|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119:1110-1118
© 2000 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
SURGERY FOR CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE |
From the Division of Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery,a Division of Pediatric Cardiology,b The University of Michigan Congenital Heart Center, Ann Arbor, Mich, and the Division of Pediatric Cardiology,c The University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
Address for reprints: Ralph S. Mosca, MD, Associate Professor of Surgery, Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery, Michigan Congenital Heart Center, University of Michigan Medical Center, F7830 Mott Childrens Hospital, 1500 East Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0223.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Certain preoperative and intraoperative variables, aside from the basic cardiac morphology, have been identified as important risk factors for early postoperative mortality after Fontan palliation. These include elevated pulmonary artery pressure and resistance, ventricular dysfunction, systemic atrioventricular valve regurgitation, longer cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, and significant pulmonary artery distortion.
6,7 In addition, there is a sense that systemicpulmonary artery collateral blood vessels, by providing pulmonary arterial flow that competes with systemic venous return, may also increase morbidity and mortality.
10,11 The purpose of this study was to review our experience with the Fontan procedure performed for patients with HLHS in an effort to ascertain whether these and other perioperative variables influenced patient outcome (hospital survival, duration of intubation, length of time in the intensive care unit, and length of total hospital stay). Although these techniques are used in all of our patients with various forms of univentricular heart, the cohort of patients with HLHS was chosen since it represents the largest and most homogeneous group at our institution. A significant change in surgical technique for the Fontan operation occurred approximately halfway through this series, and patient outcomes were therefore also related to the type of surgical management used.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Operative technique
The final anatomy of the Fontan palliation was essentially the same in all the patients in this report: a total cavopulmonary connection with a polytetrafluoroethylene*
intra-atrial lateral tunnel, with a 4-mm fenestration within this baffle. However, two significantly different surgical techniques were used to effect this palliation:
Technique I
Forty-eight patients operated on between February 1992 and December 1995 underwent the Fontan procedure with CPB, bicaval venous cannulation, and moderate systemic hypothermia (28°C). All patients who had undergone a BDG procedure
13,14 for stage 2 palliation (n = 36) were included in this group, as well as 12 patients whose stage 2 palliation was an HFP.
15 The right pulmonary artery and the cephalad aspect of the right atrium were mobilized. Incisions in the inferior aspect of the right pulmonary artery and in the superior portion of the right atrium were fashioned. The caudal aspect of the right pulmonary artery and right atrium were connected, creating the floor of the new atriopulmonary connection. A lateral tunnel (polytetrafluoroethylene) was then constructed incorporating the orifice of the inferior vena cava, as well as the new atriopulmonary connection. A 4-mm fenestration (punch or adjustable snare) was placed within the baffle.
Technique II
Fifty-two patients operated on between December 1995 and April 1998 underwent the Fontan procedure with single right atrial venous cannulation, profound hypothermia, and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest as previously described.
16 Minimal dissection of the cardiac structures was performed, and the pulmonary arteries and venae cavae were not exposed. All patients in this group had previously undergone an HFP as their stage 2 palliation. A right atriotomy anterior to the crista terminalis was fashioned, the atrial septal defect was enlarged as needed, and the patch separating the atria from the pulmonary arteries was excised. The branch pulmonary arteries were sounded and calibrated with dilators to confirm their size. A lateral tunnel incorporating the orifices of both venae cavae was fashioned with polytetrafluoroethylene. A 4-mm diameter punch fenestration was placed in the baffle. The anterior suture line was sewn to the edge of the atriotomy, avoiding the crista terminalis, completing the baffle, and closing the atria. The remainder of the operative procedure was identical to technique I.
Concurrent procedures included tricuspid valvuloplasty (n = 14) and placement of a pulmonary artery stent (n = 13). Tricuspid valvuloplasty was performed with standard techniques of suture commissuroplasty and/or annuloplasty.
17 Artificial annuloplasty rings were not used. A Palmaz stent (generally sizes P-188 or P-308; Johnson & Johnson Interventional Systems, Warren, NJ) was inserted into the left pulmonary artery when diffusely hypoplastic or when exposure of the branch pulmonary artery would have required extensive dissection.
Modified ultrafiltration (MUF) was introduced in April of 1996 and thus was used only in patients undergoing technique II (all but 2 patients undergoing technique II were treated with MUF at the Fontan procedure). This technique has been described elsewhere
18,19 and was routinely performed for 10 minutes after weaning from CPB.
Data acquisition
Demographic and other patient-related data (eg, the occurrence of postoperative complications) were obtained from hospital records. For patients operated on with technique II, the CPB time does not include the period of circulatory arrest. Survival is defined as survival to hospital discharge.
1 Lengths of stay in the intensive care unit and in the hospital were chosen as end points that encompass other potentially complicating factors, that is, the use of inotropic agents and persistent pleural effusions.
Echocardiographic data
A single examiner who was blinded to the remainder of the patient data reviewed preoperative 2-dimensional and Doppler echocardiograms, which had been obtained within 10 days of the Fontan procedure. Right ventricular systolic function was qualitatively estimated to be normal, mild to moderately depressed, or severely depressed. The magnitude of tricuspid regurgitation was qualitatively estimated to be none or trace, mild to moderate, or severe.
Cardiac catheterization hemodynamic data
The following data were extracted from the pre-Fontan catheterization record: mean right atrial (RAP) and pulmonary arterial (PAP) pressures, pulmonary blood flow (PBF, calculated by the Fick principle with the use of either measured or assumed oxygen consumption), and systemic arterial oxygen saturation. Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) was calculated by the following formula: PVR (indexed) = (Mean PAP Mean RAP)/PBF (indexed).
Angiographic data
A single observer inspected cineangiograms of the pulmonary artery and ascending aorta. Branch pulmonary artery diameters just proximal to the origins of the right and left upper lobe branches and the diameter of the descending thoracic aorta at the diaphragm were measured and used to calculate the McGoon ratio.
20,21 The magnitude of blood flow into the lungs from aortopulmonary collaterals was judged by a semiquantitative estimate of the amount of contrast material present in the pulmonary arteries and veins after injection of contrast medium into the ascending aorta. An ordinal scale was developed that is roughly proportional to the magnitude of collateral flow. For each lung, 0 = no contrast material seen in the pulmonary vessels, 1 = barely detectable contrast material in the pulmonary vessels, and 3 = relatively dense contrast material easily seen in the large branch pulmonary arteries and veins. A score of 2 was assigned when the amount of contrast material entering the pulmonary vessels was intermediate in magnitude between 1 and 3. Each lung was scored and the scores were added together (the maximum score was therefore 6).
Statistical analysis
Four outcome measures were evaluated in the postoperative period: survival, number of postoperative days intubated, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and length of hospital stay. For survival, bivariate analyses of possible predictors were performed with
2 for all categoric variables (tricuspid regurgitation, right ventricular function, and aortopulmonary collateral blood flow) and the Student t test for all continuous variables. The number of days intubated postoperatively, the length of stay in the intensive care unit, and the hospital length of stay were not normally distributed. Therefore, bivariate comparisons for each of these variables were performed by means of the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Additionally, these outcomes were each categorized into binomial variables, either less than or equal to the 75th percentile or greater than the 75th percentile. These binomial variables were assessed by means of
2 for all categoric predictor variables and the Student t test for all continuous predictor variables. Nonparametric, ordinal data were tested as a bivariate model; 75% were chosen to be tested for each of these variables. Multivariable models with the use of logistic analyses were then composed for each outcome to investigate independent outcome predictors. All data were stored in Microsoft Excel and then analyzed with the SAS statistical package (SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The care of patients with univentricular heart at our institution has evolved over the past decade. Initially, patients underwent neonatal palliation followed by a Fontan procedure. As we realized the advantages of the BDG procedure in increasing the effective pulmonary blood flow and reducing the volume load on the single ventricle, this became a routine part of our staged palliation. The Fontan procedure then required construction of an atriopulmonary connection and often augmentation of narrowed branch pulmonary arteries. These operations were performed with bicaval venous cannulation and moderate hypothermia, which required significant CPB and aortic crossclamp times and occasionally were complicated by phrenic nerve injury, postoperative bleeding, and reduced pulmonary compliance. These factors appeared to negatively affect the outcome of our patients with single ventricle lesions. The HFP was then used as a routine method to augment the branch pulmonary arteries and provide a large potential communication within the right atrial chamber for the eventual lateral tunnel Fontan procedure. When performed with a single atrial cannula and profound hypothermia, use of an HFP as an intermediate-stage procedure greatly facilitated the Fontan procedure by reducing the time required for dissection of mediastinal structures, markedly reduced phrenic nerve injury as a complication, and made reconstructive work on the branch pulmonary arteries rare. For this reason the latter technique has been adopted as our preferred method of palliation of patients with single ventricle lesions. Recognizing the potential deleterious effects of circulatory arrest, we have continued to develop our technique. We currently use brief periods of complete circulatory arrest (5-10 minutes) in association with very low flow bypass and venous return provided by nonocclusive suckers to the CPB circuit.
Although the short-term survival of the patients in this report (79%) is not as good as published reports of all patients undergoing the Fontan procedure when viewed as a whole, the survival of patients treated by technique II (98%) compares favorably with the best reported results.
4 Thus, the diagnosis of HLHS in itself does not militate against low operative morbidity and mortality.
A marked improvement in morbidity and mortality was observed between patients undergoing the Fontan procedure with technique II as compared with technique I. The preoperative characteristics of the patients in the 2 groups were very similar. The difference in age between these groups was statistically significant, although a mean age difference of 2 months is likely clinically irrelevant. These differences could be the result of one or more factors, including technique of stage 2 palliation (BDG vs HFP), differences in patient selection, improved postoperative patient care, reduction in CPB time and/or aortic crossclamp time, the use of MUF, or yet other unknown factors. Because of the nearly concurrent nature of these factors, discerning those responsible for this improvement in outcome may not be possible. We favor the notion that the reduction in CPB and aortic crossclamp time largely accounts for the improved mortality for several reasons. As previously noted, the trend toward lower mortality in HFP patients operated on by technique II rather than technique I would suggest that the type of stage 2 palliation was less important than the type of surgical technique used for the Fontan operation. Although patient selection may have tended to eliminate higher-risk patients during the time that technique II was being used, we have not consciously modified our selection criteria for the Fontan operation, and the preoperative characteristics of the patients in the technique I and II groups were nearly identical (Table I
). Similarly, we have not made any changes in postoperative management that likely account for the difference in mortality. Other investigators have found longer CPB and crossclamp times to correlate with less favorable outcomes in the patient requiring the Fontan operation.
3,4,22 Given the marked sensitivity of the Fontan patient to reduced ventricular compliance and increased pulmonary vascular resistance, both of which can be caused by CPB and myocardial ischemia related to a period aortic crossclamping, it is not surprising that these factors may adversely affect outcome. Of note, despite a period of circulatory arrest, technique II resulted in a significantly shorter duration of CPB. Recently, hypothermic low-flow CPB has been reported to produce greater pulmonary dysfunction than periods of circulatory arrest.
23 Perhaps reducing this period of CPB increases lung compliance in patients undergoing technique II, thereby improving their postoperative course. Importantly, although our technique involves a period of circulatory arrest, we do not want to suggest that circulatory arrest imparts any survival advantage. The use of a single atrial cannula and circulatory arrest has significantly simplified the procedure, but given the potential risks associated with its use, we have tried to minimize the periods of complete circulatory arrest. Currently, we use brief periods of circulatory arrest and perform the majority of the procedure with reduced-flow sucker bypass.
Right ventricular function, as assessed by preoperative right atrial pressure and a subjective echocardiographic estimate of systolic function, did not prove to be a predictor of survival. It is possible that this is a reflection of selection bias (that patients with poor function did not undergo Fontan palliation). However, in this series 21 patients estimated to have moderately to severely depressed function were operated on, and 20 survived. Thus, moderate degrees of right ventricular dysfunction may be well tolerated at least in the short to intermediate term. During the time period of the study only 2 patients underwent cardiac transplantation after an HFP: one with moderate right ventricular dysfunction, moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation, and elevated pulmonary vascular resistance, and the second with moderate right ventricular dysfunction and bilateral pulmonary artery stenoses after bilateral endoluminal stent placement. In both cases it was the combination of right ventricular dysfunction with another perceived risk factor that fostered the decision to proceed with transplantation. Both of these patients are alive and doing well after their transplant operations.
The degree of preoperative tricuspid regurgitation also did not have a significant effect on survival. This may be due to selection bias (only 11 patients had moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation) and perhaps an aggressive policy of performing tricuspid valvuloplasty at the time of the Fontan procedure for all but minimal degrees of regurgitation.
24 Pulmonary artery size appears to influence survival in some but not all previous reports
25-27 and did not predict survival in our series. This may be related in part to the routine bilateral augmentation of the pulmonary arteries at the HFP, which resulted in adequate-sized pulmonary arteries for the vast majority of patients at the Fontan procedure. In addition, the use of intravascular pulmonary artery stents at the Fontan operation may also have reduced preoperative pulmonary artery size as a risk factor. Our data also suggest that the magnitude of aortopulmonary collateral blood flow is not a significant short-term risk factor for Fontan patients. However, the method used to estimate this flow was crude and this question requires more quantitative exploration.
Unfortunately, we do not know what effect MUF may have had on outcomes in these patients. It is possible that the use of MUF improved outcomes, perhaps by reducing extravascular fluid or reducing circulating inflammatory mediators.
28-30 We began using MUF in April 1996; hence, almost all of the technique II group and none of the technique I group had been treated with this modality. We cannot therefore separate the possible confounding effect of MUF from differences related to surgical technique.
In conclusion, survival after the Fontan procedure for patients with HLHS has improved markedly and is equivalent to the results for other univentricular lesions.
The potential negative effects of pulmonary artery size can be ameliorated, at least in the case of the surgically accessible pulmonary arteries, by the routine augmentation of the pulmonary arteries at the time of the HFP or with the use of endoluminal stents. Tricuspid regurgitation should be aggressively treated and, if surgically remediable, does not unduly increase the risk of the Fontan procedure.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. G. Ohye, J. W. Gaynor, N. S. Ghanayem, C. S. Goldberg, P. C. Laussen, P. C. Frommelt, J. W. Newburger, G. D. Pearson, S. Tabbutt, G. Wernovsky, et al. Design and rationale of a randomized trial comparing the Blalock-Taussig and right ventricle-pulmonary artery shunts in the Norwood procedure. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2008; 136(4): 968 - 975. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Salvin, M. A. Scheurer, P. C. Laussen, J. E. Mayer Jr, P. J. del Nido, F. A. Pigula, E. A. Bacha, and R. R. Thiagarajan Factors Associated With Prolonged Recovery After the Fontan Operation Circulation, September 30, 2008; 118(14_suppl_1): S171 - S176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Jacobs, G. J. Pelletier, K. K. Pourmoghadam, C. I. Mesia, N. Madan, H. Stern, R. Schwartz, and J. D. Murphy Protocols associated with no mortality in 100 consecutive Fontan procedures Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2008; 33(4): 626 - 632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Khairy, S. M. Fernandes, J. E. Mayer Jr, J. K. Triedman, E. P. Walsh, J. E. Lock, and M. J. Landzberg Long-Term Survival, Modes of Death, and Predictors of Mortality in Patients With Fontan Surgery Circulation, January 1, 2008; 117(1): 85 - 92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Lee, J. Kwak, K. C. Kim, S. K. Min, W.-H. Kim, Y. J. Kim, and J. R. Rho Comparison of lateral tunnel and extracardiac conduit Fontan procedure Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2007; 6(3): 328 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B. Meyer, G. Zamora, G. Wernovsky, R. F. Ittenbach, P. R. Gallagher, S. Tabbutt, P. J. Gruber, S. C. Nicolson, J. W. Gaynor, and T. L. Spray Outcomes of the Fontan Procedure Using Cardiopulmonary Bypass with Aortic Cross-Clamping Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2006; 82(5): 1611 - 1620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Petrossian, V. M. Reddy, K. K. Collins, C. B. Culbertson, M. J. MacDonald, J. J. Lamberti, O. Reinhartz, R. D. Mainwaring, P. D. Francis, S. P. Malhotra, et al. The extracardiac conduit Fontan operation using minimal approach extracorporeal circulation: early and midterm outcomes. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2006; 132(5): 1054 - 1063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Pizarro, T. Mroczek, S. S. Gidding, J. D. Murphy, and W. I. Norwood Fontan Completion in Infants Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2006; 81(6): 2243 - 2249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Chaudhari, J. Sturman, J. O'Sullivan, J. Smith, N. Wrightson, G. Parry, D. Bolton, S. Haynes, L. Hamilton, and A. Hasan Rescue cardiac transplantation for early failure of the Fontan-type circulation in children J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2005; 129(2): 416 - 422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Soetenga and K. A. Mussatto Management of Infants With Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome: Integrating Research Into Nursing Practice Crit. Care Nurse, December 1, 2004; 24(6): 46 - 66. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Jayakumar, L. J. Addonizio, M. R. Kichuk-Chrisant, M. E. Galantowicz, J. M. Lamour, J. M. Quaegebeur, and D. T. Hsu Cardiac transplantation after the Fontan or Glenn procedure J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 16, 2004; 44(10): 2065 - 2072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Wechsler Outcome of Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome AAP Grand Rounds, November 1, 2004; 12(5): 59 - 60. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Mott, T. F. Feltes, E. D. McKenzie, D. B. Andropoulos, L. I. Bezold, A. L. Fenrich, S. L. Bedford, H. El-Said, S. A. Stayer, and C. D. Fraser Jr Improved early results with the Fontan operation in adults with functional single ventricle Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2004; 77(4): 1334 - 1340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Danford If Physicians Were Parents of a Child with Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome... AAP Grand Rounds, October 1, 2003; 10(4): 46 - 47. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Weinstein, C. Cua, D. Chan, and J. T. Davis Outcome of symptomatic patients undergoing extracardiac Fontan conversion and cryoablation J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2003; 126(2): 529 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. Burkhart, J. A. Dearani, D. D. Mair, C. A. Warnes, C. C. Rowland, H. V. Schaff, F. J. Puga, and G. K. Danielson The modified Fontan procedure: Early and late results in 132 adult patients J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2003; 125(6): 1252 - 1259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Tassani, A. Barankay, F. Haas, S. U. Paek, M. Heilmaier, J. Hess, R. Lange, and J. A. Richter Cardiac surgery with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest produces less systemic inflammatory response than low-flow cardiopulmonary bypass in newborns J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2002; 123(4): 648 - 654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Gaynor, N. D. Bridges, M. I. Cohen, W. T. Mahle, W. M. DeCampli, J. M. Steven, S. C. Nicolson, and T. L. Spray Predictors of outcome after the Fontan operation: Is hypoplastic left heart syndrome still a risk factor? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2002; 123(2): 237 - 245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Jacobs, K. K. Pourmoghadam, E. M. Geary, A. T. Reyes, N. Madan, L. B. McGrath, and J. W. Moore Fontan's operation: is aspirin enough? Is coumadin too much? Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2002; 73(1): 64 - 68. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Amin, D. B. McElhinney, J. K. Strawn, J. D. Kugler, K. F. Duncan, V. M. Reddy, E. Petrossian, and F. L. Hanley Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis increases postoperative morbidity after a modified Fontan operation J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2001; 122(5): 856 - 862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. T. Fedderly, B. N. Whitstone, S. J. Frisbee, J. S. Tweddell, and S. B. Litwin Factors Related to Pleural Effusions After Fontan Procedure in the Era of Fenestration Circulation, September 18, 2001; 104 (2009): I-148 - I-151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Bradley, M. M. McCall, J. J. Sistino, and W. A.K. Radtke Aortopulmonary collateral flow in the Fontan patient: does it matter? Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2001; 72(2): 408 - 415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Azakie, B. W. McCrindle, L. N. Benson, G. S. Van Arsdell, J. L. Russell, J. G. Coles, D. Nykanen, R. M. Freedom, and W. G. Williams Total cavopulmonary connections in children with a previous Norwood procedure Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2001; 71(5): 1541 - 1546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |