JTCS Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Christian Kreutzer
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kreutzer, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kreutzer, C.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:974
© 2003 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Letters to the Editor

Rastelli repair for transposition of the great arteries

Christian Kreutzer, MD

Instructor in Cardiovascular Surgery, Ricardo Gutierrez Children's Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina

To the Editor:

I read with interest the letter from LecompteGo 1 regarding the article "Twenty-five-year experience with Rastelli repair for transposition of the great arteries."Go 2 Although the letter was elegantly answered by my mentor in the Rastelli project, I believe there are a few points that need further clarification.

Lecompte claims that I am confused regarding the differences between a Lecompte maneuver and a Lecompte procedure. I consider that the concept that Rastelli brought into our field was a breakthrough discovery. The ventricular septal defect baffling from the left ventricle to the aorta is the main concept in the correction of transposition, ventricular septal defect, and pulmonary stenosis or atresia. I do not believe that resection of the conal septum or of the anterosuperior margin of the defect is of such importance to merit a new name of a procedure. Likewise, the way in which right ventricular-pulmonary arterial continuity is established can be another modification of the original Rastelli procedure. These are really accessories of the main concept: ventricular septal defect baffling from the left ventricle to the aorta and establishment of right ventricular-pulmonary artery continuity.

Like Lecompte, I believe that modifications or even more reappraisals of the original Rastelli technique for correction of tetralogy of Fallot and pulmonary atresia with autologous fresh pericardiumGo 3 can be and should be taken into consideration for repair of transposition, ventricular septal defect, and pulmonary stenosis or atresia. For example, our experience with Rastelli procedures with autologous fresh pericardial valved conduits was presented in several meetings and articles.Go Go 4,5 The late results are spectacular, with a freedom from reoperation and a survival of more than 80% at 15 years.

This is another alternative to the "classic" Rastelli operation. I believe that the operation proposed by Gian Carlo Rastelli is here to stay, with all the modifications that will allow improvements in survival and reoperation rates.

References

  1. Lecompte Y. Rastelli repair for transposition of the great arteries: still the best choice [letter]? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123:192-3.[Free Full Text]
  2. Kreutzer C, Gauvreau K, de Vivie J, Oppido G, Kreutzer J, Freed MF, et al. Twenty-five-year experience with Rastelli repair for transposition of the great arteries. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;120:211-23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Rastelli GC, Ongley PA, Davis GD, Kirklin JW. Surgical repair for pulmonary valve atresia with coronary pulmonary fistula: report of a case. Mayo Clin Proc. 1965;40:521-7.[Medline]
  4. Schlichter AJ, Kreutzer C, Mayorquim R, Simon JL, Vazquez H, Roman MI, et al. Long term follow up of autologous pericardial valved conduits. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62:155-60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Schlichter AJ, Kreutzer C, Mayorquim R, Simon JL, Roman MI, Vazquez H, et al. Five to fifteen year follow-up of autologous pericardial valved conduits. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119:869-79.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Christian Kreutzer
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kreutzer, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kreutzer, C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS