|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:1086-1094
© 1999 Mosby, Inc.
GENERAL THORACIC SURGERY |
From the Departments of Radiation Oncologya and Thoracic Surgery,b Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass.
Received for publication March 12, 1998. Revisions requested May 22, 1998. Revisions received Jan 18, 1999. Accepted for publication Feb 12, 1999. Address for reprints: Michael P. Hagan, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Virginia, PO Box 980058, 401 College St, Richmond, VA 23298.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The major impediment to the resolution of issues regarding treatment is the low incidence of these tumors. Owing to this, series involving tumors of the superior pulmonary sulcus are generally from single institutions, involve small numbers of patients, and are reported retrospectively.
4-13 Thus the specific roles for radiation therapy and chemotherapy and the allegation of a unique pattern of metastasis remain uncertain. Recently reported series, however, suggest that the pattern of failure of these tumors is similar to that of bronchogenic carcinomas in general.
5-13 As a result, superior sulcus tumors are currently included with other stage IIIA/B nonsmall cell tumors for the intergroup study of neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or definitive chemotherapy and irradiation.
The present study, also retrospective from a single institution, includes not only patients treated for cure, but also those who received palliation. By including the entire institutional experience, the current study provides additional information about the natural history and pattern of failure of superior sulcus tumors.
During the period encompassed by this review, patients received surgical evaluation resulting in a recommendation for either combined surgery and irradiation or irradiation alone. Combined treatment was routinely recommended for patients with T3 primary tumors, negative results of mediastinoscopy, and no evidence of distant disease. Patients with T4 tumors or N2 nodal status (with a few exceptions) received radiation therapy alone. Although the population of patients includes both those with resected and those with unresected tumors, the study does not attempt to compare treatments. Instead, we present the results of a consistent set of treatment policies aimed at an aggressive attempt to secure local control in selected patients.
| Patients and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Treatment selection
The assigned treatments are shown schematically in Fig. 1.Those patients without evidence of regional lymph node involvement, direct mediastinal invasion, extensive involvement of a vertebral body, or invasion into a neural foramina were treated for cure with combined resection and irradiation (the S+RT group). Most of these patients received preoperative irradiation followed by resection. Patients who did not meet these criteria received radiation treatment alone (the RT group), usually with palliative intent. In the palliated group, 16 patients had regional lymph node involvement, 15 had distant metastases either from the onset or discovered within the first 30 days of treatment, and for 14 patients the primary disease was too extensive to allow control by definitive irradiation. In the latter instance, the primary tumor was multilobar, involved a large region of the chest wall, or was larger than 10 cm. In all, 34 patients were selected for combined surgery plus irradiation, whereas 39 received radiation therapy alone.
|
Pretreatment evaluation
The initial evaluation of each patient routinely included history and physical examination, complete blood count, liver and renal function studies, and chest radiography. Other diagnostic work-up, reported as a percentage of the 73 patients in the total population, was performed as follows: computed tomography (CT) of the thorax (85%), radionuclide bone scan (93%), anterior mediastinoscopy or Chamberlain procedure (all patients undergoing resection and 66% of the total group), bronchoscopy (66%), and CT scan or radionuclide scan of the head (48%).
Irradiation
Radiation therapy was administered initially through parallel-opposed, anteroposterior-posteroanterior ports using megavoltage equipment. Fifty-eight patients were treated with 10-MV photons, 5 with 2-MV photons, 10 with cobalt 60, and 1 patient was treated with a combination of photon and proton irradiation. The treatment port routinely included the tumor with a 2-cm margin, ipsilateral hilum, mid-upper mediastinum, and ipsilateral or bilateral supraclavicular regions. The spinal cord was limited to 45 Gy. Fourteen patients were treated twice daily with fraction sizes ranging from 1.4 to 1.8Gy. All other patients were treated daily at 1.8 to 2 Gy per exposure. Both fields were treated at each session, except in the 5 patients treated with 2-MV photons, for whom one field was treated each day. Typically, 40 Gy was given before the operation (range 3045 Gy) with an additional 20 Gy given after the operation when lymph nodes were pathologically involved or when surgical margins were positive (diseased) or considered "close" by the reviewing pathologist. Seven patients treated before 1985 received only postoperative irradiation (range 5064 Gy). For patients treated with radiation therapy alone, the radiation dose was dependent on individual physician preference.
Tumor characteristics
Tumor histologic type and staging are shown in Table I. Eighty-two percent of the patients treated with surgery plus irradiation had stage T3 disease, and only 18% had stage N1N3 disease. For the patients who received irradiation alone, however, only 62% had stage T3 disease, whereas 46% had N1N3 disease. The N0 findings for the patients in the RT group were based on mediastinoscopy. Patients without clinical or radiographic evidence of adenopathy were considered to have NX disease. The distributions of specific histologic types were similar for the RT and S+RT groups. Although the average size of the primary tumor treated by irradiation alone was greater, these determinations were radiologic for the patients treated with radiation alone and via radiologic information or pathologic review, usually after preoperative radiation therapy, for the resected lesions. For the S+RT group the largest diameter recorded is reported.
|
2 test. The Welch modified Student t test was used to evaluate differences in sample mean values. | Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Comparison of patient characteristics for S+RT versus RT groups
Thirty-four patients were treated with a combination of irradiation and resection. Criteria for their selection are listed in the Patients and methods section. Patients who did not meet these criteria or who had evidence of distant metastasis, regional lymph node involvement, mediastinal disease, extensive vertebral body involvement, or other unresectable disease received irradiation alone. Characteristics of the patients in each treatment group are shown in Table II. Patients in both groups were of similar average age and were equally likely to have had a painful brachial plexopathy. Patients meeting the criteria for resection, however, more frequently had stage IIIA disease, had a significantly higher Karnofsky status (P = .0004), were less likely to have reported weight loss (P = .005), and infrequently had Horner's syndrome or motor deficits involving the brachial plexus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patients receiving irradiation alone (RT group)
Thirty-nine patients were treated with radiation alone. For these patients overall survival after 5 years was 7%.
Palliative response
Most patients who were not selected for resection (32/39 patients) received radiation therapy with the goal of providing durable palliation. Initial local control (scored as freedom from local progression) was achieved in 66% of these patients. The median duration of control was 15 months. Median survival for the palliated group, however, was only 34.8 weeks.
Definitive irradiation
Definitive irradiation was attempted in 7 patients in the RT group. These patients had no evidence of distant disease, had a primary tumor 6 cm or smaller, and had no sites of bulky adenopathy identified radiologically. For 1 patient with T4 N2 disease, spinal cord proximity limited the radiation dose to 54 Gy. Local control was not achieved. One patient (stage T3 N0 disease) for whom proximity of the spinal cord was not an issue received 73 Gy. This patient survived for 67 months, having local-regional treatment failure after 53 months. For the remaining 5 patients the spinal cord dose was partially limiting. The average tumor dose was 65 Gy. Median survival for this group was 25.2 months (range 1251 months). Local failure eventually developed in 5 of 6 patients in this group for whom local control information was available.
Distant metastasis
The primary mode of treatment failure for both treatment groups was through distant disease. Actuarially, 47% of patients receiving combined surgery and irradiation had distant metastases within the first 5 years. The initial site of distant disease for 5 patients was the brain. Failure first occurred in the contralateral lung, adrenals, and skin for 1 patient each and was unrecorded in 2 patients. The median time to the appearance of distant metastasis in the S+RT patient group was 17 months. In the RT group, however, the median time to appearance of distant disease was less than 3 months. For each treatment group, distant failure was seen in approximately 35% of patients in the first 18 months. The S+RT group, by virtue of its greater proportion of patients with local control and hence patients at risk for distant failure, provided evidence for late distant failures. The last was recorded 71 months after the original diagnosis.
Lymphadenopathy and distant disease
For patients in the S+RT group, lymph node disease was associated with a greater risk of distant failure, but not local-regional failure. Overall, distant metastases eventually developed in 60% of patients with positive lymph nodes, whereas only 30% of node-negative patients were similarly affected. Twenty-seven patients in the S+RT group, for whom pathologic evaluation of lymph node status was uniformly obtained, could be evaluated for distant disease. Distant disease occurred in 22% of those who were node negative and in all 4 patients who were lymph node positive. Regardless of the treatment group, no patient with lymphadenopathy survived longer than 22 months.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients were offered combined surgery and irradiation if they had resectable primary disease, had no contraindication for irradiation, had no evidence of distant disease, and had mediastinoscopic results negative for involvement. This selection resulted in 3 distinct patient populations illustrated in Fig. 1
.
This degree of selection is typical of those series that include an institution's entire experience. In the 6 other series that report results of both palliative and curative treatments, the rate of resection varied from 29% to 58%.
7,12,13,16,17 Overall 5-year survival for the patients undergoing resection from these series averaged 31%. Survival for the largely palliatively treated patients not undergoing resection was 5% from the same series. These results are similar to the values reported here (5-year overall survival of 33% with a resection rate of 42%, and a 7% 5-year survival for the patients not having resection). Interestingly, none of these results for patients undergoing resection differs significantly from the results of the seminal series reported by Paulson
5 and Maggi and colleagues
18 (35% 5-year survival and a 64% rate of resection).
The obvious aim of combined treatment is to improve survival by securing local-regional control of disease. When extension to adjacent structures impedes surgical resection of the tumor, preoperative irradiation has proven useful. Generally, irradiation in the preoperative setting reduces morbidity by requiring lower radiation doses and smaller treatment volumes. Preoperative irradiation also reduces the likelihood of spilling viable tumor cells and may improve the resectability. In addition to superior sulcus tumors, the resection of locally advanced carcinomas of the breast,
19 rectum,
20 and esophagus
21 and of sarcomas
22 has been assisted through this maneuver.
Altered fractionation schedules for the preoperative irradiation, specifically, hyperfractionation and accelerated hyperfractionation, are frequently associated with improved local control.
23-25 For this series, the irradiation component evolved from daily exposures (delivering 30 Gy before the operation) to an aggressive program consisting of accelerated hyperfractionation delivering 40 Gy.
Before the routine use of CT, few reports attempted to quantify local control of tumors involving the superior sulcus. In recent reports, however, local control has been remarkably similar for series reporting results of combined irradiation and resection. Komaki and associates
11 reported 86% local control for combined modality patients at the M. D. Anderson Hospital, and Maggi and colleagues
18 reported a similar figure, 85%, from the Turin series. Remmen and coworkers
26 have reported 2 local failures in 5 years in a small series (10 patients at risk) from Nijmegen and Groesbeek. In the present series, local control was achieved in 91% of patients undergoing resection, and for 80% of the patients, local control was maintained for more than 5 years. No local failures were documented for the 11 patients in the S+RT group who received irradiation twice daily.
When the surgical margin was close or positive, postoperative irradiation was delivered. In previous reports, the use of postoperative irradiation to salvage partially resected superior sulcus tumors has been largely unsuccessful. Series from the University of California at Los Angeles
27 and from Turin
18 reported no 5-year survivors after postoperative irradiation. At the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, although patients with partially resected tumors routinely received postoperative brachytherapy, their 5-year survival was less than 10%
28 and not different from the survival of patients not undergoing resection. In the present series, however, 14 patients with close or positive margins received postoperative irradiation. Eleven had no local-regional failures and 7 patients were 5-year survivors.
Patients whose primary tumors were unresected received irradiation alone. Although the intent of this treatment was not always clearly stated, many patients received low-dose palliative treatment. However, a small group of these patients was potentially curable. Seven patients were medically fit, and their primary disease, which was relatively small (<6 cm), was not associated with distant disease or bulky adenopathy. In 6 of these patients, either the radiation dose or the field size was limited because of proximity to the spinal cord. Treatment failed locally in 5 of these 6 patients. The single patient who received adequately placed high-dose irradiation survived more than 5 years but had a late local failure. These results illustrate both the need for and the difficulty in delivering definitive irradiation to the superior sulcus.
It is clear from this series, and the several others described in this report, that through the use of aggressive local treatment long-term local-regional control can be achieved for a high percentage of patients who are candidates for resection. Unfortunately, distant metastases will eventually develop in approximately half of these patients. Thus, in the absence of earlier diagnosis, improved long-term survival will require better systemic therapy.
In the setting of carcinomas of the superior sulcus, chemotherapy data are scarce, preventing meaningful interpretation. For example, Martinez-Monge and coworkers
29 reported a 56% 4-year survival for 18 patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy, but Ginsberg and associates
28 reported no long-term survivors from a group of 10 patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
There is evidence, however, that chemotherapy increases survival in the setting of other IIIA/IIIB nonsmall cell lung cancers. Positive results have been reported from 2 trials of preoperative platinum-based chemotherapy and radiation therapy.
30,31 These encouraging results have established the basis for a current intergroup trial studying induction chemotherapy and radiation therapy for carcinomas of the superior sulcus.
Our current approach for tumors of the superior sulcus incorporates 2 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting. This is followed by twice daily irradiation in a concomitant boost format. Three to 4 weeks later the tumor is resected en bloc either via the posterior approach or, when appropriate, through an anterior approach.
In summary, resection and adjuvant irradiation produced excellent local control of superior sulcus tumors. This degree of regional disease control was associated with a 5-year overall survival of 33%. Although few patients had positive surgical margins, adjuvant irradiation appears to have controlled the disease in most patients. Distant metastasis was the most frequent mode of first failure.
Both the high percentage of patients receiving only palliative care and the dismal prognosis for patients with positive lymph nodes of high T stage are consistent with the outcome for bronchogenic carcinomas from other sites. Thus the discordance of high survival associated with lesions of high T stage, for which superior sulcus tumors are known, appears to be more of an artifact of the staging system than evidence of an unusual natural history.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Tamura, M. A. Hoda, and W. Klepetko Current treatment paradigms of superior sulcus tumours Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2009; 36(4): 747 - 753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. W. Rusch, D. J. Giroux, M. J. Kraut, J. Crowley, M. Hazuka, T. Winton, D. H. Johnson, L. Shulman, F. Shepherd, C. Deschamps, et al. Induction Chemoradiation and Surgical Resection for Superior Sulcus Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinomas: Long-Term Results of Southwest Oncology Group Trial 9416 (Intergroup Trial 0160) J. Clin. Oncol., January 20, 2007; 25(3): 313 - 318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C.M. Pitz, A. B. de la Riviere, H. A. van Swieten, V. A.M. Duurkens, J.-W. J. Lammers, and J. M.M. van den Bosch Surgical treatment of Pancoast tumours Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2004; 26(1): 202 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. van Geel, P. P. Jansen, R. J. van Klaveren, and J. R. M. van der Sijp High Relapse-Free Survival After Preoperative and Intraoperative Radiotherapy and Resection for Sulcus Superior Tumors Chest, November 1, 2003; 124(5): 1841 - 1846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Wright, M. T. Menard, J. C. Wain, D. M. Donahue, H. C. Grillo, T. J. Lynch, N. C. Choi, and D. J. Mathisen Induction chemoradiation compared with induction radiation for lung cancer involving the superior sulcus Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2002; 73(5): 1541 - 1544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. W. Rusch, D. J. Giroux, M. J. Kraut, J. Crowley, M. Hazuka, D. Johnson, M. Goldberg, F. Detterbeck, F. Shepherd, R. Burkes, et al. Induction chemoradiation and surgical resection for non-small cell lung carcinomas of the superior sulcus: Initial results of Southwest Oncology Group Trial 9416 (Intergroup Trial 0160) J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2001; 121(3): 472 - 483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. G. Pearson Non-small Cell Lung Cancer* : Role of Surgery for Stages I-III Chest, December 1, 1999; 116 (2009): 500S - 503S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Dartevelle and P. Macchiarini Surgical Management of Superior Sulcus Tumors Oncologist, October 1, 1999; 4(5): 398 - 407. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |