JTCS Sign the Guestbook
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Gerald D. Buckberg
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buckberg, G. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buckberg, G. D.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:640-641
© 2000 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease

Editorial: Endothelial and myocardial stunning

Gerald D. Buckberg, MD

From the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, Calif.

Address for reprints: Gerald D. Buckberg, MD, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, UCLA Medical Center, Rm 62-258 CHS, Box 951741, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1741.


    Introduction
 Top
 Introduction
 References
 
Until recently, myocyte stunning from inadequate cardiac protection has been the main focus of interest and is most relevant in damaged hearts (ie, hypertrophy, unstable angina, and reduced ejection fraction) in which vulnerability is accentuated. This injury is transient, since stunning recovers after brief inotropic or mechanical support. This editorial focuses on an expanding recognition that both the myocyte and the endothelium can be injured or stunned, as the two limbs are interrelated.

Damaged hearts exhibit loss of endothelium-dependent factors and reduced nitric oxide formation. The result is perioperative vasospasm, adherence of platelets, and leukocyte attachment that also causes capillary obstruction with inhomogeneous flow. The essential theme is that the endothelium is injured, because neutrophils do not attach, then roll, and finally have parenchymal influence for oxygen radical injury without such damage. This clinical report is the application of an experimentally proven method to reduce the consequences of endothelial damage.

The transient nature of stunning is clear. Brief leukocyte depletion (ie, > 95% white blood cell reduction in this study) is quickly reversed by blood with a normal white cell count. However, the persistence of functional benefits indicates that residual protection is retained, including experimental markers of reduced endothelial adherence of white cells.

The expertise of Dr Roth's surgical teamGo 1 is apparent, with no intra-aortic balloon counterpulsations or deaths in high-risk patients. Their carefully defined data characterize the advantages of white blood cell reduction in patients with ejection fractions of about 20%, through reduced needs for dopamine, absent enoxamine for hemodynamic support, raised ejection fraction, diminished troponin release (a myocardial marker of cellular injury), less ventricular fibrillation after aortic unclamping (presumably from improved excitation/contraction coupling), and, finally, shorter intensive care unit stay (48 vs 60 hours), even though the last variant is not significant due to increased vulnerability. These aforementioned "soft or surrogate" end points conform precisely to their referenced reports of benefits of leukocyte depletion in damaged hearts. Conversely, no benefit of leukocyte depletion has been established in patients with an ejection fraction of more than 40%.

The merits of cardiac versus systemic leukocyte depletion are clear, since systemic doses allowed only 38% reduction at the time of aortic unclamping. The white cell filter becomes less functional after more than 1000 mL blood delivery, so that selection of one versus two white blood filters becomes dependent on defining the role of leukocyte depletion throughout all periods of cold blood cardioplegia during aortic clamping, and/or only in the warm 500- to 700-mL reperfusate.

Surgical reperfusion strategies become confusing to our basic science and cardiology colleagues, who address single events after short ischemic intervals, whereas we confront prolonged ischemia for surgical repair. Unidimensional focus on one element will not be successful because ischemia unmasks many changes. Our study, quoted in the reference list,Go 2 showed that white blood cell depletion alone reduced reperfusion injury but failed to restore contractility unless leukocyte depletion supplemented a more complex cardioplegic approach. The composite approach is clear from this study, since their blood cardioplegic solutions contain potassium, glucose, citrate, and a buffer with good clinical results, even without white blood cell depletion.Go 1

We must establish cardiac surgical recognition of global endothelial stunning and develop efforts to reduce this injury during myocardial protection. In damaged hearts, conventional cardioplegic solutions can completely prevent myocyte injury, yet allow endothelial damage with resultant white blood cell adherence.Go 3 A principal underlying mechanism is endothelial loss of nitric oxide production, subsequently allowing the neutrophil and platelet adherence and changing vasoactivity to impair subsequent vasodilatation. White blood cell adhesion is only one step in this injury.

Our principal surgical dilemma relates both to dealing with global stunning and understanding why this occurs. The neutrophil filter addresses the lesions after they are present, with acceptance that brief reperfusion interventions can reduce endothelial injury. Studies that focus on maintaining the intrinsic endothelium-dependent protective component, nitric oxide generation, may be useful. Hiramatsu,Go 4 Mizuno,Go 3 Kronon,Go 5 and their colleagues, discovered that delivery of the natural nitric oxide precursor, L-arginine, limits endothelial and myocyte damage, even without white blood cell depletion. Consequently, leukocyte depletion adds to the expanding catalog of strategies for surgical correction, but efforts at preventing endothelial stunning, rather than treating the injury, must be considered in the future.


    References
 Top
 Introduction
 References
 

  1. Roth M, Kraus B, Scheffold T, Reuthebuch O, Klövekorn W, Bauer EP. The effect of leukocyte-depleted blood cardioplegia in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: a randomized, double-blind study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:642-50.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Kofsky ER, Julia BL, Buckberg GD, Quillen JA, Acar C. Studies of controlled reperfusion after ischemia. XXII. Reperfusate composition: effects of leukocyte depletion of blood and blood cardioplegic reperfusates after acute coronary occlusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;101:350-9.[Abstract]
  3. Mizuno A, Baretti R, Buckberg GD, Young H, Vinten-Johansen J, Ma X, et al. Endothelial stunning and myocyte recovery after reperfusion of jeopardized muscle: a role of L-arginine blood cardioplegia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;113:379-89.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Hiramatsu T, Forbess J, Miura T, Nomura F, Mayer JE Jr. Additive effects of L-arginine infusion and leukocyte depletion on recovery after hypothermic ischemia in neonatal lamb hearts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:172-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Kronon MT, Allen BS, Halldorsson A, Rahman S, Wang T, Ilbawi M. Dose dependency of L-arginine in neonatal myocardial protection: the nitric oxide paradox. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:655-64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Received for publication July 13, 2000. Accepted for publication July 13, 2000.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. Martin, G. Lutter, C. Ihling, M. Siepe, S. Wagner, J. Hilberath, M. Kemper, K. Sarai, and F. Beyersdorf
Myocardial viability twenty-four hours after orthotopic heart transplantation from non-heart-beating donors
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2003; 125(6): 1217 - 1228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
F. Alamanni, A. Parolari, R. Visigalli, O. Bussolati, P. Rubini, R. Sala, L. Bonati, G. C. Gazzola, P. Biglioli, and V. Dall'Asta
Endothelial cell injury induced by preservation solutions: a confocal microscopy study
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2002; 73(5): 1606 - 1614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
G. Asimakopoulos
The inflammatory response to CPB: the role of leukocyte filtration
Perfusion, March 1, 2002; 17(2_suppl): 7 - 10.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Gerald D. Buckberg
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buckberg, G. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buckberg, G. D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS