| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:391-400
© 2003 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Surgery for acquired cardiovascular disease |
a Department of Cardiac Surgery, Innsbruck University Hospital, Innsbruck, Austria
Received for publication July 24, 2002; revisions received September 10, 2002; revisions received October 28, 2002; accepted for publication November 1, 2002.
* Address for reprints: Herbert Bernd Hangler, MD, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Innsbruck University Hospital, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
herbert.hangler{at}uibk.ac.at
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract Patients and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
METHODS: Epiaortic scanning was performed in 352 patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting before opening the pericardium using a 7.5-MHz ultrasonic probe. In the presence of moderate atherosclerosis (maximum aortic wall thickness of 3 to 5 mm), primarily single aortic crossclamping was carried out. In cases of severe sclerosis (maximum aortic wall thickness > 5 mm), aortic no-touch techniques on the beating heart were used.
RESULTS: The degree of ascending aortic atherosclerosis was normal or mild in 151 patients (42.9%), moderate in 167 patients (47.5%), and severe in 34 patients (9.6%). The operative technique was modified in 31.1% of patients with moderate aortic sclerosis and in 91.2% of patients with severe aortic sclerosis. Perioperative mortality was 0.0% for mild disease, 3.0% for moderate disease, and 8.8% for severe disease (P = .005). Corresponding stroke rates reached 2.0%, 2.4%, and 2.9% (P = .935). Logistic regression adjusting for EuroSCORE showed that ascending aortic atherosclerosis was an independent predictor of perioperative mortality (P = .013, odds ratio 1.67, confidence interval 1.11-2.50). The influence of aortic disease on the stroke prevalence was probably due to chance (P = .935), demonstrating a potentially positive effect of operative modifications concerning stroke caused by aortic manipulation.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that intraoperative screening of coronary artery bypass grafting patients by epiaortic scanning can reveal useful information about the operative risk and with an aortic no-touch concept, perioperative stroke rates in high-risk patients may be lower than predicted.
|
Atherosclerosis of the ascending aorta has emerged as one of the most important risk factors for postoperative complications in cardiac surgery, particularly in on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) when the diseased aorta is manipulated by cannulation and clamping. These maneuvers can be associated with intraoperative atheromatous embolization into the cerebral circulation, resulting in persistent cognitive deficit or postoperative stroke, a serious complication with a considerable mortality of up to 21%.1 Furthermore, embolization of atheromatous debris from atherosclerotic ascending aortic lesions into the coronary microcirculation accounts, at least in part, for the prevalence of perioperative myocardial infarction.2 In addition, atherosclerosis of the ascending aorta has been found to be an independent risk factor for long-term neurologic events and mortality in patients having undergone cardiac surgery.3,4 The current trend is toward surgical treatment of coronary heart disease in older patients with a higher comorbidity. In addition, the severity of ascending aortic atherosclerotic disease and the stroke rate are known to increase with age.5,6 Epiaortic ultrasonography has been added to the armament of cardiac surgeons as a fast, noninvasive, and sensitive technique that provides information of the ascending aortic wall in its entire length and circumference and seems to be superior to transesophageal echocardiography.7 Furthermore, epiaortic scanning (EAS) is more accurate than palpation in identifying mobile atheroma in the ascending aortic lumen. The aim of our study was to evaluate the postoperative short- and medium-term outcome in patients with ascending aortic atherosclerosis detected by intraoperative epiaortic ultrasound. According to an algorithm, taking into account the severity of the aortic disease, the standard surgical technique was modified. It was another aim of the study to assess risk groups for the presence of ascending aortic atherosclerosis and to evaluate its role as a predictor for adverse postoperative events.
|
Patients and methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractPatients and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Informed consent
Written informed consent for coronary artery bypass grafting was obtained from all patients preoperatively and information about potential operative modifications in risk groups was selectively provided.
Definition of end points
Palpation of the ascending aorta
Palpation of the ascending aorta for identification of calcified areas was done with caution to avoid dislodgment of embolic material.
Ultrasonic methods
EAS was performed with a 7.5-MHz linear ultrasonic probe (Hewlett-Packard Image Point HX; Hewlett-Packard Company, Andover, Mass) coated with ultrasonic gel as an acoustic medium, packed in a sterile plastic sleeve. EAS was performed before opening the pericardium to sustain an echolucent window for optimal visualization of the anterior ascending aortic wall. The probe was then manipulated gently to obtain longitudinal and transverse views from the aortic valve up to the innominate artery. Ascending aortic atherosclerotic disease (AAAD) was defined as normal/mild (aortic wall 
3 mm), moderate (aortic wall 3 to 5 mm), and severe (aortic wall thickness > 5 mm and/or the presence of marked calcification, protruding or mobile intraluminal atheromatous portions, and ulcerated plaques) according to the classification reported by Wareing and colleagues.6
Carotid artery Doppler and duplex ultrasound are routinely performed in our patients over 40 years of age. Carotid artery stenosis was graded as insignificant (luminal narrowing 50%), moderate (luminal narrowing 50%-79%), severe (luminal narrowing 
80% or complete occlusion). Cerebrovascular disease was defined as the presence of moderate to severe carotid artery stenosis.
Follow-up
Patients or their family physicians completed a telephone questionnaire to identify those who had had a major adverse neurologic event such as stroke or transient ischemic attack as well as cardiac events such as myocardial infarction and coronary reintervention or death. The grade of activity in patients who had a perioperative stroke was evaluated according to the Barthel Index. Follow-up was available in 90.0% of all patients, in 88.1% of no/mild AAAD, in 93.4% of moderate AAAD, and in 91.2% of severe AAAD.
Surgical technique
The standard procedure for coronary artery revascularization in patients with multivessel disease at our institution is extracorporeal circulation, moderate hypothermia (32°C), and antegrade-retrograde delivery of cold cardioplegic solution. Aortic anastomoses of the grafts are usually performed with a partial occluding clamp. When the surgeon encountered AAAD by EAS, operative modifications were adopted according to an algorithm taking into account the severity of the aortic disease (Figure 1).
|
Aortic no-touch surgery
When severe disease of the ascending aorta was diagnosed, the main objective was to avoid any manipulation of the aorta. Therefore, off-pump coronary surgery was preferred whenever possible. Both internal thoracic arteries were used either as in situ grafts or, when the right internal thoracic artery was too short to reach the target coronary, it was anastomosed to the left internal thoracic artery as a Y graft. For complete revascularization, vein and or radial artery grafts were also implanted into the internal thoracic arteries as Y grafts. When the internal thoracic arteries were considered too small as an inflow source, the axillary or innominate arteries were preferred as an extra-anatomic site for graft inflow.10
Data analysis
Data were collected in Excel 5.0 for Windows. Data analysis was performed with SPSS 9.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, Ill). Continuous variables were expressed as means ± SDs and categorical variables as absolute numbers (percentages).
Univariable analysis
Dichotomous variables were compared with chi-square test, continuous variables with analysis of variance. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to describe the time to the first event (stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality), combined with a log-rank test. In all nonfatal events, data were censored at the time of death if the event of interest had not previously occurred.
Multivariable analysis
Logistic regression analyses for the perioperative end points mortality and myocardial infarction and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses for the medium-term end point mortality and myocardial infarction were performed, adjusting ascending aorta maximal wall thickness (millimeters) for EuroSCORE.
The cumulative risk-adjusted mortality (CRAM) depicts the lives saved or lost versus EuroSCORE predictions,11 adding value if a patient survived the hospital stay (eg, +0.05 if a patient with 5% predicted risk survived) and subtracting value if a patient died during hospital stay (eg, -0.95 if a patient with 5% predicted risk died). If the line equals the baseline, then the observed risk equals the predicted risk; if the line moves above the baseline, then the observed result expresses the number of lives gained versus the EuroSCORE. The horizontal axis depicts the patient numbers in a chronological order plotted from left to right. Cumulative risk-adjusted stroke prevalence (CRAS) follows the same principles using the Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia (McSPI) stroke risk index as the predicting tool.12 The McSPI stroke risk index was converted to probability of event by logistic transformation. The plots were created with Excel 5.0 for Windows.
The McSPI developed, validated, and published a predictive stroke risk index for patients undergoing isolated CABG using conventional cardiopulmonary bypass for support. The McSPI stroke risk index is intended to be applied preoperatively to estimate the likelihood that a patient will experience a major perioperative neurologic event.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractPatients and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
|
|
|
Logistic regression analyses for the perioperative end points mortality and myocardial infarction adjusting for EuroSCORE rendered the results in Table 4, with the maximal wall thickness of the ascending aorta still having an important influence on both end points.
|
|
Myocardial infarction–free survival was lower in patients with severe AAAD but myocardial infarctions primarily occurred during the perioperative period (P = .001, Figure 2, C).
Cox proportional hazard regression analyses for the 36-month end points of mortality and myocardial infarction, adjusting for EuroSCORE, rendered the results in Table 4, with the maximal wall thickness of the ascending aorta having still an important influence on medium-term survival.
CRAS with some variations corresponded with the McSPI stroke risk index predictions in all 3 patient groups (Figure 3, A, B, and C). Aortic no-touch techniques with extra-anatomic bypass strategies, which were used exclusively in patients with severe ascending aortic atherosclerosis, resulted in evident stroke prevention versus McSPI stroke risk index predictions, whereas this was not the case using single aortic crossclamping, which was primarily applied in moderate ascending aortic atherosclerosis (Figure 4). Marked gains in cumulative risk-adjusted mortality versus EuroSCORE predictions were obtained in patients with no/mild and moderate AAAD, whereas losses of lives versus EuroSCORE predictions were noted in patients with severe AAAD (Figure 5, A, B, and C).
|
|
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractPatients and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Patients with severe AAAD were found to have the highest prevalence of death and myocardial infarction. With modification of the surgical technique, according to the algorithm used in this study, cerebrovascular complications could be kept at a prevalence of 2.9% in the 30-day perioperative period for high-risk patients exhibiting severe ascending aortic disease. In these patients the stroke rate predicted by the McSPI index would have been 4.4%. Studies from the early 1990s have demonstrated stroke rates in the range of 19% to 45% if a severely diseased ascending aorta is manipulated during conventional CABG.17,18 Looking at these data it seems likely that strokes could be prevented by changing the standard surgical approach. Van der Linden and colleagues4 could not show a reduction in the prevalence of postoperative strokes with minor modifications in surgical technique in a series of 921 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The prevalence of strokes in their series was 1.8% in patients without atherosclerotic disease of the ascending aorta and 8.7% in patients with the disease despite minor surgical modifications. This may advocate a more aggressive change of the operative technique in the presence of severe AAAD. With an algorithm to support the surgical decision making when severe ascending atherosclerosis is present, the perioperative neurologic event rates could be kept well below the expected ones in our study population. In contrast to our study with patients undergoing primary isolated CABG, van der Linden’s group4 investigated a more heterogeneous patient population including valve procedures and coronary reoperations, which may have a negative impact on their stroke rate. Despite the fact that the stroke reduction versus the McSPI stroke risk index predictions were not absolutely striking, it is a very satisfying fact that in our series no lethal stroke occurred and that a marked recovery potential in the patients who had a stroke was noted. According to recent data, stroke in cardiac surgery is associated with a 19% in-hospital mortality and only 25.8% of patients return to a normal level of activity.19
Despite attempts to completely revascularize the heart, myocardial infarction rates were higher in patients with severe AAAD, even adjusted for EuroSCORE (P = .045, odds ratio 1.41, confidence interval 1.01-1.98). Incomplete revascularization in some cases and predominance of diffuse coronary artery disease, as well as a possible malfunction of extra-anatomical bypass grafts and selection bias toward cardiac high-risk patients, may have been the reasons for this.
In the group of patients who underwent the beating heart and aortic no-touch concept, the stroke rate was 0%, and we regard this strategy as a very promising method for patients with extensive ascending aortic disease. For comparison, Patel and colleagues20 have most recently described a near 0% stroke rate using beating heart total arterial revascularization without aortic manipulation.
Single aortic crossclamping has repeatedly been demonstrated to be a method that can prevent strokes and myocardial infarction in CABG.8,9 We applied this method primarily in patients with moderate AAAD and in 15 patients in combination with intra-aortic filtration. Complete prevention of strokes, however, was not observed with this technique in our own series.
Ascending aortic atherosclerosis was an independent predictor of stroke in previous studies.4,16,21 In our series the disease was not associated with neurologic events, possibly demonstrating a preventive effect of the surgical modifications used.
The presence of severe atherosclerosis in the ascending aorta was associated with a higher perioperative mortality and myocardial infarction rate (see Table 4). Similar mortality differences for patients with the disease have been reported in the literature.16,22 The presence of major ascending aortic atherosclerosis is a marker for increased hospital mortality and morbidity even when neurologic complications can be kept low.
The cumulative risk-adjusted mortality plots for our patients with normal aorta or moderate ascending aortic atherosclerosis demonstrate that highly satisfying results in CABG can be obtained with the use of the extracorporeal circulation when the patient group with severe ascending aortic atherosclerosis is excluded. Lives saved versus EuroSCORE predictions have so far only been demonstrated for off-pump CABG.23
Concerning 3-year survivals, our data are well comparable with results published by Moshkovitz and colleagues,22 who described a 3-year survival in the 60% range for CABG patients with calcified ascending aorta. Similar results were reported by Davila-Roman and coworkers.3 AAAD has most recently been discussed as a risk factor for long-term neurologic events. Our patients with severe AAAD did not have a higher incidence of neurologic events per 3 years, as compared with patients who exhibited moderate or mild disease (Figure 2, B). Davila-Roman and colleagues3 described differences in the occurrence of stroke between similar patient groups. When looking at his data in detail, strokes in his series primarily occurred in the perioperative period and on the long-term course there were only slight differences between patients with different grades of AAAD.
From our data we conclude that EAS in CABG grafting can lead the surgeons’ decisions toward modifications of operative techniques in the presence of ascending aortic atherosclerosis. By these modifications low stroke rates can be achieved in high-risk patients with severe disease. Modifications using off-pump CABG and aortic no-touch techniques seem to play a very promising role in management of ascending aortic atherosclerosis. Probably the severity of strokes can be reduced by changes in the operative strategy. Mortality and myocardial infarction, however, may be prevalent in patients with severe ascending aortic atherosclerosis. The impact of ascending aortic atherosclerosis on medium-term cerebral events is probably less dramatic than previously reported.
Limitations of the study
This study has its limitations because of its retrospective design; in addition, there was no uniform protocol for the operative strategy, but in fact an algorithm was used as a guideline for operative modifications in the presence of AAAD, with the individuality of the surgeon’s decision. However, it would be impossible to conduct this study in a randomized prospective fashion.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractPatients and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. R. Caplan Translating What Is Known About Neurological Complications of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Into Action Arch Neurol, September 1, 2009; 66(9): 1062 - 1064. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Takami, K. Tajima, S. Terazawa, N. Okada, K. Fujii, and Y. Sakai Safer aortic crossclamping during short-term moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest for cardiac surgery in patients with a bad ascending aorta J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2009; 137(4): 875 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. S. Whitley and K. E. Glas An Argument for Routine Ultrasound Screening of the Thoracic Aorta in the Cardiac Surgery Population Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, December 1, 2008; 12(4): 290 - 297. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. E. Glas, M. Swaminathan, S. T. Reeves, J. S. Shanewise, D. Rubenson, P. K. Smith, J. P. Mathew, S. K. Shernan, and Council for Intraoperative Echocardiography of the Guidelines for the Performance of a Comprehensive Intraoperative Epiaortic Ultrasonographic Examination: Recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists; Endorsed by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2008; 106(5): 1376 - 1384. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Nakamura, F. Okamoto, K. Nakanishi, R. Maruyama, A. Yamada, S. Ushikoshi, S. Terasaka, S. Kuroda, K. Sakai, and T. Higami Does Intensive Management of Cerebral Hemodynamics and Atheromatous Aorta Reduce Stroke After Coronary Artery Surgery? Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2008; 85(2): 513 - 519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Rosenberger, S. K. Shernan, M. Loffler, P. S. Shekar, J. A. Fox, J. K. Tuli, M. Nowak, and H. K. Eltzschig The Influence of Epiaortic Ultrasonography on Intraoperative Surgical Management in 6051 Cardiac Surgical Patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2008; 85(2): 548 - 553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. G. Wolf, Y. Abu-Omar, B. P. Choudhary, D. Pigott, and D. P. Taggart Gaseous and solid cerebral microembolization during proximal aortic anastomoses in off-pump coronary surgery: The effect of an aortic side-biting clamp and two clampless devices J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2007; 133(2): 485 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Bonatti, W. J. van Boven, G. Nagele, G. Shahin, T. Schachner, G. Laufer, P. Bergman, J. van der Linden, and The AORTIC Study Group (Assessment Of the Risk of Do particulate emboli from the ascending aorta in coronary bypass grafting correlate with aortic wall thickness? Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 1, 2006; 5(6): 716 - 720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Royse and C. Royse A standardised intraoperative ultrasound examination of the aorta and proximal coronary arteries Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 1, 2006; 5(6): 701 - 704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Zingone, G. Gatti, E. Rauber, A. Pappalardo, B. Benussi, and L. Dreas Surgical Management of the Atherosclerotic Ascending Aorta: Is Endoaortic Balloon Occlusion Safe? Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2006; 82(5): 1709 - 1714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Takami and H. Masumoto Brain magnetic resonance angiography-based strategy for stroke reduction in coronary artery bypass grafting Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, August 1, 2006; 5(4): 383 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Zingone, E. Rauber, G. Gatti, A. Pappalardo, B. Benussi, L. Dreas, and L. Lattuada The impact of epiaortic ultrasonographic scanning on the risk of perioperative stroke. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 29(5): 720 - 728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. M. McKhann, M. A. Grega, L. M. Borowicz Jr, W. A. Baumgartner, and O. A. Selnes Stroke and Encephalopathy After Cardiac Surgery: An Update Stroke, February 1, 2006; 37(2): 562 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. F. Aranki, M. Nathan, P. Shekar, G. Couper, R. Rizzo, and L. H. Cohn Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest Enables Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Unclampable Aorta Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2005; 80(5): 1679 - 1687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Ruel, E. J. Suuronen, J. Song, V. Kapila, D. Gunning, G. Waghray, F. D. Rubens, and T. G. Mesana Effects of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on function and viability of circulating endothelial progenitor cells J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2005; 130(3): 633 - 639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Schachner, A. Zimmer, G. Nagele, G. Laufer, and J. Bonatti Risk factors for late stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2005; 130(2): 485 - 490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. G Raja and G. D Dreyfus Will off-pump coronary artery surgery replace conventional coronary artery surgery? J R Soc Med, June 1, 2004; 97(6): 275 - 278. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Das and J. Dunning Can epiaortic ultrasound reduce the incidence of intraoperative stroke during cardiac surgery? Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, March 1, 2004; 3(1): 71 - 75. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |
