|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111:1289-1290
© 1996 Mosby, Inc.
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR |
Hôpital Marie-Lannelongue
Paris, France
Reply to the Editor:
We thank Otero-Coto for his interest in our article,
1 for his comments, and for drawing attention to his own work on hearts with {S,D,L} segmental anatomy.
2-5 Otero-Coto's publications deal with anatomically corrected malposition {S,D,L} (ACM), double-outlet right ventricle {S,D,L} (DORV), transposition of the great arteries {S,D,L} (TGA), and double-outlet left ventricle {S,D,L} (DOLV). He hypothesizes that despite the different possible types of ventriculoarterial alignments (ACM, DORV, TGA, or DOLV), hearts with {S,D,L} segmental anatomy nonetheless constitute a syndrome or spectrum of anomalies that may have a similar morphogenesis.
2-5
Otero-Coto chides us by saying that TGA {S,D,L} is "not so newly recognized" a complex as we said it was. His reaction in this respect is understandable, because he well remembers his own work on this subject.
2-5
However, we think that Otero-Coto may not have fully understood what we meant. We said: "The transposition of the great arteries {S,D,L} complex is delineated for the first time from the anatomic, diagnostic, and surgical standpoints in this study of 26 cases: 16 surgical and 10 postmortem."
1 We did not mean to suggest that TGA {S,D,L} had never been published previously. Indeed, one of us (R.VP.) reported three postmortem cases of TGA {S,D,L} in 1968
6 and six additional autopsy cases in 1977.
7 In our 1995 paper,
1 we did not refer to our own previous reports of TGA {S,D,L},
6,7 or to those of Otero-Coto
2-5 or others,
8 because our paper
1 was not intended to be a literature review.
Instead, one of the main purposes of our recent publication
1 was to demonstrate that TGA {S,D,L} is statistically significantly different from the more common TGA {S,D,D} in at least six different respects. This study
1 was the first time, to our knowledge, that TGA {S,D,L} was shown by statistical analysis to be a transposition complex that is significantly different from the more common form of TGA {S,D,D}.
Six anatomic features that were found to be significantly more frequent in TGA {S,D,L} than in TGA {S,D,D} were as follows:
1 (1) ventricular septal defect, in 96% versus 15% to 31% (p < 0.01); (2) conal septal malalignment in 80%, versus 21% (p < 0.01); (3) right ventricular hypoplasia in 50%, versus 0 (p < 0.01); (4) pulmonary outflow tract stenosis in 27%, versus 10% (p < 0.01); (5) ventricular malposition such as superoinferior ventricles and crisscross atrioventricular relations in 23%, versus 0% (p < 0.01); and (6) absent left coronary ostium resulting in "single" right coronary artery in 23%, versus 5% (p < 0.02).
This is the first study,
1 to our knowledge, in which a quantitative mathematical method has been used to delineate what the TGA {S,D,L} complex really is.
Nonetheless, our findings and conclusions (summarized above) should be regarded as approximations. Further experience will continue to clarify the various anatomic features of the TGA {S,D,L} complex. Again, we thank Otero-Coto for his commentary.
References
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |