JTCS Speed Up Your Browser
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Valerie W. Rusch
Manjit S. Bains
Robert J. Ginsberg
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rusch, V. W.
Right arrow Articles by Ginsberg, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rusch, V. W.
Right arrow Articles by Ginsberg, R. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pleura

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:788-795
© 2001 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


General Thoracic Surgery

A phase II trial of surgical resection and adjuvant high-dose hemithoracic radiation for malignant pleural mesothelioma

Valerie W. Rusch, MDa, Kenneth Rosenzweig, MDb, Ennapadam Venkatraman, PhDc, Larry Leon, MSc, Adam Raben, MDb, Louis Harrison, MDb, Manjit S. Bains, MDa, Robert J. Downey, MDa, Robert J. Ginsberg, MDa

From the Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery,a the Department of Radiation Oncology,b and the Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics,c Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.

Presented in part at the 2000 Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Received for publication Feb 1, 2001. Revisions requested March 22, 2001; revisions received April 18, 2001. Accepted for publication April 19, 2001. Address for reprints: Valerie W. Rusch, MD, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 (E-mail: ruschv{at}mskcc.org).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Background: Surgical resection of malignant pleural mesothelioma is reported to have up to an 80% rate of local recurrence. We performed a phase II trial of high-dose hemithoracic radiation after complete resection to determine feasibility and to estimate rates of local recurrence and survival.
Methods: Patients were eligible if they had a resectable tumor, as determined by computed tomographic scanning, and adequate cardiopulmonary function for extrapleural pneumonectomy or pleurectomy/decortication. After complete resection, patients received hemithoracic radiation (54 Gy) and then were followed up with serial computed tomographic scanning.
Results: From 1995 to 1998, 88 patients (73 men and 15 women; median age, 62.5 years) were entered into the study. The operations performed included 62 extrapleural pneumonectomies (70%) and 5 pleurectomies/decortications; procedures for exploration only were performed in 21 patients. Seven (7.9%) patients died postoperatively. Adjuvant radiation administered to 57 patients (54 undergoing extrapleural pneumonectomy and 3 undergoing pleurectomy/decortication) at a median dose of 54 Gy was well tolerated (grade 0-2 fatigue, esophagitis), except for one late esophageal fistula. The median survival was 33.8 months for stage I and II tumors but only 10 months for stage III and IV tumors (P = .04). For the patients undergoing extrapleural pneumonectomy, the sites of recurrence were locoregional in 2, locoregional and distant in 5, and distant only in 30.
Conclusion: Hemithoracic radiation after complete surgical resection at a dose not previously reported is feasible. This approach dramatically reduces local recurrence and is associated with prolonged survival for early-stage tumors. Stage III disease has a high risk of early distant relapse and should be considered for trials of systemic therapy added to this regimen of resection and radiation.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an uncommon cancer for which treatment options are limited. In its early stages, MPM remains localized to a single hemithorax, and therapeutic efforts have therefore focused on local treatment modalities, including surgical resection, radiation, intrapleural chemotherapy, and photodynamic therapy. Although extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) is associated with a lower risk of local recurrence than pleurectomy/decortication (P/D), surgical resection alone does not offer long-term local control in most patients.Go Go 1,2 Previous experience with either adjuvant low-dose radiation or postoperative intrapleural chemotherapy showed that these approaches failed to prevent local recurrence.Go Go 3-5 We sought to test the use of high-dose hemithoracic radiation after complete surgical resection of all gross tumors in an effort to achieve local control in early-stage MPM. We now report the results of this phase II trial performed at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC).


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Objectives
The objectives of this phase II trial for resectable MPM were as follows: (1) to determine the feasibility of EPP combined with high-dose, postoperative external-beam hemithoracic radiation; (2) to determine the feasibility of combining P/D with intraoperative radiation and postoperative external-beam radiation; (3) to determine the patterns of local and distant recurrence after this combined modality treatment; and (4) to estimate overall survival after this combined modality treatment.

Eligibility criteria
Patients were eligible for this prospective phase II study if they had potentially resectable, biopsy-proven MPM. The trial was approved by the MSKCC Institutional Review Board, and informed consent was obtained from all patients entered into the study.

The histologic diagnosis of MPM was confirmed in all cases by means of immunohistochemistry, electron microscopy, or both. All patients were evaluated with history and physical examination, computed tomographic (CT) scanning of the chest and upper part of the abdomen, laboratory data, pulmonary function testing, quantitative ventilation-perfusion scanning, echocardiography, and, if clinically indicated, radionuclide stress testing. Additional scans to determine whether distant metastases were present were performed as clinically indicated. Patients were considered ineligible for the study if they had another malignancy within the previous 5 years, had cardiopulmonary or renal insufficiency that made the planned surgical resection prohibitively hazardous, or had a tumor clearly involving the chest wall, abdomen, or distant organs, as determined by means of examination or imaging studies.

Surgical treatment plan
All patients were to undergo an EPP unless contraindicated by their preoperative pulmonary function or by the presence of concurrent medical problems that made the risk of pneumonectomy prohibitive, in which case a P/D was performed.

The surgical technique used for both EPP and P/D has been described previously.Go 6 EPP was defined as an en bloc resection of the entire pleura, lung, and diaphragm, with or without resection of the pericardium. For left-sided resections, the diaphragm was reconstructed with 2-mm thickness polytetrafluoroethylene,*Go and for right-sided resections, reconstruction was with Dexon mesh (Davis & Geck, Danbury, Conn). If resected, the pericardium was also reconstructed with Dexon mesh. P/D included resection of the parietal and mediastinal pleura and removal of involved areas of the visceral pleura, without resection of the lung. Involved areas of the pericardium and diaphragm were also resected and reconstructed as necessary. At thoracotomy, a complete mediastinal lymph node dissection was also to be performed.

Patients found to have an incompletely resectable or unresectable tumor at thoracotomy because of unsuspected diffuse involvement of the chest wall, transdiaphragmatic tumor extension (T4 disease), or metastatic (M1) disease were removed from the study and did not receive the planned adjuvant radiation. Final pathologic staging was performed according to the International Mesothelioma Interest Group staging system.Go 7

Radiation treatment plan
For patients undergoing EPP, adjuvant external-beam radiation started 3 to 5 weeks postoperatively. The target volume included the entire hemithorax, the thoracotomy incision, and chest tube incisions. A total of 54 Gy was delivered through anterior and posterior fields in 30 daily fractions of 1.8 Gy by using 6-MV or higher photons. The spinal cord was protected after 41.4 Gy. Cerrobend blocks were used to limit the dose to the liver, heart, and stomach when these organs were in the treatment field. Electrons were used in the blocked regions to prevent underdosing to the pleura and diaphragm.

Patients undergoing P/D received intraoperative radiation with a previously described high-dose iridium applicator.Go Go 8,9 A dose of 15 Gy was to be delivered to the mediastinum and diaphragm, reducing this to 10 Gy over the heart and esophagus. For these patients, external-beam radiation was also started 3 to 5 weeks postoperatively. The dose administered was 45 to 54 Gy, and the target volume included the perimeter of remaining lung tissue with a 0.5- to 1.0-cm margin, the chest wall with a 1.0-cm margin, the diaphragm, and the mediastinum.

Post-treatment follow-up plan
A physical examination and CT scan of the chest and upper abdomen were performed 4 to 6 weeks after the end of external-beam radiation and then every 3 to 4 months thereafter. In accordance with previously reported criteria, local tumor progression was defined as an increasing radiographic abnormality on serial CT scans within or partially within the irradiated volume, provided such an abnormality was not considered to be solely caused by radiation pneumonitis.Go Go 10,11 Tumor progression identified by CT or other scans outside of the irradiated volume was considered to be metastatic disease. Cytologic or histologic documentation of disease progression was required whenever technically feasible. All patients were followed up until death or to the final date of analysis for this study. Postmortem examinations were not routinely performed because most patients who died of progressive disease received terminal care locally in their communities, often far away from MSKCC.

Statistical methods
Survival probabilities were calculated by the product-limit method of Kaplan and Meier. The prognostic significance of factors were tested in a univariate model by the log-rank statistic for categoric covariates and by proportional hazards regression for continuous covariates. Proportional hazards regression was used to test the prognostic significance of factors in a multivariate model.Go Go 12-14


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
From 1993 to 1998, 103 patients were entered into the study. As originally designed, the trial included intraoperative radiation after both EPP and P/D. However, after 15 patients were entered into the study (EPP, 7 patients; P/D, 4 patients; unresectable, 4 patients), it was noted that the intraoperative radiation unduly prolonged the length of the operation (median, 9.2 hours; range, 1.0-13.4 hours) and was associated with an unexpected frequency of infectious complications in the patients undergoing EPP, including empyemas. Therefore, with the approval of the institutional review board, the trial was closed for the revision of the protocol, eliminating the intraoperative radiation for patients undergoing EPP. The trial was then reopened for accrual. The intraoperative radiation was retained for patients undergoing P/D because of the limitations of external-beam radiation and the lower risk of infectious complications in these cases. This report focuses on the 88 patients entered into the revised protocol (MSKCC protocol #93-153A) between 1995 and 1998.

Patient characteristics and surgical resection data
The study schema and the numbers of patients in the study at important time points are shown in Figure 1. The demographic information for these 88 patients, shown in Table 1, reflects the usual sex, age, and tumor histology distribution of patients with MPM. Most patients were middle-aged or older men, and epithelial tumors were the most common histologic type.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Study schema of MSKCC protocol #93-153A, with the numbers of patients noted at key study time points. IORT, Intraoperative radiation therapy; EBRT, external beam radiation therapy.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Demographic information for the 88 patients entered into MSKCC protocol #93-153A
 
Data related to surgical resection and tumor stage are shown in Table 2. Of the 88 patients entered into the study, 21 did not have a completely resectable tumor at thoracotomy and were removed from the study; 62 patients had EPP, and 5 underwent P/D. The median operative time was 4.1 hours (range, 1.0-10.3 hours), and the median blood loss was 1050 mL (range, 40-5700 mL). There were 7 postoperative deaths, all primarily related to pulmonary complications in patients who had undergone EPP. A total of 33 patients had at least one complication. The most common complications (some patients had multiple complications) were atrial arrhythmias (17 patients), respiratory failure (6 patients), pneumonia (5 patients), and empyema (5 patients).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Surgical and staging data for the 88 patients entered into MSKCC protocol #93-153A
 
Almost half of all patients had T1 or T2 tumors, and just over 40% of tumors were N0 or N1. The N status was not known for 18 patients who had unresectable or incompletely resectable tumors, most frequently because of diffuse chest wall invasion. However, because of either T3 or N2 status, 51% of all tumors were considered to be stage III, and only 22% were stage I or II.

Adjuvant radiation data
Of the 60 patients who survived and had a complete surgical resection, 3 did not receive adjuvant radiation because of poor performance status. The remaining 57 patients (54 EPP and 3 P/D) received a median dose of 54 Gy of radiation (range, 20-64 Gy). Radiation-related complications are shown in Table 3. In general, radiation was well tolerated, with most toxicities being of grades 1 and 2. Grade 3 toxicities included fatigue, esophagitis, nausea, and vomiting. The most serious grade 4 toxicity was an esophagopleural fistula, which developed several months after the completion of radiation and required an Eloesser flap for drainage. Three years after EPP, the patient underwent substernal gastric interposition to restore gastrointestinal continuity but died postoperatively of respiratory failure. At death, the patient remained clinically and pathologically free of disease. Review of the radiation doses and field did not reveal any protocol violations or specific causes for the development of the esophageal fistula.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Complications of adjuvant hemithoracic radiation described by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade complications
 
Survival estimates
Because just 5 patients underwent P/D, survival estimates were performed only for the patients who underwent EPP (Figures 2-6). One patient was lost to follow-up, and therefore 61 patients are included in these analyses. The median survival for this entire group of patients was 17 months, and the overall survival at 3 years was 27%(Figure 2Go). For stage I and II tumors, the median survival was 33.8 months, but survival was only 10 months for stage III and IV tumors. The relationship of several potential prognostic factors to overall survival was examined by univariable analysis, and those results are shown in Table 4. T and N status and stage all had a significant effect on survival, whereas tumor histologic type (epithelial vs all others) did not. None of these factors was significant in a multivariate analysis because histologic type is not significant univariately, and the other 3 factors are highly associated with each other. However, the analysis of prognostic factors in relation to survival should be interpreted cautiously because it was not an end point of the study design and because of the relatively small number of patients analyzed.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Overall survival of all extrapleural pneumonectomy patients (n=61).

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Overall survival of extrapleural pneumonectomy patients by histologic type.

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Overall survival of extrapleural pneumonectomy patients by T status.

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Overall survival of extrapleural pneumonectomy patients by N status.

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Overall survival of extrapleural pneumonectomy patients by stage.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Univariate analysis of potential prognostic factors on overall survival in patients who underwent EPP (n = 61)
 
Sites of relapse
The initial sites of relapse for the largest and most uniformly treated group of patients, namely the 54 patients who underwent both EPP and radiation, are shown in Table 5. A total of 7 (13%) patients had locoregional recurrence, but only 2 (3.7%) of these did not also have evidence of distant metastases. Three (5.5% of all patients receiving radiation) patients had locally recurrent disease in the region of the previously resected pleura at the margins of the radiation field. Distant metastases were the most common form of relapse, with the peritoneum, contralateral pleura, and contralateral lung being the most common sites.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. First sites of relapse in the 55 patients who underwent EPP with postoperative radiation
 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
MPM is an uncommon malignancy, which was long considered uniformly fatal and untreatable. However, recent series show that overall survival is much longer than previously thought when MPM is diagnosed at an early stage.Go Go Go 2,15-17 These series, which include larger numbers of patients than were entered into this prospective clinical trial, all suggest that tumor histologic type, T and N status, and stage significantly influence survival. Surgical resection and adjuvant therapy, either radiation, chemotherapy, or both, seem to have a beneficial effect on survival in selected patients.Go Go 16,18

Despite some progress in treating MPM, including better surgical selection and management, local control remains a significant problem.Go Go 18-20 Baldini and colleaguesGo 5 reported that low-dose hemithoracic radiation (median, 31 Gy) failed to provide local control after EPP, even when boost radiation was given to sites of diseased surgical margins. Adjuvant intrapleural chemotherapy and photodynamic therapy have also failed to prevent local recurrence in most patients after either P/D or EPP, even though they can be administered with acceptable toxicity.Go Go Go Go 2,4,21-23

At MSKCC, we had a large historical experience with P/D and adjuvant radiation using an external beam with or without intraoperative brachytherapy.Go Go 24-27 A retrospective review of that treatment strategy in 105 patients showed that local recurrence was the predominant form of relapse and that survival was poor, except in patients who had very early-stage disease amenable to complete surgical resection by means of P/D. Radiation pneumonitis and pericarditis were also frequent complications.Go 3 This experience led us to explore other therapeutic approaches. Promising results with intracavitary chemotherapy in ovarian cancer and in patients with malignant pleural effusions led us to study adjuvant intrapleural cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients who had MPM resected by means of P/D.Go 28 That phase II trial showed a marked pharmacologic advantage for the intrapleural administration of chemotherapy and a favorable median survival, but local recurrence was clearly the most common form of relapse.Go Go 4,29 The results of that study led us to develop the trial reported here, with the underlying hypothesis that complete surgical resection, preferably by EPP, coupled with high-dose hemithoracic radiation was feasible and might achieve local tumor control.

Our results show that adjuvant radiation, administered to the entire hemithorax at a higher total dose than has been reported previously, after EPP is feasible with acceptable toxicity. This treatment strategy is associated with a very low risk of local recurrence. These results differ strikingly from those of our previous experience and those reported by other centers.Go Go Go 5,30-32 The few local recurrences in this study appear to have been failures at the margins of the radiation field, emphasizing the importance of treating the entire hemithorax, including the diaphragm, costophrenic sulcus, and ipsilateral half of the mediastinum. Careful and complex radiation-treatment planning is required to avoid excessive radiation to the stomach for left-sided tumors and to the liver for right-sided tumors. It is also notable that the radiation used in this study essentially eliminates the risk of tumor recurrence in the chest wall that is commonly seen in patients with MPM who have had thoracic incisions. In this regard, our results are consistent with those of Boutin and colleagues,Go 33 who reported a randomized trial showing that adjuvant radiation after thoracoscopy could prevent tumor recurrence in the chest wall.

On the basis of the results of the study, we have adopted EPP and high-dose hemithoracic radiation as our standard approach to local tumor control in early-stage MPM. The number of patients in this study treated with P/D, intraoperative radiation, and postoperative external-beam radiation is too small to estimate the toxicity and effectiveness of that approach.

Our results clearly indicate that the greatest challenge now is to prevent the development of metastatic disease, especially in patients who have stage III tumors. The poor survival of this group of patients, who represent the largest subset in this study and in clinical practice generally, remains the greatest concern. With recent improvements in systemic therapy, it may be possible to add chemotherapy to the treatment of patients with T3 or N2 disease.Go 34 However, previous experience with postoperative chemotherapy after EPP does not suggest a marked survival benefit compared with what we observed in this study for patients with stage III tumors.Go 15 Extrapolating from the experience with induction chemotherapy in stage III lung cancer, we hypothesize that chemotherapy can be delivered more consistently and effectively in the preoperative setting.Go 35 Therefore, we have begun to test such an approach in patients identified as having T3 or N2 disease at diagnosis.


    Footnotes
 
*Gore-Tex; registered trade mark of W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc, Flagstaff, Ariz. Back


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Rusch VW, Piantadosi S, Holmes EC. The role of extrapleural pneumonectomy in malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991;102:1-9.[Abstract]
  2. Pass HI, Kranda K, Temeck BK, Feuerstein I, Steinberg SM. Surgically debulked malignant pleural mesothelioma: results and prognostic factors. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;4:215-22.[Abstract]
  3. Mychalczak BR, Nori D, Armstrong JG, Martini N, Harrison LB. Results of treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma with surgery, brachytherapy, and external beam irradiation [abstract]. Endocurie Hypertherm Oncol. 1989;5:245.
  4. Rusch VW, Saltz L, Venkatraman E, Ginsberg R, McCormack P, Burt M, et al. A phase II trial of pleurectomy/decortication followed by intrapleural and systemic chemotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:1156-63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Baldini EH, Recht A, Strauss GM, DeCamp MM Jr, Swanson SJ, Liptay MJ, et al. Patterns of failure after trimodality therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63:334-8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Rusch VW. Mesothelioma and less common tumors. In: Pearson FG, Cooper JD, Deslauriers J, Ginsberg RJ, Patterson GA, Urschel HC, editors. Thoracic surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2000.
  7. Rusch VW, The International Mesothelioma Interest Group. A proposed new international TNM staging system for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Chest. 1995;108:1122-8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Harrison LB, Enker WE, Anderson LL. High-dose-rate intraoperative radiation therapy for colorectal cancer. Part 1. Oncology. 1995;9:679-83.[Medline]
  9. Harrison LB, Enker WE, Anderson LL. High-dose-rate intraoperative radiation therapy for colorectal cancer. Part 2. Oncology. 1995;9:737-48.[Medline]
  10. Rusch VW, Godwin JD, Shuman WP. The role of computed tomography scanning in the initial assessment and the follow-up of malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988;96:171-7.[Abstract]
  11. Heelan RT, Rusch VW, Begg CB, Panicek DM, Caravelli JF, Eisen C. Staging of malignant pleural mesothelioma: comparison of CT and MR imaging. Am J Radiol. 1999;172:1039-47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457-81.
  13. Mantel N, Haentzel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1958;22:718-48.
  14. Cox DR. Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc B. 1972;34:187-220.
  15. Sugarbaker DJ, Flores RM, Jaklitsch MT, Richards WG, Strauss GM, Corson JM, et al. Resection margins, extrapleural nodal status, and cell type determine postoperative long-term survival in trimodality therapy of malignant pleural mesothelioma: results in 183 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;117:54-65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Rusch VW, Venkatraman ES. Important prognostic factors in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, managed surgically. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:1799-804.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Allen KB, Faber LP, Warren WH. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: extrapleural pneumonectomy and pleurectomy. Chest Surg Clin North Am. 1994;4:113-26.[Medline]
  18. Rusch VW, Venkatraman E. The importance of surgical staging in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;111:815-26.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Sugarbaker DJ, Garcia JP, Richards WG, Harpole DH Jr, Healy-Baldini E, DeCamp MM Jr, et al. Extrapleural pneumonectomy in the multimodality therapy of malignant pleural mesothelioma: results in 120 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 1996;224:288-96.[Medline]
  20. Butchart EG, Ashcroft T, Barnsley WC, Holden MP. Pleuropneumonectomy in the management of diffuse malignant mesothelioma of the pleura: experience with 29 patients. Thorax. 1976;31:15-24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Rice TW, Adelstein DJ, Kirby TJ, Saltarelli MG, Murthy SR, Van Kirk MA, et al. Aggressive multimodality therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;58:24-9.[Abstract]
  22. Colleoni M, Sartori F, Calabrò F, Nelli P, Vicario G, Sgarbossa G, et al. Surgery followed by intracavitary plus systemic chemotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Tumori. 1996;82:53-6.[Medline]
  23. Pass HI, Temeck BK, Kranda K, Thomas G, Russo A, Smith P, et al. Phase III randomized trial of surgery with or without intraoperative photodynamic therapy and postoperative immunochemotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;4:628-33.[Abstract]
  24. Juettner FM, Arian-Schad K, Porsch G, Leitner H, Smolle J, Ebner F, et al. Intraoperative radiation therapy combined with external irradiation in nonresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: preliminary report. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1990;18:1143-0.[Medline]
  25. Martini N, McCormack PM, Bains MS, Kaiser LR, Burt ME, Hilaris BS. Pleural mesothelioma. Ann Thorac Surg. 1987;43:113-20.[Abstract]
  26. Hilaris BS, Dattatreyudu N, Kwong E, Kutcher GJ, Martini N. Pleurectomy and intraoperative brachytherapy and postoperative radiation in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1984;10:325-31.[Medline]
  27. McCormack PM, Nagasaki F, Hilaris BS, Martini N. Surgical treatment of pleural mesothelioma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1982;84:834-42.[Abstract]
  28. Rusch VW, Figlin R, Godwin D, Piantadosi S. Intrapleural cisplatin and cytarabine in the management of malignant pleural effusions: a Lung Cancer Study Group trial. J Clin Oncol. 1991;9:313-19.[Abstract]
  29. Sauter ER, Langer C, Coia LR, Goldberg M, Keller SM. Optimal management of malignant mesothelioma after subtotal pleurectomy: revisiting the role of intrapleural chemotherapy and postoperative radiation. J Surg Oncol. 1995;60:100-5.[Medline]
  30. Maasilta P. Deterioration in lung function following hemithorax irradiation for pleural mesothelioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;20:433-8.[Medline]
  31. de Graaf-Strukowska L, van der Zee J, van Putten W, Senan S. Factors influencing the outcome of radiotherapy in malignant mesothelioma of the pleura—a single institution experience with 189 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;43:511-6.[Medline]
  32. Kutcher GJ, Kestler C, Greenblatt D, Brenner H, Hilaris BS, Nori D. Technique for external beam treatment for mesothelioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1987;13:1747-52.[Medline]
  33. Boutin C, Rey F, Viallat J-R. Prevention of malignant seeding after invasive diagnostic procedures in patients with pleural mesothelioma: a randomized trial of local radiotherapy. Chest. 1995;108:754-8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Byrne MJ, Davidson JA, Musk AW, Dewar J, van Hazel G, Buck M, et al. Cisplatin and gemcitabine treatment for malignant mesothelioma: a phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:25-30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Meko J, Rusch VW. Neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2000;10:324-32.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
L. M. Krug, H. I. Pass, V. W. Rusch, H. L. Kindler, D. J. Sugarbaker, K. E. Rosenzweig, R. Flores, J. S. Friedberg, K. Pisters, M. Monberg, et al.
Multicenter Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Pemetrexed Plus Cisplatin Followed by Extrapleural Pneumonectomy and Radiation for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2009; 27(18): 3007 - 3013.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. Kobayashi, H. Nomori, T. Mori, H. Shibata, K. Yoshimoto, and Y. Ohba
Extrapleural pneumonectomy with reconstruction of diaphragm and pericardium using autologous materials.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2009; 87(5): 1630 - 1632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. S. Tsao, I. Wistuba, J. A. Roth, and H. L. Kindler
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
J. Clin. Oncol., April 20, 2009; 27(12): 2081 - 2090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. de Perrot, R. Feld, B.C. J. Cho, A. Bezjak, M. Anraku, R. Burkes, H. Roberts, M. S. Tsao, N. Leighl, S. Keshavjee, et al.
Trimodality Therapy With Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Extrapleural Pneumonectomy and Adjuvant High-Dose Hemithoracic Radiation for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2009; 27(9): 1413 - 1418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
L. Zellos, W. G. Richards, L. Capalbo, M. T. Jaklitsch, L. R. Chirieac, B. E. Johnson, R. Bueno, and D. J. Sugarbaker
A phase I study of extrapleural pneumonectomy and intracavitary intraoperative hyperthermic cisplatin with amifostine cytoprotection for malignant pleural mesothelioma.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2009; 137(2): 453 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
J. B. Sorensen, J. Ravn, A. Loft, J. Brenoe, A. K. Berthelsen, and on behalf of the Nordic Mesothelioma Group
Preoperative staging of mesothelioma by 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography fused imaging and mediastinoscopy compared to pathological findings after extrapleural pneumonectomy
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2008; 34(5): 1090 - 1096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
K. G. Tournoy, S. A. Burgers, J. T. Annema, F. Vermassen, M. Praet, M. Smits, H. M. Klomp, J. P. van Meerbeeck, and P. Baas
Transesophageal Endoscopic Ultrasound with Fine Needle Aspiration in the Preoperative Staging of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2008; 14(19): 6259 - 6263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. I. Pass, G. J. Brewer, R. Dick, M. Carbone, and S. Merajver
A Phase II Trial of Tetrathiomolybdate After Surgery for Malignant Mesothelioma: Final Results
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2008; 86(2): 383 - 390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
J. W. van Sandick, I. Kappers, P. Baas, R. L. Haas, and H. M. Klomp
Surgical Treatment in the Management of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Single Institution's Experience
Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2008; 15(6): 1757 - 1764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. M. Flores, H. I. Pass, V. E. Seshan, J. Dycoco, M. Zakowski, M. Carbone, M. S. Bains, and V. W. Rusch
Extrapleural pneumonectomy versus pleurectomy/decortication in the surgical management of malignant pleural mesothelioma: Results in 663 patients
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2008; 135(3): 620 - 626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. Huang, G. J. Riely, K. E. Rosenzweig, and V. W. Rusch
Multimodality Therapy for Locally Advanced Thymomas: State of the Art or Investigational Therapy?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2008; 85(2): 365 - 367.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
P. Borasio, A. Berruti, A. Bille, P. Lausi, M. G. Levra, R. Giardino, and F. Ardissone
Malignant pleural mesothelioma: clinicopathologic and survival characteristics in a consecutive series of 394 patients
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2008; 33(2): 307 - 313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
M. Okada, T. Mimura, C. Ohbayashi, T. Sakuma, T. Soejima, and N. Tsubota
Radical surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma: results and prognosis
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, February 1, 2008; 7(1): 102 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. Huang, N. P. Rizk, W. D. Travis, V. E. Seshan, M. S. Bains, J. Dycoco, R. J. Downey, R. M. Flores, B. J. Park, and V. W. Rusch
Feasibility of multimodality therapy including extended resections in stage IVA thymoma.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2007; 134(6): 1477 - 1484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. C. Rice, C. W. Stevens, A. M. Correa, A. A. Vaporciyan, A. Tsao, K. M. Forster, G. L. Walsh, S. G. Swisher, W. L. Hofstetter, R. J. Mehran, et al.
Outcomes After Extrapleural Pneumonectomy and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2007; 84(5): 1685 - 1693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committ
BTS statement on malignant mesothelioma in the UK, 2007
Thorax, November 1, 2007; 62(Suppl_2): ii1 - ii19.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
F. Bakaeen, D. Rice, A. M. Correa, G. L. Walsh, A. A. Vaporciyan, J. B. Putnam, S. G. Swisher, J. A. Roth, J. Huh, D. Chu, et al.
Use of Aprotinin in Extrapleural Pneumonectomy: Effect on Hemostasis and Incidence of Complications
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2007; 84(3): 982 - 986.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
A. S. Tsao, D. He, B. Saigal, S. Liu, J. J. Lee, S. Bakkannagari, N. G. Ordonez, W. K. Hong, I. Wistuba, and F. M. Johnson
Inhibition of c-Src expression and activation in malignant pleural mesothelioma tissues leads to apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, and decreased migration and invasion
Mol. Cancer Ther., July 1, 2007; 6(7): 1962 - 1972.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
W Weder, R. Stahel, J Bernhard, S Bodis, P Vogt, P Ballabeni, D Lardinois, D Betticher, R Schmid, R Stupp, et al.
Multicenter trial of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy in malignant pleural mesothelioma
Ann. Onc., July 1, 2007; 18(7): 1196 - 1202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
G. L. Ceresoli, C. Gridelli, and A. Santoro
Multidisciplinary Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
Oncologist, July 1, 2007; 12(7): 850 - 863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
T. Treasure and M. Utley
Ten traps for the unwary in surgical series: A case study in mesothelioma reports
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2007; 133(6): 1414 - 1418.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. S. Higginson, J. Brahmer, R. P. Tufano, and G. K. Bajaj
Pleural Mesothelioma Metastatic to Tongue
J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2007; 25(15): 2133 - 2135.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
R. B. Cameron
Extrapleural Pneumonectomy Is the Preferred Surgical Management in the Multimodality Therapy of Pleural Mesothelioma: Con Argument
Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2007; 14(4): 1249 - 1253.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
V. W. Rusch
Editorial comment: A phase II study of intrapleural immunochemotherapy, pleurectomy/decortication, radiotherapy, systemic chemotherapy, and long-term subcutaneous IL-2 in stage II-III malignant pleural mesothelioma
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 31(3): 534 - 535.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
P. S. Adusumilli, M.-K. Chan, M. Hezel, Z. Yu, B. M. Stiles, T.-C. Chou, V. W. Rusch, and Y. Fong
Radiation-Induced Cellular DNA Damage Repair Response Enhances Viral Gene Therapy Efficacy in the Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2007; 14(1): 258 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. de Perrot, K. Uy, M. Anraku, M. S. Tsao, G. Darling, T. K. Waddell, A. F. Pierre, A. Bezjak, S. Keshavjee, and M. R. Johnston
Impact of lymph node metastasis on outcome after extrapleural pneumonectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2007; 133(1): 111 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. Rice
Reply
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2006; 82(6): 2337 - 2338.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. P. Agarwal, J. M. Seely, F. R. Matzinger, R. M. MacRae, R. A. Peterson, D. E. Maziak, and C. J. Dennie
Pleural Mesothelioma: Sensitivity and Incidence of Needle Track Seeding after Image-guided Biopsy versus Surgical Biopsy
Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 589 - 594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. C. Rice, J. J. Erasmus, C. W. Stevens, A. A. Vaporciyan, J. S. Wu, A. S. Tsao, G. L. Walsh, S. G. Swisher, W. L. Hofstetter, N. G. Ordonez, et al.
Extended Surgical Staging for Potentially Resectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2005; 80(6): 1988 - 1993.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. R. Cullen
Serum osteopontin levels--is it time to screen asbestos-exposed workers for pleural mesothelioma?
N. Engl. J. Med., October 13, 2005; 353(15): 1617 - 1618.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JRSMHome page
C. Tan and T. Treasure
Mesothelioma: time to take stock
J R Soc Med, October 1, 2005; 98(10): 455 - 458.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
R. Maruyama, F. Shoji, T. Okamoto, T. Miyamoto, T. Miyake, T. Nakamura, J. Ikeda, Y. Aoki, H. Wataya, H. Asoh, et al.
Triplet Chemotherapy with Cisplatin, Gemcitabine and Vinorelbine for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2005; 35(8): 433 - 438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. Pistolesi and J. Rusthoven
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Update, Current Management, and Newer Therapeutic Strategies
Chest, October 1, 2004; 126(4): 1318 - 1329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
W. Weder, P. Kestenholz, C. Taverna, S. Bodis, D. Lardinois, M. Jerman, and R. A. Stahel
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Extrapleural Pneumonectomy in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2004; 22(17): 3451 - 3457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. J. Stewart, A. Martin-Ucar, J. E. Pilling, J. G. Edwards, K. J. O'Byrne, and D. A. Waller
The effect of extent of local resection on patterns of disease progression in malignant pleural mesothelioma
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2004; 78(1): 245 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
D. J. Sugarbaker, M. T. Jaklitsch, R. Bueno, W. Richards, J. Lukanich, S. J. Mentzer, Y. Colson, P. Linden, M. Chang, L. Capalbo, et al.
Prevention, early detection, and management of complications after 328 consecutive extrapleural pneumonectomies
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2004; 128(1): 138 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
M. K. Ozvaran, X. X. Cao, S. D. Miller, B. A. Monia, W. K. Hong, and W. R. Smythe
Antisense oligonucleotides directed at the bcl-xl gene product augment chemotherapy response in mesothelioma
Mol. Cancer Ther., May 1, 2004; 3(5): 545 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
D. Stewart, D. Waller, J. Edwards, K. Jeyapalan, and J. Entwisle
Is there a role for pre-operative contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for radical surgery in malignant pleural mesothelioma?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2003; 24(6): 1019 - 1024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
V. W. Rusch
Pemetrexed and Cisplatin for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A New Standard of Care?
J. Clin. Oncol., July 15, 2003; 21(14): 2629 - 2630.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. M. Flores, T. Akhurst, M. Gonen, S. M. Larson, and V. W. Rusch
Positron emission tomography defines metastatic disease but not locoregional disease in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2003; 126(1): 11 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
P. B. Illei, V. W. Rusch, M. F. Zakowski, and M. Ladanyi
Homozygous Deletion of CDKN2A and Codeletion of the Methylthioadenosine Phosphorylase Gene in the Majority of Pleural Mesotheliomas
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2003; 9(6): 2108 - 2113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
W.R. Smythe and P.F. Mansfield
Hyperthermia: Has Its Time Come?
Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2003; 10(3): 210 - 212.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
P. G. Phillips, G. Asimakopoulos, and M. O. Maiwand
Malignant pleural mesothelioma: outcome of limited surgical management
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, March 1, 2003; 2(1): 30 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
S. van Ruth, P. Baas, R.L. M. Haas, E.J. Th. Rutgers, V.J. Verwaal, and F.A. N. Zoetmulder
Cytoreductive Surgery Combined With Intraoperative Hyperthermic Intrathoracic Chemotherapy for Stage I Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
Ann. Surg. Oncol., March 1, 2003; 10(2): 176 - 182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
H. I. Pass
Pleural mesothelioma in 2002: Going somewhere very slowly
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2002; 124(6): 1074 - 1077.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
T. T. Lee, D. L. Everett, H.-K. G. Shu, T. M. Jahan, M. Roach III, J. L. Speight, R. B. Cameron, T. L. Phillips, A. Chan, and D. M. Jablons
Radical pleurectomy/decortication and intraoperative radiotherapy followed by conformal radiation with or without chemotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2002; 124(6): 1183 - 1189.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Valerie W. Rusch
Manjit S. Bains
Robert J. Ginsberg
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rusch, V. W.
Right arrow Articles by Ginsberg, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rusch, V. W.
Right arrow Articles by Ginsberg, R. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pleura


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS