|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:478-489
© 2000 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease |
From the Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Presented in part at the Seventy-second Meeting of the American Heart Association, Atlanta, Ga, 1999.
Address for reprints: Giovanni Battista Luciani, MD, Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Verona, O. C. M. Piazzale Stefani 1, Verona, 37126, Italy (E-mail: luciani{at}netbusiness.it ).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Statistical analysis
Data were reported as mean values ± SD or as proportions. Comparison of continuous variables was done by a 2-tailed Student t test for paired data. The Pearson
2 or Fisher exact tests were used for categoric variables as appropriate. Survival curves were constructed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences in survival were determined by the log-rank test. Multivariate correlates of survival were identified by the Cox proportional hazard method. Multivariate correlates of hospital death, recurrent angina, recurrent congestive failure, and improvement of Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class at follow-up were determined by stepwise logistic regression analysis. The list of variables entered in the analysis is as follows: age, sex, angina, congestive heart failure, silent ischemia, ventricular arrhythmia, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, prior myocardial infarction, CCS functional class, NYHA functional class, laboratory evidence of viable myocardium, LVEF, prior cardiac operation, preoperative intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP), year of operation, urgent operation, number of grafts, use of the left internal thoracic artery, duration of myocardial ischemia, duration of cardiopulmonary bypass, and use of blood cardioplegia.
The primary end points of the study were as follows: early mortality (before hospital discharge or within 30 days of operation), late mortality, cardiac-related mortality (myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, arrhythmia, or sudden death), recurrence of angina, recurrence of heart failure, and functional outcome. Functional outcome was evaluated by comparison of preoperative and 6-month follow-up echocardiographic measurements of LVEF, preoperative and follow-up clinical status according to the NYHA for congestive heart failure and CCS for angina, and evaluation of quality of life. The latter was assessed by means of a simplified self-administered questionnaire, which examined prevalence of active employment and severity of subjective physical limitation (graded as limited activity, partial limitation, or no limitation).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Major nonfatal postoperative complications were observed in 40 (24%) patients. Postoperative myocardial infarction was diagnosed in 9 (5%) patients, 8 of whom required catecholamine and IABP support. Fourteen (8%) additional patients showed reversible low cardiac output syndrome in the absence of laboratory and electrocardiographic evidence of perioperative myocardial infarction. Hemodynamic stabilization was achieved by means of IABP support in 3 of these patients, 2 of whom had required preoperative IABP support as well. Life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias were recorded in 5 (3%) patients, 1 of whom needed resuscitation with open-chest cardiac massage and an IABP, subsequently. Emergency repeat coronary angiography in the latter patient demonstrated patency of all the bypass grafts. Four (2%) patients required prolonged mechanical ventilatory support for respiratory failure. Two (1%) patients had a postoperative cerebrovascular accident, and 1 had acute renal failure necessitating dialysis. Postoperative bleeding leading to re-exploration occurred in 3 (2%) patients.
Late clinical outcome
Twenty-one late casualties were recorded during a follow-up period ranging from 0.3 to 7.8 years (mean, 2.7 ± 2.1 years). Actuarial survival was 94% ± 2%, 75% ± 8%, and 75% ± 8% at 1, 5, and 7 years, respectively (Fig 2). Cause of late mortality was cardiac in 15 patients (progressive heart failure in 7, sudden death in 5, and myocardial infarction in 3), giving an actuarial freedom from cardiac death of 95% ± 1%, 84% ± 5%, and 84% ± 5% at 1, 5, and 7 years, respectively. Noncardiac cause of death included malignancy in 5 patients and stroke in 1 patient. Multivariate analysis showed the number of bypass grafts and ejection fraction to be inversely correlated with late mortality, whereas duration of cardiopulmonary bypass was directly correlated with it (Table III). The significance of the following findings increased when late cardiac mortality was used as an end point (Table IV).
|
|
|
Late functional outcome
Laboratory evidence of successful functional outcome of myocardial revascularization was suggested by a significant improvement in ejection fraction at 6-month follow-up echocardiography (0.28 ± 0.05 vs 0.38 ± 0.09, P = .001). However, no correlates predictive of increase in ejection fraction could be isolated, possibly because of the wide distribution of follow-up values.
Eighty-nine (54%) of 164 operative survivors were symptom-free at follow-up assessment. Actuarial symptom-free survival for the entire patient population was 75% ± 8%, 41% ± 16%, and 31% ± 18% at 1, 5, and 7 years, respectively (Fig 3).
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Comparison of survival estimates after myocardial revascularization with previously published series presents some shortcomings. In particular, patient selection criteria are not uniform among the various clinical reports, as regards the upper-end limit of LVEF and the inclusion of patients with acute myocardial infarction, left ventricular aneurysm, or valve disease necessitating surgical treatment.
16 The clinical results further differ whether referred to comprehensive series of consecutive patients
10,13,17 or to limited cohorts of patients selected on the basis of detection of viable myocardium.
11,12 These limitations notwithstanding, an operative mortality ranging from 2% to 10% has recently been reported for large (ie, 100 or more consecutive patients) clinical series by Kaul,
10 Trachiotis,
13 Christakis,
17 and Langenburg,
18 and their colleagues. Detailed analysis of the present experience shows that aside from a very low operative mortality, in line with the estimates quoted above, surgical revascularization still imposes substantial cardiac morbidity to patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (myocardial infarction, 5%; low output syndrome, 8%; IABP use, 13%). This observation is entirely consistent with the findings of Christakis and associates
17 (myocardial infarction, 11%; low output, 31%; IABP use, 16%) and partly with those of Trachiotis and associates
13 (myocardial infarction, 1%; IABP use, 11%). Long-term outcome after myocardial revascularization is also satisfactory in the present study and in agreement with previously reported actuarial 5-year survivals between 64% and 73%.
10,13 Progress in perioperative management of patients with end-stage ischemic heart disease
19 has been instrumental in turning bypass grafting from a high-risk neglected alternative to transplantation
3-6 into a low-risk routine treatment modality. However, an even more important role has been played by the constant evolution throughout the last decade of time of patient selection criteria by means of prospective laboratory investigation and of retrospective risk stratification.
10-13,17,20,21
Accordingly, reviews of large clinical series, such as the current one, have been carried out to isolate preoperative or intraoperative variables, which may predict the outcome of revascularization. Analysis of previous work shows that a series of patient characteristics may be associated with increased operative risk, including advanced age, female sex, lower ejection fraction, comorbid conditions, urgency of operation, and reoperation.
10,13,17,20 Unfortunately, identification of factors predictive of early mortality proved unrewarding in the present experience, likely because of the very low number of events. On the contrary, both late overall and late cardiac mortality were associated with lower ejection fraction, lower number of bypass grafts, and longer duration of cardiopulmonary bypass. The relation between preoperative ejection fraction and long-term survival is intuitive because it may describe the severity of ischemic left ventricular failure. A similar correlation was also disclosed by Trachiotis and associates,
13 but not by Kaul and coworkers,
10 possibly because their study was limited to patients with ejection fractions below 20%. The number of bypass grafts in the current series expresses the completeness of revascularization because two thirds of patients had 3-vessel disease. Thus, the finding of an inverse relation between the number of grafts and late mortality once again matches the results of Trachiotis and colleagues,
13 who found complete myocardial revascularization to be inversely correlated with late death. Both studies extend to ischemic cardiomyopathy, the principle that ability to completely revascularize the myocardium is of great prognostic significance for survival, as shown for coronary operations in general.
22 Understanding of the role of duration of cardiopulmonary bypass, an operative variable indicative of more complex or complicated procedures, in predicting late survival is less immediate. This factor may also express the severity and extension of ischemic heart disease, whereby longer circulatory assistance may be required to wean a failing heart from bypass.
Functional outcome
Although most of the research efforts have focused on the demonstration that early and late survival after myocardial revascularization is indeed satisfactory, few studies have concentrated on the functional outcome after operation. The demonstration of a short-term improvement in LVEF has generally been regarded as an index of successful functional result.
5,6,8,9,11,23 Contrary to this assumption, more recent evidence has clearly shown that increase in left ventricular systolic performance is not necessarily accompanied by clinical improvement, as it can be measured by NYHA classification, exercise capacity, or quality-of-life scores.
12,24-27 These findings are of great relevance because medical management of congestive heart failure has also witnessed significant progress in terms of both survival and control of symptoms.
14 Thus, the choice of the optimal treatment modality in the individual patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy has nowadays become more difficult. Simply looking for a survival benefit may be insufficient to discriminate among therapeutic alternatives.
The present experience shows that recurrence of symptoms late after operation remains a definite problem, despite successful functional outcome, as traditionally evaluated by an increase in LVEF (from 28% to 38%). In general, a 5-year symptom-free survival of 41% can hardly be considered satisfactory. Closer scrutiny of late functional outcome reveals that revascularization in ischemic cardiomyopathy offers durable relief from angina because more than 80% of patients are likely to be free from angina 5 years after operation. These results favorably compare with the raw estimates quoted by Trachiotis and colleagues
13 (40% prevalence of return of angina at 5.8 years' mean follow-up) and by Kaul and colleagues
10 (35% prevalence at 3.6 years), albeit at a shorter average period of observation (10% prevalence at 2.7 years in the current series). Although generally found in patients who had angina as a presenting symptom, no variable proved predictive of recurrence in the present experience, once again because of the low number of events recorded during follow-up. Thus, it remains purely speculative whether this discrepancy in outcome, as well as the ability to adequately control recurrent angina simply by augmentation of medical therapy and interventional procedures, may be related to the more extensive use (62% of patients vs 20%-35% in the previous series
10,13) of the left internal thoracic artery as the conduit of choice for the left anterior descending artery, as demonstrated in the common coronary surgery population.
28 Arterial revascularization may also have the potential for saving these critically ill patients from reoperation, which carries a high risk.
29
As a corollary to the aforementioned observations, congestive heart failure is primarily responsible for the disappointingly high prevalence of persistence or return of symptoms late after operation. This is evident by the extent of overlap between the two respective survival curves (Figs 3
and 6
). Estimates of recurrent heart failure are uncommonly reported and vary widely among series of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, ranging from 28% to 63%
12,26,30; the present result (ie, 40%) is consistent with previous findings. Unlike angina, congestive heart failure may present in any patient subgroup, which is attested to by the fact that half of the symptomatic patients had originally presented with angina and were free from it at follow-up. It is conceivable that de novo appearance of heart failure expresses the relentless evolution toward left ventricular insufficiency, which would not be recognized by short-term echocardiographic assessment as it was carried out in this study and in the majority of previous studies.
5,6,8,11,12,23,25,26 Longitudinal measurement of LVEF is warranted to disclose the relation, if any, between left ventricular systolic function and congestive heart failure late after operation.
Predicting the recurrence or appearance of heart failure has enormous bearing in terms of patient selection, given that late survival after bypass grafting and transplantation is similar, but the quality of life with the latter is affected by the need for long-term medication and the attendant risks of immunosuppression. In the present experience, female sex, history of congestive failure, lower ejection fraction, and need for preoperative IABP support were associated with greater likelihood of heart failure at follow-up. On the contrary, history of angina, use of the left internal thoracic artery, and number of bypass grafts were inversely associated with return of congestive failure. The meaning of clinical variables is rather apparent, even though a relation with recurrent heart failure has never been previously proposed. In fact, female sex has often been associated with adverse late outcome after revascularization in ischemic cardiomyopathy, as have history of congestive failure and lower ejection fraction.
10,13 The need for preoperative IABP may further identify patients with more severe left ventricular insufficiency. Comparison with existing data is troublesome because few investigators have analyzed return of heart failure in large clinical series. Yamaguchi and colleagues
30 found diabetes and preoperative left ventricular end-systolic volume index (>100 mL/m2), but not history of congestive failure, to be predictive of recurrent heart failure in 39 operative survivors followed up for a mean of 3.6 years. The smaller number of patients and the higher proportion with preoperative heart failure (31/41 [76%] vs 54/167 [32%]) can account for the discrepancy with the present findings. Whereas the demographic characteristics isolated have an effect on patient selection, the operative variables identified herein have relevant therapeutic implications. Indeed, the unprecedented finding that more extensive use of left internal thoracic artery grafts and of complete revascularization may reduce the prevalence of congestive failure late after operation corresponds well to similar conclusions reached by historical studies on the general coronary bypass population.
22,31 Inability to show a correlation between the type of conduit for revascularization and late cardiac events or control of symptoms by past studies on ischemic cardiomyopathy may have been due to low prevalence of left internal thoracic artery use (ie, between 20% and 35% when reported).
10,13 Common reasons for not using the internal thoracic artery in patients with left ventricular failure during the 1980s were advanced age, urgency of operation, and modest concern for long-term prognosis.
17 The clinical experience of the past decade has decisively solved these reservations,
10,13 as confirmed by the present work; therefore, no patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy should be denied a left internal thoracic artery graft. Consensus already exists on the importance of complete myocardial revascularization in decreasing the rate of late adverse events,
13 although the specific role on recurrence of heart failure has not been established previously.
The substantial prevalence of congestive heart failure at follow-up explains the absence of improvement in mean NYHA functional class of the overall population. It is, however, noteworthy that patients with heart failure had significant attenuation of symptoms, and half of them were asymptomatic at follow-up. This suggests that revascularization may be associated with durable functional improvement, even in patients with pure congestive failure, although less commonly than in patients with a history of angina, as shown by the relation between the latter variable and NYHA class at multivariate analysis. Similar to the results obtained with recurrence of heart failure, male sex and greater number of bypass grafts were predictive of amelioration in functional class. On the basis of the present results, complete myocardial revascularization has the potential for decreasing not only late mortality but also the prevalence and severity of congestive failure. It follows that coronary operations without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass, by definition associated with incomplete revascularization, are not ideally suited for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, as recently advocated.
32
Quality of life was satisfactory in most long-term survivors of coronary bypass grafting, albeit assessed by a rather rudimentary questionnaire limited to mobility status and active employment. Given the profile of the patient population (large number, advanced age, and variable social background), it was believed that compliance to a simplified test would be the greatest. Although no attempt was made at correlating quality of life with preoperative parameters, previous studies with either the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure or the Nottingham Health Profile have failed to disclose any relation with clinical or laboratory data.
25,27 In particular, it has been shown that identification of viable myocardium (
8 segments at positron emission tomography) may predict improvement in LVEF or exercise capacity but not changes in functional class or quality of life.
25,27
Finally, considering half of the population of long-term survivors in the present experience was above retirement age at the time of follow-up, an overall active employment rate of 18% is not necessarily disappointing. In addition, over 70% of patients felt no or modest physical limitation in routine physical activity, which indicates acceptable functional status despite the high prevalence of persistent or newly presenting heart failure.
Limitations
The current study presents several limitations. It is retrospective and, like most clinical series of surgical revascularization in ischemic cardiomyopathy, not randomized. The bias introduced by changing clinical practice (ie, increasing adoption of blood cardioplegia, myocardial viability tests, and use of the left internal thoracic artery) cannot be easily quantified. Late follow-up echocardiographic and, most important, coronary angiographic examinations were not performed. It is difficult to understand whether unsatisfactory functional outcome is a result of progressing left ventricular insufficiency in turn because of the natural history of bypass grafts or alternatively because of a relentless evolution of the myopathy. This shortcoming afflicts all previously published clinical series. Use of NYHA and CCS classification to measure clinical and functional status has inherent limitations. Different methods, such as the Specific Activity Scale, have instead been proposed, which have greater agreement with exercise treadmill performance.
33 Nonetheless, NYHA and CCS remain the most commonly adopted scoring systems, and continued use is warranted if clinical series are to be compared.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Nardi, A. Pellegrino, A. Scafuri, D. Colella, C. Bassano, P. Polisca, and L. Chiariello Long-term outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2009; 87(5): 1401 - 1407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Soliman Hamad, M. E. S.H. Tan, A. H.M. van Straten, A. A.J. van Zundert, and J. P.A.M. Schonberger Long-Term Results of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2008; 85(2): 488 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Hegazy, A. Refaei, A. Assedique, S. Alsaif, M. Taha, M. Refaei, N. Elkum, H. Alomran, and Z. Al-Halees PET scan before CABG in diabetes The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, January 1, 2007; 7(1): 32 - 37. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Buckberg Questions and answers about the STICH trial: A different perspective J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2005; 130(2): 245 - 249. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Yamaguchi, H. Adachi, K. Kawahito, S. Murata, and T. Ino Left Ventricular Reconstruction Benefits Patients With Dilated Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 79(2): 456 - 461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Athanasuleas, G. D. Buckberg, A. W.H. Stanley, W. Siler, V. Dor, M. Di Donato, L. Menicanti, S. Almeida de Oliveira, F. Beyersdorf, I. L. Kron, et al. Surgical ventricular restoration in the treatment of congestive heart failure due to post-infarction ventricular dilation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 6, 2004; 44(7): 1439 - 1445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. S. Maxey, T. B. Reece, P. I. Ellman, P. D. Butler, J. A. Kern, C. G. Tribble, and I. L. Kron Coronary artery bypass with ventricular restoration is superior to coronary artery bypass alone in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2004; 127(2): 428 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Shah, D. L. Hare, J. S. Raman, I. Gordon, R. K. Chan, J. D. Horowitz, A. Rosalion, and B. F. Buxton Survival after myocardial revascularization for ischemic cardiomyopathy: A prospective ten-year follow-up study J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2003; 126(5): 1320 - 1327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Gummert, A. Rahmel, J. Bucerius, J. Onnasch, N. Doll, T. Walther, V. Falk, and F. W. Mohr Mitral valve repair in patients with end stage cardiomyopathy: who benefits? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2003; 23(6): 1017 - 1022. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P E Antunes, J M F. de Oliveira, and M J Antunes Coronary surgery with non-cardioplegic methods in patients with advanced left ventricular dysfunction: immediate and long term results Heart, April 1, 2003; 89(4): 427 - 431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Buckberg Congestive heart failure: Treat the disease, not the symptom--return to normalcy J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2003; 125(90030): S41 - 49. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Toda, K. Mackenzie, M. R. Mehra, C. J. DiCorte, J. E. Davis, P. M. McFadden, J. L. Ochsner, C. White, and C. H. Van Meter Jr Revascularization in severe ventricular dysfunction (15% <= LVEF <= 30%): a comparison of bypass grafting and percutaneous intervention Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2002; 74(6): 2082 - 2087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Lorusso, G. La Canna, C. Ceconi, V. Borghetti, P. Totaro, G. Parrinello, G. Coletti, and G. Minzioni Long-term results of coronary artery bypass grafting procedure in the presence of left ventricular dysfunction and hibernating myocardium Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2001; 20(5): 937 - 948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Minami Surgical Treatments for Endstage Heart Failure Due to Dilated Cardiomyopathy Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 2001; 9(3): 159 - 166. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Buckberg Congestive heart failure: Treat the disease, not the symptom--Return to normalcy J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2001; 121(4): 628 - 637. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Late Functional Outcome After CABG in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Remains Poor Journal Watch Cardiology, December 1, 2000; 2000(1201): 8 - 8. [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |