|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119:700-708
© 2000 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
CARDIOTHORACIC TRANSPLANTATION |
From the Cardiac Transplant Unit, Wythenshawe Hospital, University Department of Statistics,a School of Biological Science,b Manchester University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Address for reprints: T. M. Aziz, FRCS, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Hairmyres Hospital, Eagleshame Rd, East Kilbride, Scotland, G75 8RG, United Kingdom.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although CAV has been the subject of intense study, the relationship between the occurrence and severity of this disease and cytokines is still unknown. The production of growth factors in the allograft coronary lesions has been demonstrated by means of in situ hybridization techniques.
3 Inflammatory cells, including macrophages, as well as platelets and endothelial cells play direct and indirect roles in cardiac allograft injury and repair.
4 Evidence is accumulating that the cytokine network is involved in generating and maintaining graft atherosclerosis.
5
The contribution of transforming growth factor (TGF-ß) to the development of coronary artery disease in heart transplants is undefined. Increased expression of TGF-ß1 in human vascular stenotic lesions has been previously reported.
6 In solid organ transplantation, TGF-ß has been implicated in the development of glomerulosclerosis mediated by its dual action of increasing deposition and decreasing degradation of the extracellular matrix.
7
In the present study we have examined the involvement of TGF-ß, in association with histologic, clinical, and genetic factors, in the generation of angiographically proven CAV after orthotopic heart transplantation.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients
Between 1987 and 1996, 208 orthotopic heart transplantations were performed at our center. A total of 175 orthotopic heart transplant recipients survived more than 2 years, and they were considered for this study. The age at transplantation was 46 ± 10 years and 81% were men. Recipients having heart retransplantation or those who survived for less than 24 months after the operation were excluded from this study. The standard technique
8 was performed in 99 recipients and the bicaval
9 procedure in 76 recipients. Follow-up was complete to December 1998 or to the time of death and ranged from 39 to 135 months.
Endomyocardial biopsies
Surveillance endomyocardial biopsies were performed through a percutaneous right internal jugular approach. At least 4 to 5 biopsies were performed during each biopsy session. The biopsy sessions were performed on a scheduled basis: weekly for the first month, every 2 weeks for the next 2 months, monthly until 6 months, then at 9, 12, and 18 months after transplantation, and yearly thereafter. In the event of clinical suspicion of rejection in the interim, further biopsies were performed as indicated. Biopsy specimens were evaluated for rejection by means of International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) criteria.
10
Triple-drug immunosuppression with cyclosporine (INN: ciclosporin), azathioprine, and steroid therapy was used in all patients in addition to an initial 3-day application of cytolytic induction therapy (rabbit-antithymocyte globulin, 2 mg/kg). Acute rejection was treated with bolus methylprednisolone (500 mg daily for 3 days) and follow-up endomyocardial biopsy was performed 1 to 2 weeks later to assess outcome of treatment. Treatment was given only when the degree of rejection was 3A or more or when the patients were in a clinically compromised condition. For the purpose of this study, a rejection episode was defined as the presence in at least one biopsy specimen of ISHLT grade 2 rejection or higher. Subsequent positive biopsy results were considered to be the same rejection episode if not separated by a rejection-free biopsy result.
Coronary angiography and definition of graft atherosclerosis
Each patient underwent surveillance coronary angiography starting 2 years after transplantation and repeated annually at the time of biopsy.
Coronary angiograms were assessed by means of the protocol for angiographic assessment of coronary artery disease in heart transplant recipients as described previously by the Cardiac Transplant Research Database group.
11 The degree of CAV was assessed in all the main coronary vessels and their primary branches. A primary coronary vessel was defined as the proximal two thirds of the left anterior descending artery, left circumflex, or a dominant or co-dominant right coronary artery. A branch vessel was defined as the distal one third of the left anterior descending artery, its diagonal branches, obtuse marginal branches, intermediate artery, and/or a nondominant right coronary artery. Scoring of CAV was based on involvement of the left main stem coronary artery, primary, and branch vessel stenoses. The disease score is shown in Table I. The final score was calculated for each patient and was assessed as no CAV (score = 0), minimal CAV (score 1-3), mild CAV (score 4-7), moderate CAV (score 8-10), and severe CAV (score
10).
|
Histologic examination and immunohistochemistry
Only endomyocardial biopsy specimens taken at least 2 years after transplantation were selected for immunohistochemical assessment. A total of 4721 endomyocardial biopsy specimens, taken mainly from the interventricular septum obtained during baseline follow-up and at the time of angiographic studies, were graded according to the ISHLT classification system.
10 So that the immediate effects of current rejection could be avoided, specimens taken from recipients in whom the previous biopsy result showed evidence of cellular rejection (any grade other than 0) were excluded from immunohistochemical staining for the purposes of this study (n = 863 biopsy specimens). Also, specimens taken from patients requiring additional immunosuppression for any reason were also excluded (n = 199 biopsy specimens). The rest of the endomyocardial biopsy specimens (n = 3659) were included for immunohistochemical staining.
Paraffin-embedded sections fixed in 4% formaldehyde were dewaxed and rehydated with limonene (Citroclear; HD Supplies, Aylesbury, Bucks, United Kingdom), alcohol, and water for 10 minutes and then treated with 10% proteinase K (Dako, Bucks, United Kingdom) in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) solution. Nonspecific binding was blocked with 10% normal swine serum (Chemicon International Ltd, Harrow, United Kingdom). Mouse anti-human TGF-ß antibody was diluted 1:10 in TBS and applied to 3 of the 4 sections on each slide while the remaining section received only TBS without antibodies. The slides were incubated for 1 hour, then washed and stained with peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse immunoglobulin G at 1:1000 dilution (Sigma Immunochemical, St Louis, Mo) for 2 hours, after which slides were transferred to fresh diaminobenzidine. The slides were counterstained with Meyers haemalum (Sigma Immunochemical), dehydrated, and mounted with dibutyl polystyrene xylene (DPX). To confirm the staining specificity, we performed blocking studies with recombinant TGF-ß (R&D Systems, Abingdon, Oxon, United Kingdom) to inhibit binding of antiTGF-ß antibodies. Macrophages were identified in sections by means of an indirect immunoperoxidase technique with a mouse monoclonal antibody, CD68 (reagent PGM-1, Dako).
Immunohistochemistry quantification
TGF-ß staining assessment
We used the same immunohistochemical staining score that was previously described by our laboratory for assessment of TGF staining in human allografts.
12 The scoring for TGF-ß and CD+68 scoring took into account 3 factors:
|
Each biopsy specimen consisted of 3 to 5 pieces. TGF score was calculated for each separate piece and then added together to calculate mean TGF-ß for each single biopsy specimen.
Development of TGF-ß and CAV scoring systems for each patient
Mean TGF-ß and CAV scores were calculated annually for each patient starting from 24 months after the operation till the end point of this study (patient death or December 1998). In total, 679 angiographic assessments were performed for the entire study population (Table III).
|
Data collection and statistical analysis
The mean follow-up period for the study population was 68 ± 32 months after heart transplantation. In addition to vasculopathy, the study investigators collected vasculopathy score, TGF score, and 16 demographic and medical history variables believed to be relevant to the development of CAV after heart transplantation. Medical history variables were defined as patient report of a previous diagnosis by a physician. All statistical analyses were completed with SPSS software (Windows 7.5; SPSS, Inc, Chicago, Ill). A univariate analysis was done that analyzed the possible relationship between CAV and the variables collected. Contingency table analyses for categorical data and t tests or their nonparametric analog (Mann-Whitney U test) for continuous variables were used. Some variables required log transformations to achieve approximate normality or constancy or additivity of scale. Any variable that achieved a P value of .10 or less in the univariate analysis was included in the model. Multivariable analyses were performed by means of the Cox proportional hazard model on StatView J 4.11 software (Abacus Concepts, Inc, Berkeley, Calif). Forward and backward stepwise procedures were used to determine the combination of factors that were significant in the development of CAV after heart transplantation. If variables could be used as continuous variables, continuous variables were used in multivariate analysis. The regression and correlation analysis was used to compare the values of the immunohistochemistry score, TGF score, and the prevalence of rejection episodes. Adjusted correlation taking the time interval into consideration was used to assess the relation between TGF score and immunohistochemistry score during the study.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
After the analysis of the surveillance recipients angiograms at a 1-year interval after transplantation, we could classify the recipients into 4 groups: 131 (76%) with normal-minimal coronary artery anatomy, 31 (16.5%) with mild graft CAV, 6 (3%) with moderate CAV, and 8 (4.5%) with severe CAV.
TGF-ß was immunolocalized in the myocardium, interstitium, blood vessels, macrophages, and in areas of fibrosis (Fig 1). TGF-ß was strongly expressed in the endomyocardial biopsy specimen from patients with moderate or severe CAV (95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.8-9.3) in comparison with those with minimal or mild CAV (95% CI = 2.9-4.2), P = .0002.
|
Increased TGF-ß positive staining preceded the angiographic detection of CAV by 11 to 15 months. Eighty-two percent of patients (n = 61 patients) who had a TGF-ß staining score of more than 7 at any point of the study and normal angiograms at that time had significant CAV develop within 12 months.
Progression of allograft coronary artery disease was diagnosed in 76 patients with a TGF-ß score of more than 7 at an average of 12 months later. Progression was evidenced by new angiographic abnormalities in 69 patients and worsening of pre-existing mild-minimal coronary artery disease lesions in 7 patients.
New angiographic abnormalities were observed in 6 patients with mild coronary artery disease, in 32 patients with moderate disease, and in 31 patients with severe disease. These new abnormalities consisted mainly of new focal coronary artery disease (51 patients) and diffuse coronary artery disease (18 patients).
If the TGF-ß staining score was more than 10, the likelihood of progression to severe coronary artery disease within 12 months was 41% compared with 15% when the TGF-ß score was less. Progression of coronary artery disease strongly correlated with a higher TGF-ß staining score in the endomyocardial biopsy specimens obtained during the same period (r = 0.73, P = .0007) (Fig 2).
|
Higher TGF-ß expression was sustained in patients who had moderate or severe CAV (95% CI = 8.9-12.1) compared with those who had minimal or mild CAV changes (score > 7; 95% CI = 3.4-5.1), P = .0001. Comparison of variables between recipients with moderate or severe CAV (n = 90) and those who did not show relevant CAV changes (n = 82) are summarized in Table IV.
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Insights into pathology
The pathogenesis of CAV is poorly understood and is quite different from atherosclerosis in native coronary artery disease. Coronary arterial involvement is usually diffuse with long segments of all levels of vessels affected in a relatively uniform manner. It has been postulated that changes in the allograft coronary circulation originate from an interaction between immune and nonimmune factors that lead to smooth muscle cellular infiltration and accumulation of expanded neointima. Reape, Rayner, and Manning
15 have reported excessive expression of cell adhesion molecules, chemokines, and increased numbers of macrophages in human atherosclerotic lesions. Labarrere, Nelson, and Faulk
16 detected that early activation of coronary endothelial lining in the transplanted heart predicts the development of CAV. Other studies
17 have shown infiltration of macrophages in chronic liver and renal allograft rejection. Consequent activation of endothelial and smooth muscle cells with subsequent expression of leukocyte activation molecules and increased secretion of adhesion molecules (P-selectin and intercellular adhesion molecule1) may contribute to the development of CAV.
18 These probably lead to endothelial surface changes previously identified as early events in the pathogenesis of acute transplant rejection and the subsequent development of CAV. With time, progressive myocardial fibrosis results and adventitial fibrosis of the subepicardial tissues probably inhibits dilatation and remodeling of the epicardial arteries by constriction.
19
The role of TGF-ß
TGF-ß modulates a number of crucial events potentially central to the genesis and maintenance of CAV. These include macrophage chemotaxis, suppression of lymphocyte function, fibroblast chemotaxis, and proliferation, in addition to the modulation of collagen synthesis.
20,21 TGF-ß is also a strong stimulator of extracellular matrix synthesis.
22 Many different cells can synthesize and release TGF-ß, including activated macrophages, lymphocytes, and platelets
23,24 (cell types recruited intensely to sites of vascular injury in the development of the atherosclerotic process).
22 Previous reports have confirmed increased expression of TGF-ß in vascular stenotic lesions. In addition to its stimulating effect on cellular and vascular smooth muscle proliferation, TGF-ß is also a strong stimulant of the secretion of endothelin, a potent arterial vasoconstrictor.
25 In renal allograft recipients, TGF-ß has been shown to strongly correlate with the development of glomerulosclerosis.
7
Gayle and associates
26 assessed CAV on the basis of an evaluation of ischemic changes in the endomyocardial biopsy specimen. They concluded that ischemic myocardial changes in the biopsy specimen were highly specific for CAV (98%), with a positive and negative predictive value for ischemic injury of 92% and 51%, respectively. Their study also reported a low sensitivity for the presence of disease. An association between allograft rejection, the subsequent development of CAV, and rejection episodes (especially those that are mild and untreated) has been reported.
27,28
Current study
In the present study we have evaluated the risk factors for the development of CAV in cardiac allograft recipients at our center. We have demonstrated the significance of cardiac allograft cytokine expression and an association with the subsequent development of CAV. Recipients homozygous for high TGF-ß producer genotype were most likely to have high TGF-ß tissue expression. The level of TGF-ß expression in the endomyocardial biopsy specimen was the most potent predictor of disease. The number of ISHLT rejection episodes of grade 2 or more correlated significantly with higher myocardial TGF-ß deposition and the development of CAV.
These findings suggest that frequent cellular rejection episodes during the first 2 post-transplant years in recipients genetically predisposed to higher TGF-ß production initiate a series of inflammatory and immunologic responses characterized by overexpression of TGF-ß. This culminates in endothelial injury, coronary intimal thickening, and development of CAV. In agreement with previous work,
25,29 we also report a greater risk of the development of CAV in recipients with a history of ischemic heart disease and in those in whom the allograft donor was male. The increased incidence of CAV among recipients in whom the organ donor died of subarachnoid bleeding may be attributable to the fact that many of these donors are likely to have had chronic systemic hypertension.
Study limitations
Our analysis was limited by the fact that the study population was restricted to recipients surviving for at least 2 years after transplantation and had undergone coronary angiography. We were unable, therefore, to provide information about the very early development of fatal CAV. The rationale for this approach was based on the requirement to avoid acute allograft rejection, particularly given the poor reliability of immunohistochemical staining during rejection (170 recipients had one or more episode of rejection during the first 2 years). However, in view of the relatively young donor age (32 ± 9 years), the incidence of donor CAV was likely to have been low in this population. Another limitation of our study was the suboptimal sensitivity of contrast coronary angiography for the detection of early CAV. The accuracy of coronary angiography for detection of nonepicardial coronary lesions is doubtful, and previous reports have demonstrated severe CAV at autopsy in transplant recipients shortly after a reportedly normal angiogram.
30,31
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Appendix: Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
I have a couple of comments to make, not to mention the insensitivity of routine angiography to identify significant degrees of CAV.
The first comment relates to the details of the TGF-ß scoring system. About half the points contributing to the score seemed reasonably quantitative and hence objective in nature. They include the number of macrophages and the percent fibrosis in the biopsy specimens. The remainder of the scoring system seems quite subjective, based on shades of staining or presence of TGF-ß. I have two questions relating to that. First, were the histologic graders blinded to the study group data?
Dr Hutchinson. Yes, they were.
Dr Bailey. Second, your database included more than 12,000 myocardial biopsy specimens. How many were actually subjected to immunohistochemical analysis for the purposes of this study?
Dr Hutchinson. About 3500.
Dr Bailey. About a fourth of them. That is a lot of work.
My second comment relates to the role of TGF-ß and solid organ transplantation. TGF-ß is a multifunctional protein among a large family of cytokines that play a role in the repair of vessel injuries. It is, of course, of enormous interest to our interventional cardiology colleagues since their balloons and stents seem to up-regulate cell growth and proliferative functions of this molecule. However, TGF-ß is also a powerful immunoregulator, and its immunosuppressive behavior or function is currently under investigation as a transgene in experimental studies. You have suggested immunologic down-regulation of TGF-ß as a strategy to reduce CAV. Since TGF-ß is so ubiquitous in recipient tissue and its global effects on cell growth and differentiation are so important to the health of the recipient, would it not be better to leave it alone, simply as a marker of graft injury or in this case as a possible prognostic indicator for the development of coronary vascular disease? It occurred to me alternatively that you could examine methods of up-regulating the immunosuppressive functions of this molecule to enhance graft survival. Could you comment on any of those issues?
Dr Hutchinson. TGF-ß has many functions, including suppression of lymphocyte proliferation. In the acute situation, a little bit of TGF is probably beneficial. However, in the chronic situation in which TGF is up-regulated, chronic rejection of the lung, kidney or liver is likely to develop in patients who are genetically inclined to overproduction of TGF. As an example, 38 of 39 individuals in whom 80% restenosis developed are the high TGF-ß genotype. That is ample evidence that TGF is associated with the kind of lesion that develops in the transplant. TGF is not the only factor involved. We are currently investigating the genetics of vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor,
and ß, basic fibroblast growth factor, and insulin-like growth factor1. All of those may play a role, but the predominant one appears to be TGF-ß. In the chronic situation, TGF-ß appears to be playing a major role in the development of disease.
Dr Bailey. How do you suggest we in the transplant community use this information in the day-to-day surveillance of our patients?
Dr Hutchinson. I think you can look at biopsy specimens very easily for staining for TGF, regardless of whether you want to develop a very complex scoring system, as our pathologists have. Our pathologists were blinded, and each slide was read by at least two or three of them. They conferred to agree on a score, and they used all sorts of controls for the intensity of staining. Our pathologists exercised a great deal of care, but TGF-ß staining could be incorporated into a routine pathologic system.
You mentioned immunosuppression. We know that cyclosporine increases TGF-ß production both in vivo and in vitro, and there is actually a very close correlation between cyclosporine trough levels and circulating levels of TGF. Also, at least in lung transplant recipients, there is an association between the development of lung fibrosis and the cyclosporine trough level. We might actually think about switching our longer term patients from cyclosporine to something less damaging.
Dr Mark Pelletier (Montreal, Quebec, Canada). I have a question about TGF-ß, one of its roles being that of a proangiogenic factor. In these patients with severe CAV, might the expression of TGF-ß in fact be secondary to the hearts need to make new vessels, perhaps new collateral vessels? Would TGF-ß be increased in the same manner as vascular endothelial growth factor or basic fibroblast growth factor? Have you considered this possibility?
Dr Hutchinson. It appears to be the other way around, because the genotype predicts the development of coronary artery disease, rather than the other way around. However, I think you are right about vascular endothelial growth factor, and we are looking at the genotype associated with that.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. A. Fox and N. A. Nussmeier Does Gender Influence the Likelihood or Types of Complications Following Cardiac Surgery? Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, December 1, 2004; 8(4): 283 - 295. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Fox, S. K. Shernan, and S. C. Body Predictive Genomics of Adverse Events After Cardiac Surgery Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, December 1, 2004; 8(4): 297 - 315. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Ramirez, S. Takagawa, M. Sekosan, H. A. Jaffe, J. Varga, and J. Roman Smad3 Deficiency Ameliorates Experimental Obliterative Bronchiolitis in a Heterotopic Tracheal Transplantation Model Am. J. Pathol., October 1, 2004; 165(4): 1223 - 1232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Omoto, K. Minami, D. Bothig, U. Schutt, G. Tenderich, S. Wlost, and R. Korfer Risk Factor Analysis of Orthotopic Heart Transplantation Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, March 1, 2003; 11(1): 33 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. LIU, M. SUGA, A. A. MACLEAN, J. A. ST. GEORGE, D. W. SOUZA, and S. KESHAVJEE Soluble Transforming Growth Factor-beta Type III Receptor Gene Transfection Inhibits Fibrous Airway Obliteration in a Rat Model of Bronchiolitis Obliterans Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 1, 2002; 165(3): 419 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Aziz, R. A. Saad, M. Burgess, N. Yonan, P. Hasleton, and I. V. Hutchinson Transforming growth factor beta and myocardial dysfunction following heart transplantation Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2001; 20(1): 177 - 186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |