|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:412-413
© 2000 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Brief communications |
From the Departments of Thoracic Surgerya and Respiratory Medicine,b Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Higashinariku, Osaka, Japan.
Address for reprints: Masahiko Higashiyama, MD, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Nakamichi 1-3-3, Higashinariku, Osaka 537-8511, Japan (E-mail: higamasa{at}rj8.so-net.ne.jp ).
Along with the recent increase in the incidence of small-sized lung carcinoma has come the need to perform limited surgery such as segmentectomy, wedge resection under open thoracotomy, or video-assisted thoracic surgery. One of the unfavorable recurrent patterns after such operations is local failure, especially at the surgical margin in the pulmonary parenchyma. Of course, limited surgery should be performed while maintaining safe surgical margins. A tumor-free surgical margin is usually checked macroscopically and, if necessary, by frozen histologic analysis. However, these checking systems appear to be unsatisfactory because the whole surgical margin cannot be examined.
Therefore, we developed a novel checking test, namely "the lavage cytologic method" of examining the surgical margin in patients with lung cancer undergoing limited surgery. In this study, this technique and its preliminary results are shown.
Patients and methods
Between October 1997 and March 1999, limited surgery was performed in 55 consecutive patients with 59 lung cancer lesions in our institute. The patients, aged 34 to 84 years (mean 63.4 years), included 27 men and 28 women. Histologically, 49 lesions were adenocarcinomas, 7 were squamous cell carcinomas, and 3 were large cell carcinomas. Tumor size was from 0.5 to 5.5 cm (median size 1.9 cm). Thirty-two lesions were 2 cm or smaller, 18 were between 2.1 and 3.0 cm, and 9 were larger than 3.0 cm. Forty-six lesions were stage IA, 11 stage IB, 1 stage IIB, and 1 stage IIIB.
Limited surgery was attempted in 2 groups, designated intentional and compromised. The former group, which included 33 lesions, underwent limited surgery under the criteria of peripheral small-sized stage I lung cancer as described previously by Kodama and associates.
1,2 The latter group, which included 26 lesions, principally underwent limited resection because of preoperative high-risk complications, multiple lung cancers, or very advanced age.
For 57 lesions, limited surgery was performed through a thoracotomy, whereas 2 lesions were resected by means of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. The operative techniques of wedge resection (n = 24) or segmentectomy (n = 33) were previously described. A stapler, Nd:YAG laser, electric scissors, or a combination of these devices was used to cut into the pulmonary parenchyma and leave a macroscopically safe margin. In all cases, a pleural lavage cytologic procedure was performed immediately after thoracotomy to avoid tumor cell contamination of the surgical margin.
3
The lavage cytologic technique of the surgical margin was performed as follows. When limited surgery was performed with a stapler alone, all fired cartridges were washed in 200 mL of saline solution (Fig l, A ). When the tumor was excised with the aid of the Nd:YAG laser or electric scissors, alone or in combination with the stapler, the resected specimens were similarly washed without flooding of the pleural surface (Fig l
, B ). When tumors were resected by means of combined methods, both the used cartridges and the resected samples were washed. These lavage techniques were carefully performed before cross-sections of the specimens were made.
|
Results
Four patients with 5 lesions (8%) showed cytologically positive results in the surgical margin despite a macroscopically safe margin during the attempted operation. Therefore, 1 patient in the intentional group additionally underwent completion lobectomy. In the other patients, who were in the compromised group, no additional resection was performed because of their compromised status and because multiple cancerous lung tumors precluded curative resection. By December 1999, one patient in the compromised group had 2 lesions recur in the surgical margin, whereas no local recurrence was observed in the surgical margin among the patients with cytologically negative results.
Comments
This novel technique for checking for residual tumor cells in the surgical margin offers some advantages over the conventional methods: During the operation, the whole area of the resected margin can be collectively examined and, if necessary, each margin can be separately checked in a relatively short time. In addition, any part of the surgical margin obtained by any cutting methodstapler, Nd:YAG laser, or electric scissorscan be examined, whether by open thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracic surgery.
Recently, Sawabata and associates
4 used a stamped specimen on a glass slide to perform cytologic examination of the surgical margin. This technique, similar to ours, was also useful for detecting tumor cells in the area of the surgical margin. However, we think that our lavage technique may be more complete in estimating the whole area of the surgical margin.
Although the minimum surgical margin for limited surgery at our institution is more than l cm, for practical purposes the size of the margin of safety is influenced by anatomic, technical, and histopatholgic conditions. To resect deep-seated tumors or tumors existing in locations where a stapler cannot be anatomically applied, we introduced a promising technique using the Nd:YAG laser.
1,2 In some instances in these series, however, the surgical margin had to be less than l cm; in fact, in 4 of the lesions the margin was cytologically positive despite being macroscopically free of tumor. According to the data of Sawabata and associates,
4 some patients with a surgical margin of more than l cm also had tumor-positive results. Therefore, this novel check system of the surgical margin may provide practical, useful information in limited surgery. In particular, when a tumor is a histologically small-sized and well-differentiated adenocarcinoma such as a bronchioloalveolar type, or type IV on Higashiyamas classification,
5 the tumor itself, as well as its margin, is often undetermined intraoperatively. In such a lesion, the present technique may be even more valuable.
The problem of whether a tumor recurs or not in the cytologically positive surgical margin is clinically interesting. To date, only 1 patient with 2 lesions from the compromised group showed recurrence at the surgical margin, whereas no patient with a cytologically negative surgical margin had a local recurrence, although the follow-up period was short. Therefore, when tumor-positive results after limited operations are obtained by this technique in the intentional group (small peripheral stage I lung cancer), standard resection should be aggressively performed. Even in patients in the compromised group (high-risk complications, multiple lung cancers, or advanced age) who are undergoing limited surgery, additional resection or vaporization of the margin surface of the pulmonary parenchyma with electric scissors or Nd:YAG laser can be selectively performed. Thus, this novel lavage cytologic technique may be a useful test for complete local curability after limited surgery in patients with lung cancer.
Acknowledgments
We thank Jun-ichi Ashimura, CT, Sachiko Nagumo, CT, and Yasuyoshi Naruse, CT, for their technical assistance in performing cytologic analyses.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Shiono, G. Ishii, K. Nagai, J. Yoshida, M. Nishimura, Y. Murata, K. Tsuta, Y. H. Kim, Y. Nishiwaki, T. Kodama, et al. Predictive Factors for Local Recurrence of Resected Colorectal Lung Metastases Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2005; 80(3): 1040 - 1045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Sawabata, M. Ohta, A. Matsumura, K. Nakagawa, H. Hirano, H. Maeda, and H. Matsuda Optimal distance of malignant negative margin in excision of nonsmall cell lung cancer: a multicenter prospective study Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2004; 77(2): 415 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Higashiyama, K. Kodama, K. Takami, N. Higaki, T. Nakayama, and H. Yokouchi Malignant status at surgical margin of limited-resected non-small cell lung cancer: a crucial finding for predicting local relapse: Reply to the Editor J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2003; 126(2): 611 - 611. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Higashiyama, K. Kodama, K. Takami, N. Higaki, T. Nakayama, and H. Yokouchi Intraoperative lavage cytologic analysis of surgical margins in patients undergoing limited surgery for lung cancer J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2003; 125(1): 101 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Sawabata, A. Matsumura, M. Ohota, H. Maeda, H. Hirano, K. Nakagawa, and H. Matsuda Cytologically malignant margins of wedge resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2002; 74(6): 1953 - 1957. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Higashiyama, K. Kodama, K. Takami, N. Higaki, H. Yokouchi, T. Nakayama, K. Murata, M. Kameyama, J.-i. Ashimura, Y. Naruse, et al. Intraoperative Lavage Cytologic Analysis of Surgical Margins as a Predictor of Local Recurrence in Pulmonary Metastasectomy Arch Surg, April 1, 2002; 137(4): 469 - 474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kodama, M. Higashiyama, H. Yokouchi, K. Takami, K. Kuriyama, Y. Kusunoki, T. Nakayama, and F. Imamura Natural history of pure ground-glass opacity after long-term follow-up of more than 2 years Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 73(2): 386 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |