, Norwood WI. Interrupted aortic arch: impact of subaortic stenosis on management and outcome [Abstract]. Circulation 1994;90:203.
  23. Quagebeur JM, Jonas RA, Weinberg AD, Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW, the Congenital Heart Surgeons Society. Outcomes in seriously ill neonates with coarctation of the aorta: a multiinstitutional study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:841-54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. Uemura, I. Adachi, K. Kagisaki, F. Shikata, and T. Yagihara
Intermediate Results After a Modified Yasui Procedure With the Lecompte Maneuver
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2007; 84(1): 284 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
J. W. Brown, M. Ruzmetov, Y. Okada, P. Vijay, M. D. Rodefeld, and M. W. Turrentine
Outcomes in patients with interrupted aortic arch and associated anomalies: a 20-year experience.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 29(5): 666 - 673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
T. Suzuki, R. G. Ohye, E. J. Devaney, T. Ishizaka, P. N. Nathan, C. S. Goldberg, C. A. Gomez, and E. L. Bove
Selective management of the left ventricular outflow tract for repair of interrupted aortic arch with ventricular septal defect: Management of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2006; 131(4): 779 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. G. Hazekamp, H. B. Grotenhuis, P. H. Schoof, M. E.B. Rijlaarsdam, J. Ottenkamp, and R. A.E. Dion
Results of the Ross operation in a pediatric population
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2005; 27(6): 975 - 979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
B. W. McCrindle, C. I. Tchervenkov, I. E. Konstantinov, W. G. Williams, R. A. Neirotti, M. L. Jacobs, E. H. Blackstone, and For the members of the Congenital Heart Surgeons S
Risk factors associated with mortality and interventions in 472 neonates with interrupted aortic arch: A Congenital Heart Surgeons Society study
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2005; 129(2): 343 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. Oosterhof, A. Azakie, R. M. Freedom, W. G. Williams, and B. W. McCrindle
Associated Factors and Trends in Outcomes of Interrupted Aortic Arch
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2004; 78(5): 1696 - 1702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. Nemoto, C. Sudarshan, and C. P. R. Brizard
Successful aortic root remodeling for repair of a dilated pulmonary autograft after a ross-Konno procedure in early childhood
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2004; 78(3): e45 - e47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. Yamagishi, K. Fujiwara, Y. Yamada, K. Shuntoh, and N. Kitamura
A new surgical technique for one-stage repair of interrupted aortic arch with valvular aortic stenosis
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2001; 122(2): 392 - 393.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
E. Erez, V. K.H. Tam, K. R. Kanter, and D. A. Fyfe
Successful biventricular repair after initial Norwood operation for interrupted aortic arch with severe left ventricular outflow tract obstruction
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2001; 71(6): 1974 - 1977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. Schreiber, A. Eicken, M. Vogt, T. Gunther, M. Wottke, M. Thielmann, S. U. Paek, H. Meisner, J. Hess, and R. Lange
Repair of interrupted aortic arch: results after more than 20 years
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2000; 70(6): 1896 - 1900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
T. Tlaskal, B. Hucin, J. Hruda, J. Marek, V. Chaloupecky, M. Kostelka, J. Janousek, and J. Skovranek
Results of primary and two-stage repair of interrupted aortic arch
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 1999; 14(3): 235 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
L. Y. Tani, L. L. Minich, L. T. Pagotto, R. E. Shaddy, E. C. McGough, and J. A. Hawkins
LEFT HEART HYPOPLASIA AND NEONATAL AORTIC ARCH OBSTRUCTION: IS THERHODES LEFT VENTRICULAR ADEQUACY SCORE APPLICABLE?
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 1999; 118(1): 81 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. O. Fulton, C. Mas, C. P.R. Brizard, A. D. Cochrane, and T. R. Karl
Does left ventricular outflow tract obstruction influence outcome of interrupted aortic arch repair?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 1999; 67(1): 177 - 181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
C. I. Tchervenkov, S. A. Tahta, L. Jutras, and M. J. Beland
SINGLE-STAGE REPAIR OF AORTIC ARCH OBSTRUCTION AND ASSOCIATED INTRACARDIAC DEFECTS WITH PULMONARY HOMOGRAFT PATCH AORTOPLASTY
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 1998; 116(6): 897 - 904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
Y. Shiokawa and A. E. Becker
The Surgical Anatomy of the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract in Hearts With Ventricular Septal Defect and Aortic Arch Obstruction
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1998; 65(5): 1381 - 1387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. D. Mainwaring and J. J. Lamberti
Mid- to Long-Term Results of the Two-Stage Approach for Type B Interrupted Aortic Arch and Ventricular Septal Defect
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1997; 64(6): 1782 - 1785.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
K. Hisatomi
Is left ventricular outflow tract obstruction really relieved on long-term follow-up?
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 1997; 113(3): 617 - 618.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
V. A. Starnes, G. B. Luciani, W. J. Wells, R. B. Allen, and A. B. Lewis
Aortic Root Replacement With the Pulmonary Autograft in Children With Complex Left Heart Obstruction
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1996; 62(2): 442 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Giovanni Battista Luciani
Winfield J. Wells
Vaughn A. Starnes
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Luciani, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Starnes, V. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Luciani, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Starnes, V. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS