JTCS Speed Up Your Browser
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Darroch W. O. Moores
Keith B. Allen
Stanley W. Dziuban
William H. Warren
Riivo Ilves
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moores, D. W. O.
Right arrow Articles by Lininger, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Moores, D. W. O.
Right arrow Articles by Lininger, L.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111:489
© 1996 Mosby, Inc.


Letters to the Editor

Subxiphoid drainage for pericardial tamponade

Darroch W. O. Moores, MD a, Keith B. Allen, MDb, L. Penfield Faber, MDb, Stanley W. Dziuban, MDa, David J. Gillman, RPA/Ca, William H. Warren, MDb, Riivo Ilves, MDa, L. Lininger, PhDc

Department of Surgery
Division of Thoracic Surgery
Albany Medical Center
Albany, N.Y.a

Reply to the Editor:

I suspect that the first patient reported on by Neelakandan and associates died of complications of overwhelming sepsis associated with the pyopericardium. I have no good explanation for the development of low cardiac output in second patient, although it may have been related to his chronic underlying disease and unrelated to the actual pericardial drainage. One patient in our series died within 48 hours after the operation. This was a patient with pneumonia, sepsis, and multiorgan failure who died of overwhelming sepsis 48 hours after pericardial drainage. We do not think the pericardial drainage contributed to the patient's death. Our experience does not corroborate the presumption of Neelakandan and coworkers that sudden pericardial decompression may cause low cardiac output. Our experience has been that patients with pericardial tamponade have marked, sudden improvement in their hemodynamic status after drainage of the pericardial effusion.





This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Darroch W. O. Moores
Keith B. Allen
Stanley W. Dziuban
William H. Warren
Riivo Ilves
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moores, D. W. O.
Right arrow Articles by Lininger, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Moores, D. W. O.
Right arrow Articles by Lininger, L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS