JTCS Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evora, P. R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Evora, P. R. B.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119:632-633
© 2000 Mosby, Inc.


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Should methylene blue be the drug of choice to treat vasoplegias caused by cardiopulmonary bypass and anaphylactic shock?

Paulo Roberto B. Evora, MD, PhD

Division of Experimental Surgery, Ribeirão Preto School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Department of Surgery, UNAERP Medical School, Heart Hospital of Ribeirão Preto, Rua Rui Barbosa, 367, Ap 7, 14015-120 Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil

To the Editor:

Yiu, Robin, and PattisonGo 1 presented a rapid reversal of refractory hypotension with methylene blue after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). I would like to reinforce this kind of therapeutic approach, not only for low systemic vascular resistance (SVR) after CPB, but also for other types of vasoplegias, including anaphylactic shock.

My colleagues and IGo 2 reported the restoration of SVR with the use of methylene blue in 6 patients after cardiac surgery with and without CPB. In the immediate postoperative period, all patients had tachycardia, oliguria, good peripheral perfusion, and important systemic arterial hypotension not responsive to large doses of infused catecholamines. Hemodynamic analysis, done by the thermodilution technique (Swan-Ganz; Baxter Healthcare Corp, Santa Ana, Calif), showed a profile compatible with systemic inflammatory response syndrome, with a mean SVR index of 868 dina · s · cm5. Methylene blue was administered to block the action of nitric oxide inhibiting the soluble guanylate cyclase at doses of 1.5 mg/kg during 1 hour of intravenous infusion. The systemic vascular tone restoration (SVR index = 1693 dina · s · cm5 with normal arterial pressure and clinical performance) was effective and fast, showing methylene blue as a pharmacologic tool that improves the morbidity and mortality in systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Methylene blue did not affect cardiac output or pulmonary vascular resistance in those patients. This clinical experience was started in 1994 with the use of methylene blue in desperate situations in the operating room and early hours of the postoperative period. Since the presentation of these hemodynamic data, methylene blue has been widely used in Brazil.Go 2 Trying to find cause-effect clues, we identified some isolated dataGo 3: (1) Most of the events were observed during or after CPB. (2) Many cases were associated with the use of the curare alcuronium. (3) Some cases were observed under usual anesthesia with etomidate, fentanyl, pancuronium, and diazepam. (4) Some cases were clearly associated with protamine infusion. (5) At least in one case the vasodilatation was induced after heparin infusion. (6) The vasoplegia was also observed in noncardiac operations. (7) Our impression was that the syndrome happened periodically. (8) Many patients had diabetes. (9) Many patients were previously using the calcium antagonist diltiazem. To these observations we can add the possible effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors as suggested by Tuman and associatesGo 4 and mentioned by Yiu, Robin, and Pattison.Go 1

We also have used methylene blue to treat anaphylaxis. Our cumulative clinical experience includes 6 patients. The causes were iodinate radiographic contrast material (5 patients) and penicillin (1 patient). The traditional treatments (high doses of epinephrine and corticosteroids) failed to reverse the cardiocirculatory collapse, urticaria, and angioedema. Four patients were treated by a bolus infusion of 4% methylene blue, 1.5 mg/kg (120 mg), followed by continuous infusion of another 120 mg diluted in 5% glucose in water. The infusion was administered as a bolus because of the severity of shock. Two patients received only continuous infusion during 30 to 40 minutes. The anaphylactic manifestations were completely reversed in 10 to 15 minutes. In 1 patient we observed nodal cardiac rhythm over 1 minute during the infusion of the dye, which reversed spontaneously. One hypertensive patient had angina pectoris during infusion, without any electrocardiographic manifestation, and did not require coronary vasodilators to reverse the symptoms. We obtained the hemodynamic registers of 2 patients who had anaphylactic shock caused by radiographic contrast material in the cardiovascular catheterization laboratory. Cumulative experience would indicate that this dye is the treatment of choice or an alternative to the treatment of distributive circulatory shock. I am reporting, probably, the first experience treating anaphylaxis in human beings with methylene blue, and it deserves wide circulation because it is a lifesaving choice.Go 5

Nitric oxide stimulates soluble guanylate cyclase and activates the production of cyclic guanosine 3',5'monophosphate (cGMP), resulting in relaxation. Inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis is not approved for clinical use because of the lack of specificity to the inducible form of nitric oxide synthase and its association with tissue necrosis. Methylene blue inhibits guanylate cyclase, avoiding the cGMP-dependent vasorelaxant effect of nitric oxide in the smooth muscle of the vessels. Also, thiazine dye is widely used in clinical medicine to reduce methemoglobin, to treat malaria, and to cleanse the urinary tract. Otherwise, methylene blue is not associated with tissue necrosis, as caused by nitric oxide synthase inhibition, and its lethal dose is more than 40 mg/kg, as shown experimentally in sheep. Myles, Leong, and CurryGo 6 failed to identify an increase in nitric oxide release after, or as a consequence of, CPB on the basis of the serum and urine nitrite/nitrate levels. Since methylene blue blocks the soluble guanylate cyclase, which is the final effect on the nitric oxide pathway, it is hard to determine a different cGMP-dependent mechanism, and the hypothesis of direct activation of this final common pathway of nitric oxide release is very improbable. I guess it is more logical to speculate on the existence of another non-nitric cGMP-dependent pathway, with different receptors and/or different G-proteins, or else a sensitization of vascular smooth muscle cells to the action of nitric oxide, as hypothesized by Yiu, Robin, and Pattison.Go 1

doi:10.1067/mtc.2000.104472

References

  1. Yiu P, Robin J, Pattison CW. Reversal of refractory hypotension with single-dose methylene blue after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:195-4.[Free Full Text]
  2. Andrade JCS, Batista Filho ML, Evora PRB, et al. Methylene blue administration in the treatment of the vasoplegic syndrome after cardiac surgery. Rev Bras Circ Cardiovasc 1996;11:107-14.
  3. Evora PRB, Ribeiro PJF, Andrade JCS. Methylene blue administration in SIRS after cardiac operations [letter/comment]. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:12-3.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Tuman KJ, McCarthy KJ, O’Connor CJ, Holm WE, Ivankovich AD. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors increase vasoconstrictor requirements after cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth Analg 1995;80:473-9.[Abstract]
  5. Evora PRB, Roselino CH, Schiavetto PM. Methylene blue in anaphylactic shock [letter]. Ann Emerg Med 1997;30:240.
  6. Myles PS, Leong CK, Currey J. Endogenous nitric oxide and low systemic vascular resistance after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1997;11:571-4.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. H. Levy and N. F. Adkinson Jr
Anaphylaxis During Cardiac Surgery: Implications for Clinicians
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2008; 106(2): 392 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
P. R. B. Evora and A. J. Rodrigues
Methylene blue revised
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2006; 131(1): 250 - 251.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
G. Shanmugam
Vasoplegic syndrome--the role of methylene blue
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2005; 28(5): 705 - 710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. G. Leyh, T. Kofidis, M. Struber, S. Fischer, K. Knobloch, B. Wachsmann, C. Hagl, A. R. Simon, and A. Haverich
Reply to the Editor
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2004; 127(3): 896 - 896.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. L. Levin, M. A. Degrange, G. F. Bruno, C. D. Del Mazo, D. J. Taborda, J. J. Griotti, and F. J. Boullon
Methylene blue reduces mortality and morbidity in vasoplegic patients after cardiac surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2004; 77(2): 496 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
D. Sparicio, G. Landoni, F. Pappalardo, M. Crivellari, E. Cerchierini, G. Marino, and A. Zangrillo
Methylene blue for lithium-induced refractory hypotension in off-pump coronary artery bypass graft: report of two cases
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2004; 127(2): 592 - 593.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. G. Leyh, T. Kofidis, M. Struber, S. Fischer, K. Knobloch, B. Wachsmann, C. Hagl, A. R. Simon, and A. Haverich
Methylene blue: The drug of choice for catecholamine-refractory vasoplegia after cardiopulmonary bypass?
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2003; 125(6): 1426 - 1431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. Grayling and C. D. Deakin
Methylene blue during cardiopulmonary bypass to treat refractory hypotension in septic endocarditis
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2003; 125(2): 426 - 427.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evora, P. R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Evora, P. R. B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS