|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;121:957-968
© 2001 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Cardiopulmonary Support and Physiology |
From the Departments of Surgery,a Anaesthesiology,b and Forensic Medicinec and the Laboratory of Clinical Neurophysiology,d University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Supported by grants from Oulu University Hospital, Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research, and Sigrid Juselius Foundation. Prof. Juvonen was also supported by Ingegerd and Viking Olov Björk Scholarship for Cardiothoracic Research.
Received for publication May 18, 2000. Revisions requested Sept 5, 2000; revisions received Sept 18, 2000. Accepted for publication Nov 6, 2000. Address for reprints: Tatu Juvonen, MD, PhD, Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, FIN 90220 Oulu, Finland (E-mail: tatu.juvonen{at}oulu.fi).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
= 0.377, P = .043). A positive correlation was found between the highest individual glutamate value and histopathologic score (
= 0.336, P = .045).| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Memantine is an uncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist. It is widely used as a very well tolerated drug in the treatment of chronic neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson disease, Alzheimer disease, and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. It is also used as a symptomatic treatment for epilepsy and depression.
8-10 Memantine ameliorates NMDA receptormediated neurotoxicity in vitro and in vivo in normothermia.
11,12 Memantine has also proved to be a promising drug in the treatment of retinal ischemia.
13,14 The results of experimental studies using memantine for prevention of spinal cord injury induced by ischemia have been controversial.
15-17
We have been studying the means to ameliorate brain injury after HCA in a chronic porcine model.
18,19 The aim of this study was to test the neuroprotective efficacy of memantine during HCA with this model.
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Preoperative management
All animals received humane care in accordance with the "Principles of Laboratory Animal Care" formulated by the National Society for Medical Research and the "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals" prepared by the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources and published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH publication No. 85-23 revised 1985). The study was approved by the Research Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Oulu.
Pharmacokinetic pilot study of memantine
Therapeutic range of plasma levels in patients treated with memantine (10-30 mg per day) is 0.2 to 1.0 µmol/L and free brain interstitial concentration is 20% to 30% lower than in plasma.
10 Plasma concentrations of 1 µmol/L are achieved in laboratory animals after acute injection of 2.5 to 5.0 mg/kg.
20 To determine the appropriate dose of memantine in the pig, we performed a pharmacokinetic pilot study in 4 pigs weighing 25 kg. Memantine doses of 3, 5, 7, and 10 mg/kg were given and blood samples were obtained 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, and 5 hours after the start of drug administration. A plasma level of 1.49 µmol/L was recorded 30 minutes after a dose of 3 mg/kg. Animals in this model are known to be exposed for rather severe global cerebral ischemia
18,19 and, on the other hand, plasma is diluted by cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Therefore, a dose of 5 mg/kg providing the highest blood level of 2.81 µmol/L 30 minutes after drug administration was selected for the study.
Drug administration
Memantine was diluted in sodium chloride 0.9% to obtain a solution containing memantine at 10 mg/mL, and this was packed in 15 mL ampules in the Pharmaceutical Laboratory of Oulu University Hospital. Saline placebo ampules were prepared similarly. A dose of 5 mg/kg was measured and diluted to 50 mL in saline solution. This volume was given intravenously over a period of 20 minutes, starting 75 minutes before HCA. Randomization was carried out by the chemist in the pharmaceutical laboratory, and the codes were broken after the entire series of experiments were accomplished. Therefore, all observers in every data recording point were unaware of whether the animal was a memantine subject or a control subject. Pharmacokinetic analyses, generously performed by Merz & Co, demonstrated that memantine concentrations in the study group were sustained at a therapeutically relevant level throughout the critical period of the experiment. The median (interquartile range) plasma concentrations of memantine showed a slow tapering after the period of rewarming as follows: 1.23 µmol/L (0.98-1.46 µmol/L) at the end of cooling at 20°C, 1.47 µmol/L (1.35-1.65 µmol/L) during rewarming at 30°C, 1.12 µmol/L (0.96-1.19 µmol/L) 2 hours after the start of rewarming, 0.66 µmol/L (0.56-0.79 µmol/L) 4 hours after the start of rewarming, and 0.46 µmol/L (0.43-0.62 µmol/L) 7 hours after the start of rewarming.
Anesthesia and hemodynamic monitoring
Anesthesia was induced with medetomidine hydrochloride (0.4 mg/kg intramuscularly), and muscular paralysis was maintained with pancuronium bromide (0.1 mg/kg intravenously). After endotracheal intubation, the animals were maintained on positive-pressure ventilation with 35% oxygen; anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane (1.1%-1.2%). The arterial catheter was positioned in the left femoral artery. A thermodilution catheter (CritiCath, 7F; Ohmeda GmbH & Co, Erlangen, Germany) was placed through the femoral vein to allow blood sampling, pressure monitoring in the pulmonary artery, and recording of cardiac output. The intracranial temperature probe was placed through a drill hole in the epidural space. The drill hole was positioned 1 cm to the left side from a sagittal joint above a parietal line. Other temperature probes were placed in the esophagus and rectum, and a 10F catheter was placed in the urinary bladder to monitor urine output.
Electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring
Cortical electrical activity was registered from 4 stainless steel screw electrodes (5 mm in diameter) implanted in the skull over the parietal and frontal areas of the cortex with a digital EEG recorder (Nervus Company, Reykjavik, Iceland) and an amplifier (Magnus EEG 32/8; Nervus Company). Sampling frequency was 1024 Hz, and bandwidth was 0.03 to 256 Hz. All EEG recordings are referenced to a frontal screw electrode, which, together with a ground screw electrode, is implanted over the frontal sinuses. Isoflurane level was adjusted so that the EEG showed a steady burst suppression pattern. After this, isoflurane end-tidal was kept at this steady level until the end of monitoring. The EEG was recorded for 10 minutes to get a baseline recording of steady burst suppression activity before the cooling period. After HCA, EEG recording was restarted and continued until the first postoperative day. The durations of EEG were measured from 5-minute EEG samples at fixed time points, first with half-hour intervals, later with 1-hour intervals. From each 5-minute sample artifact periods were excluded, and from the rest the sum of bursts was counted as percentage of the sum of artifact-free bursts and suppressions. This percentage was used as a measure of EEG activity in the analysis.
CPB
Through a right thoracotomy in the fourth intercostal space, the right thoracic artery was ligated, and the heart and great vessels were exposed. A membrane oxygenator (Midiflow D 705; Dideco, Mirandola, Italy) was primed with 1 L of Ringer acetate and heparin (5000 IU). After heparinization (300 IU/kg), the ascending aorta was cannulated with a 16F arterial cannula and the right atrial appendage with a single 24F atrial cannula. Nonpulsatile CPB was initiated at a flow rate of 100 mL · kg1 · min1 and the flow was adjusted to maintain a perfusion pressure of 50 mm Hg. A 12F intracardiac sump cannula was positioned in the left ventricle for decompression of the left side of the heart during CPB. A heat exchanger was used for core cooling. The pH was maintained, using alpha-stat principles, at 7.40 ± 0.05 with an arterial PCO2 of 4.0 to 5.0 kPa, uncorrected for temperature. All measurements were performed at 37°C.
A cooling period of 60 minutes was carried out to attain a rectal temperature of 20°C. The ascending aorta was crossclamped just proximal to the aortic cannula. Cardiac arrest was induced by injecting potassium chloride (1 mEq/kg) via the aortic cannula, and topical cardiac cooling was then begun and maintained throughout the aortic crossclamp period.
Experimental protocol
After cooling to 20°C rectal temperature and crossclamping of the aorta, the animals underwent a 75-minute interval of HCA with the head packed in ice. After this 75-minute period, CPB rewarming was initiated. The left ventricular vent cannula was removed. Weaning from CPB occurred approximately 60 minutes after the start of rewarming with administration of furosemide (40 mg), mannitol (15 g), methylprednisolone (80 mg), and lidocaine (40-150 mg). Cardiac support was provided by dopamine (1-5 mg/h). The animals were kept under isoflurane anesthesia until the following morning, extubated, and moved into a recovery room.
During the experiments, hemodynamic and metabolic measurements were recorded at 5 time points as follows: at baseline; at the end of cooling (at 20°C, immediately before institution of the intervention); during rewarming (at 30°C); 2 hours after the start of rewarming; and 4 hours after the start of rewarming.
Postoperative evaluation
Postoperatively, all the animals were evaluated daily by an experienced observer who was blinded to the study group. The observer used a speciesspecific quantitative behavioral score as reported earlier.
21 The assessment quantified mental status (0 = comatose, 1 = stuporous, 2 = depressed, 3 = normal), appetite (0 = refuses liquids, 1 = refuses solids, 2 = decreased, 3 = normal), and motor function (0 = unable to stand, 1 = unable to walk, 2 = unsteady gait, 3 = normal). Numerical summing of these functions provides a final score: the maximum (score of 9) reflects apparently normal neurologic function, whereas lower values indicate substantial brain damage. A score of 8 means that the animals were able to stand unassisted and were likely to recover fully. Each surviving animal was electively killed on day 7 after the operation. The entire brain was immediately harvested and weighed for subsequent histologic analysis.
Histopathologic analysis
During autopsy the brain was excised immediately and the hemispheres were separated. One half was immersed in 10% neutral formalin solution and allowed to fix for 1 to 2 weeks en bloc. Thereafter, 3-mm thick coronal samples were sliced from the frontal lobe, thalamus (including the adjacent cortex), and hippocampus (including the adjacent brain stem and temporal cortex), and sagittal samples were obtained from the posterior brain stem (medulla oblongata and pons) and cerebellum. The pieces were fixed in fresh formalin solution for another week. After the fixation, the samples were processed as follows: rinsing in water for 20 minutes, immersion in 70% ethanol for 2 hours, in 94% ethanol for 4 hours, and in absolute ethanol for 9 hours. Thereafter, the pieces were kept 1 hour in absolute ethanol-xylene mixture, 4 hours in xylene, and were embedded in warm paraffin for 6 hours. The samples were sectioned at 6 µm and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The sections of the brain samples of each animal were screened by a single experienced senior pathologist (J.H.), unaware of the experimental design and of the identity and fate of individual animals. Each section was carefully investigated for the presence or absence of any hypoxic or other damage.
Visual estimation of the injuries in the sampled regions was made as follows: 0 = no morphologic damage; 1 = edema or eosinophilic dark neurons or dark/shrunk cerebellar Purkinje cells; 2 = at least 2 small hemorrhages, and 3 = clearly infarctive foci. Total score is the sum of scores in each specific brain area (cortex, thalamus, hippocampus, posterior brainstem, and brainstem). To allow semiquantitative comparisons between the animals, we calculated a total histologic score by adding all the regional scores. A score more than 4 means that the animal had a distinct brain injury.
Microdialysis
The microdialysis catheter (CMA 70; CMA/Microdialysis, Stockholm, Sweden) was placed into the brain cortex. A drill hole was positioned 1 cm to the right side from a sagittal joint above a parietal line. The shaft was introduced free hand through a bolt to a depth of 15 mm below the dura. The microdialysis catheter was connected to a 2.5-mL syringe placed in a microinfusion pump (CMA107; CMA Microdialysis) and perfused with Ringer solution (Perfusion Fluid; CMA Microdialysis). Samples were collected every 30 minutes. The concentrations of glucose, lactate, glutamate, and glycerol were measured immediately after collection by means of ordinary enzymatic methods on a microdialysis analyzer (CMA 600; CMA Microdialysis).
Other measurements
Systemic arterial and venous blood samples were obtained to determine pH, PO2, PCO2, oxygen saturation, oxygen content, hematocrit value, hemoglobin concentration, and glucose level (Ciba-Corning 288 Blood Gas System; Ciba-Corning Diagnostic Corp, Medfield, Mass). Lactate was analyzed by means of a YSI 1500 analyzer (Yellow Springs Instrument Co, Yellow Springs, Ohio).
Statistical analysis
Summary statistics for continuous or ordinal variables are expressed as the median with interquartile range (25th and 75th percentiles) or means with standard deviation (SD). In the figures, values are shown as medians with interquartile ranges.
The analysis was performed by analysis of variance for repeated measurements. Comparison between relevant time points and baseline (reference category) was performed by paired sample t test or Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test. Differences between groups were determined by t test or by the Mann-Whitney U test. The 2-tailed Fisher exact test was used to determine the significance of mortality rates between groups. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for microdialysis measurements, and Kendall's rank correlation was used to estimate correlation coefficients. Analyses were performed with a standard commercially available statistical program (SPSS version 9.0; SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Comparability of experimental groups
The mean (±SD) weight of the animals was 28 ± 3 kg in the memantine group and 29 ± 2 kg in the placebo group. The mean (±SD) CPB cooling time was 66 ± 6 minutes in the memantine group and 66 ± 5 minutes in the control group. Rewarming times were 69 ± 7 minutes and 76 ± 7 minutes, respectively. Temperatures during the experiments did not differ between the groups (Fig 1).
|
|
Metabolic data
The venous lactate level after baseline increased at all recording points among control animals (P < .001). The same increase was also seen in memantine animals (P = .029, P < .001, P = .001, and P = .064), respectively. Oxygen extraction and consumption decreased in memantine animals (P = .058 and P = .038) and in controls (P < .001 and P = .010) at the end of cooling. The differences in the oxygen extraction and consumption between the groups could be due to chance (P > .2) (Table II).
|
|
Behavioral outcome
The results of behavioral scoring for both groups are shown in Fig 3. Scores of 8 and 9 indicate an essentially complete neurologic recovery. Animals that died early were given a score of 0 beginning at the time of death. The median behavioral score on day 7 was 3.5 in the memantine group and 7.5 in the placebo group (P > .2). Among the surviving animals, medians were 9.0 and 8.0 on day 7 (P > .2), respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
= 0.474, P = .004), but there was no correlation between glutamate and lactate (P > .2). A 1-hour lag was found in correlation between glutamate peak (30 minutes after the start of rewarming) and glycerol (from 1.5 hours after the start of rewarming onward), giving highest correlation with a lag of 1.5 and 2 hours (
= 0.537, P = .001). There was an inverse correlation between the highest individual glutamate levels and EEG burst recovery 3 hours after the start of rewarming, the highest correlation being (
= 0.377, P = .043) (Fig 7). In addition, there was a positive correlation between the highest individual glutamate value and histopathologic score (
= 0.336, P = .045)(Fig 8).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The most frequently used method for brain protection during operations on the aortic arch is hypothermia. It has been demonstrated very recently that even in deep hypothermia (systemic temperature 10°C-15°C) a significant degree of cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen consumption remains, and the length of safe HCA is limited to 40 to 50 minutes.
3 The importance of the failure of neurotransmitter transport as a common pathway in the pathogenesis of many neurologic disorders, including ischemic cerebral injury, has been well demonstrated in the past few years. Excitatory amino acids, including glutamate and aspartate, are the primary messengers used for interneuronal communication.
6 After ischemia, glutamate accumulates in the intercellular space, where it acts as a potent neurotoxic substance. It opens calcium channels, leading to an influx of calcium, which starts the catastrophic intracellular activation of several enzymes.
6 This knowledge has opened up new avenues of research to enhance current protective methods by the addition of appropriate pharmacologic agents.
6,22 The most studied antagonists are the glutamate receptor blockers and Ca2+ and Na+ channel antagonists. Despite promising results in experimental studies with various specific interventional agents, most of these have turned out to be neurotoxic in the clinical setting.
22 Only a few potentially neuroprotective pharmacologic agents are clinically used. Lamotrigine is one of them, and we demonstrated recently using the same animal model that this antiepileptic drug substantially improved brain protection during HCA.
18 Memantine is an uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist, and it is well tolerated clinically.
10 Previous studies have shown that memantine carries neuroprotective effects in chronic neurodegenerative diseases and in acute ischemia.
10,12,14,23 On the contrary, memantine failed to improve neurologic outcome after ischemic and traumatic spinal cord injury.
15
The finding of equal hemodynamic and physiologic data between the groups in the present study indicates that memantine was well tolerated and the setup of this demanding model was appropriate. In the present study, there were no differences in total histopathologic scores between the study groups, medians being 16 in the memantine group and 14 in the placebo group. In our previous research endeavor studying leukocyte filtration during 75-minute periods of HCA at 20°C, the median histopathologic score in control animals was 15.5, which indicates that the degree of brain injury in control animals is stable. In leukocyte-depleted animals of the same study the median score was 6.5, indicating that the leukocyte filter was a powerful tool to mitigate brain injury after HCA.
19
In the present study the mortality rate tended to be higher in the memantine group (5/10 vs 1/10; P = .14), but the explanation for this remains obscure. Glutamate receptor blockers can upregulate the number of glutamate receptors.
24 This phenomenon may account for the paradoxically enhanced excitatory amino acidmediated injury.
25 Perhaps this was the reason that the animals receiving memantine did worse. As seen inFig 4
, early deaths were very likely due to brain damage, because there were no major differences in hemodynamic data and specific comorbid findings were not found during autopsies. Among the animals that survived for 7 days, the behavioral scores were equal. As seen inFig 2
, there were no differences in EEG burst recovery. The EEG data are in line with the other data and confirm that memantine did not protect the brain in this model.
Our microdialysis facilities provided us with an opportunity to look at brain continuous biochemistry during global hypothermic ischemia. As seen inFig 6
, curves were similar in both groups, demonstrating that memantine had no effect on the intracerebral concentrations of glutamate and glycerol after this dose. There were strong correlations between glutamate levels and glycerol levels, the glycerol peak following a bit later. This is in line with previous findings demonstrating that release of glutamate starts the biochemical cascade and cell damage will follow later.
6 The finding that glutamate levels were not increased in the brain is not surprising because memantine is an NMDA receptor blocker and should not influence the quantity of glutamate. There was also a correlation between highest individual glutamate levels and histopathologic scores. In addition, as depicted inFig 6
, a negative correlation between glutamate levels and EEG burst recovery was found. These findings support the knowledge that the accumulation of glutamate in the intercellular space is neurotoxic.
26
The finding of failed neuroprotection of memantine is surprising, and it can speculated that the dosage used in the current study was too low. However, side effects such as ataxia, myorelaxation, and amnesia can be encountered after higher short-term doses such as 20 mg/kg of memantine.
10 This was the first study to test the efficacy of memantine during HCA, and nonneuroprotective efficacy of memantine in this context can be related to hypothermia per se. Because the mortality rate tended to be higher in the memantine group, we believe that this report is of particular importance inasmuch as memantine has been suggested to improve neurologic outcome during operations on the thoracic aorta.
16 On the basis of these data, we conclude that memantine does not have the potential to mitigate cerebral injury in patients undergoing HCA. The present study also supports the previous findings indicating the pivotal role of glutamate in the pathogenesis of ischemic brain injury. In addition, these findings shed more light on the current concept of perioperative detection of neuronal injury, demonstrating that monitoring of intracerebral glutamate levels is an accurate method to predict ischemic insult.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. E. Tseng, M. V. Brock, M. S. Lange, J. C. Troncoso, M. E. Blue, C. J. Lowenstein, M. V. Johnston, and W. A. Baumgartner Glutamate Excitotoxicity Mediates Neuronal Apoptosis After Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2010; 89(2): 440 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Romsi, T. Kaakinen, K. Kiviluoma, V. Vainionpaa, J. Hirvonen, M. Pokela, P. Ohtonen, F. Biancari, M. Nuutinen, and T. Juvonen Fructose-1,6-bisphosphate for improved outcome after hypothermic circulatory arrest in pigs J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2003; 125(3): 686 - 698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Rimpilainen, P. Romsi, M. Pokela, J. Hirvonen, V. Vainionpaa, K. T. Kiviluoma, F. Biancari, P. Ohtonen, V. Jantti, V. Anttila, et al. Lamotrigine plus leukocyte filtration as a neuroprotective strategy in experimental hypothermic circulatory arrest Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2002; 73(1): 163 - 172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Juvonen, F. Biancari, J. Rimpilainen, V. Anttila, M. Pokela, V. Vainionpaa, P. Romsi, and K. Kiviluoma Determinants of mortality after hypothermic circulatory arrest in a chronic porcine model Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, October 1, 2001; 20(4): 803 - 810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |