HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brown, R. P. Articles by Lawson, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Brown, R. P. Articles by Lawson, C.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:137-141
© 1996 Mosby, Inc.

GENERAL THORACIC SURGERY

IMPROVED STERNAL FIXATION IN THE TRANSSTERNAL BILATERAL THORACOTOMY INCISION

From the National Heart and Lung Replacement Service/Baker Institute, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Received for publication May 24, 1995 Accepted for publication August 30, 1995. Address for reprints: Robin P. Brown, FRCS, 4 Fraser St., Middle Park, Victoria, 3206, Australia.

Abstract

The success of bilateral sequential single-lung transplantation has led to the rebirth of the transsternal bilateral thoracotomy incision. Despite the multiple advantages of this incision over a median sternotomy for this operation, one distinct disadvantage is the high prevalence of sternal disruption at the transverse sternotomy site, which is traditionally closed with sternal wires. This disruption rate is between 20% and 40% in most institutions and can lead to significant pain and deformity in addition to slowing the postoperative recovery and increasing the risk of sternal infection. To overcome this problem we have designed and manufactured a device that provides a sound method of fixating the sternum. The device is composed of two plates, one anterior and one posterior to the sternum, that are fixed to each other and to the sternum by means of screws into internally threaded posts positioned in predrilled holes through the bone on either side of the sternotomy. All components of the device are made from titanium and a range of post lengths are available to accommodate variability in sternal thickness. The structure of the device is demonstrated. The device has now been inserted into a total of 20 patients after bilateral lung transplantation and the preliminary results suggest this is a superior technique for closure of a transverse sternotomy and support continued and routine use. (J THORACCARDIOVASCSURG1996;112:137-41)

Since the initial description of bilateral sequential single-lung transplantation in 1990, ¹ this procedure has been rapidly establishing itself as the procedure of choice for end-stage septic lung disease and for end-stage emphysematous disease in a select group of patients.

The description of this procedure has led to the rebirth of the transsternal bilateral thoracotomy (or thoracosternotomy) incision, an incision once popular in cardiac operations before being abandoned for the simpler and less painful median sternotomy. This incision involves a bilateral submammary skin incision that is followed by transverse division of the pectoralis major muscles to allow access to the fourth intercostal spaces anteriorly. The intercostal muscles are then divided along with ligation and division of both internal thoracic artery pedicles. The pleura is then incised bilaterally, and to complete this incision the only remaining requirement is division of the sternum transversely at this level. The main advantage of this incision, also known as the clam-shell incision, is that it gives superb exposure to all aspects of both pleural cavities. This allows easy and safe division of adhesions, easy control of bleeding, and exposure to both lung hila. In addition, it allows rapid access to the heart if cardiopulmonary bypass is necessary. As familiarity with the incision increases, its use is expanding into other areas of cardiothoracic surgery particularly for bilateral pulmonary pathologic conditions.

One major disadvantage of this incision that is becoming prominent as the number of procedures increases is the high disruption rate at the transverse sternotomy site. This is traditionally closed with two or three sternal wires. The prevalence of this complication was 36% at our institution before introduction of our sternal fixation device and ranges from 20% to 60% at institutions worldwide. This disruption leads to increased and prolonged sternal pain in the initial postoperative period and increases the risk of sternal infection. In the long term it can lead to chronic pain and significant deformity (Fig. 1). To prevent this complication we have designed and constructed a sternal fixation device. The device in situ is demonstrated in Fig. 2. The method associated with its design and provisional results are provided in this article.

View larger version (92K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Lateral chest radiograph demonstrating sternal disruption at transverse sternotomy site. Note anterior displacement of inferior sternal part and fractured sternal wires.

View larger version (113K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Lateral chest radiograph demonstrating sternal fixation with device.

The underlying problem that needs to be overcome in this group of patients is the anterior displacement of the inferior sternal part at the transverse sternotomy site (Fig. 1). This is demonstrated clearly in all cases of sternal disruption after the procedure. The reason for this anterior displacement is unclear, but it may be a manifestation of the now-unopposed action of the rectus abdominus muscles in combination with postoperative alteration to breathing mechanics. In our experience these forces are considerable, and the sternal junction at the sternotomy site offers little resistance to displacement because of the small contact surface area.

Obstacles one must overcome when designing a device to fixate the sternum at this level include the anatomic structure of the sternum with its two thin outer cortices and the space limitations at this site. Device thickness is restricted anteriorly by scant overlying muscle and subcutaneous tissue and posteriorly by the proximity of the mediastinum: device protrusion may cause skin erosion or mediastinal damage.

The relative fragility of the sternum does not provide much strength for fixation by conventional devices. The device we believe to be the ideal structure to fixate the sternum at this level consists of a two-plate system, one plate for each side of the sternum, in which the plates are fixed to each other by means of two posts (Fig. 3). This provides its own inherent strength and eliminates the inadequacy of the sternum itself. The strength of the plate material is such that only thin plates are required. The posts are fixed to the posterior plate to form a solitary unit, and this combined with countersinking of the screws that fix the anterior plate to the posts overcomes space restrictions in this area while also avoiding any prominence. The posts are sunk into the sternum via drilled holes a predetermined distance from the sternotomy edge. This provides a large mass of bone to resist displacing forces. An in situ illustration of the device both anteriorly and in cross section is shown in Fig. 4.

View larger version (87K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Sternal fixation device.

View larger version (29K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Device in situ viewed from anterior aspect of sternum and in cross section.

The major factors that prevent bone disruption are therefore the diameter of the post and the distance between the post hole and transverse sternotomy, with a greater emphasis on the latter on the superior sternal part. Both these factors will be inversely proportional to the likelihood of disruption of the sternum. The most vulnerable aspect of the sternum is that which exists between the superior sternal post and the transverse sternotomy edge.

The dimensions of the device that we believe to be the most appropriate to prevent sternal disruption while complying with space restrictions are shown in Fig. 5.

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5. Ideal device dimensions.

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 6. Template required for determination of sternal thickness and selection of sternal hole sites.

Results

To date a total of 20 sternal fixation devices have been inserted at the primary procedure of bilateral sequential single-lung transplantation with use of the transsternal bilateral thoracotomy incision. There have been no sternal disruptions or significant sternal mobility in either the immediate or long-term postoperative period with follow-up now as much as 12 months. There was a minor degree of mobility detected early in one patient, which resolved with no additional intervention. There have been no sternal infections. These results compare favorably with those in the 11 transplant procedures done before the introduction of the device, among which there were four sternal disruptions (36%) and one sternal infection.

An area of concern with the use of such a device is the ease at which it can be removed at a later date if required. One patient required a median sternotomy at 10 months after transplant because of an unrelated problem and at operation it was found that the sternum was well healed and the device was able to be removed before sternotomy.

Discussion

Bilateral sequential single-lung transplantation is the most rapidly growing transplant procedure. The prevention of disruption at the transverse sternotomy site of the transverse thoracosternotomy incision will lead to significantly decreased morbidity in both the early and late postoperative periods. We believe we now have a device that significantly decreases the prevalence of sternal disruption and this is borne out by our preliminary results. We have now done 20 insertions with no complications, compared with a predevice disruption rate of 36%. The follow-up period is now as great as 12 months. We advocate the routine use of this device in the closure of any transverse sternotomy. Further applications may develop with continued use of the device, and its use in fixation of sternal fractures is being investigated.

References

1. Pasque MK, Cooper JD, Kaiser LR, et al. Improved technique for bilateral lung transplantation: rationale and clinical experience. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;49:785-79.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
2. Gianncoli DC. Physics for scientists and engineers with modern physics. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1984.
   
3. Esmore DS, Brown RP, Buckland MB, et al. Techniques and results in bilateral sequential single lung transplantation. J Card Surg 1994;9:1-14.[Medline]
   

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. L. Gandy and M. J. Moulton Sternal Plating to Prevent Malunion of Transverse Sternotomy in Lung Transplantation Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2008; 86(4): 1384 - 1385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Oto, R. Venkatachalam, Y. S. Morsi, S. Marasco, A. Pick, M. Rabinov, and F. Rosenfeldt A reinforced sternal wiring technique for transverse thoracosternotomy closure in bilateral lung transplantation: From biomechanical test to clinical application J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2007; 134(1): 218 - 224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Durrleman and G. Massard Clamshell and hemiclamshell incisions MMCTS, January 1, 2006; 2006(0810): mmcts.2006.001867 - mmcts.2006.001867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. C. McGiffin, J. E. Alonso, G. L. Zorn Jr, J. K. Kirklin, K. R. Young Jr, K. M. Wille, K. Leon, and K. Hart Sternal Approximation for Bilateral Anterolateral Transsternal Thoracotomy for Lung Transplantation Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 79(2): e19 - e20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Venuta, E. A. Rendina, T. De Giacomo, A. M. Ciccone, M. Moretti, E. Mercadante, M. Anile, and G. F. Coloni Bilateral sequential lung transplantation without sternal division Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, June 1, 2003; 23(6): 894 - 897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Varela, C. G. Montero, E. Castedo, J. Roda, P. Gamez, L. Madrigal, and J. Ugarte Transcutaneous extracorporeal cannulation for bilateral lung transplantation without splitting the sternum J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2000; 119(2): 402 - 403. [Full Text]

				P. Macchiarini, F. Le Roy Ladurie, J. Cerrina, E. Fadel, A. Chapelier, and P. Dartevelle Clamshell or sternotomy for double lung or heart-lung transplantation? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, March 1, 1999; 15(3): 333 - 339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. F. Meyers, R. S. Sundaresan, T. Guthrie, J. D. Cooper, and G. A. Patterson BILATERAL SEQUENTIAL LUNG TRANSPLANTATION WITHOUT STERNAL DIVISION ELIMINATES POSTTRANSPLANTATION STERNAL COMPLICATIONS J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 1999; 117(2): 358 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brown, R. P. Articles by Lawson, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Brown, R. P. Articles by Lawson, C.