JTCS Click here to go to SJM website.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Joren C. Madsen
David H. Sachs
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Madsen, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Weissman, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Madsen, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Weissman, N. J.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111:1230-1239
© 1996 Mosby, Inc.


CARDIAC AND PULMONARY REPLACEMENT

CARDIAC ALLOGRAFT VASCULOPATHY IN PARTIALLY INBRED MINIATURE SWINE. I. TIME COURSE, PATHOLOGY, AND DEPENDENCE ON IMMUNE MECHANISMS

Joren C. Madsen, MD, DPhil, David H. Sachs, MD, John T. Fallon, MD, PhD*, Neil J. Weissman, MD**

From the Cardiac Surgical Unit and Transplantation Biology Research Center, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

Received for publication May 18, 1995; Accepted for publication July 26, 1995. Address for reprints: Joren C. Madsen, MD, DPhil, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114.

Abstract

To assess the role of the immune system in cardiac allograft vasculopathy in large animals, heterotopic heart transplantation was done between partially inbred miniature swine, animals in which transplantation can be done across defined major histocompatibility barriers in a reproducible fashion. Porcine hearts transplanted into untreated recipients across a class I, class II, or full major histocompatibility mismatch were acutely rejected in 6 to 8 days (n= 4). Hearts transplanted into untreated recipients across minor histocompatibility barriers survived for 21 to 44 days (n= 5) and showed no evidence of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. When recipients were treated with a 12-day course of cyclosporine, hearts transplanted across minor histocompatibility barriers survived 42, 64, and 56 days and did not develop vascular lesions. However, hearts transplanted into cyclosporine-treated recipients across a full major histocompatibility disparity survived 20, 22, and 23 days and all three developed biopsy-proven vasculopathy. In one animal, the progression of intimal proliferation was followed in vivo by intracoronary ultrasonography. The degree of intimal thickening documented by ultrasonography correlated well with the intimal proliferation found on tissue histologic samples. These results are the first to show that in large animals, an immune response stimulated by donor major histocompatibility antigens is involved in the induction of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. In addition, these studies point out the utility of a large-animal model of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in which transplantation across defined major histocompatibility barriers can be done reproducibly and in which accurate determinations of the progression or regression of coronary vascular lesions in individual animals can be accurately assessed in vivo. (J THORACCARDIOVASCSURG1996;111:1230-9)

The short-term results of heart transplantation have improved dramatically during the past 25 years with survival rates at 1 year increasing from 22% in 1969Go 1 to more than 80% in 1993.Go 2 However, the progress made in the detection, prevention, and treatment of acute rejection has been overshadowed by the poorly understood problem of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). This disease is manifested by a diffuse and accelerated form of atherosclerosis that often involves entire lengths of coronary arteries. Autopsy findings reveal that virtually all transplant recipients who survive for more than a year demonstrate intimal changes.Go 3 Indeed, in many series, CAV is the leading cause of death or graft failure after the first posttransplant year.Go 4 Nonetheless, the cause of CAV remains a mystery and at present there is no effective treatment for this disease.

Experimental studies investigating the immunologic basis of CAV have been primarily done in rodent models with the use of whole-organ or arterial allografts.Go 5 Although these studies have yielded important information, many of the results from experiments that attemped to elucidate the potential immune mediators of CAV have been conflicting. Some studies have implicated antibodies specific for donor antigens in the development of intimal proliferation in rodents,Go 6 whereas others have supported the predominance of T cell–mediated immunity directed against the hostGo 7 or activated macrophages.Go 8 Of course, it is possible that multiple forms of immunity might participate in the pathogenesis of CAV.

To investigate the immunobiologic basis of CAV in large animals, we performed heterotopic heart transplants between partially inbred miniature swine. Miniature swine bring several unique advantages to the study of CAV. Unlike those of rodents, the porcine immune and cardiovascular systems are similar to those of human beings, as is the porcine susceptibility to atherosclerosis.Go Go 9-11 Transplantation across defined major histocompatibility (MHC) barriers can be done reproducibly in these animals, making it possible to study the dependence of CAV on MHC genetics.Go 12 Also, the coronary arteries of the transplanted heart are large enough to be imaged with intracoronary ultrasonography (ICUS), making miniswine the only experimental model of CAV in which the effects of treatment can be accurately assessed in vivo.

In this article we describe and validate a large-animal, preclinical model of CAV with the use of miniature swine, which develop vascular lesions identical to those observed in clinical transplantation. Data are presented that support the hypothesis that the induction of CAV in large animals is mediated by an immune response stimulated by MHC antigen.

Material and methods

Animals
During the past 25 years, a selective breeding program has been used to develop and maintain miniature swine with defined MHC loci (termed SLA, for swine leukocyte antigens) as a large-animal model for studies of transplantation biology.Go 12 At present, swine of three homozygous MHC haplotypes, SLAa, SLAc, and SLAd, are maintained (Fig. 1). In addition, swine bearing four intra-MHC recombinant haplotypes have been derived by spontaneous recombination events during the breeding of heterozygotes as part of the breeding program (Fig. 1).Go 13 Genotyping has been controlled by strict pedigree breeding and confirmed by microcytotoxicity testing with allospecific antisera.



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Origin of available MHC haplotypes of partially inbred miniature swine.

 
All animal care and procedures were in compliance with the "Principles of Laboratory Animal Care" formulated by the National Society for Medical Research and the "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals" prepared by the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources and published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 86-23, revised 1985).

Heterotopic cardiac transplants
Transplant donors and recipients (4 to 6 months old and weighing between 15 and 40 kg) were fasted overnight, then sedated with ketamine (20 mg/kg), butorphanol (Torbugesic, 0.2 mg/kg), and xylazine (2 mg/kg) intramuscularly for scrubbing, shaving, and intubation. Anesthesia was maintained with halothane 1%, N2O 1%, and O2. The recipient was placed in the left lateral decubitus position and a Hickman catheter was placed in the left external jugular vein for long-term vascular access. A left flank incision was done and, by a retroperitoneal approach, the infrarenal aorta and inferior vena cava were isolated. Next, the donor was systemically heparinized (3 mg/kg) and the donor heart harvested after cardiac standstill was achieved with cold (4º C) cardioplegic solution (Plegisol, Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Ill.). An atrial septal defect was created in each donor heart and the mitral valve defunctionalized to minimize left ventricular atrophy and intracavitary thrombus formation.Go Go 14,15 The recipient was systemically heparinized (3 mg/kg) and the donor pulmonary artery was anastomosed end-to-side to a 1 to 2 cm venotomy in the inferior vena cava with a continuous 6-0 polypropylene suture (Prolene, Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, N.J.). Next, the ascending aorta of the donor heart was anastomosed to the recipient's abdominal aorta in a similar manner. A 2 to 4 mm cuff of aortic wall was resected around the aortotomy before construction of the anastomosis to avoid stricture formation. Neither cold ischemic times nor warm ischemic times exceeded 45 minutes. In most cases, removal of the aortic crossclamp resulted in spontaneous conversion to a normal sinus rhythm. However, in some cases internal electrical defibrillation (10 to 20 joules) was necessary. Before closure of the abdominal wall, iridium-tipped ventricular electrodes (model 6500 pacing lead, Medtronic Inc., Secaucus, N.J.) were implanted into each ventricle and brought out through the skin for long-term electrocardiographic monitoring.

Heart function was monitored by transabdominal palpation, electrocardiography (EK/5A, Burdick Corp., Milton, Wis.), and echocardiography (Sonos 1500, Hewlett-Packard, Andover, Mass.). Allograft rejection (heart survival time) was defined by one or more of the following: lack of a ventricular impulse on palpation, an R wave of less than 3 mm amplitude on electrocardiography, or lack of ventricular contraction on echocardiography. After allograft rejection, the animal was put to death and the allograft harvested for histologic examination.

On posttransplant days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 50 percutaneous biopsy samples of the transplanted heart were obtained with a spring-loaded biopsy device (Monopty, Waltham, Mass.) with ultrasonographic guidance. On posttransplant days 8 and 21, animal No. 11531 underwent ICUS to validate its applicability.

Most of the inbred miniature swine herd is seropositive for porcine cytomegalovirus (personal communication, Dr. Jay A. Fishman). Cholesterol levels in the recipients remained consistently low before and after transplantation.

Coronary hemodynamics
Blood pressure was transduced via a 25-gauge needle inserted directly into the proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD) before the first diagonal branch. Blood flow was measured with an ultrasonic flow probe (Transonics Systems, Ithaca, N.Y.) placed circumferentially around the proximal LAD.

Histopathologic examination
Heart tissue from biopsy or necropsy specimens was fixed in 10% formalin. The graft tissues were embedded in paraffin and then stained with hematoxylin and eosin or Masson's trichrome stain. An effort was made to examine a range of vessels in the transplanted heart, including epicardial and muscular arteries and arterioles. Histologic findings were scored with the use of light microscopy to determine the severity of interstitial rejection, which was based on a modification of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation system,Go 16 and the degree of arterial intimal thickening, which was based on the system described by Lurie and colleaguesGo 17 Go(Table I). The average grade of intimal thickening of all small, medium, and large arterial vessels was determined and labeled "mean average involvement."Go 18 All histologic sections were read in a blinded manner.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Pathologic grading of heart tissue from biopsy or necropsy samples
 
Immunosuppression
Cyclosporine was generously provided by Sandoz (Hanover, N.J.). Cyclosporine was administered to designated recipients intravenously beginning on the day of operation (postoperative day 0) and continuing until posttransplant day 11. Cyclosporine blood levels (fluorescence polarization immunoassay) were maintained between 500 and 1000 ng/ml by varying the cyclosporine dosage between 10 and 13 mg/kg per day. This regimen has proved effective in prolonging the survival of SLA class I kidney transplants in miniature swine.Go 19

ICUS
The right or left carotid artery was accessed via cutdown under sterile conditions. An 8F guiding catheter was inserted into the ostium of the left main coronary artery under fluoroscopic guidance. Coronary angiography was done in orthogonal views with the use of 50% Hypaque preparation. ICUS imaging was obtained with a 2.9F ultrasonography catheter (Cardiovascular Imaging Systems, Sunnyvale, Calif.) with a 30 MHz transducer rotating at 1800 RPM to produce a 360-degree tomographic image. This catheter has an axial and lateral resolution of 150 µm or less. After placement of a 0.014-inch guide wire into the LAD, the ICUS catheter was advanced over the wire under fluoroscopic guidance to a segment of the LAD previously marked with a titanium clip at the time of transplantation.

Imaging was begun as the transducer was withdrawn at 1 mm/sec with use of a motorized pullback device and terminated when the aorto-ostial junction of the LAD was reached. Use of a motorized pullback allowed proper alignment of images proximal to the titanium marker so that images from the same location within the artery could be accurately compared at different times. A motorized pullback also allowed three-dimensional reconstruction of the tomographic images by a commercially available program (INDEC System, Capitola, Calif.). All images were recorded on 1/2-inch VHS videotape for further analysis. Measurements were made from images at four discrete locations in the LAD or left main coronary artery. The following dimensions were measured at end-systole: minimal luminal diameter, luminal area, arterial area (defined as the area enclosed by the media-adventitial border), maximal intimal thickness for each quadrant, and plaque area (defined as arterial area minus luminal area). Intimal changes were classified as minimal, mild, moderate, and severe by the classification of St. Goar and associates.Go 20

Results

Cardiac allograft survival in untreated recipients
Hearts transplanted across a full MHC mismatch underwent severe, acute rejection with survival times of 7 and 8 days Go(Table II). Similarly, hearts transplanted across a single-haplotype class I disparity and a two-haplotype class II disparity were acutely rejected in 8 and 6 days, respectively. Matching for the SLA, on the other hand, led to prolonged survival (mean survival, 33.4 days), with one graft surviving 44 days. None of the SLA-matched hearts went on to long-term survival, most likely because of minor histocompatibility antigen disparities. Histologic examination of these hearts at necropsy revealed no evidence of intimal thickening (personal communication, Dr. Chris Stone). These results demonstrated that both major and minor histocompatibility antigens present strong barriers to heart transplantation in the pig and that immunosuppressive therapy would be necessary to prolong graft survival and permit the development of vascular lesions.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Effects of MHC matching on cardiac allograft survival in untreated miniswine*
 
Cardiac allograft survival and development of CAV in cyclosporine-treated recipients
Cyclosporine was chosen for immunosuppression because of its clinical relevance and because a cyclosporine dose-response relationship had already been established in miniswine for kidney transplantation.Go 19

First, three SLA-matched hearts were transplanted into recipients treated with a 12-day course of cyclosporine (10 to 13 mg/kg). Allograft rejection was only minimally delayed as compared with that in MHC-matched grafts transplanted into untreated recipients (compare GoTables II and GoIII). Histologic examination of biopsy and necropsy specimens from these cyclosporine- treated, MHC-matched hearts revealed no intimal thickening in either large or small coronary arteries Go(Table III).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III. Cardiac allograft survival and evolution of lesions in cyclosporine-treated* miniswine bearing MHC-matched or MHC-mismatched heartsHeart histologic findings
 
In contrast, when hearts were transplanted into cyclosporine-treated recipients across a full MHC mismatch, dramatic proliferation of the coronary artery intima was observed in each case even though graft survival times were shorter (20 to 23 days) Go(Table III). Early lesions exhibited proliferation of spindle cells and matrix in the intima of arteries and arterioles, which resulted in a marked thickening of this layer as compared with findings in normal hearts (Fig. 2, compare A and B). Later lesions demonstrated deposition of lipid and progressive intimal fibrosis, which in many cases occluded the lumens of both large (Fig. 2, C) and small (Fig. 2, D) arteries. The frequency with which the coronary arteries in tissue sections from cyclosporine-treated, MHC- mismatched hearts demonstrated intimal thickening was 70% to 95%.






View larger version (575K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Photomicrographs of coronary arteries. A, Normal heart stained with hematoxylin and eosin stain (original magnification x400); B, heart No. 11531 stained with hematoxylin and eosin (original magnification x400); C, heart No. 11597 stained with trichrome elastic stain (original magnification x400); D, heart No. 10598 stained with trichrome stain (original magnification x600. Arrows indicate internal elastic lamina. L, Lumen; I, intima; M, media; A, adventitia.

 
Imaging with ICUS
ICUS was done in the LAD of recipient No. 11531 on posttransplant days 8 and 21 (Fig. 3). On posttransplant day 8, no intimal thickening was observed (Fig. 3, A and C). The thickness of the intima and media was essentially at the resolution of the ultrasonographic catheter (150 µg) and therefore not visualized. However, by posttransplant day 21, repeat ICUS in a similar location revealed the development of intimal hyperplasia in more than half the circumference of the vessel wall (Fig. 3, B and D). The increase in intimal thickness measured approximately 0.5 mm, which represents a severe change according to the classification of St. Goar and associates.Go 20 After necropsy, photomicrographs were obtained of the LAD from recipient No. 11531 in the same region imaged by ICUS. A similar degree of eccentric intimal thickening was observed (Fig. 3, F). By way of comparison, Fig. 3, E, represents a section of normal LAD from a naive pig. The slight differences in the overall thickness of the intima and media in the ICUS images as compared with that in the histologic sections were probably related to differences in the location of ICUS imaging versus tissue sectioning.








View larger version (623K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. ICUS and histologic section of LAD of allograft No. 11531 at posttransplant day 8 (A) and 21 (B). Black central circle is ultrasonographic catheter surrounded by lumen. Graphic representation of ultrasonographic image is beneath actual ultrasonogram (C and D). E, Hematoxylin and eosin–stained section of normal LAD; F, section through area in region of LAD from No. 11531 that corresponded with area imaged by ICUS (original magnification x400).

 
Characteristics of coronary artery blood flow in the native and heterotopically transplanted heart
Coronary artery hemodynamics in native miniswine hearts were compared with coronary flow characteristics in heterotopically transplanted hearts. GoTable IV depicts the mean blood pressure and blood flow in the LAD of the hearts from donors No. 11043 and 11613 in the native position (before donor cardiectomy) and in the heterotopic position 5 minutes after the aortic crossclamp was removed. The results show that heart rate, mean aortic blood pressure, mean LAD blood pressure, and mean LAD flow all increased proportionately in the heterotopic heart after transplantation Go(Table IV). These hemodynamic changes were probably related to postischemic hyperemia in the vascular bed of the transplanted heart and the higher systemic blood pressure in the recipient.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table IV. Mean blood pressure and flow in LAD of pig No. 11043 and pig No. 11613 before and after transplantation
 
Discussion

This study demonstrated the feasibility and advantages of studying CAV in partially inbred miniature swine. In cyclosporine-treated miniswine, obstructive coronary lesions developed in hearts transplanted across a full MHC barrier but not in cardiac allografts matched at the MHC. The florid vascular lesions, as well as the deposition of lipid, that developed within 4 weeks of transplantation in the coronary arteries of MHC-mismatched hearts appeared indistinguishable from atherosclerotic lesions observed in long-term human cardiac grafts. Although results from rodent experiments have led to the view, now rather widely held, that immune phenomena underlie CAV, these findings are the first that indicate that MHC histoincompatibility between donor and recipient is important in the development of CAV in large animals.

The distinction between large animals (including human beings) and small animals is important because significant differences exist between the immune systems and cardiovascular systems of these two groups and in their susceptibility to atherosclerosis.Go 9 For instance, it has been demonstrated that rodents do not constitutively express MHC class II antigens on their vascular endothelium, whereas large animals and human beings do.Go Go 21,22 Given the crucial role that class II antigens play in allograft rejection,Go 23 these interspecies differences may be important in both early and late alloresponses.Go 24 In terms of atherosclerosis, there is evidence that the vigor of an atherogenic response after endothelial injury varies greatly, not only between small animal species,Go 10 but even between different strains within the same rodent species.Go 14 Moreover, rat coronary arteries have no vasa vasorum, a much thinner intimal layer, and a lower elastin content than human or porcine vessels.Go 25

Obviously, the availability of inbred and transgenic rodents, specifically mice, constitutes an important resource for genetic and "knock-out" experiments. However, the vascular lesions that develop in murine coronary arteries differ from those observed in the human being and pig with respect to the lack of lipid deposition in the intimal layer of the vessel wall.Go Go 5,18 Also, nonvascularized arterial transplants, used in some of these experiments,Go 26 elicit a different alloresponse than that generated by a vascularized organ allograft.Go Go 5,27 Finally, the interpretation of immune events that take place in rodent models of CAV has been based primarily on the histologic and morphologic findings of graft tissue samples instead of on serial in vitro testing of specific immune effector functions or on in vivo assessment of the progression of intimal thickening.

Because they are large animals, miniature swine are uniquely suited to the study of the immunobiology of CAV Go(Table V). The porcine MHC has been well-characterized, making it possible to transplant hearts across defined MHC barriers reproducibly.Go 12 In addition, various MHC mismatches can be tested with use of a single recipient strain, thus minimizing strain-specific variations in atherogenesis and immune responsiveness (Ir gene effects). Unlike that in rodents, porcine coronary endothelium constitutively expresses class II antigens, similar to this expression in human beings (J. C. M., manuscript submitted). Swine resemble human beings in their cardiovascular physiologic makeupGo 9 and in their susceptibility to nontransplant atherosclerosis.Go 11 The porcine lymphohematopoietic system allows multiple samplings so that longitudinal analyses of immune effector functions can be done in individual animals with the use of swine-specific monoclonal antibodies and cytokine probes. Similarly, the porcine heart is large enough to allow repeated biopies, orthotopic transplantation, and serial imaging with ICUS. Miniature swine provide the only experimental model of CAV in which the effects of treatment can be accurately assessed in vivo.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table V. Comparison of rodent and pig models of CAV
 
The difference in arterial obstructive lesions between MHC-matched and MHC-mismatched grafts in our model supports the hypothesis that a persistent, low-grade immunologic injury to coronary artery walls induces the coronary endothelium to respond with a similar inflammatory-fibroproliferative reaction to that observed in nontransplant atherosclerosis. In addition, the observation that both MHC-matched and MHC-mismatched hearts underwent interstitial rejection suggests that although the immune mechanisms responsible for initiating CAV were MHC driven, they may well have been different from the mechanisms that stimulated interstitial rejection. The observation of the former lesion clinically in association with chronic graft loss and that of the latter with acute graft loss further suggests that the afferent mechanisms that mediate acute and chronic rejection may differ. Of note, the possibility that porcine cytomegalovirus contributed to the development of vascular lesions in these studies has not been ruled out and awaits the determination of donor and recipient porcine cytomegalovirus status for each transplant.

Miniature swine will allow us to dissect further the effects of MHC class I versus class II antigen disparities on the induction of CAV and to study the effects of therapy in vivo. Preliminary data in this large-animal system suggest that, unlike conditions in some rodent models,Go 28 MHC class I antigen disparities play an important role in the development of vascular lesions (J. C. M., manuscript submitted). We plan to evaluate whether induction of tolerance to donor class I antigensGo 19 can prevent cardiac allograft vasculopathy in this model.

We wish to thank Drs. Paul S. Russell, Robert B. Colvin, and Tomasz Sablinski for their critical review of this manuscript.

Footnotes

*Current address: Division of Pathology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Cardiovascular Institute, New York, N.Y. Back

**Current address: Division of Cardiology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, D.C. Back

References

  1. Jamieson SW, Oyer PE, Baldwin JC, Billingham ME, Stinson EB, Shumway NE. Heart transplantation for end-stage ischemic heart disease: the Stanford experience. Heart Transplant 1984;3:224-7.
  2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 1994 report of center specific graft and patient survival rates. 1st ed. Bethesda, Maryland: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1995.
  3. Uys CJ, Rose AG. Pathologic findings in long-term cardiac transplants. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1984;108:112-6.[Medline]
  4. Billingham ME. Graft coronary disease: the lesions and the patients. Transplant Proc 1989;21:3665-6.[Medline]
  5. Colvin RB, Chase CM, Winn HJ, Russell PS. Chronic allograft arteriopathy: insights from experimental models. Transplant Sci. In press.
  6. Russell PS, Chase CM, Winn HJ, Colvin RB. Coronary atherosclerosis in transplanted mouse hearts: II—importance of humoral immunity. J Immunol 1994;152:5135-41.[Abstract]
  7. Libby P, Tanaka H. The pathogenesis of coronary arteriosclerosis ("chronic rejection") in transplanted hearts. Clin Transplant 1994;8:313-8.[Medline]
  8. Karnovsky MJ, Russell ME, Hancock WW, Sayegh MH, Adams DH. Chronic rejection in experimental cardiac transplantation in a rat model. Clin Transplant 1994;8:308-12.[Medline]
  9. Kirkman RL. Of swine and men: organ physiology in different species. In: Hardy MA, ed. Xenograft 25. 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1989:125-39.
  10. Muller D, Ellis S, Topol E. Experimental models of coronary restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19:418-32.[Abstract]
  11. Fuster V, Badimon L, Badimon JJ, Ip JH, Chesebro JH. The porcine model for the understanding of thrombogenesis and atherogenesis. Mayo Clin Proc 1991;66:818-31.[Medline]
  12. Sachs DH, Leight G, Cone J, Schwartz S, Stuart L, Rosenberg S. Transplantation in miniature swine: I—fixation of the major histocompatibility complex. Transplantation 1976;22:559-67.[Medline]
  13. Pennington LR, Lunney JK, Sachs DH. Transplantation in miniature swine: VIII—recombination within the major histocompatibility complex of miniature swine. Transplantation 1981;31:66-75.[Medline]
  14. Paigen B, Morrow A, Brandon C, Mitchell D, Holmes P. Variations in susceptibility to atherosclerosis among inbred strains of mice. Atherosclerosis 1985;57:65-73.[Medline]
  15. Steinbrüchel DA, Nielsen B, Salomon S, Kemp E. A new model for heterotopic heart transplantation in rodents: graft atrial septectomy. Transplant Proc 1994;26:1298-9.[Medline]
  16. Billingham ME. Cardiac transplantation arteriosclerosis. Transplant Proc 1987;19:19-25.[Medline]
  17. Lurie KG, Billingham ME, Jamieson SW, Harrison DC, Reitz BA. Pathogenesis and prevention of graft arteriosclerosis in an experimental heart transplant model. Transplantation 1981;31:41-7.[Medline]
  18. Russell PS, Chase CM, Winn HJ, Colvin RB. Coronary atherosclerosis in transplanted mouse hearts: I—time course and immunogenetic and immunopathological considerations. Am J Pathol 1994;144:260-74.[Abstract]
  19. Rosengard BR, Ojikutu CA, Guzzetta PC, et al. Induction of specific tolerance to class I disparate renal allografts in miniature swine with cyclosporine. Transplantation 1992;54:490-7.[Medline]
  20. St. Goar FG, Pinto FJ, Alderman EL, et al. Intracoronary ultrasound in cardiac transplant recipients: in vivo evidence of "angiographically silent" intimal thickening. Circulation 1992;85:979-87.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Pescovitz MD, Sach DH, Lunney JK, Hsu SM. Localization of class II MHC antigen on porcine renal vascular endothelium. Transplantation 1984;37:627-30.[Medline]
  22. Daar AS, Fuggle SV, Fabre JW, Ting A, Morris PJ. The detailed distribution of MHC class II antigens in normal human organs. Transplantation 1984;38:293-8.[Medline]
  23. Pescovitz MD, Thistlethwiate JR Jr, Auchincloss H Jr, et al. Effect of class II antigen matching on renal allograft survival in miniature swine. J Exp Med 1984;160:1495-508.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Fabre JW. Rat kidney allograft model: was it all too good to be true. Transplantation 1982;34:223-4.[Medline]
  25. Sims FH. A comparison of the structural features of the walls of coronary arteries from ten different species. Pathology 1989;21:115-24.[Medline]
  26. Shi C, Russell ME, Bianchi C, Newell JB, Haber E. Murine model of acclerated transplant arteriosclerosis. Circ Res 1994;75:199-207.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Warren RP, Lofgreen JS, Steinmuller D. Factors responsible for the differential survival of heart and skin allografts in inbred rats. Transplantation 1973;16:458-65.[Medline]
  28. Clarke Forbes RD, Zheng S, Gomersall M, Al-Saffar M, Guttmann RD. Evidence that recipient CD8+ T cell depletion does not alter development of chronic vascular rejection in a rat heart allograft model. Transplantation 1994;57:1238-46.[Medline]
  29. Stone CD, Rosengard BR, Hennein E, Mendeloff E, Sachs DH, Clark RE. Heterotopic heart transplantation in partially inbred miniature swine: the influence of MHC matching on rejection of cardiac allografts. Surg Forum 1990;41:417-23.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. L. Schwarze, S. L. Houser, A. Muniappan, J. S. Allan, M. T. Menard, I. McMorrow, M. E. Maloney, and J. C. Madsen
Effects of Mycophenolate Mofetil on Cardiac Allograft Survival and Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy in Miniature Swine
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2005; 80(5): 1787 - 1793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
D. R. Johnston, A. Muniappan, R. Hoerbelt, D. A. Guenther, T. Shoji, S. L. Houser, D. H. Sachs, and J. C. Madsen
Heart and en-bloc thymus transplantation in miniature swine
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2005; 130(2): 554 - 559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
E. D. Poggio, M. Clemente, J. Riley, M. Roddy, N. S. Greenspan, C. Dejelo, N. Najafian, M. H. Sayegh, D. E. Hricik, and P. S. Heeger
Alloreactivity in Renal Transplant Recipients with and without Chronic Allograft Nephropathy
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2004; 15(7): 1952 - 1960.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. S. Lee, K. Yamada, S. L. Houser, K. L. Womer, M. E. Maloney, H. S. Rose, M. H. Sayegh, and J. C. Madsen
Indirect recognition of allopeptides promotes the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy
PNAS, March 13, 2001; 98(6): 3276 - 3281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. L. Schwarze, M. T. Menard, Y. Fuchimoto, C. A. Huang, S. Houser, K. Mawulawde, K. S. Allison, D. H. Sachs, and J. C. Madsen
Mixed hematopoietic chimerism induces long-term tolerance to cardiac allografts in miniature swine
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2000; 70(1): 131 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
K. Yamada, K. Mawulawde, M. T. Menard, A. Shimizu, H. T. Aretz, J. K. Choo, K. S. Allison, J. K. Slisz, D. H. Sachs, and J. C. Madsen
MECHANISMS OF TOLERANCE INDUCTION AND PREVENTION OF CARDIAC ALLOGRAFT VASCULOPATHY IN MINIATURE SWINE: THE EFFECT OF AUGMENTATION OF DONOR ANTIGEN LOAD
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2000; 119(4): 709 - 719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
L. P Perrault, J.-P. Bidouard, P. Janiak, N. Villeneuve, P. Bruneval, J.-P. Vilaine, and P. M Vanhoutte
Impairment of G-protein-mediated signal transduction in the porcine coronary endothelium during rejection after heart transplantation
Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 1999; 43(2): 457 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. S. Allan, J. K. Choo, L. Vesga, J. S. Arn, M. R. Pins, D. H. Sachs, and J. C. Madsen
Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Is Abrogated by Anti-CD8 Monoclonal Antibody Therapy
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1997; 64(4): 1019 - 1025.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Joren C. Madsen
David H. Sachs
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Madsen, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Weissman, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Madsen, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Weissman, N. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS