JTCS Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Boughner, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Boughner, D.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;114:513
© 1997 Mosby, Inc.


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Concentration of glutaraldehyde in fixation of bioprosthetic values

Anthony C. Duncan , PhDa,b, Derek Boughner , MD, PhDa,c,d

John P. Robarts Research Institutea
Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineeringb
Department of Medical Biophysicsc
University of Western Ontario
Division of Cardiologyd
Department of Medicine
London Health Sciences Center
University Campus
London, Ontario, Canada

Reply to the Editor:

I would like to respond to the issues addressed to me by Dr. Chanda concerning extent of glutaraldehyde fixation and calcification of bioprosthetic tissue. Our hydrothermal isometric temperature or denaturation temperature data indicate that dynamic fixation stabilized porcine aortic heart valve tissue within 3 hours 15 minutes and 24 hours when the tissue was fixed at room temperature in 0.5% and 0.05% glutaraldehyde, respectively. Previous authors have suggested that at concentrations from 0.625% down to 0.025%, glutaraldehyde cross-linking is a rapid and the degree of cross-linking reaches a plateau within 24 hours, consistent with our study.Go Go 1–4 In contrast, Chachques and associatesGo 5 suggested that adequate fixation of pericardium could be achieved with a brief 10-minute immersion in standard glutaraldehyde solution (0.625%). Complete saturation remains elusive. Schoen, Tsao, and LevyGo 2 have shown that only 70% of the reactive sites of collagen react. This is due to limitations in the accessibility of the reactive sites and also resistance to diffusion of the glutaraldehyde reagent, a problem likely caused by glutaraldehyde polymer film formation (e.g., steric hinderance factors).Go Go 6, 7 We believe some of these limitations may be overcome by means of our dynamic fixation technique. The gradual depletion of glutaraldehyde in the preservative solution during long periods (exceeding 4 to 8 weeks) is less likely caused by completion of saturation than by rapid incorporation of glutaraldehyde monomers recruited during polymer formation. Polymer growth (i.e., alpha- or beta-unsaturated aldehyde polymers) can be catalyzed by amino acids (e.g., lysine, hydroxylysine), the rate of growth increasing rapidly with time and exponentially with temperature and pH.Go Go 3,8 Thus the observation, by Chanda and associates, that shorter periods of time are required to achieve complete saturation at higher temperatures (i.e., more than 8 weeks at 4° or 10°C and less than 4 weeks at 37° C) is consistent with the hypothesis of glutaraldehyde consumption by polymer formation. The fact that glutaraldehyde incorporation finally reaches a limit in their study (i.e., after more than 8 weeks at 0.25%) may be associated with simple limitations in the extent of glutaraldehyde polymer growth.

With respect to glutaraldehyde-mediated calcification, although the mechanism is yet unclear, ample evidence indicates a direct relationship between the extent of tissue calcification and the amounts of glutaraldehyde used or incorporated during tissue fixation,Go Go Go Go 1,2,9,10 along with the duration of tissue exposure to the glutaraldehyde solution.Go 11

Thus the use of a technique (e.g., dynamic fixation) that can both reduce glutaraldehyde levels and concomitantly achieve similar or more effective cross-linking can only be beneficial in potentially limiting the adverse side effects of glutaraldehyde used, such as calcification or cytotoxicity (not discussed here). We recognize, however, that further calcification studies are required to fully confirm this hypothesis.

We do not exclude the possible advantage of combining such a technique (i.e., dynamic fixation) with anticalcification treatments to optimally reduce the risks of longterm calcification of bioprosthetic tissue.

12/8/83228

References

  1. Schoen FJ, Tsao JW, Levy RJ. Calcification of bovine pericardium used in cardiac valve prostheses: implications for the mechanisms of bioprosthetic tissue mineralization. Am J Pathol 1986;123:134-45.
  2. Golomb G, Schoen FJ, Smith MS, Linden J, Dixon M, Levy RJ. The role of glutaraldehyde-induced cross-links in calcification of bovine pericardium used in cardiac valve bioprostheses. Am J Pathol 1987;127:122-30.
  3. Woodroof EA. The chemistry and biology of aldehyde treated heart valve xenografts. In: Ionescu MI, editor. Tissue heart valves. Toronto: Butterworths. 1979. p. 347-62.
  4. Chachra D, Gratzer PF, Pereira CA, Lee JM. Effect of applied uniaxial stress on rate and mechanical effects of cross-linking in tissue-derived biomaterials. Biomaterials 1996;12:1865-75.
  5. Chachques JC, Vasseur B, Perier P, Balansa J, Chauvaud S, Carpentier A. A rapid method to stabilize biological materials for cardiovascular surgery. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1988;529:184-6.
  6. Cheung DT, Nimni ME. Mechanism of crosslinking of proteins by glutaraldehyde. II. Reaction with monomeric and polymeric collagen. Connect Tissue Res 1982;10:201-16.
  7. Cheung DT, Perelman N, Ko EC, Nimni ME. Mechanism of crosslinking of proteins by glutaraldehyde. III. Reaction with collagen tissues. Connect Tissue Res 1985;13:109-15.
  8. Rasmussen KE, Albrechtsen J. Glutaraldehyde, the influence of pH, temperature, and buffering on the polymerization rate. Histochemistry 1974;38:21-6.
  9. Jayakrisan A, Jameela SR. Review: glutaraldehyde as a fixative in bioprostheses and drug delivery matrices. Biomaterials 1996;17:471-84.
  10. Schoen FJ, Kujovic JL, Levy RJ, Sutton M. Bioprosthetic heart valve pathology: clinical pathological features of valve failure and pathobiology of calcification. Cardiovasc Clin 1988;18:289-318.
  11. Liao KL, Frater W, LaPietra A, Ciuffo G, Ilardi CF, Seifter E. Time-dependent effect of glutaraldehyde on the tendency to calcify of both autografts and xenografts: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 1994. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:S343-7.




This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Boughner, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Boughner, D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS