| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;121:842-853
© 2001 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Evolving Technology |
From the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Received for publication May 4, 2000. Revisions requested July 27, 2000; revisions received Sept 14, 2000. Accepted for publication Nov 1, 2000. Address for reprints: Friedrich W. Mohr, MD, Klinik für Herzchirurgie, Universität Leipzig, Herzzentrum, Russenstraße 19, 04289 Leipzig, Germany (E-mail: mohf{at}medizin.uni-leipzig.de).
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionAppendix: DiscussionReferences |
|---|
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionAppendix: DiscussionReferences |
|---|
1-3 At the same time methods for closed-chest CPB with cardioplegic cardiac arrest were developed to provide a platform for endoscopic cardiac surgery. 4 Whereas videoscopic techniques for mitral valve repair found a rapid and widespread use, 5,6 endoscopic CABG proved more difficult and was not feasible given the limitations of standard endoscopic instruments (Table I). While 6 degrees of freedom are required to allow free orientation in space, standard endoscopic instruments with only 4 degrees of freedom reduce dexterity substantially. Working through a fixed entry point causes the operator to reverse motions (fulcrum effect) while at the same time shear forces on the instrument shaft require higher handle forces, leading to muscle fatigue. 7 Motion transmission is dependent on the ratio of internal and external instrument shaft length, again due to pivoting at the body entry point. 8 In addition, human cognitive and motor skills to accomplish tasks deteriorate with visual-motor incompatibility that is commonly associated with endoscopic surgery (misalignment of camera viewing and instrument orientation). 9 Computer-enhanced instrumentation systems have been developed to overcome these limitations,. 10-12 With the introduction of these systems, endoscopic CABG and mitral valve repair have become possible. 13-15 This article summarizes the single-institution results with the da Vinci telemanipulation system (Intuitive Surgical, Mountain View, Calif).
|
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionAppendix: DiscussionReferences |
|---|
The Intuitive da Vinci system was approved as an investigational device by the regional government "Regierungspräsidium Leipzig"; meanwhile, the system has received CE mark (European Commission) approval.
Telemanipulation system
The da Vinci computer-enhanced instrumentation system consists of two major parts, an input device (surgeons console) and an output device (manipulator). The console houses the display system, the input handles, the user interface, and the electronic controller. The tool handles are serial link manipulators that act both as high-resolution input devices, reading the position, orientation, and grip commands from the surgeon, and as haptic displays. The image of the surgical site is transmitted to the surgeon through a high-resolution stereo display. The system projects the image of the surgical site atop the surgeon's hands (via mirrored overlay optics), while the controller transforms the spatial motion of the tools into the camera frame of reference. Thereby the system restores hand-eye coordination and provides a natural correspondence in motions.
The user interface allows the surgeon to control camera positioning while keeping the slave tool tips in the operator's view, to reposition the masters in their work space, and to focus the endoscope. Orientational alignment is always provided, and positional alignment can be changed to allow repositioning of the master handles independent of the instrument tips. Motion scaling and tremor filtering further enhance precision. The electronic controller is capable of fully interconnected control of 48 degrees of freedom at update rates exceeding 1000 cycles per second. 16
The second subsystem is the patient side cart, consisting of fully sterilizable tools, the tool manipulators, the camera manipulator, the surgical endoscope, and the assistant's user interface. The end-effectors are fully sterilizable instruments that attach interchangeably to the two manipulators (automated instrument recognition) and provide a total of 6 degrees of freedom (plus tool function) inside the body. Three manipulators drive the two instruments and the endoscope. In turn, these manipulators are positioned around the body by three passive multiple-link arms mounted to a fixed base. In an emergency, the arms can be removed from the patient in seconds.
Endoscopic CABG
In the beginning of this experience, according to the study protocol, the device was used for only part of the procedure. This stepwise approach acknowledges the fact that two learning curves are expected to influence the initial results of this new endoscopic cardiac procedure: working in a total endoscopic environment with limited exposure and different anatomic landmarks and using a computer-enhanced instrumentation system. By April 2000, the da Vinci system had been used in operations on 148 patients. In a group of 81 patients with single-vesssel disease undergoing a MIDCAB procedure, the ITA was harvested endoscopically with the system (Table II). In 15 patients undergoing multiple-vessel revascularization through a sternotomy, the anastomosis of the internal thoracic artery (ITA) to the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) was performed with the system. 13 Twenty-seven patients underwent a total closed-chest approach for ITA-LAD grafting (total endoscopic coronary artery bypass; TECAB) on the arrested heart. In 8 patients TECAB was attempted on the beating heart. For the TECAB group, only patients with an indication for a single-vessel revascularization of the LAD and normal left ventricular function were included. Among the exclusion criteria were all known contraindications for using the Port-Access technique (Heartport, Inc, Redwood City, Calif). In addition, patients with left ventricular dilatation or diffuse disease of the target vessel were excluded. Other contraindications for thoracoscopic ITA takedown were extensive pleural symphysis or intolerance of single lung ventilation because of pulmonary disease. Demographic data of the TECAB group are given in Table III.
|
|
11,13 In brief, patients were placed in a supine position with the left side of the chest slightly elevated and the left arm lowered. After deflation of the left lung, a 30° scope angled up was inserted at the fourth intercostal space in the anterior axillary line. Continuous carbon dioxide insufflation was used. The instrument ports were created at the third and sixth intercostal spaces above the anterior axillary line. The ITA was dissected as a pedicle from the first rib to the sixth intercostal space by means of a low-energy cautery (Fig 1). The distal end of the ITA was skeletonized, with the concomitant veins and fascia left intact to provide countertraction (Fig 2). After removal of pericardial fat, a pericardial window in the region of the LAD was created and the target vessel marked by a clip close to the chosen anastomotic site. After full heparinization, an angled vascular clamp (Scanlan, St Paul, Minn) was inserted to temporarily occlude the ITA, which still in situ was then clipped, cut, and trimmed for the anastomosis. Femoro-femoral bypass and closed-chest cardioplegic arrest were initiated by means of the Port-Access system as described elsewhere. 17 Access to the groin was facilitated by moving the left manipulator arm out of the operating field during placement of the EndoClamp catheter (Heartport). Monitoring for the EndoClamp catheter included transesophageal echocardiography and transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. 18,19 The procedure was continued using the same ports as for ITA takedown but switching the scope to a 30° downward angle. The ITA was detached and approximated to the anastomotic site with a stay suture. The LAD was dissected and an arteriotomy was made. A running 8-0 double-armed suture (7 cm) was used to perform the anastomosis (Fig 3). An angiogram was performed in the operating room during rewarming and before discharge.
|
|
|
20 a new endoscopic stabilizer based on the EndoWrist principle (Intuitive) was developed (Fig 4). By adding cleats onto the pads of the stabilizer, we were able to anchor silicone rubber bands, achieving coronary occlusion by adapting a technique commonly used in off-pump revascularization. For an initial trial, a second console was added, yielding two more manipulator arms and thus providing assistance. The video signal of the primary surgeon's console was fed into the assistant's console; camera position was controlled from the primary console. 21 After an initial trial, beating-heart TECAB was then performed with the same setup (single console, three manipulator arms) and the same ports as described for TECAB on the arrested heart. The stabilizer was inserted through a fourth port in a subxiphoid position.
|
14 Short (6 cm) single-armed sutures were used both for leaflet repair (Premio 4-0; Peters, Bobigny Cedex, France) and for ring implantation (Tevdek II 2-0; Genzyme Biosurgery, Fall River, Mass). Annular sutures were placed in a counterclockwise fashion beginning at the right fibrous trigone. Because of the small field of view, continuous suturing requiring long suture lines was avoided. Although in general sutures were tied after each stitch (thereby providing maximum countertraction for the following suture placement), placement of the last three sutures toward the aortic commissure was completed before the preceding suture was tied. For recovering lost needles, an endoscopic tool with a bendable shaft and a strong magnet at the tip was developed. After completion of the repair and testing of the valve, the end-effectors were withdrawn and the left atrium was closed manually with standard endoscopic instruments (Heartport). |
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionAppendix: DiscussionReferences |
|---|
MIDCAB with computer-enhanced ITA takedown
The results are given inTable II
. Time for endoscopic ITA takedown has constantly improved and is now in the range of 25 to 40 minutes. In 2 patients the ITA was discarded for occlusion (n = 1) or low flow (n = 1), so that the overall success rate for endoscopic ITA takedown is currently 97.5% (79/81). In these 2 patients a sternotomy was performed and a vein graft placed on the beating heart. Transit time flow measurements and intraoperative angiograms were performed in almost all patients, documenting graft patency in the operating room. According to the protocol, a postoperative angiogram was performed between postoperative days 3 and 6 and revealed patency in all but 1 ITA graft (78/79). This patient was subsequently reoperated on (sternotomy, vein graft). Thus, overall immediate postoperative graft and optimal anastomotic patency rate was 96.3% (78/81). Two patients required re-exploration for bleeding. In 1 patient, a side branch was identified as the cause; in the other patient, no obvious bleeding source was found. One patient had a stroke postoperatively and is currently undergoing a neurologic rehabilitation program. Three patients had transient atrial fibrillation. One patient in this group required an extensive endarterectomy of the LAD after an uneventful ITA takedown. Despite a patent graft and an uneventful immediate postoperative period, the patient died on postoperative day 7 of an unknown cause (autopsy denied). At 6 months' follow-up (completed in 58/79 patients by April 2000), all patients were free from angina.
TECAB on the arrested heart
Total closed-chest left ITA–LAD grafting through 3 or 4 ports was achieved on the arrested heart in 22 of 27 patients by April 2000. A substantial learning curve was associated with the procedure, which is reflected in long operating times of from 3.5 to 8 hours (Fig 5). Despite a clear trend toward shorter procedure times, the overall time far exceeds that required for a standard MIDCAB approach, and that remains a major concern.
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionAppendix: DiscussionReferences |
|---|
22 a prototype of the system was introduced into clinical practice in May 1998. 23 Beginning in December 1998, the system was used in a total of 148 patients. During this period, the system was operated by the hospital staff and worked without any relevant mechanical failures. Time for setup is well within the range of 10 to 20 minutes (median time 16 minutes in 22 TECAB patients. 13 There were 3 deaths in the series (2.0%), none related to the use of the system. Clearly the EndoWrist technology enhances intracorporeal dexterity, rendering knot-tying and suturing relatively easy. Optimized hand-eye alignment, indexing, and tremor filtering all greatly facilitate tissue handling. The high-resolution 3-dimensional image display provides a detailed view of all anatomic details, allowing for precise tissue manipulation. However, some restrictions of thoracoscopic surgery still apply, despite all these advantages over conventional endoscopic instruments. The rib cage defines a rigid boundary for thoracoscopic work and limits the work space and the insertion angles that define the ease of manipulation. This can cause singularities (loss of 1 degree of freedom by using one link to compensate for an unfavorable insertion angle) and thus impair performance. Depending on the individual's anatomy, collisions may occur between the manipulator arms or the manipulator arms and the shoulder or lower rib cage of the patient. Usually collisions occur only during the very proximal or the very distal part of the ITA dissection because the manipulator arms then work parallel to each other. However, it was usually not necessary to change ports. Rather, a different scope was used (leading to a different viewing angle that helped to resolve some collisions with the camera arm), or dissection was performed with the nondominant hand. In addition, longer tipped instruments were developed, which help to avoid collisions due to subsequent changes of the angle and distance of the instrument toward the tissue. Despite its limitations, TECAB grafting that has been attempted in the past with only minor success 24 has now become feasible. With the use of the ZEUS system (Computer Motion, Inc, Goleta, Calif), robot-assisted coronary anastomoses were performed on the arrested heart with good patency results in a long-term calf model. 25 However, the ITA was harvested through a minithoracotomy with conventional instruments. Clinically, the system has been used in 5 patients for endoscopic CABG. Although the anastomosis was performed through ports, manual assistance was provided through a minithoracotomy. 26 Damiano and associates 12 reported on 10 patients in whom the left ITA–LAD anastomosis was performed through a sternotomy by means of the ZEUS system. In 8 patients the anastomosis was successfully performed. Reichenspurner and colleagues 27 also reported on the performance of computer-assisted coronary anastomosis on the beating heart using manual assistance and a conventional stabilizer. The da Vinci system was used for ITA harvesting in MIDCAB patients as well as for coronary anastomoses in patients undergoing a sternotomy. 13 Endoscopic ITA harvesting is now routinely performed and allows the thoracotomy incision for the MIDCAB procedure to be decreased. This is in accordance with other studies of thoracoscopic ITA harvesting, which demonstrated that the minithoracotomy incision can be tailored for the anastomosis, rather than for ITA harvest. The thoracoscopic approach (irrespective of the computer-enhanced instrumentation system) allows a smaller chest incision and may reduce the pain that usually results from the extensive spreading necessary for a direct takedown. 28 Early patency is currently 96.3%, which resembles the early patency rate with our MIDCAB program in 1997. 29
With increased clinical experience and experimental trials (cadaver and animal studies), it became obvious that ITA-LAD grafting could be performed without the need for a thoracotomy (TECAB procedure). The first 2 successful cases were subsequently performed in June 1998 30 and were followed by larger series in a number of centers. 13
Natural tissue attachments provide enough countertraction for the procedure to be performed unassisted as solo surgery through 3 ports. Careful patient positioning and port placement are crucial. Although all patients in the TECAB group had a good outcome with a good functional result, refinements in the procedural flow were and are required. With the described technique, the incidence of conversion is decreasing as is the overall procedure time.
In terms of access, this is currently the least invasive procedure for CABG. Although the surgical trauma is reduced in the absence of a thoracotomy, CPB and cardioplegic cardiac arrest are still required. Given the known side effects of CPB, and in the light of a very successful and noninvasive surgical alternative, namely, the MIDCAB procedure, the benefit of the TECAB operation for the patient is currently not evident. We therefore focused on developing an approach for endoscopic CABG on the beating heart. After development of a low-profile endoscopic stabilizer, an initial animal trial demonstrated the feasibility of this approach. 20 By means of a more sophisticated stabilizer that allows for free angulation inside the chest, stabilization of the target vessel was improved. At the same time, coronary occlusion was achieved by designing the stabilizer to feature locking slits to hold silicone rubber tapes. Despite stabilization, there is some residual motion. Due to the mechanical design of the manipulators and end-effectors, residual system inertia may thus become an issue during beating-heart procedures. Both in the clinical trial as well as in this animal study, bleeding presents a major problem in beating-heart TECAB grafting. A new generation of tools featuring irrigation channels was therefore developed. These instruments only became available during the study but showed great potential to provide a bloodless field. The anastomosis could be sutured on the beating heart in an unassisted fashion, but the procedure was performed with more comfort once an assisting tool driven by a second console became available. In these cases, an assistant worked remotely from a second console driving an electronic version of the stabilizer and an assisting instrument (forceps). This experimental setup demonstrated the potential benefit of multiple robotic arms that could also be operated by one surgeon provided the human-machine interface would allow an intuitive control algorithm for multiple arm operation. Clearly, beating-heart surgery not only will minimize the overall trauma of the procedure but also will lead to a major decrease in procedure time, as no time for cannulation, reperfusion, and rewarming is required. However, the technique of closed-chest beating-heart CABG has not fully evolved and currently works only under the best of circumstances. In 1 patient, ventricular fibrillation occurred during the procedure and necessitated emergency conversion and initiation of CPB. The reason for the triggering event remains speculative, but it could be that the combination of carbon dioxide insufflation and mechanical stabilization may increase the likelihood of ischemic complications even without temporary vascular occlusion. As outlined inTable IV, limited exposure is one reason for conversion. A large septal branch may lead to substantial bleeding from the anastomotic site, rendering an endoscopic anastomosis impossible. The lack of tactile feedback may lead to impaired decision making in terms of defining the best spot for the anastomosis. If the target vessel is opened in a largely calcified segment, suturing becomes difficult and time consuming. We have therefore developed an endoscopic Doppler method to detect the target vessel and to outline disease-free segments that are amenable for anastomosis. Furthermore, endoscopic Doppler ultrasonography may aid in ITA harvesting in case the vessel is covered by fat or muscle. 31 The endoscopic stabilizer, although providing articulation, will need further refinement and allow for easier placement. Alternatives to the currently applied method for vascular occlusion are also to be developed. Application of multimodal 3-dimensional image visualization and manipulation systems that allow modeling of the range of motion of the robotic arms in an individual patient data set (computed tomographic scan, electrocardiogram-gated magnetic resonance imaging) may help to optimize port placement and minimize the risk of collisions in the future. A virtual cardiac surgical planning platform that will allow surgeons to examine the topology of a patient's thorax for planning of endoscopic cardiac procedures has recently been introduced by Chiu and colleagues. 32 A similar system, including a 3-dimensional reconstruction of coronary angiograms that will be fused with the intraoperative videoscopic image, is currently being developed at the French Institute National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique. 33
Mitral valve repair
The versatility of the end-effectors enabled complex intracardiac repairs including chordal transfers and shortening and sliding plasty, as well as annular decalcification. The use of a rib spreader was abandoned because of some collisions that occurred between the end-effectors and the retractor blade. As a result, the right instrument can be placed more cephalad and below the scope, which solves the problem of unintended enlargement of the atriotomy by the tool coming in too low. Recently we have started to use the Chitwood clamp for aortic clamping through a separate stab incision in the posterior axillary line. No collisions between the clamp and the manipulator arms were encountered. Although not yet a total endoscopic approach, the technique of computer-enhanced mitral valve repair may offer some potential benefits over the standard endoscopic approach using conventional instruments. Among those are the freedom to orient the instrument tip relative to the tissue, yielding optimal angles for tissue manipulation. Intracardiac knot-tying is easily accomplished. Future design of mitral valve rings with preloaded sutures may further facilitate the procedure.
In conclusion, some cardiac procedures can be performed in selected patients by means of current computer-enhanced telemanipulation systems. ITA takedown is now routinely and safely performed with very good results. Total endoscopic single-vessel bypass grafting to the LAD is feasible on the arrested heart but does not offer a major benefit over the MIDCAB approach because CPB is still required. Experimentally, endoscopic beating-heart CABG can be performed with good functional results. The early clinical experience with this approach clearly outlines its limitations despite some procedural success. Mitral valve repair can be performed safely using the system, but the numbers are too small to render a comparison to manual endoscopic mitral valve repair meaningful. It is expected that with further refinements and the development of adjunct technologies, the technique of computer-enhanced endoscopic cardiac surgery will evolve in specialized centers and may prove beneficial for selected patients; as yet, it is in an investigational stage and should be carefully evaluated.
|
Appendix: Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionAppendix: DiscussionReferences |
|---|
This is a very demanding technology. At the beginning there is a learning curve, and one has to proceed very wisely, but the technology can be learned.
The only limitation for the moment is loss of tactile feedback. Dr Mohr, how do you think we could improve this particular point, as well as the strength of the instrument? This is particularly important for mitral valve disease, which requires more strength than is needed for coronary artery disease.
Dr Mohr. Thank you. I think this is an obvious conflict. The surgeon is always demanding a change for the next day, and technicians and engineers are not able to make such changes immediately.
They focused on coronary bypass surgery for many reasons, and it would be helpful to have tactile feedback in coronary operations. However, I think the improved visualization overcomes many of the drawbacks of not having tactile feedback. For CABG surgery it may not really be necessary. For mitral valve surgery, I think tactile feedback would be very helpful. However, major technical changes will be required, and I do not know how long those changes will take.
The development of different instruments for mitral valve surgery is absolutely necessary. Some of the rings must also be changed. We have made some changes together with Professor Camp on the Physio rings. I have used many Carpentier rings in this series, and I think there will be great progress in the future.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionAppendix: DiscussionReferences |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T. Mihaljevic, A. M. Gillinov, C. Jarrett, L. Seto, R. Savage, and P. DeVilliers Endoscopic robotically-assisted mitral valve repair MMCTS, September 14, 2009; 2009(0914): 3608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. R. Chitwood Jr., E. Rodriguez, M. W.A. Chu, A. Hassan, T. B. Ferguson, P. W. Vos, and L. W. Nifong Robotic mitral valve repairs in 300 patients: a single-center experience. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2008; 136(2): 436 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. E. Reiley, T. Akinbiyi, D. Burschka, D. C. Chang, A. M. Okamura, and D. D. Yuh Effects of visual force feedback on robot-assisted surgical task performance J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2008; 135(1): 196 - 202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. R. Chitwood Jr. and E. Rodriguez Minimally Invasive and Robotic Mitral Valve Surgery Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1079 - 1100. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Waseda, N. Ishikawa, M. Oda, I. Matsumoto, Y. Ohta, N. Inaki, Y. Hirano, and G. Watanabe Robot-assisted endoscopic airway reconstruction in rabbits, with the aim to perform robot-assisted thoracoscopic bronchoplasty in human subjects. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2007; 134(4): 989 - 995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. de Canniere, G. Wimmer-Greinecker, R. Cichon, V. Gulielmos, F. Van Praet, U. Seshadri-Kreaden, and V. Falk Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: Multicenter European experience J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2007; 134(3): 710 - 716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. M. Smith, H. Stein, A. M. Engel, S. McDonough, and L. Lonneman Totally Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair Using a Robotic-Controlled Atrial Retractor Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2007; 84(2): 633 - 637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Oehlinger, N. Bonaros, T. Schachner, E. Ruetzler, G. Friedrich, G. Laufer, and J. Bonatti Robotic Endoscopic Left Internal Mammary Artery Harvesting: What Have We Learned After 100 Cases? Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 83(3): 1030 - 1034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. Wisser, T. Fleck, D. Hutschala, and E. Wolner The 3rd hand - a simple but useful tool for beating heart total endoscopic coronary bypass grafting (BH-TECAB) Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, October 1, 2006; 5(5): 519 - 520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Akpinar, M. Guden, E. Sagbas, I. Sanisoglu, B. Caynak, and Z. Bayramoglu Robotic-Enhanced Totally Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair and Ablative Therapy Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2006; 81(3): 1095 - 1098. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Farhat, M. Vergnat, P. Blanc, P. Chiari, and O. Jegaden Which place for Port AccessTM surgery in coronary artery bypass grafting? A mid-term follow up study Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, February 1, 2006; 5(1): 71 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. G. Pennington The Impact of New Technology on Cardiothoracic Surgical Practice Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2006; 81(1): 10 - 18. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. J. Park, R. M. Flores, and V. W. Rusch Robotic assistance for video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy: Technique and initial results J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2006; 131(1): 54 - 59. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Y. Loisance, K. Nakashima, and M. Kirsch Computer-assisted coronary surgery: lessons from an initial experience Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, October 1, 2005; 4(5): 398 - 401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. J. DeRose Jr, S. K. Balaram, C. Ro, D. G. Swistel, V. Singh, J. R. Wilentz, G. J. Todd, and R. C. Ashton Mid-term results and patient perceptions of robotically-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, October 1, 2005; 4(5): 406 - 411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. W. Nifong, W.R. Chitwood, P.S. Pappas, C.R. Smith, M. Argenziano, V.A. Starnes, P.M. Shah, and for the Multi-center Robotic Mitral Repair Group Robotic mitral valve surgery: A United States multicenter trial J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2005; 129(6): 1395 - 1404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. R. Chitwood Jr Current Status of Endoscopic and Robotic Mitral Valve Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2005; 79(6): S2248 - S2253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. A. Subramanian, N. U. Patel, N. C. Patel, and D. F. Loulmet Robotic Assisted Multivessel Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass With Port-Access Stabilization and Cardiac Positioning: Paving the Way for Outpatient Coronary Surgery? Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2005; 79(5): 1590 - 1596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Savitt, G. Gao, A. P. Furnary, J. Swanson, H. L. Gately, and J. R. Handy Application of Robotic-Assisted Techniques to the Surgical Evaluation and Treatment of the Anterior Mediastinum Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 79(2): 450 - 455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Reiter, U. Reiter, P. Bergmann, and R. Rienmuller MR imaging-based port placement planning for totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2004; 3(2): 341 - 345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. R. Ewing, A. Pigazzi, Y. Wang, and G. H. Ballantyne Robots in the Operating Room The History Surgical Innovation, June 1, 2004; 11(2): 63 - 71. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Carrel, L. Englberger, D. Keller, S. Windecker, B. Meier, and F. Eckstein Clinical and angiographic results after mechanical connection for distal anastomosis in coronary surgery J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2004; 127(6): 1632 - 1640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Hashizume and K. Tsugawa Robotic Surgery and Cancer: the Present State, Problems and Future Vision Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2004; 34(5): 227 - 237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Bolotin, W. W. Scott Jr, T. C. Austin, P. J. Charland, A. P. Kypson, L. W. Nifong, K. Salleng, and W. R. Chitwood Jr Robotic skeletonizing of the internal thoracic artery: is it safe? Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2004; 77(4): 1262 - 1265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Morgan, J. C. Peacock, T. Kohmoto, M. J. Garrido, B. M. Schanzer, A. R. Kherani, D. W. Vigilance, F. H. Cheema, S. Kaplan, C. R. Smith, et al. Robotic techniques improve quality of life in patients undergoing atrial septal defect repair Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2004; 77(4): 1328 - 1333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. C. Saunders, E. A. Grossi, R. Sharony, C. F. Schwartz, G. H. Ribakove, A. T. Culliford, J. Delianides, F. G. Baumann, A. C. Galloway, and S. B. Colvin Minimally invasive technology for mitral valve surgery via left thoracotomy: Experience with forty cases J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2004; 127(4): 1026 - 1032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. P. Carrel, F. S. Eckstein, L. Englberger, P. A. Berdat, and J. Schmidli Clinical experience with devices for facilitated anastomoses in coronary artery bypass surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2004; 77(3): 1110 - 1120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Bonatti, T. Schachner, O. Bernecker, O. Chevtchik, N. Bonaros, H. Ott, G. Friedrich, F. Weidinger, and G. Laufer Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass: Program development and learning curve issues J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2004; 127(2): 504 - 510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Filsoufi, R. S. Farivar, L. Aklog, C. A. Anderson, R. H. Chen, S. Lichtenstein, J. Zhang, and D. H. Adams Automated distal coronary bypass with a novel magnetic coupler (MVP system) J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2004; 127(1): 185 - 192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Jacobs, D. Holzhey, B. B. Kiaii, J. F. Onnasch, T. Walther, F. W. Mohr, and V. Falk Limitations for manual and telemanipulator-assisted motion tracking--implications for endoscopic beating-heart surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2003; 76(6): 2029 - 2035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. J. Damiano Jr Invited commentary Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2003; 76(6): 2035 - 2036. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Ohtsuka, M. Ninomiya, T. Maemura, and S. Takamoto Needle-guided mini-entry in video-assisted coronary artery bypass Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2003; 24(4): 644 - 646. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Herzog, S. Dogan, T. Diebold, M. F. Khan, H. Ackermann, S. Schaller, T. G. Flohr, G. Wimmer-Greinecker, A. Moritz, and T. J. Vogl Multi-Detector Row CT versus Coronary Angiography: Preoperative Evaluation before Totally Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Radiology, October 1, 2003; 229(1): 200 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. J. Novick, S. A. Fox, B. B. Kiaii, L. W. Stitt, R. Rayman, K. Kodera, A. H. Menkis, and W. D. Boyd Analysis of the learning curve in telerobotic, beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting: a 90 patient experience Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2003; 76(3): 749 - 753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. D. Boyd and K. D. Stahl The Janus syndrome: a perspective on a new era of computer-enhanced robotic cardiac surgery J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2003; 126(3): 625 - 630. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. J. van Andel, P. V. Pistecky, and C. Borst Mechanical properties of porcine and human arteries: implications for coronary anastomotic connectors Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2003; 76(1): 58 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. C. Giulianotti, A. Coratti, M. Angelini, F. Sbrana, S. Cecconi, T. Balestracci, and G. Caravaglios Robotics in General Surgery: Personal Experience in a Large Community Hospital Arch Surg, July 1, 2003; 138(7): 777 - 784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. K. von Segesser, P. Tozzi, M. Augstburger, and A. Corno Working heart off-pump cardiac repair (OPCARE) - the next step in robotic surgery? Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2003; 2(2): 120 - 124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Morgan, M. E. Ginsburg, J. R. Sonett, D. L.S. Morales, T. Kohmoto, L. A. Gorenstein, C. R. Smith, and M. Argenziano Advanced thoracoscopic procedures are facilitated by computer-aided robotic technology Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2003; 23(6): 883 - 887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. D. Bacchetta, R. J. Korst, N. K. Altorki, J. L. Port, O. W. Isom, and C. A. Mack Resection of a symptomatic pericardial cyst using the computer-enhanced Da VinciTM surgical system Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2003; 75(6): 1953 - 1955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. W. Nifong, V. F. Chu, B. M. Bailey, D. M. Maziarz, V. L. Sorrell, D. Holbert, and W. R. Chitwood Jr Robotic mitral valve repair: experience with the da Vinci system Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2003; 75(2): 438 - 443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Mehta, S. Goswami, M. Argenziano, C. R. Smith, and B. Mets Anesthesia for Robotic Repair of the Mitral Valve: A Report of Two Cases Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2003; 96(1): 7 - 10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. J. Woo and T. J. Gardner Myocardial Revascularization with Cardiopulmonary Bypass Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 581 - 607. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. R. Chitwood Jr. and L. W. Nifong Minimally Invasive and Robotic Valve Surgery Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1075 - 1092. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. W. LoGerfo, D. J. Drenth, N. J.G.M. Veeger, P. W. Boonstra, G. D'Ancona, H. Karamanoukian, R. E. Dragu, W. C. Wood, H. Thiele, F. W. Mohr, et al. Minimally Invasive Bypass Surgery N. Engl. J. Med., December 26, 2002; 347(26): 2165 - 2168. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Yoshino, M. Hashizume, M. Shimada, M. Tomikawa, and K. Sugimachi Video-assisted thoracoscopic extirpation of a posterior mediastinal mass using the da Vinci computer enhanced surgical system Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2002; 74(4): 1235 - 1237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Doll, M. A. Borger, J. Hain, J. Bucerius, T. Walther, J. F. Gummert, and F. W. Mohr Minimal access aortic valve replacement: effects on morbidity and resource utilization Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2002; 74(4): S1318 - 1322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Dogan, T. Aybek, S. Mierdl, and G. Wimmer-Greinecker Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting on the arrested heart is a prerequisite for successful totally endoscopic beating heart coronary revascularisation Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, September 1, 2002; 1(1): 30 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Dogan, T. Aybek, E. Andre{beta}en, C. Byhahn, S. Mierdl, K. Westphal, G. Matheis, A. Moritz, and G. Wimmer-Greinecker Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting on cardiopulmonary bypass with robotically enhanced telemanipulation: Report of forty-five cases J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2002; 123(6): 1125 - 1131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Bucerius, S. Metz, T. Walther, V. Falk, N. Doll, F. Noack, D. Holzhey, A. Diegeler, and F. W. Mohr Endoscopic internal thoracic artery dissection leads to significant reduction of pain after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass graft surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2002; 73(4): 1180 - 1184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. W Susilo and A. P Schulz Totally Robotic Technique in Multivessel Coronary Disease -- Is it Possible? Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, March 1, 2002; 10(1): 92 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Ruel, R. B. Streeter, R. de la Torre, J. R. Liddicoat, and W. E. Cohn Intracardiac ultrasonic suture welding for knotless mitral valve replacement Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 21(2): 245 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |
