|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;123:377-378
© 2002 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Brief Communications |
From the Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Received for publication May 31, 2001. Accepted for publication June 6, 12, 2001. Address for reprints: Rainer G. Leyh, MD, Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hanover Medical School, Carl Neuberg St 1, 30623 Hannover, Germany (E-mail: leyh{at}thg.mh-hannover.de).
The list of long-term complications after surgical intervention for acute type A aortic dissection includes recurrent dissection, aneurysm formation, and aortic valve regurgitation. Ten years after the initial operation for acute type A dissection, the reoperation rate for these kinds of long-term complications is 13% to 30% in the literature.
1 The diseased aortic root in these patients is commonly treated with the replacement of the aortic valve and ascending aorta with an artificial composite graft carrying a mechanical or biologic valve substitute.
Recently, we have described the feasibility of valve-sparing aortic root replacement in acute type A dissection.
2 However, no reports are available on the feasibility of valve-sparing aortic root replacement after a previous operation for acute type A dissection involving the aortic root. Here we report on 3 patients who underwent reoperation after an operation for acute type A dissection involving the aortic root, ascending aorta, and aortic arch. In all 3 cases we successfully performed valve-sparing aortic root replacement.
Clinical summary
Between May 2000 and May 2001, 3 patients with symptomatic aneurysmal dilation or redissection of the aortic root after a previous operation for acute type A aortic dissection underwent valve-sparing aortic root replacement. As the initial operation in all 3 cases, supracommisural replacement of the ascending aorta and reconstruction of the aortic root with gelantine-resorcin-formaldehyde glue (GRF) was performed. Preoperative data and indications for reoperation are summarized in Table 1.
|
Intraoperative data are depicted in Table 2. In patient 2 the postoperative course was prolonged as a result of paraplegia caused by a thrombosed false lumen in the descending aorta. The other 2 patients recovered uneventfully. The latest postoperative echocardiographic follow-up on patients 1, 2, and 3 (at 12, 10, and 1 months, respectively) revealed fully competent aortic valves in all 3 patients.
|
Supracommisural tube graft replacement of the ascending aorta with reconstitution of the aortic wall layers with either biologic glue or incorporation of Teflon felt strips is currently the surgical technique of choice for patients with acute type A dissection. However, a high rate of late aortic root reoperations, mostly for aneurysmal dilation or redissection of the aortic root, is seen. In these cases replacement of the aortic root with a composite graft is currently the surgical intervention of choice. Recently, we have demonstrated that valve-sparing aortic root replacement in acute type A dissection is safe and feasible.
2 To our knowledge, no data exist that prove the safety of this concept in aortic root reoperations after a previous operation for acute type A dissection. Reoperation on the aortic root in these cases challenges the cardiac surgeon because excessive adhesive scar tissue of the adjacent aortic root tissue develops frequently after reconstruction of aortic wall layers with GRF glue. In some patients so-called blackened leaflet tissue develops when GRF glue was used because of widely unknown chemical processes, which has been explained as a feature of tissue degeneration by Bingley and coworkers.
4 Because the fate of blackened leaflet tissue is not known, and premature failure of a repair incorporating this tissue can be anticipated, we consider this finding as a contraindication for valve-sparing aortic root replacement. In 1962, Hufnagel and Conrad
5 pointed out that the main goal of surgical interventions for the treatment of cardiovascular disease should be the complete restoration of physiologic and mechanical normality. This ideal concept, although impossible to reach, can be partially achieved with valve-sparing aortic root surgery. Although our preliminary results are very encouraging, because of the small number of patients, it is impossible to draw definite conclusions on the clinical importance of valve-sparing aortic root replacement after a previous operation for acute type A dissection. However, we believe this technique to be a valuable alternative to the standard technique, which is the replacement of the aortic valve and ascending aorta with an artificial composite graft. Future studies, however, should compare the long-term outcome of valvesparing versus artificial composite graft aortic root replacement to conclusively judge on the value of valve-sparing aortic root reoperation after type A aortic dissection.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Ono, H. Goerler, D. Boethig, M. Westhoff-Bleck, and T. Breymann Current Surgical Management of Ascending Aortic Aneurysm in Children and Young Adults Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2009; 88(5): 1527 - 1533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Miller Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement: Current State of the Art and Where Are We Headed? Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2007; 83(2): S736 - S739. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Leyh, K. Kallenbach, M. Karck, C. Hagl, S. Fischer, and A. Haverich Impact of Preoperative Aortic Root Diameter on Long-Term Aortic Valve Function After Valve Sparing Aortic Root Reimplantation Circulation, September 9, 2003; 108(2011): II-285 - II-290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Miller Valve-sparing aortic root replacement in patients with the Marfan syndrome J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2003; 125(4): 773 - 778. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Leyh, T. Kofidis, S. Fischer, K. Kallenbach, W. Harringer, and A. Haverich Aortic root reimplantation for successful repair of an insufficient pulmonary autograft valve after the Ross procedure J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2002; 124(5): 1048 - 1049. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |