|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:826-831
© 2003 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Surgery for acquired cardiovascular disease |
a Department of Cardio-Thoracic and Respiratory Sciences, V. Monaldi Hospital, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
b Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit, V. Monaldi Hospital, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
Presented at the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of The European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Monte Carlo, Sept 22-25, 2002.
Received for publication October 11, 2002; revisions received November 6, 2002; revisions received December 27, 2002; accepted for publication January 22, 2003.
* Address for reprints: Luca Salvatore De Santo, MD, Viale Colli Aminei 491, 80129, Naples, Italy
luca.desanto{at}ospedalemonaldi.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: Twenty-two patients referred for acute type A aortic dissection, who were free from preoperative respiratory dysfunction, were assigned prospectively and alternately to one of 2 treatment groups. Pulmonary perfusion was performed during retrograde cerebral perfusion in group B (11 patients), whereas the conventional Ueda technique was applied in group A (11 patients). Lung function was evaluated on the basis of intubation time, scoring of chest radiographs at 12 hours after cardiopulmonary bypass, and PaO2/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio assessed from immediately before the operation to 72 hours after termination of cardiopulmonary bypass.
RESULTS: Study groups were homogeneous for age, sex, interval between symptom onset and surgical operation, previous aortic surgery, preoperative ejection fraction and pulmonary gas exchange function, extent of aortic repair, and concomitant procedures. Cardiopulmonary bypass time, length of retrograde cerebral perfusion, operation time, need for blood substitutes, and surgical revision for bleeding did not differ between treatment groups. Postoperative PaO2/fraction of inspired oxygen ratios were higher in group B than in group A, and the difference remained statistically significant throughout the study period. The incidence of prolonged ventilator support (>72 hours) and the severity of the radiographic pulmonary infiltrate score were lower in the perfused group (18.2% vs 72.7% [P = .015] and 0.81 ± 0.75 vs 1.8 ± 0.78 [P = .028], respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Continuous pulmonary perfusion provided a better preservation of lung function in patients operated on with deep systemic hypothermia.
Cumulative knowledge of the mechanisms underlying lung injury indicates that cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)induced systemic inflammatory response, extensive lung sequestration of neutrophils, interaction between neutrophils and pulmonary endothelium, and ischemia-reperfusion insult are the major determinants.
Recently, Suzuki and coworkers3 reported that continuous perfusion of the pulmonary arteries during total CPB in infants with congenital heart disease and pulmonary hypertension preserves lung gas exchange and reduces the need for postoperative mechanical ventilation. The present study was therefore designed to evaluate the effect of continuous pulmonary perfusion during RCP in a prospective series of 22 patients referred for acute type A aortic dissection.
| Patients and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Surgical procedure and pulmonary perfusion protocol
Anesthesia was induced with moderate doses of fentanyl, midazolam, and a long-acting muscle relaxant and was maintained with isoflurane or sevoflurane in 100% oxygen and supplemental intravenous opioids. The alpha-stat method was the standard practice in blood gas management. No steroid bolus or aprotinin was used. All operations were performed by the same surgeons (C.M., A.R.). The heart, ascending aorta, aortic arch, and arch vessels were exposed through a median sternotomy in all cases. The CPB circuit comprised a roller pump and membrane oxygenator. Arterial return for CPB was achieved in all cases through femoral arterial cannulation. Branched collagen-sealed grafts (Hemashield Branched Graft; Meadox Medical, Oakland, NJ) were used. After completion of the distal anastomosis, antegrade CPB was started through the graft, together with rewarming. Myocardial protection was achieved by means of intermittent antegrade crystalloid cardioplegia administered through selective cannulation of the coronary ostia and pericardial cooling with iced slush. RCP was performed in both groups according to the technique of Ueda and coworkers.4 Systemic hypothermia at 18°C (rectal), cannulation of the superior vena cava (which was occluded with a snare), and cerebral perfusion at a flow rate of 200 to 350 mL/m2 adjusted to keep jugular venous pressure at 20 mm Hg were the main features of this strategy. Head ice packing was performed to further improve cerebral protection. During DHCA, only group B patients underwent continuous pulmonary perfusion with the oxygenated blood at a flow rate of 300 mL · m-2 · min-1. The perfusate was infused into the pulmonary trunk through a 24F cannula and was drained away from the left atrium through an 18F vent circuit to secure a bloodless field. The mechanical ventilation was arrested in both groups with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) at 10 cm H2O.
Postoperative respiratory management
Inotropic agents were used in the intensive care unit when the cardiac index was less than 3.0 L · min-1 · m-2, despite volume loading to ensure pulmonary capillary wedge pressures of between 12 and 15 mm Hg. An 8-hour period of sedation was carried out with incremental doses of morphine sulfate. Mechanical ventilation was performed under the following conditions: tidal volume of 8 to 10 mL/kg and PEEP of 5 cm H2O. The fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) and respiratory rates were adjusted to keep 100 < PaO2 < 150 mm Hg and 30 < PaCO2 < 50 mm, and awakening was allowed when the following targets were achieved: cardiocirculatory stable condition on continuous positive airway pressure ventilation, with dopamine or dobutamine at less than 7.5 µg · kg-1 · min-1, chest drainage of less than 100 mL/h, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure of less than 15 mm Hg, urine output of greater than 50 mL/h, and patient warm and cooperative. Patients were extubated when awake at spontaneous continuous positive airway pressure ventilation with pressure-assisted spontaneous breathing of less than 15 mm Hg and PEEP of less than 5 cm H2O and with FIO2 of 40%, if PaO2 was greater than 80 mm Hg, PaCO2 was less than 50 mm Hg, tidal volume was greater than 10 mL/kg, and respiratory rate was 15 to 20 breaths/min.
Assessment of lung function
In all patients arterial blood gas measurements were collected at baseline and at 9 postoperative time intervals: approximately 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 36, 48, and 72 hours after the end of the procedure. The PaO2/FIO2 ratio was used as the parameter of lung function. Chest radiography was performed 24 hours after admission to the intensive care unit. Scoring of chest radiographs was performed by a blinded radiologist according to the Lung Injury Score proposed by Murray and colleagues,5 ranging from 0 (no infiltrate) to 4 (extensive alveolar consolidation).
Other intraoperative and postoperative parameters
For each patient, demographic data, perioperative and postoperative data (length of DHCA, CPB time, operation time, number of blood units used, and need for >72 hours of ventilator support), postoperative inotropic support, and hospital outcome were recorded.
Study assessment and statistical analysis
The primary efficacy assessment was a comparison between the 2 groups of patients who experienced pulmonary complications. Pulmonary complication was defined as the need for mechanical ventilation for more than 72 hours because of respiratory performance not satisfying the extubation criteria defined above. Secondary assessment included comparison of lung function through PaO2/FIO2 ratio and chest radiography score. Continuous variables are presented as means ± SD. Discrete variables are presented as counts and percentages. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for the analysis of continuous variables, and the Fisher exact test was used for analysis of discrete variables. As for PaO2/FIO2 ratio analysis, 1-way analysis of variance for repeated measurements was used. All computations were performed with the SPSS v.10.1 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill) statistical software package.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
· kg-1 · min-1, enoximone of greater than 10
· kg-1 · min-1, and norepinephrine at any dosage.
|
|
Lung function
Figure 1
reports PaO2/FIO2 ratio patterns in study groups. In both groups preoperative gas exchange was similar: the PaO2/FIO2 ratio decreased gradually, reaching its nadir between 8 and 16 hours after CPB, and then it started recovering. At each measuring point beyond 4 hours after CPB, the PaO2/FIO2 ratio of the perfused group was significantly higher than that of the control group. Analysis to detect differences among the sampling points within each group disclosed a statistically significant difference between baseline PaO2/FIO2 values and postoperative measurements through all the experimentation, irrespective of surgical treatment. Mean length of ventilator support was 61.1 ± 10.6 hours in group A and 29.7 ± 12.7 hours in group B. Consequently, the rate of pulmonary complications (need for mechanical ventilation for more than 72 hours) was significantly lower (72.7% vs 18.2%, P = .015) in the perfused group (Figure 2).
Figure 3
reports chest radiographic scoring. The mean scores in group A and group B were 1.8 ± 0.78 and 0.81 ± 0.75, respectively. Again, this difference was statistically significant (P = .028).
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study limitations
Some limitations of the study are to be considered. First, the number of patients in each group is relatively small, implying some weakness of the statistical results. This is clearly a result of the single-center design of the trial itself, which, on the other hand, guarantees the uniform perioperative management of the patient population throughout the experimentation. Second, our study might have lacked a third group in which pulmonary perfusion with complete lung deflation (no PEEP) during RCP should have been applied. This approach might have disclosed the contribution of PEEP to this protective strategy. There is much evidence in the literature supporting the application of PEEP when mechanical ventilation is stopped,18,19 and we advocate its use as standard practice in procedures requiring long total CPB times or DHCA. Furthermore, we did not directly measure lung ischemia or bronchial arterial flow or estimate the inflammatory response in the 2 groups. Consequently, we were unable to comment on the degree of ischemia and eventual contribution of bronchial flow impairment. As far as the inflammatory response is concerned, both groups were exposed to the same type of extracorporeal circuit for a similar period, underwent the same extent of operative trauma, and received comparable amounts of blood units, and thus the degree of inflammation should be considered the same. Finally, the inclusion criteria were clearly aimed to select a homogeneous study population (freedom from COPD and normal preoperative respiratory ratios); nevertheless, the role of some confounding factors (extracorporeal circulation length, blood requirements, and postoperative cardiac function) was difficult to assess because of the unpredictability of surgical procedure and, above all, because of the limited study sample. Inferences from the study results to the routine clinical environment might need careful consideration.
Conclusions
Our study suggests that continuous pulmonary perfusion might have a beneficial effect on pulmonary function during aortic procedures performed during deep hypothermia. Further studies with larger groups of patients are needed.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Santini, F. Onorati, M. Telesca, F. Patelli, G. Berton, G. Franchi, G. Faggian, and A. Mazzucco Pulsatile pulmonary perfusion with oxygenated blood ameliorates pulmonary hemodynamic and respiratory indices in low-risk coronary artery bypass patients Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, October 1, 2011; 40(4): 794 - 803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Girdauskas, T. Kuntze, M. A. Borger, K. Rohrich, D. Schmitt, J. Fassl, V. Falk, and F.-W. Mohr Acute respiratory dysfunction after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, March 1, 2010; 37(3): 691 - 696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-y. Luo, K.-j. Hu, J.-y. Zhou, and C.-s. Wang Analysis of the risk factors of postoperative respiratory dysfunction of type A aortic dissection and lung protection Perfusion, May 1, 2009; 24(3): 199 - 202. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. S. De Santo, C. Bancone, G. Santarpino, G. Romano, M. De Feo, M. Scardone, N. Galdieri, and M. Cotrufo Microbiologically documented nosocomial infections after cardiac surgery: an 18-month prospective tertiary care centre report Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, April 1, 2008; 33(4): 666 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |