HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Harris, K. M. Articles by Dávila-Román, V. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Harris, K. M. Articles by Dávila-Román, V. G.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;114:619-626
© 1997 Mosby, Inc.

SURGERY FOR ACQUIRED HEART DISEASE

TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC AND CLINICAL FEATURES OF AORTIC INTRAMURAL HEMATOMA

Supported in part by a Minority Scientist Development Award from the American Heart Association, Dallas, Texas, to Dr. Dávila-Román.

Received for publication Oct. 31, 1996 revisions requested May 12, 1997; revisions received June 5, 1997 accepted for publication June 9, 1997. Address for reprints: Kevin M. Harris, MD, Cardiovascular Division, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Ave., Box 8086, St. Louis, MO 63110.

Abstract

Objective: This study sought to determine the transesophageal echocardiographic features and natural history of patients with aortic intramural hematoma. Methods: The transesophageal echocardiograms of all patients who had symptoms indicative of aortic dissection over 6 years were reviewed. Measurements were made of the involved aortic segment in the study patients, and follow-up was obtained. Results: In patients with aortic intramural hematoma, the wall thickness of the involved segment was significantly greater for descending segments than ascending segments (ascending aorta 7 ± 2 mm, descending aorta 15 ± 6 mm, p = 0.0016). In each case, the crescent-shaped intramural hematoma involved one wall predominantly, leading to compression of the aortic lumen. The findings of echolucent areas and displaced intimal calcium were found in the majority of patients. Four of eight patients with intramural hematoma of the ascending aorta were treated medically and four were treated surgically. The 30-day mortality was 50% in the medically treated patients and 0% in the surgically treated group. Four of 11 patients with isolated intramural hematoma of the descending aorta were treated medically and seven were treated surgically. All medically treated and 86% of surgically treated patients were alive at 30 days. Conclusions: Aortic intramural hematoma has distinct and identifiable transesophageal echocardiographic features. These data support those of previous studies documenting high morbidity and mortality in patients with aortic intramural hematoma.

Aortic dissection is a life-threatening disorder associated with a high mortality. The recognition of classic aortic dissection by imaging techniques requires the identification of the intimal flap that results from blood dissecting between the intimal and medial layers of the aortic wall. ¹ Noninvasive imaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) have recently been used to identify a variant of classic aortic dissection, aortic intramural hematoma (IMH). ^2-5 Aortic IMH was first described in 1920 by Krukenberg ⁶ and is characterized by the presence of thrombosis between the intimal and medial vessel layers, giving the aortic wall an appearance of focal thickening. Patients with aortic IMH have symptoms similar to those associated with classic aortic dissection, but the characteristic intimal flap is not visible by imaging techniques. Studies to date have suggested that aortic IMH carries morbidity and mortality rates that are similar to those of classic aortic dissection. ^2-5 Thus early recognition and treatment of patients with aortic IMH is important to optimize outcomes.

TEE allows for rapid, accurate bedside evaluation of patients with classic aortic dissection, ^7-10 and it has been suggested that it would be equally useful in the identification of patients with aortic IMH. Thus the purpose of this study was to define the echocardiographic features of aortic IMH and characterize the natural history of patients with this disorder.

Methods

Patient population.
The studies of all patients undergoing TEE for aortic dissection at Barnes-Jewish Hospital at Washington University Medical Center in St. Louis over a 6-year interval (from January 1990 to January 1996) were reviewed retrospectively. A total of 84 patients had aortic dissection; 65 had classic aortic dissection and 19 had aortic IMH. A region of focal wall thickening with a thrombus-like consistency and no intimal flap identified aortic IMH. ⁵ Patients were included in the study if the diagnosis was suspected on the basis of TEE and subsequently confirmed at the time of the operation, by CT, by MRI, or by clinical course (1 patient). Patients with hematoma resulting from trauma were excluded. In four patients IMH involved the ascending aorta alone, in 11 the descending aorta alone, and in four the hematoma involved both the ascending and the descending aorta. One patient with IMH has been previously reported (N Engl J Med 1997;336:1875).

For comparison, the TEEs from 10 consecutive age-matched patients who underwent the study for indications other than suspected thoracic aortic disease were reviewed. Each patient had extensive study of the aorta. The indications for the study included evaluation for suspected endocarditis in four, valvular disease in four, cardiac source of embolus in one, and evaluation of left ventricular function in one patient.

Clinical criteria.
Clinical data including coronary risk factors, symptoms, cardiovascular findings on physical examination, information gathered with other imaging modalities, intraoperative reports, and/or surgical pathology findings were obtained by review of medical records and interview with the cardiac surgeon. Follow-up data were obtained by telephone after hospital discharge.

TEE.
TEE was performed by use of commercially available monoplane, biplane, or multiplane transesophageal transducers (Hewlett-Packard, Andover, Mass., and Acuson Computed Sonography, Mountain View, Calif.). Excellent two-dimensional images of the thoracic aorta (ascending and descending aorta), the left and right ventricles, the pericardium, and the cardiac valves and color-flow Doppler imaging to evaluate for aortic regurgitation were available in every case.

Analysis of TEE images.
Images of a total of 23 aortic segments (8 ascending and 15 descending aorta segments) containing an aortic IMH were analyzed. Measurements were made by use of an off-line image analysis system (Nova Microsonics, Indianapolis, Ind.). Aortic IMH was identified as localized thickening of the aortic wall that had a thrombus-like appearance and was measured in a short-axis projection at the site of maximal involvement, as shown in Fig. 1. In the short-axis view, measurements were made of the involved and the uninvolved portion because aortic IMH involves only a portion of the aortic circumference. A normalized wall thickness ratio was derived by comparing involved and uninvolved segments of aorta. Compression of the normal circular aortic lumen by the IMH results in two aortic diameters defined as the major axis (largest) and minor axis (smallest), respectively, and these were measured from trailing edge to leading edge (Fig. 1). An aortic lumen major/minor axis ratio was derived from these measurements.

View larger version (70K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Short-axis TEE view of descending aorta at site of measurements. Left, TEE from patient with IMH. Right, Normal aorta. Aortic lumen measurements are indicated in major-axis diameter (a) and minor-axis diameter (b). Aortic wall thickness is indicated by c.

View larger version (418K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. TEE features of patients with IMH. a, IMH of descending aorta. There is marked focal wall thickening (1.4 cm), and wall thickness ratio is 4.7. b and c, Eccentric IMH causes crescent-shaped deformity of aortic lumen. Aortic lumen major/minor axis ratio is 1.6 in b. Note echolucent areas within the hematoma and displaced intimal calcium in b and c. d, Atherosclerotic plaque associated with an ulcer and IMH.

Statistical analysis.
Measurements were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Differences between study and control patients were evaluated with the use of the unpaired t test or Fisher's exact test when appropriate.

Results

Patient characteristics.
The study population consisted of 12 women and seven men with a mean age of 70.9 ± 10.0 years. All patients had symptoms consistent with aortic dissection, including chest pain in seven, back pain in seven, chest and back pain in four, and a sense of impending doom in one. The symptoms had been present for less than 24 hours in 11 patients, for 1 to 7 days in six patients, and for more than 7 days in two patients. Sixteen patients had a history of hypertension or were hypertensive on admission, nine had a smoking history, six had known coronary disease, and five had known hypercholesterolemia. No patient had a blood pressure discrepancy greater than 10 mm Hg between the two arms. On the admission chest x-ray film, 12 patients had a widened mediastinum or dilated thoracic aorta and five of 11 patients with isolated descending aortic IMH had a left pleural effusion.

Echocardiographic characteristics.
The TEE findings in patients with aortic IMH are listed in Table I. The wall thickness of descending segments containing IMH was significantly greater than that of ascending segments with IMH (15 ± 6 mm vs 7 ± 2 mm, p = 0.0016). Inasmuch as the IMH involves primarily one wall, the mean wall thickness ratio was 4.5 ± 1.6. The wall thickening led to compression of the normal circular lumen; thus the aortic lumen major/minor axis ratio was 1.3 ± 0.2.

The age-matched control patients had a mean age of 70.4 ± 7 years. The mean wall thickness in the control patients measured 3 ± 1 mm in the ascending aorta and 4 ± 2 mm in the descending aorta; thus the corresponding IMH segments were significantly thicker (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, respectively). The aortic lumen of patients with IMH was greater than that found in control patients (ascending aorta 32 ± 4 mm, p = 0.01; descending aorta 23 ± 3 mm, p = 0.002). Control patients had a wall thickness ratio of 1.1 ± 0.4 and an aortic lumen major/minor axis ratio of 1.1 ± 0.1, which differed from that of the patients with IMH (p < 0.0001, p = 0.001). No control patient was noted to have echolucent areas or displaced intimal calcium (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001). Atherosclerotic plaques were noted in 33% of ascending segments and in 70% of descending segments in the control patients.

Six of eight patients (75%) with IMH of the ascending aorta had large pericardial effusions and/or cardiac tamponade, and seven of eight patients (88%) had moderate or severe aortic insufficiency. Mediastinal hematoma suggestive of aortic rupture was noted in three of 11 patients with isolated IMH of the descending aorta.

Cardiovascular imaging and/or surgical findings.
Imaging of the thoracic aorta with CT (11 patients) and/or MRI (7 patients) confirmed the presence of aortic IMH in all patients. Representative TEE and MRI findings in two patients with aortic IMH can be seen in Figs. 3 and 4. Aortography was performed in eight patients, but the diagnosis of aortic IMH was suspected with this technique in only three (38%), whereas the other five aortograms showed no abnormalities. Thus aortography has a low yield in this condition.

View larger version (61K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Corresponding MRI (sagittal view) (left) and TEE (longitudinal view) (right) features in a patient with involvement of the ascending aorta with IMH. Involvement of the anterior wall of the ascending aorta is noted by arrows. AA, Ascending aorta; RPA, right pulmonary artery.

View larger version (88K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4. MRI (left) and TEE (right) images of a patient with involvement of both the ascending and descending aorta. Upper right TEE image shows focal thickening of ascending aorta. Lower right images show crescent-shaped IMH (which is thicker than ascending segment) compressing the aortic lumen.

Clinical course.
Eight patients had IMH of the ascending aorta; four were treated medically and four underwent surgery (Table II). The 30-day mortality for the four patients treated medically was 50%. One of the patients treated medically died of unrelated causes 1 year later; the other is alive at 1 year of follow-up. All four patients who underwent surgery were alive at 30 days with a mean follow-up of 16 ± 14 months. All four patients with involvement of the ascending and descending aorta also had arch involvement; two were treated medically and two underwent surgical replacement of the ascending aorta to the level of the arch.

Discussion

Aortic IMH can be identified by TEE with a high degree of accuracy. Echocardiographic indicators of IMH include focal aortic wall thickening, an eccentric aortic lumen, displaced intimal calcium, and areas of echolucency within the aortic wall. Our results support those of previous studies that show that aortic IMH results in high mortality in patients treated medically. ^2-5

Echocardiographic criteria.
The echocardiographic features of IMH were first described by Mohr-Kahaly and associates. ² They found that in three patients with ascending aortic IMH and in 12 with descending aortic IMH, a wall thickness of greater than 0.7 cm that extended longitudinally from 3 to 20 cm was indicative of hematoma. ² The present study, to our knowledge the largest echocardiographic series to date, shows that descending aortic segments were markedly thicker than ascending segments. Thus, whereas IMH of the descending aorta is easily recognized as marked thickening of an eccentric segment, ascending aortic IMH may be characterized by lesser degrees of thickening. We found echolucent areas in 83% of our patients with aortic IMH and in none of our control patients. Atherosclerotic plaques were noted in 42% of our patients with ascending aortic IMH and in all patients with descending aortic IMH. These findings are similar to the findings of the earlier series, in which echolucent areas were seen in 67% of patients and atherosclerotic plaques were noted in 73% of the patients. ²

Our data add further descriptive findings that may be useful in the diagnosis of aortic IMH. We noted that the crescent-shaped IMH narrows the aortic lumen to a significant degree, leading to an increased aortic lumen major/minor axis ratio. We also found that the intimal calcium was displaced medially in 87% of our patients having a hematoma. Although no single echocardiographic finding is an absolute indicator of aortic IMH, the presence of multiple features is highly suggestive of the diagnosis.

Differentiation from other conditions.
The echocardiographic characteristics of classic aortic dissection, such as intimal flap and entry point, are widely recognized. However, the diagnosis of aortic IMH may be difficult at times, inasmuch as this entity resembles other pathologic entities involving the aorta, such as atherosclerotic disease and aneurysmal dilatation with intraluminal thrombi. The distinction between severe aortic atherosclerosis and aortic IMH may be difficult. ² Distinguishing aortic IMH from the other pathologic conditions depends on identification of the intima, which is often calcified and therefore has a bright echodense appearance. Thickening beneath the intima is suggestive of IMH; thickening above the intima represents a different pathologic condition, such as occurs with thrombus within the aorta (Fig. 5).

View larger version (144K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5. Transverse TEE image of an intraluminal thrombus within an aneurysm in the descending thoracic aorta. In contrast to intramural hematoma (Figs. 1 to 4), note that the thrombus (arrowheads) lies superior to the intimal calcium (arrows).

Pathogenesis.
The pathogenesis of classic aortic dissection and more recently of IMH has been the subject of considerable debate. Most studies defining the pathologic characteristics of aortic dissection have noted that in 5% to 13% of patients the entry point of blood into the dissection cannot be visualized. ¹⁷, ^17a However, others contend intimal tears can be found on close inspection. ¹⁸ IMH has traditionally been considered to be a form of dissection without an entry point, although, as in classic dissection, close surgical inspection of patients with aortic IMH has been shown to reveal entry points. ¹⁹ The incidence of aortic IMH in our study (23%) and other aortic IMH series ^2,5 is similar to the incidence in patients in earlier series of classic dissection in which an entry point could not be identified. ¹⁷, ^17a The four patients in our series with ascending aortic IMH who underwent surgery had no apparent entry point on surgical inspection, which lends support to the hypothesis that rupture of the vasa vasorum may cause ascending aortic IMH.

All of our patients with descending aortic IMH also had severe aortic atherosclerosis; in those undergoing surgical treatment, associated atherosclerotic ulcerated plaques were identified. ^20-22 Although the role of atherosclerosis in classic aortic dissection is controversial, ^17,23 our data add support to findings of previous studies suggesting that atherosclerotic plaque rupture and/or penetrating ulcers may be associated with descending aortic IMH. ²

Clinical features and natural history
Risk factors.
Our patients had risk factors for aortic IMH similar to those described by others, including old age and a history of hypertension. ^1,2 The prevalence of atherosclerosis in older patients may predispose them to formation of penetrating ulcers and localized hematoma instead of classic aortic dissection. Roberts ²³ has suggested that patients with atherosclerosis have limited dissection or an absence of longitudinal extension that leads to limitation of the extent of the dissection. The preponderance of women in our series is contrary to what has been reported in studies of patients with classic aortic dissection.

Ascending aorta.
The complication rate and mortality in ascending aortic IMH are high, ^17a,24-27 and thus surgical intervention has been recommended. However, these recommendations are based on small numbers of patients. ^2-5,24-27 Including our eight patients, a total of 49 patients with ascending aortic IMH have been described to date. ^2-5,24,25,27 Twenty-six (53%) of these patients have been treated surgically and 23 medically. A strategy of initial medical management often leads to urgent surgical treatment. ^2,27 When patient data from these studies are pooled, survival of the medically treated patients is 43%. ^2-5,24,25

Inasmuch as the ascending aorta is enveloped by pericardium, extravasation of blood through the adventitia likely leads to the high incidence of effusions seen in our series (75%) and is similar to that in other series. ^2,4 Because of the high morbidity and mortality associated with medical treatment, patients with ascending aortic IMH should undergo emergency surgical repair.

Descending aorta.
Among the 11 patients with isolated IMH of the descending aorta, three (27%) underwent surgical repair for rupture, two for expansion and continued pain, and two for persistent pain. The fact that the hemorrhage lies immediately adjacent to a thin layer of adventitia may help to explain the propensity to rupture. Four of our patients were treated medically and all have done well with an average follow-up of 24 months. As with classic descending aortic dissection, aggressive medical management (hypertension and pain control) and follow-up imaging is necessary. Of 53 patients with descending aortic IMH in our series and other series, 33 have received medical treatment and 20 underwent surgery with similar survival on follow-up (91% and 80%, respectively). ^2-5,24

Limitations of the study.
This is a retrospective study and as such suffers from the inherent limitations of such studies, including evaluation bias and lack of standardized evaluation and treatment.

Conclusions

The use of noninvasive imaging techniques such as CT, MRI, and TEE has improved the accuracy of the diagnosis of classic aortic dissection, whose hallmark is the identification of an intimal flap. A variant of classic aortic dissection, aortic IMH has specific TEE features that differentiate it from other abnormalities of the thoracic aorta. These criteria can be applied prospectively to identify patients with this condition and to define the clinical features associated with it. Our results confirm those of previous studies that show a high mortality for this condition and support recommendations for rapid diagnosis and treatment, similar to that for classic aortic dissection.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the contributions of Michael Rosenbloom, MD, Beth Engeszer (editorial assistance), and Linda Gallo (secretarial assistance).

Footnotes

From the Cardiovascular Division^a and the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology,^b Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Mo.

References

1. Nienaber CA, von Kodolitsch Y, Nicolas V, Siglow V, Piepho A, Brockhoff C, et al. The diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection by noninvasive imaging procedures. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1-9. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
2. Mohr-Kahaly S, Erbel R, Kearney P, Puth M, Meyer J. Aortic intramural hemorrhage visualized by transesophageal echocardiography: findings and prognostic implications. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23:658-64. [Abstract]
   
3. Robbins RC, McManus RP, Mitchell RS, Latter DR, Moon MR, Olinger GN, et al. Management of patients with intramural hematoma of the thoracic aorta. Circulation 1993;88:1-10.
   
4. Yamada T, Tada S, Harada J. Aortic dissection without intimal rupture: diagnosis with MR imaging and CT. Radiology 1988;168:347-52. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
5. Nienaber CA, von Kodolitsh Y, Peterson B, Loose R, Helmchen A, Spielmann RP. Intramural hemorrhage of the aorta: diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Circulation 1995;92:1465-72. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
6. Krukenberg E. Beitrage zur Frage des Aneurysma dissecans. Beitr Pathol Anat Allg Pathol 1920;67:329-51.
   
7. Cigarroa JE, Isselbacher EM, DeSanctis RW, Eagle KA. Diagnostic imaging in the evaluation of suspected aortic dissection. N Engl J Med 1993;328:35-43. [Free Full Text]
   
8. Erbel R, Borner N, Steller D, Brunier J, Thelen M, Pfeiffer C, et al. Detection of aortic dissection by transesophageal echocardiography. Br Heart J 1987;58:45-51. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
   
9. Erbel R, Daniel W, Visser C, Engberding R, Roelandt J, Rennollet H, et al. Echocardiography in diagnosis of aortic dissection. Lancet 1989;1:457-60. [Medline]
   
10. Khandheria BK. Aortic dissection: the last frontier. Circulation 1993;87:1765-8. [Free Full Text]
    
11. Karalis DG, Chandrasekaran K, Victor MF, Ross JJ, Mintz GS. Recognition and embolic potential of intraaortic atherosclerotic debris. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;17:73-8. [Abstract]
    
12. Katz ES, Tunick PA, Rusinek H, Ribakove G, Spencer FC, Kronzon I. Protruding aortic atheromas predict stroke in elderly patients undergoing cardiopulmonary by-pass: experience with intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:70-7. [Abstract]
    
13. Dávila-Román VG, Barzilai B, Wareing TH, Murphy SF, Schechtman KB, Kouchoukos NT. Atherosclerosis of the ascending aorta: prevalence and role as an independent predictor of cerebrovascular events in cardiac patients. Stroke 1994;25:2010-6. [Abstract]
    
14. Dávila-Román VG, Barzilai B, Wareing TH, Murphy SF, Kouchoukos NT. Intraoperative ultrasonographic evaluation of the ascending aorta in 100 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Circulation 1991;84(Suppl):III47-53.
    
15. Kazerooni EA, Bree RL, Williams DM. Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers of the descending thoracic aorta: evaluation with CT and distinction from aortic dissection. Radiology 1992;183:759-66. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
16. Yucel EK, Steinberg FL, Egglin TK, Geller SC, Waltman AC, Athanasoulis CA. Penetrating aortic ulcers: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 1990;177:779-81. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
    
17. Gore I. Pathogenesis of dissecting aneurysm of the aorta. In: AMA Arch Pathol 1952;53:142-53.
    
17. ^a Braverman AC, Harris KM. Management of aortic intramural hematoma. Curr Opin Cardiol 1995;10:501-4. [Medline]
    
18. Larson EW, Edwards WD. Risk factors for aortic dissection: a necropsy study of 161 cases. Am J Cardiol 1984;53:849-55. [Medline]
    
19. Borst HG, Heinemann MK, Stone CD. Pathogenesis. In: Surgical treatment of aortic dissection. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1996. p. 47-54.
    
20. Stanson AW, Kazmier FJ, Hollier LH, Edwards WD, Pairolero PC, Sheedy PF, et al. Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers of the thoracic aorta: natural history and clinicopathologic correlations. Ann Vasc Surg 1986;1:15-23. [Medline]
    
21. Spittell PC, Spittell JA, Joyce JW, Tajik AJ, Edwards WD, Schaff HV, et al. Clinical features and differential diagnosis of aortic dissection: experience with 236 cases (1980 through 1990). Mayo Clin Proc 1993;68:642-51. [Medline]
    
22. Braverman AC. Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers of the aorta. Curr Opin Cardiol 1994;9:591-7. [Medline]
    
23. Roberts WC. Aortic dissection: anatomy, consequences, and causes. Am Heart J 1981;101:195-214. [Medline]
    
24. Alfonso F, Goicolea J, Aragoncillo P, Hernandez R, Macaya C. Diagnosis of aortic intramural hematoma by intravascular ultrasound imaging. Am J Cardiol 1995;76:735-8. [Medline]
    
25. Vilacosta I, San Roman A, Peral V, Castillo J, Domínguez L, Batle E, et al. Imaging aortic intramural hematoma: identification of two groups of patients. Circulation 1995;92(Suppl):I307.
    
26. O'Gara PT, DeSanctis RW. Acute aortic dissection and its variants toward a common diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Circulation 1995;92:1376-8. [Free Full Text]
    
27. Keren A, Kim CB, Hu BS, Eyngorina I, Billingham ME, Mitchell RS, et al. Accuracy of biplane and multiplane transesophageal echocardiography in diagnosis of typical acute aortic dissection and intramural hematoma. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:627-36.[Abstract]
    

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Kitai, S. Kaji, A. Yamamuro, T. Tani, K. Tamita, M. Kinoshita, N. Ehara, A. Kobori, M. Nasu, Y. Okada, et al. Clinical Outcomes of Medical Therapy and Timely Operation in Initially Diagnosed Type A Aortic Intramural Hematoma: A 20-Year Experience Circulation, September 15, 2009; 120(11_suppl_1): S292 - S298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. D. Patel and R. R. Arora Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of aortic dissection Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, December 1, 2008; 2(6): 439 - 468. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. G. Svensson, N. T. Kouchoukos, D. C. Miller, J. E. Bavaria, J. S. Coselli, M. A. Curi, H. Eggebrecht, J. A. Elefteriades, R. Erbel, T. G. Gleason, et al. Expert Consensus Document on the Treatment of Descending Thoracic Aortic Disease Using Endovascular Stent-Grafts Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2008; 85(1_Supplement): S1 - S41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Sundt Intramural Hematoma and Penetrating Atherosclerotic Ulcer of the Aorta Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2007; 83(2): S835 - S841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Sueyoshi, I. Sakamoto, M. Uetani, and Y. Matsuoka CT Analysis of the Growth Rate of Aortic Diameter Affected by Acute Type B Intramural Hematoma Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6_Supplement_2): S414 - S420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. A. Flachskampf Assessment of Aortic Dissection and Hematoma Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2006; 10(1): 83 - 88. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. G. Hayter, J. T. Rhea, A. Small, F. S. Tafazoli, and R. A. Novelline Suspected Aortic Dissection and Other Aortic Disorders: Multi-Detector Row CT in 373 Cases in the Emergency Setting Radiology, March 1, 2006; 238(3): 841 - 852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Sueyoshi, I. Sakamoto, M. Fukuda, K. Hayashi, and T. Imada Long-Term Outcome of Type B Aortic Intramural Hematoma: Comparison With Classic Aortic Dissection Treated by the Same Therapeutic Strategy Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2004; 78(6): 2112 - 2117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J-K Song Diagnosis of aortic intramural haematoma Heart, April 1, 2004; 90(4): 368 - 371. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C A Nienaber, B M Richartz, T Rehders, H Ince, and M Petzsch Aortic intramural haematoma: natural history and predictive factors for complications Heart, April 1, 2004; 90(4): 372 - 374. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M D Dake Aortic intramural haematoma: current therapeutic strategy Heart, April 1, 2004; 90(4): 375 - 378. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Evangelista, R. Dominguez, C. Sebastia, A. Salas, G. Permanyer-Miralda, G. Avegliano, Z. Gomez-Bosh, T. Gonzalez-Alujas, H. Garcia del Castillo, and J. Soler-Soler Prognostic value of clinical and morphologic findings in short-term evolution of aortic intramural haematoma: Therapeutic implications Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2004; 25(1): 81 - 87. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-M. Song, H.-S. Kim, J.-K. Song, D.-H. Kang, M.-K. Hong, J.-J. Kim, S.-W. Park, S.-J. Park, T.-H. Lim, and M.-G. Song Usefulness of the Initial Noninvasive Imaging Study to Predict the Adverse Outcomes in the Medical Treatment of Acute Type A Aortic Intramural Hematoma Circulation, September 9, 2003; 108(90101): II-324 - 328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Evangelista, R. Dominguez, C. Sebastia, A. Salas, G. Permanyer-Miralda, G. Avegliano, C. Elorz, T. Gonzalez-Alujas, H. Garcia Del Castillo, and J. Soler-Soler Long-Term Follow-Up of Aortic Intramural Hematoma: Predictors of Outcome Circulation, August 5, 2003; 108(5): 583 - 589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. von Kodolitsch, S. K. Csosz, D. H. Koschyk, I. Schalwat, R. Loose, M. Karck, C. Dieckmann, R. Fattori, A. Haverich, J. Berger, et al. Intramural Hematoma of the Aorta: Predictors of Progression to Dissection and Rupture Circulation, March 4, 2003; 107(8): 1158 - 1163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. W. Lissin and R. Vagelos Acute aortic syndrome: a case presentation and review of the literature Vascular Medicine, November 1, 2002; 7(4): 281 - 287. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y. Moizumi, T. Komatsu, N. Motoyoshi, and K. Tabayashi Management of patients with intramural hematoma involving the ascending aorta J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2002; 124(5): 918 - 924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Kaji, T. Akasaka, Y. Horibata, K. Nishigami, H. Shono, M. Katayama, A. Yamamuro, S. Morioka, I. Morita, K. Tanemoto, et al. Long-Term Prognosis of Patients With Type A Aortic Intramural Hematoma Circulation, September 24, 2002; 106(12_suppl_1): I-248 - I-252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Ganaha, D. C. Miller, K. Sugimoto, Y. S. Do, H. Minamiguchi, H. Saito, R. S. Mitchell, and M. D. Dake Prognosis of Aortic Intramural Hematoma With and Without Penetrating Atherosclerotic Ulcer: A Clinical and Radiological Analysis Circulation, July 16, 2002; 106(3): 342 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. L. Tittle, R. J. Lynch, P. E. Cole, H. S. Singh, J. A. Rizzo, G. S. Kopf, and J. A. Elefteriades Midterm follow-up of penetrating ulcer and intramural hematoma of the aorta J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2002; 123(6): 1051 - 1059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. A. Ali, N. Okike, R. G. Hogan, and R. C. Becker Intramural hematoma of the thoracic aorta in a woman with neurofibromatosis Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2002; 73(3): 958 - 960. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. S. Sawhney, A. N. DeMaria, and D. G. Blanchard Aortic Intramural Hematoma : An Increasingly Recognized and Potentially Fatal Entity Chest, October 1, 2001; 120(4): 1340 - 1346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-K. Song, H.-S. Kim, D.-H. Kang, T.-H. Lim, M.-G. Song, S.-W. Park, and S.-J. Park Different clinical features of aortic intramural hematoma versus dissection involving the ascending aorta J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 2001; 37(6): 1604 - 1610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. J. Willens and K. M. Kessler Transesophageal Echocardiography in the Diagnosis of Diseases of the Thoracic Aorta* : Part 1. Aortic Dissection, Aortic Intramural Hematoma, and Penetrating Atherosclerotic Ulcer of the Aorta Chest, December 1, 1999; 116(6): 1772 - 1779. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Kaji, K. Nishigami, T. Akasaka, T. Hozumi, T. Takagi, T. Kawamoto, H. Okura, H. Shono, Y. Horibata, T. Honda, et al. Prediction of Progression or Regression of Type A Aortic Intramural Hematoma by Computed Tomography Circulation, November 9, 1999; 100 (2009): II-281 - II-286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Ohmi, K. Tabayashi, Y. Moizumi, T. Komatsu, Y. Sekino, and C. Goko EXTREMELY RAPID REGRESSION OF AORTIC INTRAMURAL HEMATOMA J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 1999; 118(5): 968 - 969. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Moriyama, G. Yotsumoto, K. Kuriwaki, S. Watanabe, K. Hisatomi, S. Shimokawa, H. Toyohira, and A. Taira Intramural hematoma of the thoracic aorta Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 1998; 13(3): 230 - 239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Harris, K. M. Articles by Dávila-Román, V. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Harris, K. M. Articles by Dávila-Román, V. G.