JTCS Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Yoshio Misawa
Katsuo Fuse
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Misawa, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Fuse, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Misawa, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Fuse, K.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:1174-1175
© 2003 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Letters to the Editor

Does normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass influence clinical outcomes, cytokine production, and in vitro platelet function?

Yoshio Misawa, MD, Katsuo Fuse, MD

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Jichi Medical School, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Minami-kawachi, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan

To the Editor:

We read with great interest the article by Gaudino and associatesGo 1 in the June 2002 issue of this Journal. They evaluated prospectively the clinical outcomes of patients and some inflammatory and fibrinolytic markers such as C-reactive protein, interleukin (IL) 6, prothrombin time, and platelets. They concluded that normothermic systemic perfusion did not influence the clinical course or the extent of inflammatory and hemostatic activation in patients undergoing primary isolated coronary artery bypass. The markers were determined before surgical inetervention; 21, 48, and 72 hours thereafter; and at hospital discharge.

WeGo 2 previously investigated platelet activation and aggregation up to 24 hours after operation by examining the serial changes of platelet count and small particle formation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass with normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Platelet counts decreased during CPB, and 24 hours after CPB they had increased to approximately half the pre-CPB levels. Small particle formation was the main type of platelet aggregation observed before surgery. Medium particle formation was also recognized, but no patient had large particle formation. After systemic heparinization, small and medium particle formation occurred. One hour after the initiation of CPB, only small particles were seen; 2 hours after the end of CPB, no small particles were observed. Small particle formation was the main platelet aggregation type observed 24 hours after CPB.

WeGo 3 also evaluated cytokine production and levels of thrombomodulin and soluble endothelium-derived adhesion molecules in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass under normothermic CPB. The study was scheduled also up to 24 hours after the operation. IL-6 values were elevated minimally after 30 minutes of CPB, and they showed a surge at the end of CPB or 2 hours after CPB in some patients. Other patients showed stable levels. The IL-6 values were reduced after 2 hours, but 24 hours after CPB they were still higher than the initial levels. There was a huge difference in IL-6 changes among patients. A surge of IL-8 occurred 2 hours after CPB, and the values returned to the initial levels 24 hours after CPB. Thrombomodulin levels were reduced 30 minutes after the initiation of CPB; however, they began to recover during CPB. The levels returned to the initial levels 2 hours after CPB and exceeded them 24 hours after CPB. Levels of soluble endothelium-derived adhesion molecules were reduced after 30 minutes of CPB; they returned to the initial levels 2 hours after CPB and exceeded them 24 hours after CPB.

Our studies may endorse the conclusions of Gaudino and associates. CPB for less than 3 hours does not influence clinical outcomes, and in vitro studies, such as platelet function and cytokine production, did not differ under normothermic and moderate hypothermic conditions.

References

  1. Gaudino M, Zamparelli R, Andreotti F, Burzotta F, Iacoviello L, Glieca F, et al. Normothermia does not improve postoperative hemostasis nor does it reduce inflammatory activation in patients undergoing primary isolated coronary artery bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasac Surg. 2002;123:1092-100.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Misawa Y, Konishi H, Kawahito K, Fuse K. Platelet activation and aggregation during normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;49:21-8.
  3. Misawa Y, Kawahito K, Konishi H, Fuse K. Cytokine mediate endothelial activation during and after normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass: heparin-bonded versus non heparin-bonded circuits. ASAIO J. 2000;46:740-3.[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Yoshio Misawa
Katsuo Fuse
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Misawa, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Fuse, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Misawa, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Fuse, K.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS