|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;123:45-52
© 2002 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease |
From the Divisions of Cardiothoracic Surgerya and Cardiology,b Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo.
Received for publication May 15, 2001. Accepted for publication July 5, 2001. Address for reprints: Thoralf M. Sundt, MD, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
70%) was worse than that for vessels with critical stenosis (
90%; relative risk, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-2.2; P < .001). Patency for targets of the right coronary artery was statistically inferior to that for targets of the left anterior descending artery (relative risk, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.9; P = .01) and bordered on significance versus that for the circumflex artery distribution (relative risk, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-2.8; P = .06). When directed toward critically stenosed targets of the left anterior descending or circumflex arteries, radial artery patency was not statistically different that that of the internal thoracic artery (P = .19). | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recently, the radial artery (RA) has gained popularity as an alternative conduit for coronary bypass grafting. It may be used either as an aorta-coronary graft or as a composite T graft when anastomosed proximally to the pedicled ITA. The RA is an attractive conduit because it can be harvested simultaneously with the ITA and may be taken bilaterally if additional conduit is required. Its thick vessel wall and large diameter facilitate the performance of anastomoses, and its length is sufficient to accommodate sequential grafting for even distal targets.
9 As a result of its versatility, the RA has become the second conduit of choice after the ITA for many surgeons.
8
The reported early patency for the RA is promising,
10-12 but late patency and factors affecting it have yet to be established. Some evidence suggests that the RA may be particularly sensitive to competitive flow.
13 Furthermore, the effect of target location and coronary size are both factors that have been shown to influence vein graft patency, but neither have been investigated for the RA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of target location, proximal stenosis of the target vessel, target size, and quality on the composite ITA-RA T-graft patency.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
70%), severely (71%-89%), or critically (
90%) stenosed, as determined by the results of preoperative angiography. The operating surgeon recorded target vessel location, size, and quality in the operative record. Target locations were classified as the LAD, circumflex artery, or right coronary artery (RCA) on the basis of their anatomic relation to the major coronary arteries. Target quality was characterized as good or fair on the basis of the extent of local atherosclerotic disease at the anastomotic site.
|
Grafting strategy
During this study, the ITA was routinely used for the LAD and was frequently used as a sequential graft to the diagonal artery. The RA was used as a composite graft in all cases and anastomosed proximally to the ITA. The RA was directed most often to targets of the circumflex artery and RCA distributions(Table 2
), with sequential grafting performed routinely to provide total arterial revascularization. Rarely, when total arterial grafting was not possible because of geometry or limited conduit length, additional saphenous vein grafts were used.
Ra harvesting and preparation
A surgical assistant harvested the RA simultaneously with the harvest of the ITA. The details of this procedure have been previously described.
14 Briefly, the RA and its surrounding venous structures were dissected sharply as a pedicle, without use of electrocautery. More recently, the Harmonic scalpel (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc, Cincinnati, Ohio) has been used for this dissection. The RA was stored in diluted papaverine (60 mg of papaverine in 30 mL of heparinized blood) before the ITA anastomosis. The completed T graft was filled with the same solution and allowed to distend under arterial pressure while we were preparing for initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass. No mechanical or hydrostatic methods of dilatation were used, so that intimal injury could be avoided.
14
Surgical technique
Two surgeons familiar with the T-graft strategy performed all procedures according to the surgical technique that has been previously described.
14 Cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic cardiac arrest were used for all cases. The ITA was harvested as a pedicled graft for all patients. The RA anastomosis was performed end to side at the level at which the ITA enters the pericardial space and adjacent to the left atrial appendage. The RA was fish mouthed and taken from the ITA as a T or Y graft at approximately 45°. All side-to-side anastomoses were performed in a parallel fashion.
Pharmacologic protocol
Systemic calcium-channel blockers (nicardipine) were administered intraoperatively and for the first 24 hours postoperatively. Oral calcium-channel blockers (diltiazem or nicardipine) were prescribed for the first 6 months postoperatively but were frequently discontinued by the patient or referring physician.
Follow-up
The clinical research staff obtained follow-up data for 1022 patients with an ITA-RA T graft between July 1998 and April 2001 by means of postal questionnaires and telephone interviews. A total of 109 patients were identified as having undergone postoperative angiography or subsequent cardiac intervention. The results of postoperative angiography were obtained directly from the performing cardiologist or cardiac catheterization laboratory. Anastomotic failure was defined as occlusion or stenosis of 90% or greater. The presence of extensive conduit narrowing or "string sign" was considered functionally occluded and recorded as nonpatent.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was conducted with SAS version 7.0 software (SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC). Survival analysis methods were based on the incidence of anastomotic failure that was presumed to occur at the time of reangiography. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for comparisons of RA and ITA patencies. Univariate analysis identified target variables that were significantly associated with RA anastomotic failure. Multivariate analysis with Cox regression identified the relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for significant target variables on the basis of the
2 statistic. Continuous data were expressed as means ± SD unless otherwise stated. All statistical analyses were reviewed by the Department of Biostatistics, Washington University, and are in agreement with the "Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals According to Biostatistics" guidelines.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Early patencies for the RA and ITA to all targets were 95% and 99% at 12 months, respectively (Figure 1). The number of anastomotic failures for the RA (n = 8) versus those for the ITA (n = 1) during this interval bordered on significance, as determined with Kaplan-Meier analysis. The first instance of anastomotic failure occurred at 3.8 months for the RA group and at 11.1 months for the ITA. The difference in anastomotic failures for the RA (n = 19) and the ITA (n = 3) did become statistically different at 18 months postoperatively, as determined by means of actuarial analysis (P = .015).
|
Target location and stenosis were both identified as significant predictors for anastomotic failure. As shown in Table 3, univariate analysis demonstrated superior patency for targets of the LAD and progressively worse patency for the circumflex and RCA distributions. The effect of coronary distribution on graft patency, independent of proximal stenosis, was examined within a Cox multivariate analysis (Table 4). Target location as an independent variable remained a significant predictor for RA patency. The risk of anastomotic failure on the basis of target choice was increased for vessels of both the circumflex and right coronary distributions. The increased risk for anastomotic failure was statistically significant for targets of the RCA and almost 2-fold higher than for targets of the LAD. The isolated effects of target location are shown in Figure 2. The actuarial curves for anastomoses to targets of the LAD and the circumflex artery both demonstrated superior patency when compared with targets of the RCA.
|
|
|
70%) and increased steadily with increasing target stenosis(Table 3
70% stenosis). The average target stenosis for patent vessels was 82.2% ± 15.2% compared with 70.9% ± 17.7% for occluded vessels (P < .001).
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this investigation RA graft patency was also significantly inferior when grafted to moderately stenosed coronary vessels. Presumably, this is secondary to competitive flow. Several investigators have demonstrated an association between grafting moderately stenosed vessels and a subsequent increase in the incidence of arterial graft occlusion or an angiographic "string sign."
20,21 Angiographically, a to-and-fro pattern of flow is often seen within bypass conduits when anastomoses are performed to less than critically stenosed vessels. This oscillating flow between native and conduit circulations produces greater shear force on conduit endothelium and may predispose to an anastomotic occlusion.
22
Among arterial conduits, the RA may be particularly sensitive to competitive flow given its increased propensity for graft spasm.
23 Tatoulis and colleagues
8 reported RA patency that decreased significantly from 94% to 72% when grafted to vessels with less than 70% native disease. Possati and associates
24 have demonstrated a similar increase in RA graft occlusion when anastomosed to less than critically stenosed vessels. Some surgeons have further recommended that the RA be reserved for grafting only the relatively greater stenosed coronary targets to avoid the effects of competitive flow.
13,25 Among 12 patients from within this study, the proximal segment of the RA graft, extending from the ITA to the first distal anastomosis, was occluded; however, the distal segment remained patent. Coronary-to-coronary flow was apparent angiographically. The flow was typically from the circumflex system to the RCA, although occasionally retrograde flow was evident. This coronary autoperfusion supports the concept of competitive flow leading to graft occlusion rather than technical difficulties at the anastomoses.
Neither the variation in coronary artery size nor the extent of atherosclerosis at the anastomotic site (target quality) was found to be significantly associated with RA graft patency(Table 3
). Although both variables have been shown to be significant predictors for anastomotic failure in other studies,
16 the statistical analysis in this investigation was hindered by the uneven distributions within the target size and target quality groups.
This investigation supports the safety of the proximal anastomosis of the RA to the ITA in the T-graft configuration. Construction of the ITA-RA composite graft is more technically challenging than an anastomosis to the aorta. However, the concern that technical errors of this anastomosis may endanger the ITA conduit and the resulting anastomosis to the LAD was not borne out in this study. The demonstrated ITA patency was excellent, indicating that the ITA was not adversely affected by the T anastomosis. The low operative mortality observed previously by us
6 and others
26,27 further supports the safety of this technique when performed carefully.
In summary, RA patency is sensitive to both the location and proximal stenosis of the bypassed coronary artery. On the basis of these data, we have modified our approach to coronary revascularization. The effect of target vessel location, although disappointing for the RCA, is not different than for other conduits. Although the risk of anastomotic failure is higher for RCA targets than for others, the patency of the RA is likely to be as good as or better than that of other conduits given high-grade proximal disease. We therefore continue to use the RA for the critically stenosed RCA target.
The management of targets with moderate native disease is more problematic. We have abandoned the use of the RA to targets with moderate stenosis because we believe other conduits may perform better. Reserving the RA for targets with higher stenosis seems appropriate, and when selectively used, the RA remains promising as an alternative arterial conduit.
13 The relative degrees to which the ITA and RA resist competitive flow are unknown and worthy of further investigation. Furthermore, although prospective randomized trials are not available, the conventional wisdom is that high-flow saphenous grafts may better compete with the native circulation and be less susceptible to competitive flow. Alternatively, the ability of cardiologists to slow the progression of native disease and the option of subsequent percutaneous intervention opens the discussion of leaving moderately stenosed targets ungrafted. We discuss each of these cases individually with all physicians involved when making this decision.
The principal limitation of this study is that it is retrospective and influenced by patient selection and grafting strategy. This study was conducted in a highly selected group of symptomatic patients with signs or symptoms of ischemia. This represents a worst-case scenario in the analysis of RA patency. It has been long recognized that graft patency may be 15% to 20% lower among symptomatic versus asymptomatic patients.
28 The data concerning relative patency, however, should be minimally affected by this consideration, and conclusions regarding risk factors for anastomotic failure should remain valid.
An additional limitation is imposed by the assumption that the time to graft failure is assumed to be the same as the date of postoperative cardiac catheterization. In the absence of serial follow-up angiography, this assumption permits the use of the Cox model for analysis of patency within a longitudinal study.
| Appendix: Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A very important message that comes from this article is that the study confirms the safety of using the left ITA and RA in a Y configuration, a concern to many of us. They found a low occlusion rate in the distal left ITA and proximal RA segment.
One of the problems when analyzing such an article is to isolate or identify the graft function from the many confounding variables in such a complex reconstruction. For instance, the RA, when used as a sequential Y graft, has 3 anastomoses and 2 segments, each having a separate pressure gradient. To try and unravel this problem, we examined, from our database, the patency of 191 free right ITA grafts and a separate series of 124 RA grafts used as a standard aorta-coronary rather than a sequential graft. However, we reached a very similar conclusion to those of the authors; that is, both of these arterial grafts had about a 3-fold increase in failure when anastomosed to vessels with a stenosis of less than 60% compared with those of 80% or greater. We also found that when the same arteries were grafted to the right coronary system, there was a 2-fold increase in graft failure compared with grafting the left system.
The main point this article raises is that the patency of the segment of the RA distal to the sequential anastomosis is of concern. In a series of 336 RA graft angiograms performed by my colleagues, Dr Royse and Dr Tatoulis, we observed a 25% graft failure in this situation in the first 12 months after reconstruction. In an attempt to overcome this problem, we now use the right skeletonized ITA in situ either with or without a radial graft used as an extension graft. This brings me to 2 questions I would like to ask the authors.
How did you manage grafting the distal RCA, and in view of the current information, how do you manage grafting a native vessel with a stenosis of about 50% when being considered as the sequential anastomosis?
Dr Maniar. Thank you, Dr Buxton, for your comments. In answer to your first question, grafts to the distal right coronary targets tend to have decreased patency regardless of conduit choice, either arterial or venous. The results of this investigation have shown that the RA is also at increased risk for occlusion when directed toward the right coronary distribution. As of yet, no prospective trials have been reported comparing RA patency with that of other conduits for this particular target. Because the ideal conduit for this target has yet to be established, we continue to use the RA conduit for critically stenosed targets of the RCA, accepting that the relative risk of occlusion is somewhat higher.
In terms of addressing a vessel with only moderate proximal stenosis, the question is a little more difficult. It appears that the RA is very sensitive to competitive flow. We believe that other conduits, including saphenous vein grafts, may be less sensitive to competitive flow, and as a result, we have recently adjusted our grafting strategy. We now limit the use of the RA for targets with at least 70% proximal stenosis or greater.
Your concern regarding the effect of sequential grafting is difficult to answer because over 90% of our patients in this analysis received sequential grafting. We therefore cannot separate out what role sequential grafting versus the biology of the RA graft might have played in RA occlusion.
Dr Todd Rosengart (Evanston, Ill). Coincidentally, we recently analyzed results of 80 patients undergoing postoperative angiography of some 4000 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting at our institution. Interestingly, even in saphenous vein grafts we found that RCA anastomoses were a significant predictor of occlusion; however, we also found factors such as diabetes being the highest predictor of occlusion, with obesity also being a significant factor, but also risk factors such as graft quality playing an important role. Did you look at these factors, and if not, why not? Can you speculate at all about the reasons why, for example, RCA anastomoses tend to be a bigger problem not only in RAs but now also in saphenous veins?
Dr Maniar. It is interesting that you have similarly found decreased patency for targets of the RCA. We believe that one contributor to the inferior patency of the RCA may be that these targets supply a relatively smaller vascular bed in comparison with the LAD. Theoretically, the anastomoses to these targets do not receive the same benefit in terms of vascular outflow. This would not only affect the anastomotic patency of the RA but should also affect other arterial conduits and venous conduits alike.
With respect to your second question regarding patient profiles and comorbidities, we did address this and looked at several factors, including diabetes, hypertension, tobacco use, age, and sex. None of these was found to be a statistically significant predictor of anastomotic failure in our series.
Last, we did not include the quality of conduit in this analysis and cannot address this regarding its role as a possible risk factor for conduit patency.
Dr Sergio Moran (Santiago, Chile). In a very similar study, we found evidence supporting your results. We analyzed baseline and follow-up angiograms at 1 year postoperatively in patients submitted to myocardial revascularization with an RA graft. We found that the degree of stenosis in the native coronary artery significantly influences the patency of RA grafts. The patency in ITA grafts was 100% at 1 year, whereas RA patency was only 80%. However, RA patency increased to 92% at 1 year when anastomosed to coronary arteries with 70% or greater stenosis. We did not find differences in the patency of RAs grafted to right or left coronary arteries. My question to you is, did you analyze the effect of calcium-channel antagonists in your results?
Dr Maniar. The current practice at our institution is not uniform with regard to the use of postoperative calcium-channel blockers. We have also found that in many instances the primary care physicians discontinue the calcium-channel blockers, often without our knowledge. As a result of the variability regarding postoperative use of calcium-channel blockers, we were unable to include this within our model or address the role these agents may play in RA graft patency.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Tatoulis, B. F. Buxton, J. A. Fuller, M. Meswani, S. Theodore, N. Powar, and R. Wynne Long-term patency of 1108 radial arterial-coronary angiograms over 10 years. Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2009; 88(1): 23 - 29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-H. Jung, H. Song, S. J. Choo, H. G. Je, C. H. Chung, J.-W. Kang, and J. W. Lee Comparison of radial artery patency according to proximal anastomosis site: Direct aorta to radial artery anastomosis is superior to radial artery composite grafting J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2009; 138(1): 76 - 83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Di Mauro, M. Contini, A. L. Iaco, A. Bivona, M. Gagliardi, E. Varone, P. Bosco, and A. M. Calafiore Bilateral internal thoracic artery on the left side: A propensity score-matched study of impact of the third conduit on the right side J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2009; 137(4): 869 - 874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Zacharias and R. H. Habib Radial artery versus saphenous vein as a second coronary bypass conduit in septuagenarians Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2008; 34(6): 1269 - 1270. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Yoshizaki, N. Tabuchi, and M. Toyama Verapamil and Nitroglycerin Improves the Patency Rate of Radial Artery Grafts Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, October 1, 2008; 16(5): 396 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kofidis and F. Woitek eComment: Radial artery doppler study in every case? Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, October 1, 2008; 7(5): 800 - 800. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Glineur, C. Hanet, A. Poncelet, W. D'hoore, J.-C. Funken, J. Rubay, P. Astarci, V. Lacroix, R. Verhelst, P. Y. Etienne, et al. Comparison of saphenous vein graft versus right gastroepiploic artery to revascularize the right coronary artery: a prospective randomized clinical, functional, and angiographic midterm evaluation. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2008; 136(2): 482 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Schwann, A. Zacharias, C. J. Riordan, S. J. Durham, A. S. Shah, and R. H. Habib Does radial use as a second arterial conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting improve long-term outcomes in diabetics? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2008; 33(5): 914 - 923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Schwann, A. Zacharias, C. J. Riordan, S. J. Durham, A. S. Shah, and R. H. Habib Reply Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2008; 85(5): 1839 - 1840. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yie, C.-Y. Na, S. S. Oh, J.-H. Kim, S.-H. Shinn, and H.-J. Seo Angiographic results of the radial artery graft patency according to the degree of native coronary stenosis Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 33(3): 341 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Habib Optimal target vessel stenosis for radial artery grafting. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2008; 135(2): 463 - 463. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Glineur, W. D'hoore, G. El Khoury, S. Sondji, G. Kalscheuer, J.-C. Funken, J. Rubay, A. Poncelet, P. Astarci, R. Verhelst, et al. Angiographic Predictors of 6-Month Patency of Bypass Grafts Implanted to the Right Coronary Artery: A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Gastroepiploic Artery and Saphenous Vein Grafts J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 15, 2008; 51(2): 120 - 125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Gongora and T. M. Sundt III Myocardial Revascularization with Cardiopulmonary Bypass Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 599 - 632. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nakajima, J. Kobayashi, T. Funatsu, Y. Shimahara, M. Kawamura, A. Kawamura, T. Yagihara, and S. Kitamura Predictive factors for the intermediate-term patency of arterial grafts in aorta no-touch off-pump coronary revascularization Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2007; 32(5): 711 - 717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. P. Choudhary, C. Antoniades, A. F. Brading, A. Galione, K. Channon, and D. P. Taggart Diabetes Mellitus as a Predictor for Radial Artery Vasoreactivity in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 11, 2007; 50(11): 1047 - 1053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nakajima, J. Kobayashi, O. Tagusari, K. Niwaya, T. Funatsu, A. Kawamura, T. Yagihara, and S. Kitamura Angiographic flow grading and graft arrangement of arterial conduits. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2006; 132(5): 1023 - 1029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Nezic, A. M. Knezevic, P. S. Milojevic, B. P. Dukanovic, M. D. Jovic, M. D. Borzanovic, and A. N. Neskovic The fate of the radial artery conduit in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2006; 30(2): 341 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Di Lazzaro, T. Ragni, G. Di Manici, G. Bardelli, U. Da Col, F. Grasselli, A. Antoniella, W. Papa, F. Crusco, and A. Giovagnoni Noninvasive midterm follow-up of radial artery bypass grafts with 16-slice computed tomography. Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2006; 82(1): 44 - 50. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nakajima, J. Kobayashi, O. Tagusari, K. Bando, K. Niwaya, and S. Kitamura Functional Angiographic Evaluation of Individual, Sequential, and Composite Arterial Grafts Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2006; 81(3): 807 - 814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gaudino, F. Prati, and G. Possati Radial artery grafting MMCTS, January 9, 2006; 2006(0109): 752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Miwa, N. Desai, T. Koyama, E. Chan, E. A. Cohen, S. E. Fremes, and Radial Artery Patency Study Investigators Radial Artery Angiographic String Sign: Clinical Consequences and the Role of Pharmacologic Therapy Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2006; 81(1): 112 - 119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Parvaiz, J. T. Lund, and H. Kelbaek The Arterial Sling Operation: One-Year Follow-Up Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2005; 80(4): 1375 - 1380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mussa, B. P. Choudhary, and D. P. Taggart Reply to the Editor J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2005; 130(4): 1227 - 1228. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Fukui, S. Takanashi, Y. Hosoda, and S. Suehiro Total Arterial Myocardial Revascularization Using Composite and Sequential Grafting With the Off-Pump Technique Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2005; 80(2): 579 - 585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. R. Sajja, G. Mannam, N. R. Pantula, and S. Sompalli Role of Radial Artery Graft in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2005; 79(6): 2180 - 2188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Shah, K. Bui, S. Blackmore, I. Gordon, D. L. Hare, J. Fuller, S. Seevanayagam, and B. F. Buxton Has the in situ right internal thoracic artery been overlooked? An angiographic study of the radial artery, internal thoracic arteries and saphenous vein graft patencies in symptomatic patients Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2005; 27(5): 870 - 875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.-E. Falcoz, S. Chocron, C. Binquet, L. Stoica, D. Kaili, C. Quantin, and J.-P. Etievent Revascularization of the Right Coronary Artery: Grafting or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention? Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2005; 79(4): 1232 - 1239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Pevni, G. Uretzky, P. Yosef, B. Gal Yanay, I. Shapira, N. Nesher, R. Braunshtein, and R. Mohr Revascularization of the Right Coronary Artery in Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 79(2): 564 - 569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mussa, B. P. Choudhary, and D. P. Taggart Radial artery conduits for coronary artery bypass grafting: Current perspective J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2005; 129(2): 250 - 253. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Acar, R. C. Cook, S. G. Raja, S. Hashim, I. Birdi, P. J. Shah, R. A. Baker, J. J. Knight, U. N. Khot, D. T. Friedman, et al. Letters Regarding Article by Khot et al, "Radial Artery Bypass Grafts Have an Increased Occurrence of Angiographically Severe Stenosis and Occlusion Compared With Left Internal Mammary Arteries and Saphenous Vein Grafts" * Letters Regarding Article by Khot et al, "Radial Artery Bypass Grafts Have an Increased Occurrence of Angiographically Severe Stenosis and Occlusion Compared With Left Internal Mammary Arteries and Saphenous Vein Grafts" * Letters Regarding Article by Khot et al, "Radial Artery Bypass Grafts Have an Increased Occurrence of Angiographically Severe Stenosis and Occlusion Compared With Left Internal Mammary Arteries and Saphenous Vein Grafts" * Letters Regarding Article by Khot et al, "Radial Artery Bypass Grafts Have an Increased Occurrence of Angiographically Severe Stenosis and Occlusion Compared With Left Internal Mammary Arteries and Saphenous Vein Grafts" * Response Circulation, January 4, 2005; 111(1): e6 - e9. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Berger, P. A. MacCarthy, U. Siebert, S. Carlier, W. Wijns, G. Heyndrickx, J. Bartunek, H. Vanermen, and B. De Bruyne Long-Term Patency of Internal Mammary Artery Bypass Grafts: Relationship With Preoperative Severity of the Native Coronary Artery Stenosis Circulation, September 14, 2004; 110(11_suppl_1): II-36 - II-40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Raja, A. Zacharias, R. H. Habib, T. A. Schwann, C. J. Riordan, S. J. Durham, and A. Shah Radial Artery as the Second Choice Conduit: Some Unsolved Problems * Response Circulation, August 10, 2004; 110(6): e62 - e63. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Chen-Scarabelli, T. Scarabelli, A. Zacharias, R. H. Habib, T. A. Schwann, C. J. Riordan, S. J. Durham, and A. Shah Factors Affecting Graft Patency: The Operating Room and Beyond * Response Circulation, August 10, 2004; 110(6): e64 - e64. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Verma, P. E. Szmitko, R. D. Weisel, D. Bonneau, D. Latter, L. Errett, Y. LeClerc, and S. E. Fremes Should Radial Arteries Be Used Routinely for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting? Circulation, August 3, 2004; 110(5): e40 - e46. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nakajima, J. Kobayashi, O. Tagusari, K. Bando, K. Niwaya, and S. Kitamura Competitive flow in arterial composite grafts and effect of graft arrangement in Off-Pump coronary revascularization Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2004; 78(2): 481 - 486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Lev-Ran, R. Braunstein, N. Nesher, Y. Ben-Gal, G. Bolotin, and G. Uretzky Bilateral versus single internal thoracic artery grafting in oral-treated diabetic subsets: comparative seven-year outcome analysis Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2004; 77(6): 2039 - 2045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. N. Khot, D. T. Friedman, G. Pettersson, N. G. Smedira, J. Li, and S. G. Ellis Radial Artery Bypass Grafts Have an Increased Occurrence of Angiographically Severe Stenosis and Occlusion Compared With Left Internal Mammary Arteries and Saphenous Vein Grafts Circulation, May 4, 2004; 109(17): 2086 - 2091. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Shimizu, S. Ito, Y. Kikuchi, M. Misaka, T. Hirayama, S. Ishimaru, and A. Yamashina Arterial conduit shear stress following bypass grafting for intermediate coronary artery stenosis: a comparative study with saphenous vein grafts Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2004; 25(4): 578 - 584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Zacharias, R. H. Habib, T. A. Schwann, C. J. Riordan, S. J. Durham, and A. Shah Improved Survival With Radial Artery Versus Vein Conduits in Coronary Bypass Surgery With Left Internal Thoracic Artery to Left Anterior Descending Artery Grafting Circulation, March 30, 2004; 109(12): 1489 - 1496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Hagiwara, T. Ito, H. Kamiya, T. Akita, A. Usui, and Y. Ueda Mid-term structural change in the radial artery grafts after coronary artery bypass grafting Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2004; 77(3): 805 - 810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gaudino, F. Alessandrini, C. Pragliola, C. Cellini, F. Glieca, N. Luciani, F. Girola, and G. Possati Effect of target artery location and severity of stenosis on mid-term patency of aorta-anastomosed vs. internal thoracic artery-anastomosed radial artery grafts Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2004; 25(3): 424 - 428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Tatoulis, B. F. Buxton, and J. A. Fuller Patencies of 2,127 arterial to coronary conduits over 15 years Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2004; 77(1): 93 - 101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Bolotin, A. P. Kypson, L. W. Nifong, and W. R. Chitwood Jr A technique for evaluating competitive flow for intraoperative decision making in coronary artery surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2003; 76(6): 2118 - 2120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. S. Maniar, H. B. Barner, M. S. Bailey, S. M. Prasad, M. R. Moon, M. K. Pasque, M. L. Lester, W. A. Gay, and R. J. Damiano Radial artery patency: are aortocoronary conduits superior to composite grafting? Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2003; 76(5): 1498 - 1504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Possati, M. Gaudino, F. Prati, F. Alessandrini, C. Trani, F. Glieca, M. A. Mazzari, N. Luciani, and G. Schiavoni Long-Term Results of the Radial Artery Used for Myocardial Revascularization Circulation, September 16, 2003; 108(11): 1350 - 1354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Lev-Ran, R. Mohr, K. Amir, M. Matsa, N. Nehser, C. Locker, and G. Uretzky Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in Insulin-Treated diabetics: should it be avoided? Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2003; 75(6): 1872 - 1877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. F. Buxton, J. S. Raman, P. Ruengsakulrach, I. Gordon, A. Rosalion, R. Bellomo, M. Horrigan, and D. L. Hare Radial artery patency and clinical outcomes: Five-year interim results of a randomized trial J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2003; 125(6): 1363 - 1371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Merlo, A. Terzi, M. Tespili, and P. Ferrazzi Reversal of radial artery 'string sign' at 6 months follow-up Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2003; 23(3): 432 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Lev-Ran, R. Mohr, G. Uretzky, D. Pevni, C. Locker, Y. Paz, and I. Shapira Graft of choice to right coronary system in left-sided bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2003; 75(1): 88 - 92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. J. Woo and T. J. Gardner Myocardial Revascularization with Cardiopulmonary Bypass Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 581 - 607. [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |