| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;124:1048-1049
© 2002 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Brief Communications |
From the Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Received for publication Aug 27, 2001. Accepted for publication Sept 10, 2001. Address for reprints: Rainer G. Leyh, MD, Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl Neuberg St 1, 30623 Hannover, Germany (E-mail.: leyh{at}thg.mh-hannover.de).
Dilation of the pulmonary autograft after Ross operation is a potential problem that can cause autograft valvular regurgitation, which eventually necessitates aortic valve rereplacement.
1 In most cases of pulmonary autograft dilation, the valve leaflets appear macroscopically to be within normal limits. The reason for autograft valve regurgitation is not the dilation of the sinuses of Valsalva itself, but rather dilation of the sinotubular junction or aortic anulus. 2,3 Thus these valves could potentiall be repaired by valve-sparing aortic root reimplantation, as first described by David and Feindel. 4 Here we report the case of a patient in whom severe regurgitation of the pulmonary autograft valve developed 28 months after a Ross procedure for aortic valve regurgitation. Autograft valve function was restored by valve-sparing aortic root reimplantation.
Clinical summary
A 37-year-old male patient with severe aortic valve regurgitation underwent aortic valve replacement by pulmonary autograft valve implantation. Complete aortic root replacement was performed. At this time the diameter of the ascending aorta was judged to be within normal range. A bicuspid aortic valve was excised. The diameter of the aortic anulus was measured to be 31 mm and was downwardly sized to 23 mm by commisural plication. A specimen of the ascending aorta obtained for histologic evaluation revealed fibrosis of the medial layer but no cystic medial necrosis. The postoperative cause was uneventful, and the patient was discharged from hospital on the ninth postoperative day. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography and transthoracic echocardiography at the first follow-up examination 12 months after the operation showed a competent pulmonary autograft valve with normal dimensions of the sinutubular junction, sinuses of Valsalva, and aortic anulus (by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography 25 mm, 31 mm, and 25 mm, respectively, and by 12-month follow-up transthoracic echocardiography 26 mm, 29 mm, and 25 mm, respectively). Twenty-eight months later, routine echocardiography revealed severe autograft valve regurgitation with echocardiographic signs of left ventricular volume overloading (left ventricular end-diastolic dimension 70 mm). In addition, dilations of the sinotubular junction (44 mm), sinuses of Valsava (47 mm), and aortic anulus (39 mm) were diagnosed. A computed tomographic scan showed significant dilations of the sinutubular junction (42 mm), the sinuses of Valsava (48 mm), and the aortic anulus (40 mm; Figure 1).
|
4 After excision of the sinuses, the autograft was implanted into a straight, nontailored Dacron polyester fabric tube, similar to the implantation of an aortic valve homograft, followed by reimplantation of the coronary ostia. The slightly prolapsing noncoronary leaflet was resuspended by a Trusler commissural plasty between the left and noncoronary leaflet commissure. The patient was successfully weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass, and intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography revealed a fully competent reimplanted autograft. After an uneventful postoperative course, the patient was discharged from the hospital on postoperative day 10. The latest follow-up, 14 months after the operation, showed normal autograft valve function, with no signs of regurgitation and stenosis. Comment
To our knowledge this is the first report on a successful repair by aortic root reimplantation technique of an insufficient pulmonary autograft after a Ross operation. Basically, the Ross procedure can be performed in three different ways: (1) by aortic root replacement, (2) by aortic root inclusion, and (3) by subcoronary implantation of the pulmonary autograft. Elkins and coworkers 2 described a higher incidence of aortic valve regurgitation after aortic root inclusion and therefore recommended aortic root replacement as the safest technique for Ross procedures, which is currently the technique of choice. 5 However, David and associates 1 reported recently on an increased frequency of pulmonary autograft valve dilation after freestanding root replacement that might subsequently lead to autograft valve regurgitation neseccitating reoperation. For these patients, replacement of the aortic root with a composite graft is currently the surgical intervention of choice. However, most of these patients have normally functioning autograft valve leaflets, and valvular regurgitation is caused by dilation of either the sinotubular junction or the aortic anulus. Under these conditions, valve-sparing aortic root reimplantation may be a beneficial approach with the option of preserving the native valve. There are concerns about the safety and feasibility of this technique after previous aortic root surgery. Reoperation of the aortic root in these cases challenges the surgeon because of excessive adhesive scar tissue of the adjacent aortic root tissue. However, we have recently reported on the feasibility and safety of valve-sparing aortic root replacement after aortic root surgery for acute type A dissection with favorable midterm results. 6
Because of the increasing popularity of the Ross procedure for aortic valve replacement, the number of patients requiring reoperation for aortic root dilation after this procedure will also increase. We believe that a significant number of these patients will meet the criteria for successful autograft valve repair by means of valve-sparing aortic root reimplantation. For final judgment on this surgical approach, however, larger numbers of patients and additional data obtained from extended follow-up studies are required. We hope that this report will help to initiate a change in thinking about the surgical management of pulmonary autograft dilation in the aortic position after a Ross procedure.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Flynn, S. G. Little, E. H. Blackstone, and G. B. Pettersson Reversing the Ross operation: A new reoperation option for autograft failure J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2007; 133(6): 1645 - 1647. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Chiappini, B. Absil, J. Rubay, P. Noirhomme, J.-C. Funken, R. Verhelst, A. Poncelet, and G. El Khoury The Ross Procedure: Clinical and Echocardiographic Follow-Up in 219 Consecutive Patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2007; 83(4): 1285 - 1289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Watanabe, S. Saito, H. Saito, and H. Kurosawa Valve-sparing aortic root replacement with repair of leaflet prolapse after Ross operation Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, February 1, 2007; 6(1): 89 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. O. Bohm, C. A. Botha, A. Horke, W. Hemmer, D. Roser, G. Blumenstock, F. Uhlemann, and J.-G. Rein Is the Ross operation still an acceptable option in children and adolescents? Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 82(3): 940 - 947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. El-Essawi, J. Sanger, S. Ulrich, I. Kutschka, and W. Harringer Aortic valve-sparing operation for autograft failure after the Ross procedure J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2005; 130(4): 1215 - 1216. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. B. Luciani, A. Favaro, F. Viscardi, P. Bertolini, and A. Mazzucco Valve-sparing root replacement for pulmonary autograft dissection late after the Ross operation J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2004; 128(5): 753 - 756. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Nemoto, C. Sudarshan, and C. P. R. Brizard Successful aortic root remodeling for repair of a dilated pulmonary autograft after a ross-Konno procedure in early childhood Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2004; 78(3): e45 - e47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. H. Kincaid, J. D. Maloney, S. W. Lavender II, and N. D. Kon Dissection in a pulmonary autograft Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2004; 77(2): 707 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. B. Luciani, G. Casali, A. Favaro, M. A. Prioli, L. Barozzi, F. Santini, and A. Mazzucco Fate of the Aortic Root Late After Ross Operation Circulation, September 9, 2003; 108(90101): II-61 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. G. Leyh, K. Kallenbach, M. Karck, C. Hagl, S. Fischer, and A. Haverich Impact of Preoperative Aortic Root Diameter on Long-Term Aortic Valve Function After Valve Sparing Aortic Root Reimplantation Circulation, September 9, 2003; 108(90101): II-285 - 290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |
