|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119:401
© 2000 Mosby, Inc.
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR |
Department of Cardiology
Wilford Hall Medical Center
Lackland Air Force Base
Lackland, TX 78235a
To the Editor:
Poullis and colleagues
1 recently presented their results of an ex vivo study suggesting that a hemoconcentrator could be used to remove the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) inhibitor abciximab (c7E Fab, ReoPro) during cardiopulmonary bypass. On the basis of their findings, they state that the use of a hemoconcentrator would reduce the need for platelet transfusions and decrease the risk of bleeding in patients recently treated with abciximab undergoing coronary bypass. However, we believe their model incorporates severe limitations that invalidate their findings.
The investigators state that the use of a hemoconcentrator will remove "free ReoPro from the plasma." They support this conclusion through studies with a model that used either saline solution or saline plus packed red blood cells to which abciximab was added. However, because of the pharmacokinetics of abciximab, this model is not representative of a patient treated with abciximab. In a patient, abciximab binds with very high affinity (KD = 5 nmol/L) to the platelet GPIIb/IIIa receptor, as well as to the
vß3 receptor found on endothelial and smooth muscle cells
2,3; any unbound molecules of this monoclonal antibody fragment are cleared rapidly from the plasma by the reticuloendothelial system. Therefore free plasma concentrations of abciximab diminish very rapidly after the termination of an infusion, with a half-life of about 30 minutes.
4,5 Thus, although in the model described by Poulliss group there was free abciximab available to be removed by the hemoconcentrator, this was because they used solutions free of platelets or any other cells to which the abciximab could bind. In a patient treated with abciximab, there would be no unbound molecule available for removal, and a hemoconcentrator would be of no benefit.
Aggressive platelet inhibition with GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients needing urgent cardiac surgery is certainly an appropriate concern. However, although anecdotal reports have suggested a risk of excessive bleeding,
6 results from recent randomized trials have shown only a higher rate of platelet transfusions in abciximab-treated patients, and, in fact, a trend toward a decrease in death and perioperative myocardial infarction compared with results in patients receiving placebo.
7
12/8/103152
References
vß3 integrins. Circulation 1998;98:1085-91. This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Y Lee, W. DeBois, K. H Krieger, L. N Girardi, L. Russo, J. McVey, W. Ko, N. K Altorki, R. A Brodman, and O W. Isom The effects of platelet inhibitors on blood use in cardiac surgery Perfusion, January 1, 2002; 17(1): 33 - 37. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |