|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:531-536
© 1996 Mosby, Inc.
CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS, |
Received for publication July 13, 1995 Revisions requested Sept. 13, 1995; revisions received Dec. 29, 1995 Accepted for publication Jan. 15, 1996. Address for reprints: Samuel Sclarovsky, MD, Department of Cardiology, Beilinson Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel 49100.
Abstract
Reports have shown increased systemic levels of endothelins during coronary artery bypass grafting in human beings. It was not known whether increased endothelin levels during coronary artery bypass grafting reflect a general systemic response to the surgical procedure or increased myocardial production of endothelins in response to ischemia and reperfusion. We therefore measured endothelin levels in the right atrium and proximal aorta of 15 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting for anginal syndrome immediately before aortic crossclamping and again after cessation of cardiopulmonary bypass. In five patients, we also measured coronary sinus levels of endothelins during cardiopulmonary bypass circulation. We found that endothelin levels were elevated throughout the surgical procedure. Right atrial endothelin levels were significantly elevated after cessation of cardiopulmonary bypass circulation with respect to values immediately before aortic crossclamping (11.1 ± 3.1 vs 14.2 ± 3.7 pg/ml, p = 0.008), whereas endothelin levels in the proximal aorta did not rise significantly (10.5 ± 2.3 vs 11.6 ± 2.4 pg/ml, p > 0.5). Coronary sinus endothelin levels tended to decline temporarily during cardiopulmonary bypass circulation (11.1 ± 2.1 pg/ml before aortic crossclamping, 7.9 ± 1.9 1 minute after release of aortic crossclamp, and 9.9 ± 2.1 pg/ml after release of partial aortic crossclamping, p = 0.06). We conclude that the rise in right atrial endothelin levels during coronary artery bypass grafting reflects systemic production and secretion of endothelins, probably by vasculature or organs distal to the proximal aorta, and is not the result of increased myocardial production and secretion of endothelins. (J THORACCARDIOVASCSURG1996;112:531-6)
The endothelin family, known for its potent vasoconstrictive activity,
1 consists of three structurally and pharmacologically distinct 21amino acid isopeptides, ET-1, ET-2, and ET-3, each produced by a different gene.
2 Although endothelins were thought to be produced solely by endothelial cells, they have been shown to be produced by other cell types,
3-8 including cardiac myocytes.
9 ET-1 is the most abundant and biologically active of the endothelin isopeptides in the human heart.
10
During acute myocardial infarction, circulating endothelin levels consistently are increased, especially when the clinical course is complicated by heart failure. In contrast, during other forms of myocardial ischemia, such as stable and unstable angina, circulating endothelin levels remain unaltered in most clinical studies.
11 In contrast to the relatively consistent results attained in human beings, endothelin levels in various animal models of myocardial ischemia and infarction have been reported to be increased, decreased or unchanged.
11
Reports have shown increased systemic (arterial) levels of immunoreactive endothelins during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in human beings.
12-15 Anesthesia and surgical procedures may themselves elevate plasma levels of endothelins,
16,17 so increased endothelin levels during CABG in human beings may reflect a general systemic response to the surgical procedure or myocardial production of endothelins in response to ischemia and reperfusion.
18,19 This study was undertaken (1) to characterize the kinetics of circulating endothelin levels during CABG and (2) to determine the contribution of the heart to changes in circulating endothelin levels during CABG in human beings.
Methods
Patients
The study population consisted of 15 patients undergoing CABG at Beilinson Medical Center on an elective basis for angina pectoris. Patients with chronic renal failure (serum creatinine >1.4 mg/dl), hepatic cirrhosis, scleroderma, pulmonary hypertension, uncontrolled hypertension, recent myocardial infarction, or severe congestive heart failure (ejection fraction <0.35 or New York Heart Association functional class III or IV) were excluded because these conditions have themselves been found to be associated with elevated plasma levels of endothelins.
20-26 Patients were informed of the surgical procedure by the attending physician, after which they signed informed consent to undergo operation.
Surgical protocol
Each patient was anesthetized with intravenous injections of midazolam (0.05 mg/kg body weight) and fentanyl (30 to 50 µg/kg body weight). Muscular relaxation was obtained with pancuronium bromide (0.2 mg/kg body weight). Patients were mechanically ventilated (Narcomed 2B, N.A.D., Inc., Telford, Pa.) with adjustments in parameters to maintain normocapnia on frequent arterial blood gas measurements. The radial artery and internal jugular vein were cannulated for blood pressure and central venous pressure monitoring, respectively. Heart rate was monitored by surface electrocardiography. The mediastinum was exposed by a median sternotomy. Intravenous heparin (3 mg/kg body weight) was administered before cannulas were inserted for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), with repeated injections as necessary to maintain activated clotting time at longer than 400 seconds. Hypothermic (28º C) nonpulsatile CPB was established through a cannula in the ascending aorta and a cannula in the right atrium (two-stage cannula) for venous return. A disposable membrane oxygenator (Polystan, Copenhagen, Denmark) with polyvinyl chloride tubing was used with a roller pump. The extracorpeal circuit consisted of Hartman's solution, and the hematocrit value was maintained at 25% ± 1% during CPB. A small amount of pulmonary perfusion persisted and was returned to the heart-lung machine through aortic root aspiration. Grafting was performed during a single period of aortic occlusion with cold (4º C) cardioplegic solution injected retrogradely into the coronary arteries through the aortic root and the coronary sinus. In group A (the first 10 patients), the cardioplegic solution consisted of Plasma-Lyte solution and 100 mg lidocaine, 40 mg papaverine, 12 mEq potassium, and 500 mg methylprednisolone. In group B (five later patients), blood cardioplegia was used. Induction blood cardioplegic solution (consisting of 400 mg lidocaine, 80 mg papaverine, 60 mEq potassium, 500 mg methylprednisolone [Solu-Medrol] 2.5 gm glucose, 5 gm magnesium ion, and 15 mEq sodium bicarbonate in 1000 ml saline solution) was given antegradely (aortic root) and retrogradely (coronary sinus) simultaneously. The rate of induction of blood cardioplegia (blood/crystalloid dilution factor of 4:1) was 200 to 250 ml/min, with a coronary sinus pressure limit of 40 mm Hg. Every 20 to 30 minutes thereafter, cardioplegia (400 mg lidocaine, 80 mg papaverine, 12 mEq potassium, 2.5 gm glucose, 5 gm magnesium ion and 15 mEq sodium bicarbonate) was given retrogradely. In both groups (A and B), the cardioplegic solution partially perfused the lungs and was collected outside the extracorpeal circuit.
Blood samples
For all patients (groups A and B), arterial and mixed venous blood samples were drawn from indwelling cannulas in the ascending aorta (proximal to the connection of CPB circuit to aorta) and the right atrium, respectively. For patients in group B, blood samples were also drawn from a cannula in the coronary sinus. The stages at which blood samples were drawn for each group are depicted in
Table I. A 5 ml sample of blood was placed in a precooled tube containing ethylene diamine tetraacetate and 100 KIU aprotonin (Trasylol, Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany). All tubes were immersed in ice and later centrifuged at 3000 g for 15 minutes at 4º C. The supernatant from each tube was then stored in a vial at minus 70º C for subsequent biochemical analysis.
|
Statistics
Results are presented as mean (± standard deviation). The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare endothelin levels. All tests were two-tailed, and p values no greater than 0.05 were considered significant.
Results
The study population consisted of 15 patients, nine men and six women, ranging in age from 46 to 72 years (mean ± standard deviation 62.6 ± 7.6 years). Demographic and clinical characteristics for each patient are presented in
Table II, as are data concerning the surgical procedure. Endothelin levels were elevated throughout the surgical procedure with respect to normal values. As is apparent in Fig. 1, right atrial endothelin levels were significantly higher immediately after cessation of CPB versus values before aortic crossclamping (n = 15, 11.1 ± 3.1 vs 14.2 ± 3.7 pg/ml, p = 0.008). This trend was seen in both groups (for group A [n = 10], 11.5 ± 2.1 vs 14.7 ± 4.2 pg/ml, p = 0.03; for group B [n = 5], 10.4 ± 4.7 vs 13.2 ± 2.7 pg/ml, p = 0.13). Endothelin levels in the proximal aorta, however, were not significantly higher immediately after cessation of CPB (group A [n = 10] 11.5 ± 2 vs 11.9 ± 2.2 pg/ml, p > 0.5; group B [n = 5] 8.6 ± 1.5 vs 10.9 ± 2.8 pg/ml, p = 0.34; combined [n = 15] 10.5 ± 2.3 vs 11.6 ± 2.4 pg/ml, p > 0.5). In addition, whereas right atrial endothelin levels were similar to proximal aortic endothelin levels before aortic crossclamping (n = 15, 10.5 ± 2.3 vs 11.1 ± 3.1 pg/ml, p > 0.5), they were significantly higher after cessation of CPB (n = 15, 11.6 ± 2.4 vs 14.2 ± 3.7 pg/ml, p = 0.04), indicating increased secretion and production of endothelins in vasculature or organs distal to the proximal aorta. In the five patients belonging to group B, coronary sinus levels of endothelins obtained during CPB tended to decline temporarily with ensuing recovery (11.1 ± 2.1 pg/ml before aortic crossclamping 7.9 ± 1.9 1 minute after release of aortic crossclamping, and 9.9 ± 2.1 pg/ml after release of partial aortic crossclamping, p = 0.06; Fig. 2). At the same times, endothelin levels in the proximal aorta tended to rise immediately after release of aortic crossclamping and then returned to precrossclamp values (8.6 ± 1.5, 12.5 ± 3.5, and, 10.2 ± 2.4 pg/ml, respectively, p = 0.06).
|
|
|
Previous studies of ET levels during CABG
Previous studies have reported increased arterial endothelin levels in the course of CABG in human beings.
12-15 Although Hynynen and coworkers
15 proposed that elevated endothelin levels during CABG reflect surgical stress and catecholamine release, Knothe and colleagues
13 found that arterial endothelin levels did not correlate with systemic hemodynamic or endocrinologic parameters (including catecholamine levels). None of the studies examined whether the heart contributed to the elevation in circulating plasma endothelin levels. To this end, we measured arterial, mixed venous, and coronary sinus endothelin levels during CABG in human beings. Moreover, to avoid any effects of hemodynamic instability on endothelin levels, we enrolled only patients with stable hemodynamic status before and during the surgical procedure (as reflected by monitored heart rate, blood pressure, urine output, and blood gas values).
Main finding of study
The main finding of this study was that circulating endothelin levels increase in the course of CABG. Right atrial endothelin levels were significantly elevated after cessation of CPB, compared with values immediately before aortic crossclamping. Endothelin levels in the proximal aorta did not rise significantly. Coronary sinus levels of endothelins measured in five patients also did not rise during CPB; rather, they tended to decline temporarily. We therefore conclude that the rises in right atrial endothelin levels reflect systemic production and secretion of endothelins, most probably by vasculature or organs distal to the proximal aorta, and is not the result of increased myocardial production and secretion of endothelins. The trend toward transient increases in proximal aortic endothelin levels immediately after release of aortic crossclamping most probably reflects washout of blood that partially perfused the lungs and accumulated in the heart during cardioplegia.
Our data demonstrate marked fluctuations in endothelin levels during CABG. Indeed, the disparities among different studies to date regarding the effect of myocardial ischemia and reperfusion on circulating endothelin levels
11 may be partially explained by temporal differences in drawing of blood samples and differences in the source of the blood samples (arterial, venous, coronary sinus). We chose to obtain baseline endothelin levels for all patients immediately before aortic crossclamping (rather than before operation) to preclude possible effects on circulating endothelin levels of anesthesia, mechanical ventilation, and vascular injury during venous and arterial manipulation. Indeed, it is known that anesthesia and the surgical procedure themselves increase plasma endothelin levels.
16,17 Similarly, we examined endothelin levels in all patients again immediately after cessation of CPB because previous studies showed that arterial endothelin levels are highest at this stage.
12,13 As shown recently by Wang and coworkers
27 and previously shown by others,
11 endothelin levels rise only during the reperfusion period after experimental myocardial ischemia. For patients in group B, we therefore also measured coronary sinus levels of ET in two stages of CPB, representing different stages of the reperfusion period.
Systemic versus local ET levels
Endothelins may be secreted into systemic circulation or abluminally to the interstitium. Indeed, it is claimed that abluminal secretion of endothelins is predominant, and that the major effect of endothelins is exerted at the paracrine level.
11,28 For example, Wang and coworkers
27 reported a slight increase in coronary venous endothelin levels during the reperfusion period in pigs subjected to 45 minutes of coronary artery ligation. This rise was minute, however, compared with the dramatic rise in tissue content of endothelins in the ischemic myocardium. In contrast, Hiramatsu and associates
29 recently showed that coronary sinus levels of endothelins are not altered during experimental CPB in lambs. In our study we measured only coronary sinus endothelin levels and not tissue levels, so we cannot determine unequivocally the effects of myocardial ischemia and reperfusion during CABG on myocardial endothelin levels. Our finding that coronary sinus endothelin levels are not elevated in the course of CABG (rather, they tend to decline temporarily), however, indicates that even if there is increased myocardial endothelin production and secretion, this does not affect systemic endothelin levels.
Implications regarding CABG
The clinical significance of elevated endothelin levels during CABG has yet to be determined. Although endothelins were thought to be merely a marker for stress (acute phase reactant),
12,20 it is now reasonable to assume that they play an important role during CABG in light of the multitude of effects that they exert on the cardiovascular system.
11 In the acute phase, endothelins may affect recovery from cardioplegic ischemia
29 by attenuating microvascular flow in the reperfused bed.
30 Because they are potent vasoconstrictors,
1 they may also be at least partially responsible for the phenomenon of acute hypertension in the immediate postoperative period after CABG.
31 Indeed, Boldt and colleagues
14 recently showed that administration of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors to patients undergoing heart operations reduces mean arterial pressure significantly during operation; this reduction occurs concomitantly with an attenuation of a rise in plasma endothelin levels. Moreover, the vasoconstrictive properties of endothelins may account for spasm of arterial grafts, thus compromising both acute blood flow and subsequent patency.
32 In the long run, the effects of endothelins as potent promotors of vascular smooth muscle proliferation
33-35 and intimal hyperplasia after vascular injury
36 may contribute to the process of venous and arterial graft stenosis. As mentioned previously the local effects of endothelins may be of greater importance than their systemic effects. Myocardial production and secretion of endothelins during CABG thus might also have profound acute and long-term effects. With the recent introduction of novel therapeutic strategies designed to attenuate endothelin levels or activity (for example, endothelin-receptor antagonists
37), it might be possible to prevent some of these short- and long-term complications.
Although this study was not designed to compare cardioplegic protocols, our data suggests that both cardioplegic protocols are associated with similar circulating endothelin levels and with the same fluctuation trends in endothelin levels. Because of the small number of patients in each group, however, further research is warranted to compare endothelin levels with different cardioplegic protocols.
Conclusion
This study shows that systemic endothelin levels are elevated during CABG and suggests that these changes reflect increased systemic, rather than myocardial, production and secretion of endothelins. Moreover, although myocardial endothelin levels may rise during CABG as a result of increased myocardial production and secretion, these changes are confined to the heart and may not have an effect on systemic endothelin levels.
Footnotes
From the Departments of Cardiologya and Cardiothoracic Surgery,b the Pediatric Endocrinology Laboratory,c and the Epidemiology Unit,d Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, and Beilinson Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel. ![]()
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
U. Lockowandt and A. Franco-Cereceda Is there a role for endothelin-blockade early after coronary artery bypass grafting? Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2002; 74(3): 727 - 732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Lockowandt, S. Bjessmo, T. Ivert, and A. Franco-Cereceda Plasma levels and vascular effects of endothelin and big endothelin in patients with stable and unstable angina pectoris undergoing coronary bypass grafting Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 21(2): 218 - 223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Hennein Inflammation After Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Therapy for the Postpump Syndrome Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2001; 5(3): 236 - 255. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Walker, S. C. Baicu, A. T. Goldberg, C. E. Widener, D. J. Fary, D. K. Almany, A. Ergul, F. A. Crawford Jr, and F. G. Spinale Temporal endothelin dynamics of the myocardial interstitium and systemic circulation in cardiopulmonary bypass J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2000; 120(5): 864 - 871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. T. Goldberg, B. R. Bond, R. Mukherjee, R. B. New, J. L. Zellner, F. A. Crawford Jr, and F. G. Spinale Endothelin receptor pathway in human left ventricular myocytes: relation to contractility Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2000; 69(3): 711 - 715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Sadaba, K. Mathew, C. M. Munsch, and D. J. Beech Vasorelaxant properties of nicorandil on human radial artery Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2000; 17(3): 319 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |