|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;121:594-596
© 2001 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Brief Communications |
From the Toronto Lung Transplant Program, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Departments of Surgerya and Respirology,b Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Received for publication March 29, 2000. Accepted for publication June 28, 2000. Address for reprints: S. Keshavjee, MD, Director, Toronto Lung Transplant Program, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, 200 Elizabeth St, EN 10-224, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C4 (E-mail: shaf.keshavjee{at}uhn.on.ca).
Lung transplantation is an established therapeutic modality for end-stage lung diseases. In the immediate post-transplantation period, life-threatening graft dysfunction occurs in up to 20% of patients, a percentage that has remained largely unchanged for several years. As reported by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) in 1999, the 5-year survival after lung transplantation is approximately 50%. The most important factor adversely affecting long-term survival after lung transplantation is bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, which is generally considered to be a complex end result of a chronic rejection process. However, about 15% of patients die within the first 3 months after lung transplantation of severe organ dysfunction related to ischemia/reperfusion injury, acute rejection, and infection.
1
In clinical practice, acceptable graft storage times are limited to around 6 hours. A recent report reaffirmed the occurrence of diminishing graft function after periods of storage in excess of 4 hours.
2 The strategy used for preservation of lung grafts is important and has been the subject of much experimental research over the past 10 years. It has been shown that inflated lungs are able to maintain aerobic metabolism during the period of cold ischemia.
3 In contrast, solid organs such as the liver and pancreas undergo anaerobic metabolism during storage. Despite this, those organs can be stored safely for up to 24 hours with current techniques, reflecting perhaps a better understanding of the behavior of those organs during ischemia and also their inherently more robust anatomic characteristics.
Much experimental work has been directed toward improving the quality of lung preservation, in particular the evaluation of low-potassium dextran solution (LPD), University of Wisconsin solution, Euro-Collins solution (EC), and Wallwork blood-based solutions, each one in conjunction with a variety of pharmacologic adjuncts. Although strong evidence exists supporting the use of alternatives to the commonly used EC, the slow adoption of such knowledge into clinical practice is somewhat alarming, as highlighted in a recent survey of current clinical practice.
4
Initial results from experimental lung transplantation in the development and modification of LPD at our institution indicated that dextran 40 and low potassium concentration both contribute significantly to uniformly excellent 12-hour lung preservation and post-transplantation function seen with LPD compared with EC.
5 We have subsequently demonstrated that standard LPD is less cytotoxic than EC, that LPD enables higher levels of metabolic activity in recovering isolated alveolar type II epithelial cells, and that dextran does not act as a suoperoxide radical scavenging mechanism.
6 These and other results by various other investigators in experimental lung transplantation using LPD confirm the potential for improved human lung preservation.
Encouraged by our own observations and those of other groups, the Toronto Lung Transplant Program has now adopted LPD preservation solution into clinical practice after approval was obtained for the use of LPD in clinical lung transplantation in April 1998. This article reports our initial experience with the use of LPD in comparison with EC in 94 lung clinical lung transplant procedures.
Methods and results
Data were prospectively recorded for 108 consecutive lung transplant procedures performed between May 1996 and November 1999. All patients who received single lung transplants were removed from this analysis (n = 13). This was done to avoid the potential confounding influence on overall oxygenation of the remaining native lung in patients after single lung transplantation. Unequivocal evaluation of transplanted lung function after ischemic preservation and transplantation is possible only in patients who receive either heart-lung or bilateral lung transplants. One patient with bronchiolitis obliterans, who received a re-transplant, was also excluded from the study. The outcome of 46 procedures after graft preservation with LPD (Perfadex, Vitrolife, Uppsala, Sweden) was compared with the results after transplantation for 48 procedures performed with EC (Baxter Healthcare Corp, Pharmacy Division, Deerfield, Ill) for graft preservation. Alprostadil (prostaglandin E1, Prostin VR; Upjohn, Don Mills, Ontario, Canada) was used before lung flush and in the flush solution (0.5 mg each). Lungs were flushed with 4 L of preservation solution and stored in preservation solution in an inflated state. Since 1996, inhaled nitric oxide was used as indicated for severe graft dysfunction. From December 1997 on, all patients in our program were enrolled in an ongoing double-blind randomized controlled trial on the use of inhaled nitric oxide after transplantation; therefore, half received nitric oxide and half received placebo.
For the purpose of this study, the primary end point was initial post-transplantation graft function as assessed by arterial oxygen tension/inspired oxygen fraction (PaO2/FIO2) ratio on arrival in the intensive care unit. Secondary end points included APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) score on arrival in the intensive care unit and 30-day survival. Age, sex, indication for transplant, type of transplant (bilateral or heart-lung transplants), and total graft ischemic times were also compared between these two groups. The results were analyzed by analysis of variance (continuous data) or the Fisher exact test (categoric data) and are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation.
Although this was not a randomized trial, the two groups were reasonably evenly matched for important risk factors, such as patient sex and age, type of transplant, and reason for transplant (Table I).
|
Comment
Graft preservation with LPD demonstrated improved lung function in the early phase after clinical lung transplantation compared with EC, despite significantly longer ischemic times. This superior outcome with LPD is consistent with evidence from experimental lung transplant studies that LPD is superior to EC for lung preservation.
5 Experimental data suggest longer safe ischemic times are possible with LPD than EC. To our knowledge, this is the first report that supports these findings in clinical lung transplantation as well. The initial choice of EC as a lung preservation solution was based on the experimental evidence available at the conception of clinical transplantation in the early 1980s. Although we acknowledge that a randomized study might provide more compelling data, we did not believe that such a study could be ethically justified given the wealth of data now available demonstrating the clear benefit of LPD in experimental studies. All data in this study were collected prospectively in a mature lung transplant program without a learning curve on equally matched study groups; these features indicate the strengths of our study. Our surgical judgment is that LPD provides better lung preservation than EC in clinical lung transplantation, and we are very satisfied with the switch to LPD in clinical practice. In future studies we hope to provide long-term follow-up results on the use of LPD in clinical lung transplantation. These data will ideally determine whether this improved early graft function is translated into decreased long-term graft dysfunction in transplanted lungs.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Ailawadi, C. L. Lau, P. W. Smith, B. R. Swenson, S. A. Hennessy, C. J. Kuhn, L. M. Fedoruk, B. D. Kozower, I. L. Kron, and D. R. Jones Does reperfusion injury still cause significant mortality after lung transplantation? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2009; 137(3): 688 - 694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Ferraro, J. Martin, J. Dery, J. Prenovault, L. Samson, M. Coutu, L.-Q. Chen, C. Poirier, N. Noiseux, A. Duranceau, et al. Late Retrograde Perfusion of Donor Lungs Does Not Decrease the Severity of Primary Graft Dysfunction Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2008; 86(4): 1123 - 1129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Ganesh, C. A. Rogers, N. R. Banner, R. S. Bonser, and Steering Group of the UK Cardiothoracic Transplant Does the method of lung preservation influence outcome after transplantation? An analysis of 681 consecutive procedures. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2007; 134(5): 1313 - 1321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Struber, S. Fischer, J. Niedermeyer, G. Warnecke, B. Gohrbandt, A. Gorler, A. R. Simon, A. Haverich, and J. M. Hohlfeld Effects of exogenous surfactant instillation in clinical lung transplantation: A prospective, randomized trial J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2007; 133(6): 1620 - 1625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Oto, A. P. Griffiths, F. Rosenfeldt, B. J. Levvey, T. J. Williams, and G. I. Snell Early Outcomes Comparing Perfadex, Euro-Collins, and Papworth Solutions in Lung Transplantation Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2006; 82(5): 1842 - 1848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Glycine intravenous donor preconditioning is superior to glycine supplementation to low-potassium dextran flush preservation and improves graft function in a large animal lung transplantation model after 24 hours of cold ischemia. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2006; 131(3): 724 - 729. |
||||
![]() |
S.-P. Sommer, B. Gohrbandt, S. Fischer, J. M. Hohlfeld, G. Warnecke, M. Avsar, and M. Struber Glutathione improves the function of porcine pulmonary grafts stored for twenty-four hours in low-potassium dextran solution J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2005; 130(3): 864 - 869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Fischer, B. Gohrbandt, P. Struckmeier, J. Niedermeyer, A. Simon, C. Hagl, K. Kallenbach, A. Haverich, and M. Struber Lung transplantation with lungs from donors fifty years of age and older J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2005; 129(4): 919 - 925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Keshavjee, R.D. Davis, M.R. Zamora, M. de Perrot, and G.A. Patterson A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of complement inhibition in ischemia-reperfusion injury after lung transplantation in human beings J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2005; 129(2): 423 - 428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Gohrbandt, S. P. Sommer, S. Fischer, J. M. Hohlfeld, G. Warnecke, A. Haverich, and M. Strueber Iloprost to improve surfactant function in porcine pulmonary grafts stored for twenty-four hours in low-potassium dextran solution J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2005; 129(1): 80 - 86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. de Perrot, W. Weder, G.A. Patterson, and S. Keshavjee Strategies to increase limited donor resources Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2004; 23(3): 477 - 482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Lau, G. A. Patterson, and S. M. Palmer Critical Care Aspects of Lung Transplantation J Intensive Care Med, March 1, 2004; 19(2): 83 - 104. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.L. Lau and G.A. Patterson Current status of lung transplantation Eur. Respir. J., November 16, 2003; 22(47_suppl): 57s - 64s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. de Perrot, K. Young, Y. Imai, M. Liu, T. K. Waddell, S. Fischer, L. Zhang, and S. Keshavjee Recipient T Cells Mediate Reperfusion Injury after Lung Transplantation in the Rat J. Immunol., November 15, 2003; 171(10): 4995 - 5002. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Fischer, M. de Perrot, M. Liu, A. A. MacLean, J. A. Cardella, Y. Imai, M. Suga, and S. Keshavjee Interleukin 10 gene transfection of donor lungs ameliorates posttransplant cell death by a switch from cellular necrosis to apoptosis J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2003; 126(4): 1174 - 1180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. F. Kelly, J. Murar, Z. Hong, D. P. Nelson, F. Hong, A. Varghese, and E. K. Weir Low potassium dextran lung preservation solution reduces reactive oxygen species production Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2003; 75(6): 1705 - 1710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Aziz, T. M. Pillay, P. A. Corris, J. Forty, C. J. Hilton, A. Hasan, and J. H. Dark Perfadex for clinical lung procurement: is it an advance? Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2003; 75(3): 990 - 995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. de Perrot, M. Liu, T. K. Waddell, and S. Keshavjee Ischemia-Reperfusion-induced Lung Injury Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 15, 2003; 167(4): 490 - 511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. de Perrot and S. Keshavjee Lung preservation Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2002; 74(2): 629 - 631. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Pierre, Y. Sekine, M. A. Hutcheon, T. K. Waddell, and S. H. Keshavjee Marginal donor lungs: A reassessment J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2002; 123(3): 421 - 428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |