|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119:173-174
© 2000 Mosby, Inc.
BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS |
From the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland.
Address for reprints: René Prêtre, MD, Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital, 100 Rämistrasse, CH8091 Zürich, Switzerland (E-mail: rene.pretre{at}chi.usz.ch).
Vascular compression of the tracheobronchial tree can create troublesome respiratory problems after an otherwise successful correction of a cardiac defect. Short arching of the thoracic aorta, by a bowstring effect, or medial position of the descending aorta on the vertebral column can be a cause for compression of the left main bronchus. Anterior traction and fixation of the ascending aorta to the sternum has been the classic approach to tracheobronchial compression,
1,2 but with inconsistent results. We chose to address the aortic anomaly more directly in 2 patients with compression of the left main bronchus by remodeling an ampler arch of the aorta via a posterior approach.
Patients and surgical technique
A newborn infant with type B interrupted aortic arch and a 6-month-old infant with double-outlet right ventricle underwent remodeling of the aortic arch to relieve compression of the left main bronchus. The second baby, who had a high pulmonary flow and dilated pulmonary arteries, already had preoperative compression of the bronchus. Cardiac physiology and hemodynamic parameters became normal after surgical correction in both infants. Extubation was not possible because of inadequate blood gas exchange and retained tracheobronchial secretions. Examination with a bronchoscope revealed a pulsatile compression of the left main bronchus. Tracheostomy was performed in the first baby. Chest computed tomography revealed a compression of the left main bronchus by a medially positioned proximal descending aorta in the second baby(Fig 1).
|
|
Vascular compression of the left main bronchus was relieved in both infants. A residual narrowing of 20% was documented by perioperative and postoperative bronchoscopic studies. Blood gases and respiratory parameters improved and tracheobronchial secretions diminished. The tracheotomy cannula was removed 30 days after the operation in the first baby, and extubation was possible after 14 days in the second baby. Stenting of the left main bronchus, as initially planned, was avoided.
Discussion
Vascular compression of the trachea or a main bronchus occurs with dilatation of the great arteries, congenital or surgically created deformities of the aortic arch, or with a combination of these anomalies.
1-4 A direct approach to dilated arteries, vascular ring, or sling usually results in successful relief of compression.
1,2 Correction of a cardiac defect to eliminate a volume overload or pulmonary hypertension is often insufficient for relief of severe compression, as exemplified in our second patient. Anterior displacement and fixation of the ascending aorta against the sternum has at times relieved compression on the trachea but inconsistently on the remote left main bronchus. Compression of the left main bronchus often results from a space conflict within the aortic arch. Our approach aimed at remodeling a wider aortic arch appears sound because it directly addresses this space conflict. Normal arching of the aorta is ample and encompasses three quarters of a spire, starting at the aortic anulus and ending at the beginning of the descending aorta. Reduction in the length of the spire, which may occur after operations on the ascending aorta, reduces the radius of curvature and the space within the arch. The risk of a left main bronchus compression is particularly great after correction of an interrupted aortic arch because the gap between the two aortic extremities is wide after resection of ductal tissue, and mobilization of the descending aorta to gain length is limited through an anterior sternotomy.
Widening of the aortic arch relieved compression of the left main bronchus in both of our patients. The gain in length of the aorta obtained after extensive dissection of the descending aorta allowed a more cephalad and posterior coursing of the distal aortic arch and proximal descending aorta, away from the bronchus(Fig 2
). It is noteworthy that extensive dissection of the aorta was insufficient to relieve bronchial compression, which was achieved only after widening of the aortic arch.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. J. Baker, W. J. Wells, C. A. Derby, S. Rizi, and V. A. Starnes Ascending Aortic Extension for Enlargement of the Aortopulmonary Space in Children with Pulmonary Artery Stenosis Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2005; 80(5): 1647 - 1651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Mitchell, D. N. Campbell, W. H. Toews, and T. Z. Khan Autograft aortic arch extension and sleeve resection for bronchial compression after interrupted aortic arch repair Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2002; 73(6): 1969 - 1971. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |