|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:1158-1159
© 2003 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Brief Communications |
From the Departments of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tenri Hospital, Nara, Japan.
Received for publication Aug 28, 2002. Accepted for publication Sept 9, 2002. Address for reprints: Yoshiyuki Tokuda, MD, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tenri Hospital, 200 Mishima, Tenri, 632-8552, Japan (E-mail: tokuda{at}mxb.mesh.ne.jp).
Bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis is a rare but severe complication of cardiac surgery mainly caused by hypothermic injury of phrenic nerves.
1,2 Most patients with bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis have been treated with positive-pressure ventilators through tracheostomy.
3 Recently, noninvasive positive airway ventilation has been applied to various types of respiratory failure. We report the case of a 35-year-old man who had postoperative bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis and was treated with nasal mask bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) ventilation.
Clinical summary
A 35-year-old man with a history of renal dysfunction and hypertension complained of sudden chest pain and was referred to our hospital. Computed tomography revealed the presence of Stanford type A acute aortic dissection and a large amount of pericardial effusion. The patient was in shock because of cardiac tamponade.
The patient underwent an emergency operation. During the operation, cardiopulmonary bypass was established with right atrial venous cannulation and left femoral arterial cannulation. The patient was cooled to 25°C by using the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit. The dilated ascending aorta was opened vertically, and antegrade selective cerebral perfusion was performed for all 3 arch vessels. For myocardial protection, St Thomas solution was directly administered into the coronary arteries, and topical cooling of the heart with ice slush was performed. The aortic dissection ranged from the aortic root to the iliac bifurcation; however, the aortic valve, coronary orifices, and arch vessels were not involved with the dissection. The intimal tear was found in the aortic arch just below the brachiocephalic artery. The ascending aorta and proximal aortic arch were replaced with a woven Dacron graft by using the open anastomosis technique. The operative procedure was straightforward, and no apparent direct injury to the phrenic nerve occurred. The patient was easily weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass.
After the operation, the patient required hemodialysis for renal dysfunction. The patient also had liver dysfunction, probably as a result of preoperative shock status. After the improvement of these conditions, weaning from assisted ventilation was attempted. Weaning required 2 days, and the patient was extubated on the 10th postoperative day. After extubation, he was found to have tachypnea and then had respiratory failure. Chest radiography showed a bilaterally raised diaphragm. Fluoroscopic examination showed paradoxical movement of the bilateral diaphragm. The transcutaneous phrenic nerve stimulation test showed almost absent compound diaphragmatic motor action potential bilaterally, which confirmed bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis of the nerve (Figure 1). Therefore the patient was placed on nasal mask BiPAP ventilation to avoid repeated intubation or tracheostomy. The inspiratory support pressure was set at 10 cm H2O, and the expiratory pressure was set at 5 cm H2O by using a BiPAP Vision (Respironics Inc) ventilatory support system. The ventilatory support was effective and well tolerated. The patient was then able to sleep in the supine position without breathing difficulties. The patient had only scanty sputum and was very cooperative during treatment.
|
Discussion
Hypothermic injury of the phrenic nerve is regarded as the main cause of postoperative diaphragmatic paralysis, although several other mechanisms have been proposed, such as direct surgical injury of the phrenic nerve and sternal retraction.
1 Phrenic nerve dysfunction caused by hypothermic injury is usually reversible, but spontaneous recovery requires several months. Thus most patients with bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis have been treated with positive-pressure ventilators through a tracheostomy until recovery occurs.
2,3
For the present patient, however, nasal mask BiPAP ventilation was chosen instead. It has been applied to various types of hypercapnic and hypoxic respiratory failure, and several published studies support its use.
4 It improves patients' quality of life by avoiding intubation or tracheostomy and is thus of great benefit. On the other hand, one must consider the potential disadvantage of BiPAP ventilation. Nasal mask BiPAP ventilation requires a patient's cooperation during treatment, including self-excretion of sputum. Furthermore, there are risks specific to BiPAP ventilation, such as failure to provide sufficient oxygenation and CO2 elimination, eye or nasal trauma, and gastric distention. Patient comfort, as well as cyanosis, tachypnea, and conventional vital signs, should be carefully monitored. In addition, because the existence of mask leaks is associated with a higher incidence of failure, close monitoring for leaks is mandatory.
4
The benefits of BiPAP ventilation must be balanced against the disadvantages on a case-by-case basis. However, we recommend that nasal mask BiPAP ventilation be tried first, as opposed to direct tracheostomy, for postoperative bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Chin, K.-i. Takahashi, K. Ohmori, I. Toru, H. Matsumoto, A. Niimi, H. Doi, T. Ikeda, T. Nakahata, M. Komeda, et al. Noninvasive ventilation for pediatric patients under 1 year of age after cardiac surgery J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2007; 134(1): 260 - 261. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Adachi, H. Ogino, H. Imanaka, H. Matsuda, K. Minatoya, and H. Sasaki Aortic root replacement in a patient with pulmonary dysfunction caused by severe chest deformity associated with Marfan syndrome J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2005; 130(1): 213 - 215. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |