JTCS Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schlag, G.
Right arrow Articles by Seifert, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schlag, G.
Right arrow Articles by Seifert, J.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:1082-1083
© 1998 Mosby, Inc.


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Fibrin sealant, aprotinin, and immune response in children undergoing operations for congenital heart disease

G. Schlag, J. Seifert

To the Editor:

In their well-planned study of 49 children, "Fibrin Sealant, Aprotinin, and Immune Response in Children Undergoing Operations for Congenital Heart Disease" (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;115:883-9), Scheule and colleagues advise the reader that antibovine antibodies can be formed after professional application of a fibrin sealant. It is interesting to note that only some of the patients formed antibodies (14% immunoglobulin [Ig] E antibodies, 39% IgG antibodies); most patients did not form antibodies against aprotinin after identical application of the fibrin sealant.

Here it is important to ask the following question: Which factors led to the increased antibody formation? Even if data in Table IV do not show a significant difference with respect to the dose of aprotinin and the age of patients, the higher dose of aprotinin used in the older children seems to lead to an increased incidence of IgE or IgG antibodies. We must not forget that children of this age receive bovine milk products with their food. The gastrointestinal tract cannot be considered an absolute barrier for nutritious proteins, which can to some degree get into the blood without being degraded, and thus previous sensitization against bovine proteins cannot be excluded. A test for antibovine protein at baseline would have answered this question. We consider this a serious shortcoming of the study design that makes the conclusion doubtful.

Scheule and colleagues classified only the specific IgE antibodies according to their quantity, and only in 1 case could the level be classified as "high" (class III radio-allergosorbence test/fluorescence enzyme immunoassay). In this case the high value had already been determined 1 week after aprotinin application, which leads us to conclude that this patient had been sensitized against bovine protein before and that aprotinin in the fibrin sealant led to a booster effect.

The next important question is the clinical relevance of the antibodies found. Scheule and colleagues show that IgE antibody disappeared 1 year after exposure, suggesting a short half-life and therefore a low clinical relevance if any.

As far as we know from the manufacturer's pharmacovigilance department, there have only been 2 reports of anaphylactic reactions. In both cases the patients responded to standard treatment. The reports represent 2 cases in approximately 5 million applications, yielding a rate of 1 in 2.5 million. To minimize any risk, the medical histories taken before an operation should include questions on known allergies of any type and previous application of aprotinin, which may be used predominantly in heart surgery.


G. Schlag, MD
Professor of Anaesthesiology
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology
Donaueschingenstrasse 13,
A-1200 Vienna, Austria

J. Seifert, MD
Professor
Chirurgische Forschung der Klinik Für Allgemeine
Chirurgie und Thoraxchirurgie
der Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel
Michaelisstrasse 5,
D-24105 Kiel, Germany

12/8/93095




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Blood Conservatio, V. A. Ferraris, S. P. Ferraris, S. P. Saha, E. A. Hessel II, C. K. Haan, B. D. Royston, C. R. Bridges, R. S.D. Higgins, G. Despotis, et al.
Perioperative Blood Transfusion and Blood Conservation in Cardiac Surgery: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Clinical Practice Guideline
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2007; 83(5_Supplement): S27 - S86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
L. A. Gramlich and S. D. Barnes
Aprotinin Use in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2001; 5(1): 117 - 121.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schlag, G.
Right arrow Articles by Seifert, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schlag, G.
Right arrow Articles by Seifert, J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS