|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;113:425
© 1997 Mosby, Inc.
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR |
Chief, Division of Cardiac Surgery
Hospital de Niños
Buenos Aires, Argentina
To the Editor:
I was pleased to read the recently published article by Lacour-Gayet and associates
1 regarding truncus arteriosus. The implications of different technical approaches used for right ventricularpulmonary artery outflow reconstructions on the immediate, midterm, and long-term results are widely known. In this study, the authors used different types of conduits and a direct anastomosis to establish right ventricularpulmonary artery continuity. In five patients, a fresh autologous pericardial valved conduit was used, manufactured according to the description published by my colleague Schlichter and me.
2-4 It is not surprising to us that 100% of survivors in whom this technique was used did not require conduit replacement in more than 6 years of follow-up. In our experience
4, 5 in more than 50 patients followed up for 1 to 10.4 years (median 5 years), the conduit implant's freedom from reoperation was 90% at 5 years and 100% for those that measured more than 16 mm at the time of implantation. It is hard to believe that the 40% immediate mortality in two of five patients treated by this technique was purely related to the pericardial valved conduit and to severe pulmonary regurgitation. Both patients who died had interrupted aortic arch, one of whom was 2 days of age at the time of repair, and young age under 30 days is recognized by the authors as a risk factor. In addition, the diagnosis of severe pulmonary regurgitation in the reported two patients is surprising, because we have not registered any case of moderate or severe postoperative pulmonary regurgitation during the immediate postoperative period. Furthermore, no considerations are made with respect to possible technical problems during tailoring of the conduit. To achieve success, the constructor must be extremely careful and follow all the steps precisely, as they were described.
2,3
We continue to believe that the autologous pericardial valved conduit is an effective, cheap, and highly successful option for the Rastelli repair or even the Ross procedure when no previous pericardial adhesions are present. We concur with the authors' observation on the advantageous capability of the autologous pericardial valved conduit to grow with time.
12/8/77398
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C A C Pedra, J Haddad, S F Pedra, A Peirone, C B Pilla, and J A Marin-Neto Paediatric and congenital heart disease in South America: an overview Heart, September 1, 2009; 95(17): 1385 - 1392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Schlichter, C. Kreutzer, R. d. C. Mayorquim, J. L. Simon, M. I. Roman, H. Vazquez, E. A. Kreutzer, G. O. Kreutzer, and S. R. A. Jonas Five- to fifteen-year follow-up of fresh autologous pericardial valved conduits J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2000; 119(5): 869 - 879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |