|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:460-466
© 1999 Mosby, Inc.
CARDIOPULMONARY SUPPORT AND PHYSIOLOGY |
Supported by National Institutes of Health grants HL47193 (B. R. Smith) and HL02668 (H. M. Rinder) and by Alexion Pharmaceuticals. C. S. Rinder is a recipient of an American Heart Association Clinician-Scientist Award.
Address for reprints: Christine S. Rinder, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Tompkins 3, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, PO Box 8051, New Haven, CT 06510-8051 (E-mail christine.rinder{at}yale.edu).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In vitro studies have demonstrated a number of complement-mediated proinflammatory and procoagulant effects relevant to CPB. Generation of the MAC induces platelet
-granule release,
4 platelet prothrombinase activity,
5 and platelet expression of CD62P,
6 which mediates the binding of activated platelets to leukocytes.
7 We have demonstrated an increase in platelet CD62P during clinical CPB,
8 as well as a parallel increase in circulating monocyte-platelet conjugates.
9,10 C5a formation up-regulates neutrophil (PMN) CD11b/CD18 through mobilization of intracellular granules,
11 a marker of leukocyte activation that we have demonstrated to occur on both PMNs and monocytes during clinical CPB.
10 Both C5a and C5b-9 also promote endothelial cell CD62P expression in vitro.
12
In vitro recirculation of whole blood in an extracorporeal bypass circuit, for example, simulated extracorporeal circulation (SECC), has been used extensively to simulate platelet,
13 leukocyte,
14 and complement activation
15 on CPB. It serves as a preclinical model for examining the response of human blood to interventions targeting inflammatory or coagulopathic complications of CPB. Novel interventions blocking complement activation at different stages now allow us to selectively examine the pathophysiology of cell-mediated, complement-dependent responses to extracorporeal circulation. We
15 have previously demonstrated that simultaneous blockade of both C5a and the MAC prevented both platelet and PMN activation during SECC. In the current study, we used a blocking monoclonal antibody (Mab) directed against the complement component C8 to examine the specific role of the MAC on platelet and PMN activation during SECC.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In vitro studies
16 had demonstrated that the anti-C8 Mab at 30 µg/mL completely inhibited C5b-9 generation in human serum (measured both by a functional hemolytic assay and by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) without significant blockade of either C3a or C5a generation. Preliminary dosing studies indicated that anti-C8 at 40 µg/mL in whole blood was the lowest dose giving maximal C5b-9 blockade during SECC, and thus 40 µg/mL was used in the present study. In vitro whole blood experiments demonstrated that this dose of anti-C8 Mab had no direct effect on either platelet or leukocyte activation. The anti-C8 Mab did not inhibit platelet CD62P expression to a 1 µmol/L dose of epinephrine followed by a 5 µmol/L dose of adenosine diphosphate, nor the increase in CD11b on monocytes and PMNs in response to a 1 µmol/L dose of N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine.
Extracorporeal circuit preparation.
As previously described, extracorporeal circuits were assembled with the use of a pediatric membrane oxygenator (VP CML Plus: Cobe Cardiovascular, Arvada, Colo) and a roller pump (Cardiovascular Instruments Corp, Wakefield, Mass). The oxygenator and circuitry were primed with lactated Ringers solution containing dextrose (4.0 g/L), mannitol (4.0 g/L), and porcine heparin (5 U/mL) and circulated at 1.5 L/min with sweep gas flow (95% oxygen, 5% carbon dioxide) at 0.25 L/min. The pH, PO2, and temperature were continuously monitored and maintained at a pH of 7.35 to 7.45 and a PO2 greater than 150 mm Hg.
Extracorporeal circuit operation and sampling.
After gaining approval from the Human Investigation Committee of Yale University School of Medicine and obtaining informed consent from the subjects, we drew blood (500 mL) over a 5-minute period from healthy volunteers who were receiving no medications. The blood was drawn into a transfer pack (Baxter Healthcare Corp, Deerfield, Ill) containing porcine heparin (5 U/mL final concentration). Anti-C8 or control Mab was added to the transfer pack immediately before addition of the blood to the extracorporeal circuit. As blood was introduced to the circuit reservoir, 400 mL of prime fluid was simultaneously withdrawn to yield a final circuit volume of 700 mL, a mean hematocrit value of 24% ± 4% (standard deviation), and a final Mab concentration of 40 µg/mL. Blood was gently and slowly circulated with prime, and complete mixing was accomplished within 2 minutes; this point was designated as time 0. The circuit flow rate was then accelerated to 1.5 L/min, cooled to 27°C over 5 minutes, and maintained at that temperature for 60 minutes. Then it was rewarmed to 37°C for an additional 30 minutes (90 minutes of total recirculation time), simulating CPB at our institution. Six experiments were performed with anti-C8 Mab at 40 µg/mL and 4 with control Mab at the same final concentration. Blood samples were drawn at 0, 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 minutes of recirculation. Plasma samples for C3a and C5b-9 were immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at 70°C until assayed. Plasma samples for neutrophil elastase-antitrypsin complex were anticoagulated with EDTA and similarly snap-frozen. Whole blood samples for flow cytometric studies were immediately fixed in 1% (final concentration) paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline solution.
17 Additional whole blood samples were drawn into EDTA, 5 mmol/L, at 0, 30, and 90 minutes for a complete blood count and leukocyte differential.
Flow cytometry.
Whole blood samples were fixed for 60 minutes at 4°C followed by addition of 1:8 vol/vol of Tris-glycine.
18 Samples were washed twice and resuspended in Tyrode-HEPES buffer, aliquots were incubated with fluorescent Mab at 4°C for 20 minutes, and then washed and resuspended in Tyrode-HEPES buffer for flow cytometric analysis. The percentage of leukocytes with bound platelets and leukocyte activation was determined by labeling samples with (1) fluorescein isothiocyanateanti-CD45 and phycoerythrin antiglycoprotein IIb/IIIa and (2) fluorescein isothiocyanateanti-CD45 and phycoerythrinanti-CD11b, respectively. Platelet CD62P expression was determined by labeling with (3) fluorescein isothiocyanateanti-glycoprotein IIb/IIIa and phycoerythrinanti-CD62P.
18 Samples were analyzed on a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson, Mountain View, Calif). Leukocyte measurements were carried out by live-gating on fluorescein isothiocyanatepositive, leukocyte-sized events, and PMN and monocyte populations were distinguished on the basis of size, granularity, and differential CD45 expression.
18 Mean CD11b fluorescence and the percentage of leukocyte-platelet conjugates were determined as previously described.
9 Platelet analysis was accomplished by acquisition of fluorescein isothiocyanatepositive, platelet-sized events with the percentage of platelets expressing CD62P determined as previously described.
18 An isotype-matched control Mab was used to set a threshold (99% of events below threshold) for CD62P expression and quantitation of leukocyte-platelet conjugates.
Plasma assays.
C3a and C5b-9 levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits from Quidel (San Diego, Calif) according to the methods described by the manufacturer. Levels were reported in absorbance units (AU) as in previous work.
15 Neutrophil elastase levels were similarly measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (E.M. Sciences, Gibbstown, NJ) according to the manufacturers instructions.
Statistics.
C3a and C5b-9 levels are reported as mean ± standard error of the mean of the absolute values. All other results are expressed as a percentage of the individual experiments time 0 value to minimize the effect of interdonor variability. Thus changes over time of recirculation are expressed as relative changes compared with the starting value and are reported as mean ± standard error of the mean. Two-way analysis of variance for time and antibody effect was performed with GraphPad software (Prism, San Diego Calif).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In contrast to platelet activation, selective blockade of MAC formation did not inhibit either monocyte or PMN activation, as measured by up-regulation of the adhesion receptor CD11b and neutrophil elastase release. Complement activation, along with contact activationinduced mediators, for example, kallikrein,
22 contributes to the generalized inflammatory response to CPB, but the link between specific complement components and cellular activation pathways has been difficult to ascertain. Previous work from our laboratory demonstrated that anti-C5 blockade on SECC inhibited C5a and C5b-9 formation but did not check C3a formation. In addition to inhibiting platelet activation and formation of platelet-leukocyte conjugates, blockade of both C5a and C5b-9 formation prevented PMN activation. By contrast, in the current study, selective C5b-9 inhibition did not affect PMN activation. These data suggest that C5a, rather than C5b-9, is responsible for the complement-related PMN activation induced by SECC. This is consistent with in vitro studies in which C5a is a potent activator of PMN.
11 The effects of C5b-9 on leukocytes appear to be more subtle. Nucleated cells are relatively resistant to the lytic effects of complement membrane attack
23; however, nonlytic C5b-9 levels can induce release of reactive oxygen metabolites from PMNs,
24 creating the potential for additional proinflammatory effects. These latter effects, however, may not be detectable in the setting of the more profound levels of PMN activation induced when C5a formation is unopposed, as in the present study.
It is important to note one caveat: because we were unable to completely abrogate C5b-9 formation, it remains possible, albeit unlikely, that the small amounts of C5b-9 produced in the presence of the anti-C8 Mab were sufficient to activate PMNs. The incomplete blockade of MAC may be a function of the particular Mab used or may be a universal finding with any inhibitor of C8 cleavage. The Mab dosage did not appear to be the limiting factor, given that doubling the anti-C8 dose did not additionally improve MAC inhibition (data not shown). Therefore, although these results demonstrate that inhibition of platelet activation by terminal complement blockade is predominantly caused by C5b-9 rather than C5a, it is not possible to determine whether C5b-9 generation contributes in more subtle ways to PMN activation. Nevertheless, on the basis of the ability of in vitro C5a to potently activate PMNs,
11 and the current findings, we believe C5a to be one of the major inducers of PMN activation in the SECC setting. Blockade of C5a formation and contact activationinduced kallikrein production are promising strategies for reducing the inflammatory response to CPB.
MAC inhibition also preserved the total number of circulating platelets, monocytes, and PMNs compared with control Mab runs. Although we expected that reduced platelet activation would limit platelet adhesion to the circuit
25 and preserve platelet numbers, the surprisingly effective preservation of leukocyte counts, despite continued leukocyte activation, may suggest important features of the pathophysiology of leukocyte-biomaterial interaction. Preservation of the absolute numbers of circulating leukocytes could be an indirect result of reduced platelet activation in the presence of MAC inhibition. Data from our laboratory and others
26,27 have suggested that leukocyte adhesion to a biomaterial surface can occur as the result of "bridging" by platelets bound both to the material and to leukocytes. Fibrinogen binds rapidly to the CPB circuit; activated platelets may adhere to the bound fibrinogen via glycoprotein IIb/IIIa
27; monocytes and PMNs may then bind via CD62P to these platelets and consequently be lost to the circulation. Since circulating platelet-leukocyte conjugates were reduced by anti-C8, it is possible that a similar event occurs on the circuit itself, although other explanations such as decreased mediator release by activated platelets are also possible.
It is not known whether selective inhibition of C5b-9 formation would be of benefit in clinical settings necessitating extracorporeal circulation. In theory, specific inhibition of platelet activation by the MAC may reduce procoagulant activity in the perioperative period, because MAC assembly on the platelet surface causes phosphatidylserine exposure, produces procoagulant platelet microparticles,
6 and enhances platelet "procoagulant activity" in vitro.
20 The activated platelet may also increase monocyte procoagulant activity through CD62P-mediated induction of tissue factor.
28 Thus selective inhibition of MAC formation might be appropriate for circumstances in which it is desirable for PMNs to remain responsive to complement, but at the same time limiting the procoagulant potential of platelets and monocyte-platelet conjugates. In the setting of CPB, however, the additional reduction of proinflammatory PMNs through complement and/or contact pathway inhibition is desirable to reduce "reperfusion injury" physiology. Blockade at C5b-9 alone is not likely to block this physiology and has the potential to worsen any inflammatory component by preserving greater numbers of activated PMNs in the circulation.
In summary, selective inhibition of C5b-9 generation during SECC resulted in significant inhibition of platelet activation and activation-dependent monocyte-platelet conjugate formation. This inhibition also allowed greater preservation of absolute numbers of circulating platelets, as well as PMNs and monocytes. By contrast, C5b-9 inhibition did not produce any decrease in PMN or monocyte activation, suggesting at best a minor role for this complement component in leukocyte activation during SECC. This study also suggests that platelet activation and/or MAC may be responsible in part for the loss of circulating PMNs and monocytes to the extracorporeal circuit.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2-adrenergic receptors during simulated extracorporeal circulation: prevention with prostaglandin E1. J Lab Clin Med 1985;105:601-7.[Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. W. Hammon Extracorporeal Circulation: The Response of Humoral and Cellular Elements of Blood to Extracorporeal Circulation Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 370 - 389. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Rinder, M. J. Smith, H. M. Rinder, D. N. Cortright, R. M. Brodbeck, J. E. Krause, and B. R. Smith Leukocyte Effects of C5a-Receptor Blockade During Simulated Extracorporeal Circulation Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2007; 83(1): 146 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Sato, Y. Hiramatsu, S. Homma, M. Sato, S. Sato, S. Endo, and Y. Sohara Phosphodiesterase type 4 inhibitor rolipram inhibits activation of monocytes during extracorporeal circulation J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2005; 130(2): 346 - 350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. T. Lappegard, M. Fung, G. Bergseth, J. Riesenfeld, J. D. Lambris, V. Videm, and T. E. Mollnes Effect of complement inhibition and heparin coating on artificial surface-induced leukocyte and platelet activation Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2004; 77(3): 932 - 941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Menasche and L. H. Edmunds Jr. Extracorporeal Circulation: The Inflammatory Response Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 349 - 360. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. Paparella, T.M. Yau, and E. Young Cardiopulmonary bypass induced inflammation: pathophysiology and treatment. An update Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 21(2): 232 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Despotis, M. S. Avidan, and C. W. Hogue Jr Mechanisms and attenuation of hemostatic activation during extracorporeal circulation Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2001; 72(5): S1821 - 1831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Fung, P. G. Loubser, A. Undar, M. Mueller, C. Sun, W. N. Sun, W. K. Vaughn, and C. D. Fraser Jr Inhibition of complement, neutrophil, and platelet activation by an anti-factor D monoclonal antibody in simulated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2001; 122(1): 113 - 122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Barnes and A. A. Weiss BrkA Protein of Bordetella pertussis Inhibits the Classical Pathway of Complement after C1 Deposition Infect. Immun., May 1, 2001; 69(5): 3067 - 3072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. F. Mojcik and J. H. Levy Aprotinin and the systemic inflammatory response after cardiopulmonary bypass Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2001; 71(2): 745 - 754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |