| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111:753-763
© 1996 Mosby, Inc.
SURGERY FOR ACQUIRED HEART DISEASE |
Supported by NIH grant R29HL49398.
Received for publication June 21, 1995 Revisions requested Oct. 3, 1995; revisions received Oct. 11, 1995; Accepted for publication Nov. 8, 1995. Address for reprints: David A. Fullerton, MD, Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Box C-310, 4200 E. Ninth Ave., Denver, CO 80262.
Abstract
Increased pulmonary vascular resistance may greatly complicate the perioperative management of cardiac surgical patients. Inhaled nitric oxide may be a promising new therapy to selectively lower pulmonary vascular resistance. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of inhaled nitric oxide on pulmonary and systemic hemodynamics in cardiac surgical patients. Twenty patients (age 57 ± 6 years) were studied in the operating room after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass. Mean pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, systemic vascular resistance, and mean aortic pressure were determined at four points of data collection: before nitric oxide, with 20 ppm nitric oxide, with 40 ppm nitric oxide, and after nitric oxide. Statistical analysis was by analysis of variance; significance was accepted for p < 0.05. Inhaled nitric oxide produced selective pulmonary vasorelaxation. Pulmonary vascular resistance was lowered from 343 ± 30 before nitric oxide to 233 ± 25 dynes · sec-1 · cm-5 with 20 ppm nitric oxide. Pulmonary vascular resistance was not further lowered by 40 ppm nitric oxide (p < 0.05). Mean pulmonary arterial pressure was 29 ± 1 mm Hg before nitric oxide and was lowered to 22 ± 1 mm Hg by 20 ppm nitric oxide and 21 ± 1 mm Hg by 40 ppm nitric oxide (p < 0.05). Both pulmonary vascular resistance and mean pulmonary arterial pressure returned to baseline after withdrawal of inhaled nitric oxide. Inhaled nitric oxide produced no changes in either systemic vascular resistance or mean aortic pressure. We conclude that nitric oxide may be used as an effective pulmonary vasodilator after cardiac operations. It may be particularly valuable for selectively lowering right ventricular afterload in patients with right ventricular dysfunction. (J THORACCARDIOVASCSURG1996;111:753-63)
Increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) may greatly complicate perioperative management of cardiac surgical patients. Because PVR is the primary clinical determinant of right ventricular afterload, increased PVR may result in right ventricular afterload mismatch, compromising cardiac output (CO). Pharmacologic agents currently used as pulmonary vasodilators produce vasodilation of both the systemic and pulmonary circulations. Such nonselective vasodilation may be hazardous in patients with increased PVR
1,2; significant hypotension may result if the degree of systemic vasodilation exceeds that of the pulmonary vasodilation.
When administered to patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), inhaled nitric oxide (NO) has been shown to improve oxygenation and to lower PVR. 3,4 It has also been shown to lower PVR in pediatric cardiac surgical patients with pulmonary hypertension. 5 We therefore hypothesized that NO would effectively vasodilate the pulmonary circulation without producing unwanted systemic vasodilation in adult cardiac surgical patients.
The purpose of this study was to examine the pulmonary and systemic hemodynamic effects of inhaled NO in adults after cardiac operations. Patients undergoing aorta-coronary bypass operations were studied in the operating room while under general anesthesia. Inhaled NO was administered in two concentrations, 20 and 40 ppm. The results of this study demonstrate that inhaled NO effectively reduced PVR and mean pulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP) without affecting systemic vascular resistance (SVR) or systemic arterial pressure (SAP). These data suggest that inhaled NO may be used clinically in adult cardiac surgical patients as a "selective" pulmonary vasodilator to optimize pulmonary hemodynamics without adverse systemic hemodynamic effects.
Methods
This protocol was approved by the Human Subjects Review Committee of the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center and the Research and Development Committee, Human Subjects Subcommittee of the Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Informed consent was obtained from each participant.
Administration of inhaled NO
Inhaled NO was supplied in tanks of 800 to 2200 ppm (Scott Medical Products, Plumsteadville, Pa.) and was administered into the inspiratory arm of the anesthesia breathing circuit. The concentration of inhaled NO was continuously monitored at a location just proximal to the endotracheal tube by chemiluminescence (Chemiluminescence Monitor model 42H; Thermo Environmental Instruments, Franklin, Mass.). The exhalation limb of the breathing circuit was likewise continuously monitored by chemiluminescence for nitrogen dioxide and NOx (toxic higher oxides of NO).
Protocol for data collection
Twenty consecutive male patients undergoing aorta-coronary artery bypass for severe three-vessel coronary artery disease participated in the study. All patients underwent complete coronary artery revascularization, including reversed saphenous vein grafts to the right coronary artery system. Patients received preoperative medication of 0.1 mg/kg morphine sulfate and 0.4 mg scopolamine intramuscularly 1 hour before arrival in the operating room. Ongoing drug therapy for concomitant medical problems was continued as deemed appropriate by the attending anesthesiologist.
Each patient was monitored with a five-lead electrocardiogram, a radial arterial line, and a pulmonary artery thermodilution oximetric catheter (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, Ill.) introduced through the right internal jugular vein. To accurately measure pulmonary venous outflow pressure (left atrial pressure [LAP]) for determination of PVR, a catheter for LAP monitoring was introduced into the left atrium through the right superior pulmonary vein after the patient had been weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass. The LAP catheter was subsequently removed after completion of data collection and before chest closure. The anesthetic technique consisted of a high-dose narcotic (fentanyl) and relaxant (vecuronium) technique supplemented with intravenous midazolam. Inhalational anesthetic agents were administered only during cardiopulmonary bypass.
Data were collected in the operating room beginning approximately 20 minutes after completion of cardiopulmonary bypass but before chest closure. After weaning from bypass and protamine administration, all patients were in hemodynamically stable condition and demonstrated normal coagulation. No patients required cardiac pacing, antiarrhythmic therapy, or inotropic or vasoactive drug administration. No inhalational anesthetics were administered from the time of cessation of cardiopulmonary bypass throughout the period of data collection.
The protocol for collection of data proceeded as follows: Tidal volume was set at approximately 10 ml/kg and respiratory rate was adjusted to establish an arterial carbon dioxide tension of approximately 40 mm Hg and an arterial pH of approximately 7.40. 6 To avoid changes in pulmonary hemodynamics resulting from changes in ventilatory patterns, ventilator settings were not subsequently altered during the study period. Fraction of inspired oxygen was maintained at a mean of 0.97 (range 0.94 to 0.99), and no patient had positive end-expiratory pressure applied at any point during the study period. Arterial oxygen tension (Po2) was therefore maintained at greater than 275 mm Hg throughout the study period to avoid any influence of hypoxemia on pulmonary vascular tone. Arterial and mixed venous blood gas samples were obtained at each point of data collection. The hemodynamic variables measured and recorded were heart rate, mean SAP, MPAP, central venous pressure, LAP, and thermodilution CO (mean of three values). These allowed mathematic derivation of PVR, SVR, cardiac index, right ventricular stroke work index (RVSWI), and transpulmonary gradient (TPG).
The protocol for data collection is shown in Fig. 1. After placement of the LAP line and with the patient in a hemodynamic steady state, baseline hemodynamic variables were determined. NO at a concentration of 20 ppm was then added to the ventilatory circuit. After 10 minutes of inhaled 20 ppm NO, hemodynamic variables were determined. The concentration of inhaled NO was then increased to 40 ppm. After 10 minutes, hemodynamic variables were once again determined. Inhaled NO was then stopped. After 10 minutes, hemodynamic post–inhaled NO data were collected. The LAP line was then removed under direct vision and its insertion site in the right superior pulmonary vein was determined to be hemostatic. Methemoglobin level was determined before and after data collection.
|
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed with a Macintosh Quadra 650 Computer (Apple Computer, Inc., Cupertino, Calif.) and StatView software (Brain Power, Inc., Calabasas, Calif.). Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical evaluation used standard analysis of variance in conjunction with the Student-Newman-Keuls multiple comparisons procedure. A p value less than 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.
Results
The study population comprised 20 male patients, with subject demographics listed in Table I. All patients had a history of cigarette smoking; none, however, demonstrated clinical or radiographic evidence of significant chronic pulmonary disease. No subjects had preoperative pulmonary hypertension. All subjects were taking at least one aspirin daily before operation.
|
Table II lists the arterial and mixed venous blood gas values along with the hemodynamic variables determined at each point of data collection. There were no changes in arterial pH, arterial Po2, or arterial carbon dioxide tension throughout the study period. Likewise, there were no significant changes in heart rate, central venous pressure, or LAP throughout the period of data collection. Methemoglobin level was unchanged after administration of inhaled NO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The results of this study demonstrate that inhaled NO after aorta-coronary bypass operations produced significant reductions in MPAP, TPG and PVR. In turn, these effects on the pulmonary circulation resulted in a significant reduction in RVSWI. In this group of patients without severe pulmonary hypertension, inhalation of 20 ppm NO lowered PAP to normal levels; the reductions in PVR and PAP were not augmented by increasing inhaled NO from 20 to 40 ppm. This pulmonary vasorelaxation was achieved without changes in SVR or mean SAP.
Patients undergoing cardiac operations offered a unique opportunity to examine the influence of inhaled NO on PVR. A homogeneous group, patients undergoing aorta-coronary bypass grafting, could be studied. Control of many variables that affect PVR was available with this select group of patients. Surgical access allowed accurate measurement of pulmonary venous outflow pressure (LAP) for calculation of PVR. 7 Anesthesia and mechanical ventilated of these patients allowed maintenance of a constant rate of ventilation and tidal volume to avoid mechanical alterations of PVR. 8 Furthermore, arterial Po2 could be well controlled and changes in acid-base status could be avoided. 6,9
In our protocol, a standard cardiac anesthetic technique was employed. Intravenous anesthetic agents were administered only before cardiopulmonary bypass, and inhalational anesthetic agents were not administered after cessation of cardiopulmonary bypass until after the period of data collection. Any influence of anesthesia on PVR can therefore be assumed to have been held constant. Although the anesthetic technique may influence the response of the pulmonary vasculature to inhaled NO, this influence was held constant during the period of data collection. In addition, to optimize clinical relevance, patients were examined early after operation.
The principal intracellular mechanisms of pulmonary vasodilators are ultimately mediated through either guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP) or adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate. 10 Pharmacologic agents mediated by cGMP that have been employed as pulmonary vasodilators in cardiac surgical patients include nitroglycerin and sodium nitroprusside 11; agents mediated by cyclic adenosine monophosphate include prostaglandin E1, dobutamine, amrinone, and isoproterenol. 12-15 All of these agents are administered intravenously, and all clinically produce vasodilation of both the systemic and pulmonary vascular beds. In patients with increased PVR, such nonselective vasodilation may be hazardous: significant hypotension may result if the reduction of SVR is greater than the reduction in PVR. 1,2 Such hypotension may in fact be life-threatening if the SAP is lowered enough to decrease coronary arterial perfusion pressure, resulting in right ventricular ischemia and failure. 16,17 Further, the clinical effectiveness of intravenously administered pulmonary vasodilators is often limited by the fact that they increase intrapulmonary shunt fraction and thereby lower arterial Po2. 18
Inhaled NO may offer a significant advantage as a pulmonary vasodilator. Once administered into the alveoli by inhalation, it diffuses rapidly across the alveolar-capillary membrane into the subjacent vascular smooth muscle to stimulate guanylate cyclase, generating cGMP and producing pulmonary vascular smooth muscle relaxation. 19,20 Once NO diffuses through the smooth muscle cell into the capillary lumen, it is immediately bound to hemoglobin in erythrocytes as methemoglobin; the affinity of hemoglobin for NO is approximately 3000 times greater than the affinity of hemoglobin for oxygen. 20 Methemoglobin is reduced to nitrates by methemoglobin reductase, found in erythrocytes. It is estimated that most of the nitrates and nitrites found in blood result from the metabolism of endogenous NO. 20 In this way, the vasodilating actions of inhaled NO are focused in the pulmonary circulation; it is metabolized before it reaches the systemic circulation.
Most of the human data relating to the use of inhaled NO have been obtained from patients with both hypoxemia and pulmonary vasoconstriction. Inhaled NO has been used clinically as a pulmonary vasodilator in infants with persistent pulmonary hypertension. In such infants, severe pulmonary vasoconstriction is associated with hypoxemia and systemic hypotension. By dilating the pulmonary circulation, inhaled NO has been shown to improve oxygenation and increase systemic blood pressure. 21,22 Inhaled NO has also proved to be an effective pulmonary vasodilator in children with acute pulmonary insufficiency. 23 Although the pediatric pulmonary vascular bed is prone to avid pulmonary vasoconstriction, inhaled NO has been shown to vasodilate hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in adults as well. 24 In fact, the most extensive clinical experience with inhaled NO has been in patients with ARDS. 3,4,25-28 Inhalational administration of NO directs the agent into ventilated alveoli, where it acts locally to vasodilate. This local vasodilation diverts pulmonary blood flow away from poorly ventilated regions of the lung, thereby optimizing ventilation-perfusion matching. In most series of patients with ARDS, inhaled NO is reported to simultaneously improve oxygenation and reduce PAP. Because hypoxemia is such an important cause of pulmonary vasoconstriction, however, it is unclear from these data what effect, if any, inhaled NO has on pulmonary vasoconstriction that is not associated with hypoxemia. Of particular interest, as many as one third of patients with ARDS have not shown improved oxygenation in response to inhaled NO. In these nonresponding patients, inhaled NO has minimal effect on PAP. 3
Unlike patients with ARDS, cardiac surgical patients may have pulmonary vasoconstriction not associated with hypoxemia. Unfortunately, relatively few data are available regarding the use of inhaled NO after cardiac operations. When administered before operation to patients with congenital heart disease and pulmonary hypertension, inhaled NO lowered PAP without lowering SAP. 29 In postoperative pediatric cardiac surgical patients with severe pulmonary hypertension refractory to conventional therapy, inhaled NO lowered MPAP in 12 of 17 patients. Administration of inhaled NO was associated, however, with a significant decrease in mean SAP in four of these 17 patients (24%). 5 In adults with pulmonary hypertension after mitral valve replacement, inhaled NO produced a modest reduction in PAP. 30 Patients with pulmonary hypertension from mitral valve disease frequently have structural changes in the pulmonary vascular bed, however, which may contribute to increased PVR yet may not be amenable to vasodilator therapy. In a study of 20 adult cardiac surgical patients, 16 of whom underwent single- or double-valve replacement and four of whom underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, the response to inhaled NO was found to be unchanged by cardiopulmonary bypass. The responsiveness of the pulmonary vascular bed to inhaled NO in these patients was variable, however, and depended on the level of PVR before administration of inhaled NO. 31 In the first report of the use of inhaled NO in human beings, Pepke-Zaba and coworkers 32 reported a significant fall in PVR in patients (including seven patients with mitral valve disease and three with ischemic heart disease) who breathed inhaled NO in the cardiac catheterization suite during preoperative evaluation. Lindberg and colleagues 33 as well as Snow and colleagues, 34 however, reported minimal effect of inhaled NO on PVR after aorta-coronary bypass operations in adult cardiac surgical patients in whom the starting PAP was low. The findings of our study confirm that inhaled NO is an effective pulmonary vasodilator in adult cardiac surgical patients with elevated PAP (29 ± 1 mm Hg) after cardiopulmonary bypass. Further, this pulmonary vasodilation was accomplished in patients without hypoxemia. It is possible that the reduction of PAP and PVR found in our study but not found in the studies by Lindberg and associates 33 and Snow and colleagues 34 was a function of the higher PAP in our study. The reasons for the higher pulmonary vascular tone in our study are unclear, but this higher PAP may reflect differences in anesthetic or perfusion techniques, duration of cardiopulmonary bypass, or the time interval after completion of cardiopulmonary bypass before data collection.
Our study was designed to examine the acute effects of inhaled NO administration. One may not draw conclusions therefore regarding the effects of prolonged exposure. NO is a potentially toxic gas; inhalation of greater than 1000 ppm has been shown to cause acute lung injury in laboratory animals. 35 In human beings, NO is believed to cause silo-filler's disease. 20 Prolonged administration of inhaled NO therefore requires chemiluminescence monitoring to accurately measure the concentration of inhaled NO and to measure the exhaled concentration of its toxic metabolite, nitrogen dioxide. Blood samples are also required to measure methemoglobin concentration. During the brief administration of inhaled NO in our study, there were no changes in nitrogen dioxide or methemoglobin. Despite these potential toxicities, prolonged administration of inhaled NO to patients with ARDS in concentrations as great as 80 ppm for durations as long as 53 days have not been found to produce toxic effects in the lung. 4 Nonetheless, a trial of inhaled NO was reported to precipitate pulmonary edema in a patient with stable heart failure. 36 Of particular concern in cardiac surgical patients is the possibility that inhaled NO may depress myocardial contractility. Although no changes in CO were found with inhaled NO in our study, further investigation is required to determine the influence of inhaled NO on cardiac function.
Net pulmonary vascular smooth muscle tone results from the mechanistic balance of vasoconstriction and vasorelaxation. In the normal lung, the low pulmonary vascular smooth muscle tone may be due at least in part to basal release of endothelium-derived NO. 37 The pulmonary vasoconstricting effects of cardiopulmonary bypass are well recognized. After cardiopulmonary bypass, increased pulmonary vascular tone may be caused by increased levels of circulating or local vasoconstricting agonists. 38 Pulmonary vascular endothelial dysfunction may contribute to this pulmonary vasoconstriction; impairment of endothelium-dependent cGMP-mediated pulmonary vasorelaxation has recently been described after cardiopulmonary bypass. 39 Because inhaled NO achieves pulmonary vascular smooth relaxation independently of the endothelium, it may offer a mechanistic advantage for use as a pulmonary vasodilator after cardiopulmonary bypass.
In summary, inhaled NO produced a significant reduction in both PAP and PVR in patients after cardiac operations without reducing SAP or SVR. In this study, there were no differences in the hemodynamic effects of 20 and 40 ppm NO. In patients with higher PVR and PAP, however, concentrations as high as 80 ppm may be required. We conclude that inhaled NO may be clinically valuable as a "selective" pulmonary vasodilator for cardiac surgical patients. It may be particularly valuable for patients with dysfunction of the right side of the heart by selectively lowering right ventricular afterload, thereby optimizing function of the right side of the heart.
Appendix: Discussion
Dr. Jorge A. Wernly (Albuquerque, N.M.)
I congratulate Fullerton and associates on an elegant, well-controlled clinical study demonstrating the efficacy of NO in controlling PVR after cardiac operations. Specifically, I congratulate Dr. Fullerton for a beautiful presentation. He has presented the data in a clear, eloquent, and precise manner.
The study confirms that inhaled NO is able to selectively vasodilate the pulmonary artery circulation without decreasing SAP. As expected, these changes in PVR resulted in a significant substantial decrease in right ventricular work. There are few data on the effects of NO after cardiac operations. Most clinical studies have been done on patients who had pulmonary hypertension or ARDS with different degrees of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. In these patients, NO improves oxygenation and decreases the hypoxic vasoconstriction. By dilating vessels next to ventilated alveoli, NO distributes blood flow away from nonventilated areas, improving systemic oxygenation. It is unclear from these what direct effect NO has on general indexes of PVR. The patient undergoing cardiac operation, in contrast, offers a unique opportunity to observe the direct effects of NO on pulmonary vasculature. These patients can be safely instrumented, and most of the variables affecting PVR, namely po2, carbon dioxide tension, and pH, can be controlled.
I have three comments and three questions. The first thing that caught my attention when I reviewed the manuscript, with which the authors graciously provided me well in advance, was that NO worked in all patients studied. From personal experience with NO in the pediatric population, I was prepared to accept that NO did not modify PVR in a significant number of patients. Are we in the presence of pulmonary hypertension with a single cause? Do these findings help identify which mechanism is causing pulmonary vasoconstriction after cardiopulmonary bypass?
Dr. Fullerton
To be honest, I do not know the answer to your question. I think that if one looks at how NO works, it requires intact intracellular mechanisms within the vascular smooth muscle. It is our working hypothesis that the vascular smooth muscle as well as the endothelium is injured in certain settings of lung injury. Perhaps in those patients the mechanism within the smooth muscle cells, specifically guanylate cyclase, is unable to respond to the administration of inhaled NO. If guanylate cyclase cannot make cGMP in response to NO, NO is ineffective. We deliberately chose a homogeneous group of patients, those undergoing coronary artery bypass. As we continue to collect data, it is my anecdotal observation that patients who have severe pulmonary hypertension from valvular disease respond much less favorably to inhaled NO. I wonder whether some of the vascular remodeling that goes on with chronic venous congestion in the left atrium, for instance, may affect these mechanisms within the smooth muscle cell, rendering such patients less responsive to NO.
Dr. Wernly
If we accept that the increase in PVR is a result of endothelium dysfunction, I wonder whether these findings will stimulate us to explore ways to better protect the endothelium during cardiopulmonary bypass.
My second question deals with lack of changes in LAP. Recent clinical studies in patients with ARDS have demonstrated a modest yet significant decrease in occluded PAP, probably as a result of changes in LAP. In contrast, your patients did not demonstrate any changes in LAP. I wonder whether the fact that the pericardium was opened in all your patients explains the lack of decrease in LAP. As you know, there is a "volume competition" in the intact patient when the right ventricle dilates in response to increases in afterload, which obviously did not take place here. Also, do you think that transesophageal echocardiography could have demonstrated changes in heart chamber dimensions in response to NO?
Dr. Fullerton
We deliberately studied patients in the operating room for just that reason, to minimize the number of confounding variables. I believe that it is an excellent suggestion to use transesophageal echocardiography to help get some other parameter to follow in terms of ventricular function. We have not employed that modality, but it is an excellent idea.
One of the reasons we believe in measuring LAP directly, rather than relying on wedge pressure, is that our data as well as data published by others have shown a dissociation of those two numbers in approximately 25% of paired measured samples. We therefore do not measure the wedge pressure; rather, for the purposes of studies like this, we have studied LAP directly.
Dr. Wernly
My third question deals with the possibility that NO may depress myocardial contractility. I found it interesting that despite the beneficial effects of NO on right ventricular work, there were no beneficial changes in CO. Do you think that this is because these patients did not have right ventricular dysfunction? Or is it perhaps because the benefits were "canceled" by a subtle negative effect on myocardial contractility?
Dr. Fullerton
I do not think that there is any way to answer that question from our data, but my gut feeling is that NO may well have a negative inotropic effect on the myocardium. I think that if you look at other studies in which pulmonary vasodilators have been administered there is typically an increase in CO as PVR falls. Consistently, however, both in patients with ARDS and now in this study in which NO was administered, CO has not changed. I therefore think that the reduction in right ventricular afterload may have been counterbalanced by the negative inotropic effect of some circulating element leaving the lungs and entering the myocardium. Unfortunately, our study was not able to address that issue.
Dr. Wernly
I thank the Association for the privilege of discussing this presentation, which I believe is a significant contribution to our understanding of pulmonary circulation.
Dr. Winfield J. Wells (Los Angeles, Calif.)
You have hinted that you have data on patients with mitral disease and elevated PAP. Have you done these same studies on that group?
Dr. Fullerton
In a relatively small number of patients, we have not found that NO has been very effective at all. There has been a very small reduction in PAP and a small reduction in PVR. My gut feeling is that it probably has something to do with the inherent differences in this remodeling of the pulmonary circulation, which is of course well understood in mitral stenosis, that prevents those particular vessels from responding to NO.
Dr. Wells
A follow-up is obviously to ask your thoughts about an experimental model that might be able to tell us why this agent is not working in this disease process.
Dr. Fullerton
As you know, we have a couple of different models of acute lung injury ongoing in our laboratory, and our emphasis has been to try to get a better handle on why cGMP may not be generated in response to stimulation by NO. That is what we are working on, and although I do not know whether that will provide any insight into this, I am hopeful.
Dr. Charles M. Rucker (Phoenix, Ariz)
I just wanted to follow up. When you mentioned that you think that perhaps there is a decrement in function of cGMP guanylate cyclase in patients with pulmonary hypertension, do you think there is any dysfunction in NO synthase itself. If you do, do you think that it is related to inducible NO or constitutive NO?
Dr. Fullerton
That is a hard question to answer. I have no personal knowledge, but judging from what others have written in the literature, I think that NO synthase is probably intact. In isolated lung preparations in which the perfusate is altered, the metabolites of NO that come out in the effluent appear to be unchanged despite infliction of a variety of forms of lung injury.
Appendix
where MSAP is mean SAP, CVP is central venous pressure, CI is cardiac index, BSA is body surface area, and HR is heart rate.
Footnotes
Read at the Twenty-first Annual Meeting of The Western Thoracic Surgical Association, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, June 21-24, 1995. 
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. A. Albert, N. Halevy, and E. M. Antman Preoperative Evaluation for Cardiac Surgery Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 261 - 280. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. P. Coggins and K. D. Bloch Nitric Oxide in the Pulmonary Vasculature Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2007; 27(9): 1877 - 1885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. D. Bloch, F. Ichinose, J. D. Roberts Jr., and W. M. Zapol Inhaled NO as a therapeutic agent Cardiovasc Res, July 15, 2007; 75(2): 339 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Fung, R. R. Fiscus, A. P. C. Yim, G. D. Angelini, and A. A. Arifi The Potential Use of Type-5 Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 3065 - 3073. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Albert and E. M. Antman Preoperative Evaluation for Cardiac Surgery Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 235 - 248. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. S. Maxey, C. D. Smith, J. A. Kern, C. G. Tribble, D. R. Jones, I. L. Kron, and I. K. Crosby Beneficial effects of inhaled nitric oxide in adult cardiac surgical patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 73(2): 529 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Bushman Essentials of Nitric Oxide for the Pediatric (Cardiac) Anesthesiologist Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2001; 5(1): 79 - 90. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Weinberger, D. L. Laskin, D. E. Heck, and J. D. Laskin The Toxicology of Inhaled Nitric Oxide Toxicol. Sci., January 1, 2001; 59(1): 5 - 16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Z. Y. Jiang, T. Costachescu, M. Derouin, and G. Blaise Treatment of pulmonary hypertension during surgery with nitric oxide and vasodilators Can J Anesth, June 1, 2000; 47(6): 552 - 555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Ceccarelli, L. M. Bigatello, D. Hess, J. Kwo, and L. Melendez Inhaled Nitric Oxide Delivery by Anesthesia Machines Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2000; 90(2): 482 - 482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. S Hayward, R. P Kelly, and P. S Macdonald Inhaled nitric oxide in cardiology practice Cardiovasc Res, August 15, 1999; 43(3): 628 - 638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. C. Body and S. K. Shernan The Utility of Nitric Oxide in the Postoperative Period Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 1998; 2(1): 4 - 30. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. P. Chen, H. B. Bittner, F. Tull, D. Craig, R. D. Davis, and P. Van Trigt NITRIC OXIDE IMPROVES PULMONARY VASCULAR IMPEDANCE, TRANSPULMONARY EFFICIENCY, AND LEFT VENTRICULAR FILLING IN CHRONIC PULMONARY HYPERTENSION J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 1997; 113(5): 849 - 857. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. Fullerton, J. Jaggers, M. M. Wollmering, F. Piedalue, F. L. Grover, and R. C. McIntyre Jr Variable Response to Inhaled Nitric Oxide After Cardiac Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1997; 63(5): 1251 - 1256. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. Fullerton, J. Jaggers, F. Piedalue, F. L. Grover, and R. C. McIntyre Jr. EFFECTIVE CONTROL OF REFRACTORY PULMONARY HYPERTENSION AFTER CARDIAC OPERATIONS J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 1997; 113(2): 363 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG |
