|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:1004-1008
© 1999 Mosby, Inc.
CARDIOPULMONARY SUPPORT AND PHYSIOLOGY |
From the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery,a Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China, and Departments of Cardiac Surgery,b Anesthesiology,c and Intensive Care,d University Hospital Erasme, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
This study was supported by Fondation pour la Chirurgie Cardiaque, Belgium.
Received for publication June 11, 1998. Revisions requested Oct 30, 1998. Revisions received Jan 21, 1999. Accepted for publication Jan 21, 1999. Address for reprints: Song Wan, MD, PhD, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|

Corticosteroids have been used during cardiac operations with CPB for many years, but the mechanism of this intervention is incompletely defined.
3 Steroid administration has been suggested to inhibit ischemia-reperfusion injury and to reduce the inflammatory response associated with CPB,
10-13 but clinical benefits have not been conclusively demonstrated. Hence steroid pretreatment remains controversial. Moreover, it was suggested that steroid-treated patients might have greater blood endotoxin levels during CPB.
14
This prospective, randomized study was designed to explore the possible relationship between steroid pretreatment and the degree of endotoxin release during clinical CPB. To help to define the source of endotoxin, we measured endotoxin levels in both venae cavae.
| Patients and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All patients received a similar balanced anesthetic regimen, including sufentanil and midazolam. Relaxation was achieved with pancuronium. Cefuroxime (Zinacef; GlaxoWellcome Belgium) was given intravenously for prophylaxis at a dose of 1.5 g at induction of anesthesia, followed by 1.5 g every 12 hours for 48 hours. All patients received aprotinin (Trasylol; Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) intravenously at a dose of 280 mg within 30 minutes of the beginning of the operation, 280 mg added to the prime of the circuit when starting CPB, and 70 mg/h during CPB. Patients in the steroid pretreatment group (S-group) received a 30 mg/kg dose of methylprednisolone (Solu-Medrol; Pharmacia & Upjohn, Kalamazoo, Mich) during induction of anesthesia. The other 10 patients in the placebo group (NS-group) did not receive steroids before, during, or after CPB.
The extracorporeal circuit consisted of a roller pump (Stöckert Instrumente GmbH, Munich, Germany) and a membrane oxygenator (Optima; Cobe Cardiovascular Inc, Arvada, Colo). Standard systemic heparinization (3 mg/kg) was accomplished and an activated clotting time of more than 480 seconds was maintained during CPB. The pump flow was set at 2.4 L/min per square meter. All patients were cooled to between 30°C and 32°C. Heparin was neutralized with protamine sulfate on discontinuation of CPB.
Blood samples for the measurements of endotoxin were collected simultaneously from the superior vena cava (SVC) through a standard central venous catheter introduced via the internal jugular vein and from inferior vena cava (IVC) through a femoral venous catheter that was inserted with fluoroscopic guidance after induction of anesthesia. The tips of both catheters were placed about 1.5 cm away from the respective caval opening to the right atrium. After the operation, their positions were confirmed again by radiography in the intensive care unit (ICU). The femoral venous catheter was withdrawn 2 hours after the end of CPB.
The blood sampling schedule was as follows: (1) just before heparin administration; (2) 5 minutes after the onset of CPB but before aortic crossclamping; (3) 50 minutes after the onset of CPB; (4) 5 minutes after aortic declamping; (5) at the end of CPB; and (6) 1 hour, (7) 2 hours, and (8) 20 hours after the end of CPB (except for IVC samples). Samples were collected in endotoxin-free tubes (EndoTube ET, with sodium heparin 120 IU; Chromogenix AB, Mölndal, Sweden), immediately cooled to 4°C, and centrifuged (2800g for 6 minutes at 4°C). Plasma was stored at 20°C until assay.
Postoperative serum creatine kinase MB and lactate values were measured every 12 hours within 24 hours. Postoperative blood losses, duration of mechanical ventilation, and the length of ICU stay were also recorded. The ICU staff was blinded as to the pretreatment of steroids.
Plasma endotoxin levels were measured with the Limulus amebocyte lysate test (Coatest Plasma-Endotoxin; Endosafe Inc, Charleston, SC). The principle of this assay is that endotoxin activates a proenzyme in the Limulus amebocyte lysate. The activated enzyme split off para-nitro aniline from the chromogenic substrate S-2423 to produce a yellow color, which can be determined photometrically at 405 nm. The end-point method was applied for endotoxin measurement, with each sample being tested in duplicate. The endotoxin concentration is presented as picograms per milliliter of plasma, with 1 pg corresponding to 0.012 unit of endotoxin. No adjustment was made for hemodilution. Laboratory technicians were not aware of the clinical data.
The Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of clinical data between 2 groups. Inasmuch as endotoxin values were not normally distributed, logarithm was applied. Data transformation was confirmed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Multivariate analysis was used to compare endotoxin levels between groups across time. Unbalanced repeated-measures models with first-order autoregressive covariance matrices (BMDP/Dynamic Program 5V, release 7, BMDP Statistical Software Inc, Los Angeles, Calif) were applied. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was also used for comparison between paired SVC and IVC samples at a specific time point as appropriate. Clinical data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Endotoxin values are presented as medians and interquartile ranges.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Transient endotoxemia during CPB has been observed for a decade
1,2 and has occasionally been related to untoward effects in patients.
5,6 The pathogenesis involved in this phenomenon, however, is not entirely clear. For instance, the source of endotoxin during CPB remains to be fully defined. Two possible factors, exogenous and endogenous, have been incriminated. On the one hand, endotoxin has been detected in intraoperatively administered fluids.
1 On the other hand, nonpulsatile perfusion during CPB may lead to gut mucosal ischemia, increase gut permeability,
7-9 and result in endotoxin translocation into portal and systemic circulation. Exogenous endotoxin may also be a contributing trigger for gut release of endotoxin.
15,16 Preoperative digestive decontamination has been suggested to reduce endotoxin levels after CPB.
17 Thus it was logical to speculate that the gut is a major source of endotoxin during CPB.
However, direct supportive evidence for this hypothesis was lacking. By sampling hepatic venous and mixed venous blood in 10 patients undergoing CPB, Andersen and colleagues
7 found identical changes in endotoxin concentrations in the systemic and splanchnic circulations. The increase in splanchnic endotoxin levels was even statistically insignificant compared with the baseline values.
7 The authors
7 could not show a correlation between the elevation of endotoxin levels and the fall in gastric intramucosal pH. Riddington and coworkers
9 reported increased intestinal permeability and raised endotoxin levels during CPB but were also unable to demonstrate any clear relationship between the two events. In both studies,
7,9 intramucosal pH did not decrease until after the termination of CPB, suggesting that ischemia was not the prime cause for the increase in intestinal permeability. In addition, some investigators
7,8 found that the increase in gut permeability was related to the duration of CPB, but others did not.
9 A positive correlation between the peak endotoxin level and both the duration of CPB and the duration of aortic crossclamping has been noted by some investigators,
2 but not by others.
18
Andersen and colleagues
7 reported that the endotoxin concentrations did not differ in hepatic venous and mixed venous blood. Although they used a different analytic technique, including a rocket immunoelectrophoretic assay, endotoxin levels in the hepatic venous blood in their study were similar to those in the IVC blood in our study. However, endotoxin levels they measured in the mixed venous blood were relatively high.
7 This led us to compare the IVC blood samples with the premixed blood in the SVC. Our data, showing that endotoxin levels were higher in blood from the IVC than from the SVC, support the hypothesis that gut is an important source of endotoxin under CPB conditions.
The release of endotoxin has been described to be two-phased, a first peak occurring early after the onset of CPB and a second one after aortic declamping.
4 The initial phase was explained by the presence of "environmental" exogenous endotoxin in the CPB circuit or pump prime solution.
1,4 However, the higher endotoxin levels in the IVC blood after the onset of CPB, as observed in the current study, suggest that the gut may already be involved in the first part of endotoxin release. Jansen and associates
19 proposed that endotoxin levels might be related to the degree of initial vasoconstriction and the degree of the hypo-oncotic state during CPB. It has also been postulated that the type of flow during CPB may play a role in inducing endotoxin release. Some investigators incriminated a nonpulsatile flow,
2,4 whereas Watarida and his associates
20 reported that pulsatile flow might reduce endotoxin release. Nevertheless, the type of flow did not influence endotoxin levels during CPB in another randomized trial.
21
Andersen and colleagues
14 found that endotoxin levels were significantly higher after 90 minutes of CPB and at the end of CPB in 8 steroid-pretreated patients undergoing CABG than in control patients. No other study has been undertaken to confirm or refute this potentially critical conclusion. The effects of steroid pretreatment on inflammatory reactions associated with CPB have been recently reviewed.
3,22 Previous studies documented that steroid treatment can significantly inhibit the production of endotoxin-induced cytokines in patients undergoing CPB, such as tumor necrosis factor
, interleukin-6, and interleukin-8.
10-13,22 In a sheep heart transplantation model, steroid pretreatment has been reported to improve systolic and diastolic function and hemodynamic stability after CPB.
23 Although not universally applied to clinical practice, steroid pretreatment has become a fundamental component of the so-called "fast-track recovery" protocol and has been suggested to improve postoperative recovery in patients after CPB and to reduce the length of stay in the ICU and in the hospital.
24 In view of this reasoning, the relationship between steroid pretreatment and the degree of the regional release of endotoxin during CPB needed to be defined. Our results indicate that steroid pretreatment does not increase, but may actually reduce endotoxin release during CPB. However, the findings from this pilot study still need to be confirmed in a larger trial, inasmuch as the multiple comparisons involved in data analysis may overstate the degree of statistical significance.
The involvement of the complex inflammatory response in perioperative injury has been recognized in patients undergoing CPB.
3 It was proposed that mesenteric ischemia-reperfusion primes circulating neutrophils which, when activated by endotoxin, can result in distant organ damage.
25 Although the exact role of endotoxin in this process remains elusive,
26 a low preoperative level of immunoglobulin M endotoxin core antibody has been found to represent an independent predictor of adverse postoperative outcome in patients undergoing CPB
27 and has been related to postoperative complications after cardiac valve surgery.
28 Therefore, on the basis of a better understanding of the underlying pathogenesis, the development of efficient therapy aimed at limiting this inflammatory reaction may improve patient outcome.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
concentrations in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Crit Care Med 1993;21:210-7. [Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. M. Ho and J. A. Tan Benefits and Risks of Corticosteroid Prophylaxis in Adult Cardiac Surgery: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis Circulation, April 14, 2009; 119(14): 1853 - 1866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Whitlock, S. Chan, P.J. Devereaux, J. Sun, F. D. Rubens, K. Thorlund, and K. H.T. Teoh Clinical benefit of steroid use in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: a meta-analysis of randomized trials Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2008; 29(21): 2592 - 2600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Hammon Extracorporeal Circulation: The Response of Humoral and Cellular Elements of Blood to Extracorporeal Circulation Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 370 - 389. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. G Raja and G. D Dreyfus Modulation of Systemic Inflammatory Response after Cardiac Surgery Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2005; 13(4): 382 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Morariu, B. G. Loef, L. P. H. J. Aarts, G. W. Rietman, G. Rakhorst, W. van Oeveren, and A. H. Epema Dexamethasone: Benefit and Prejudice for Patients Undergoing On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Study on Myocardial, Pulmonary, Renal, Intestinal, and Hepatic Injury Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2677 - 2687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Boning, J. Scheewe, T. Ivers, C. Friedrich, J. Stieh, S. Freitag, and J. T. Cremer Phosphorylcholine or heparin coating for pediatric extracorporeal circulation causes similar biologic effects in neonates and infants J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2004; 127(5): 1458 - 1465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F D Rubens and T Mesana The inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass: a therapeutic overview Perfusion, January 1, 2004; 19(1_suppl): S5 - S12. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. B. Aydin, H. Gercekoglu, B. Aksu, V. Ozkul, T. Sener, I. Kiygil, T. Turkoglu, S. Cimen, F. Babacan, and M. Demirtas Endotoxemia in coronary artery bypass surgery: A comparison of the off-pump technique and conventional cardiopulmonary bypass J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2003; 125(4): 843 - 848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Menasche and L. H. Edmunds Jr. Extracorporeal Circulation: The Inflammatory Response Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 349 - 360. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. Paparella, T.M. Yau, and E. Young Cardiopulmonary bypass induced inflammation: pathophysiology and treatment. An update Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 21(2): 232 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Pearl, D. P. Nelson, S. M. Schwartz, and P. B. Manning First-stage palliation for hypoplastic left heart syndrome in the twenty-first century Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2002; 73(1): 331 - 339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Hennein Inflammation After Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Therapy for the Postpump Syndrome Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2001; 5(3): 236 - 255. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D B. Sanders, D. F Larson, K. Hunter, M. Gorman, and B. Yang Comparison of tumor necrosis factor-effect on the expression of iNOS in macrophage and cardiac myocytes Perfusion, January 1, 2001; 16(1): 67 - 74. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Wan, J.-L. LeClerc, M. Antoine, J.-M. DeSmet, A. P.C. Yim, and J.-L. Vincent Heparin-coated circuits reduce myocardial injury in heart or heart-lung transplantation: a prospective, randomized study Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1999; 68(4): 1230 - 1235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Wan and A. P.C. Yim Cytokines in myocardial injury: impact on cardiac surgical approach Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 1999; 16(suppl_1): S107 - S111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |