JTCS Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reves, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Amory, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reves, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Amory, D. W.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;113:1118
© 1997 Mosby, Inc.


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Improvement of outcomes after coronary artery bypass

J. G. Reves, MD, W. D. White, MPH, D. W. Amory, MD, PhD

Department of Anesthesiology
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, NC 27710

To the Editor:

We wish to draw attention to serious problems in the reports by Gold and associatesGo Go 1,2 regarding the effects of cerebral perfusion pressure on neurologic outcome after cardiac operations. Our first concern is that the original study has inadequate power to discern a difference in stroke outcome resulting from an intervention, inasmuch as there were only 248 patients in the study. This small sample size is combined with a stroke rate of 7.2% in the "control" group. This is an unexpectedly high rate, inconsistent with the generally expected rate of about 3% to 5% or the recently reported rate of 0.8% in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI),Go 3 which was conducted in 18 centers in North America with perfusion pressures similar to those used in Gold's control group. The combination of a small sample size and an abnormally high event rate raises serious questions about the general applicability of Gold's results and almost certainly leads to the creation of a type I statistical error (i.e., finding an effect when one did not exist). With a stroke rate liberally assigned at approximately 5%, it would take an estimated 2000-patient study to detect a 50% reduction,Go Go 4,5 a difference less than purported to have been found in the 248-patient study of Gold and associates.

Also of serious statistical concern is the issue of multiple comparisons. Although Gold identified the five major outcomes in advance, there is no license to test each one at the overall unadjusted alpha of 0.05, especially considering that the outcomes are clearly strongly related and not mutually exclusive. Even without any adjustment, none of the five major outcomes showed a significant difference between the mean arterial pressure groups. Most disturbing is that selected endpoints were combined in post hoc analysis to create another outcome for comparison (mortality + cardiac morbidity + neurologic morbidity). This combination, which ignored the variables that were similar between groups, requires a penalty for multiple comparisons that would place the observed difference inside the cutoff for significance.

A final mechanistic issue relating to the presumed effect of mean arterial pressure on cerebral perfusion is the authors' apparent ignorance of the rather large amount of literature regarding autoregulation of cerebral circulation during cardiac surgery, a subject recently reviewed by Schell and coworkers.Go 6 There is abundant information from many clinical studies that show clearly that cerebral perfusion pressure has little effect on cerebral blood flow in the range of pressures used in the study by Gold and coworkers.Go 1 Contrary to the comments of Gold,Go 2 this has been shown during hypothermic, nonpulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass. Similar findings have been shown in the more elderly patient population as well.Go 7

We believe the report of Gold and coworkers that higher perfusion pressure during cardiopulmonary bypass improves outcome should be considered at best as a preliminary, incomplete scientific study and the conclusion in defiance of current knowledge concerning cerebral physiology during cardiopulmonary bypass.

12/8/79443

References

  1. Gold JP, Charlson ME, Williams-Russo P, Szatrowski TP, Peterson JC, Pirraglia PA, et al. Improvement of outcomes after coronary artery bypass: a randomized trial comparing intraoperative high versus low mean arterial pressure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:1302-14.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Gold JP. Reply to the Editor. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:205-6.[Free Full Text]
  3. Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 1996:335:217-25.
  4. Casagrande JT, Pike MC. An improved approximate formula for calculating samples sizes for comparing two binomial distributions. Biometrics 1978;34:483-6.[Medline]
  5. Elashoff JD. nQuery Advisor Users Guide. Los Angeles: Dixon Associates Publishers, 1995.
  6. Schell RM, Kern FH, Greeley WJ, Schulman SR, Frasco PE, Croughwell ND, et al. Cerebral blood flow and metabolism during cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth Analg 1993;76:849-65.[Free Full Text]
  7. Newman MF, Croughwell ND, Blumenthal JA, White WD, Lewis JB, Smith LR, et at. Effect of aging on cerebral autoregulation during cardiopulmonary bypass: association with postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Circulation 1994;90(Suppl):II243-9.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. E. Hill, G. K. van Wermeskerken, J.-W. H. Lardenoye, B. Phillips-Bute, P. K. Smith, J. G. Reves, and M. F. Newman
Intraoperative physiologic variables and outcome in cardiac surgery: part I. In-hospital mortality
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2000; 69(4): 1070 - 1075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. K. van Wermeskerken, J.-W. H. Lardenoye, S. E. Hill, H. P. Grocott, B. Phillips-Bute, P. K. Smith, J. G. Reves, and M. F. Newman
Intraoperative physiologic variables and outcome in cardiac surgery: part II. Neurologic outcome
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2000; 69(4): 1077 - 1083.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reves, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Amory, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reves, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Amory, D. W.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS