JTCS Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Marc Ruel
Tanveer A. Khan
John R. Liddicoat
Pierre Voisine
Frank W. Sellke
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruel, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sellke, F. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruel, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sellke, F. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Myocardial protection

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:1521-1530
© 2003 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Cardiopulmonary support and physiology

Gene expression profile after cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest

Marc Ruel, MD, MPHa, Cesario Bianchi, MD, PhDa, Tanveer A. Khan, MDa, Shu Xu, PhDa, John R. Liddicoat, MDa, Pierre Voisine, MDa, Eugenio Araujo, PhDa, Helen Lyon, MDb, Isaac S. Kohane, MD, PhDc, Towia A. Libermann, PhDd, Frank W. Sellke, MDa,*

a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass, USA
b Divisions of Medical Genetics, Boston, Mass, USA
c Informatics Program, Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass, USA
d Genomics Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass, USA

Received for publication December 5, 2002; revisions received January 21, 2003; revisions received February 5, 2003; accepted for publication March 11, 2003.

* Address for reprints: Frank W. Sellke, MD, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, LMOB 2A, 110 Francis St, Boston, MA 02215, USA
fsellke{at}bidmc.harvard.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
OBJECTIVE: This study examines the cardiac and peripheral gene expression responses to cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest.

METHODS: Atrial myocardium and skeletal muscle were harvested from 16 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting before and after cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest. Ten sample pairs were selected for patient similarity, and oligonucleotide microarray analyses of 12,625 genes were performed using matched precardiopulmonary bypass tissues as controls. Array results were validated with Northern blotting, real-time polymerase chain reaction, in situ hybridization, and immunoblotting. Statistical analyses were nonparametric.

RESULTS: Median durations of cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest were 74 and 60 minutes, respectively. Compared with precardiopulmonary bypass, postcardiopulmonary bypass myocardial tissues revealed 480 up-regulated and 626 down-regulated genes with a threshold P value of .025 or less (signal-to-noise ratio: 3.46); skeletal muscle tissues showed 560 and 348 such genes, respectively (signal-to-noise ratio: 3.04). Up-regulated genes in cardiac tissues included inflammatory and transcription activators FOS; jun B proto-oncogene; nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 3; MYC; transcription factor-8; endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule-1; and cysteine-rich 61; apoptotic genes nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 1 and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A; and stress genes dual-specificity phosphatase-1, dual-specificity phosphatase-5, and B-cell translocation gene 2. Up-regulated skeletal muscle genes included interleukin 6; interleukin 8; tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 11B; nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 3; transcription factor-8; interleukin 13; jun B proto-oncogene; interleukin 1B; glycoprotein Ib, platelet, alpha polypeptide; and Ras-associated protein RAB27A. Down-regulated genes included haptoglobin and numerous immunoglobulins in the heart, and factor H-related gene 2, protein phosphatase 1, regulatory subunit 3A, and growth differentiation factor-8 in skeletal muscle.

CONCLUSIONS: By establishing a profile of the gene-expression responses to cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegia, this study allows a better understanding of their effects and provides a framework for the evaluation of new cardiac surgical modalities directly at the genome level.


Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cardioplegic arrest are used in more than 300,000 patients who undergo cardiac surgery in the United States every year. Although off-pump coronary surgery has recently gained in popularity, CPB and cardioplegic arrest are still employed in more than 75% of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures and for virtually every other type of adult cardiac operation. Although these modalities are indispensable adjuncts, they are also paradoxically responsible for a large part of the morbidity associated with cardiac surgery. CPB is associated with disturbances of virtually every organ system, mediated by its elicitation of a whole-body inflammatory response.1-4 Cardioplegic arrest may result in coronary vasomotor dysfunction, ischemia-reperfusion injury, myocardial edema, perioperative myocardial infarction, and low cardiac output syndrome.5-7

Transcriptional profiling using high-density microarrays provides unique data about disease mechanisms, drug responses, regulatory pathways, and gene function by comparing the level of mRNA transcribed in cells in a given pathologic state versus a control. This allows for the elucidation of complex pathophysiologic mechanisms directly at the gene expression level.8 We examined the cardiac and skeletal muscle gene expression profiles of patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB and cardioplegic arrest to improve the understanding of these modalities and provide a reference framework for the evaluation of prognostic gene markers and new intraoperative strategies.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
Tissue samples
After the protocol was approved by the research ethics committee of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and informed consent was obtained from the patients, samples of right atrium and skeletal muscle were collected immediately before and after CPB in 16 patients undergoing primary elective CABG. Samples were harvested with cold sharp dissection and handled in a nontraumatic fashion.

Right atrial samples consisted of nontraumatized tissue that was not involved in a purse string suture. Pre-CPB tissues were taken from the right atrial appendage before venous cannulation, and post-CPB atrial samples were harvested after the construction of a second purse string suture on the right atrial appendage and decannulation. Skeletal muscle samples were taken from the left intercostal muscle bed, lateral to the internal thoracic artery harvest site. Atrial and skeletal muscle samples (~10 x 10 x 2 mm) were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and immediately stored at -80°C.

To minimize baseline phenotypic variation, 5 patients aged between 55 and 75 years, who were normocholesterolemic, nonsmoking, nondiabetic, of the same ethnicity and gender, and who had similar procedural characteristics, were selected from the 16 subjects whose tissues were harvested; 10 atrial (ie, 5 pre- and 5 post-CPB and cardioplegic arrest) and 10 skeletal muscle (ie, 5 pre- and 5 post-CPB) samples obtained from these patients were therefore used for the microarrays analyses and the validation studies (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Patient characteristics

 
RNA isolation
Total RNA was isolated with a Trizol-based method, following the manufacturer's protocol (Gibco BRL, Rockville, Md), on samples of approximately 200 mg. Purification was achieved by passing the RNA samples through an RNAeasy column (Qiagen, Valencia, Calif). Residual DNA contamination was eliminated by DNase I treatment (Invitrogen, San Diego, Calif). RNA concentrations were determined by spectrophotometry; each sample yielded a minimum of 5 µg of total RNA at a minimum concentration of 0.5 µg/µL with an A260/A280 ratio ranging between 1.8 and 2.1.

Microarray processing
cDNA was prepared according to protocols provided with the Affymetrix U95 GeneChip system (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, Calif).9 Five micrograms of total RNA were used in the first-strand cDNA synthesis with T7-d(T)24 primer (GGCCAGTGAATTGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGGCGG-[dT]24) and Superscript II (Gibco-BRL, Gaithersburg, Md). The second-strand cDNA synthesis was performed at 16°C by adding Escherichia coli DNA ligase, DNA polymerase I, and RNase H to the reaction, followed by T4 DNA polymerase to blunt the ends of newly synthesized cDNA. The cDNA was purified through phenol/chloroform and ethanol precipitation. By using a BioArray High Yield RNA Transcript Labeling Kit (Enzo Diagnostics, Farmingdale, NY), the purified cDNA was incubated for 5 hours at 37°C in an in vitro transcription reaction to produce cRNA-labeled with biotin.

Microarray hibridization
cRNA was fragmented by incubating in a buffer containing 200 mmol/L Tris-acetate, 500 mmol/L KOAc, and 150 mmol/L MgOAc for 35 minutes at 94°C. Fifteen micrograms of fragmented cRNA were mixed with eukaryotic hybridization controls (containing control cRNA and oligonucleotide B2) and hybridized with a pre-equilibrated human U95Av2 Affymetrix chip for 16 hours at 45°C. The chips were washed in a fluidic station with low-stringency buffer (6x standard saline phosphate with EDTA, 0.01% Tween 20, and 0.005% antifoam) for 10 cycles and in high-stringency buffer (100 mmol/L N-morpholino-ethanesulfonic acid, 0.1 mol/L NaCl, and 0.01% Tween 20) for 4 cycles and stained with streptavidin phycoerythrin. This process was followed by incubation with normal goat immunoglobulin G and biotinylated mouse anti-streptavidin antibody, and restaining with streptavidin phycoerythrin.

Statistical analysis of microarray data
The chips were scanned in an HP G2500A ChipScanner (Affymetrix) to detect hybridization signals. Image output files were visually examined for major chip defects and hybridization artifacts, and raw data were processed with GeneChip Microarray Analysis Suite 5.0 software (Affymetrix). The image from each chip was scaled such that the absolute signal intensities were adjusted to target intensity and reported as a non-negative numerical quantity. Data were imported into SAS version 7 (SAS, Cary, NC) for further analysis. Statistical techniques were separately applied to each type of tissue and involved tests that were paired for each patient.

Median post- to pre-CPB and cardioplegic arrest gene expression ratios were computed for each gene by using the relative signal intensities of the probe cells. Two statistical methods were combined to assess differential gene expression between the pre- and post-CPB and cardioplegic arrest tissues.10 To ensure a minimal number of false positives, only the probe sets commonly yielded by the 2 methods were included in the list of genes differentially expressed in post- versus pre-CPB and cardioplegic arrest samples.

Method 1 identified probe sets with significant intensity differences between pre- and post-CPB and cardioplegic arrest tissues. For each tissue type, a Wilcoxon signed-rank test was applied to the absolute signal intensities of each gene in the pre- versus post-CPB and cardioplegic arrest data set. The use of a nonparametric, paired Wilcoxon test was selected over that of a standard t test to avoid a distributional assumption;11,12 the threshold was set at a P value of .0253 or less, which corresponds to the lowest possible P value in the particular experimental setting of the study (observed when 5 of 5 patients show a similar pattern of differential expression). By using this P value, the number of genes that could have reached significance by chance alone was determined and compared with the number of observed significant genes, and a signal-to-noise ratio was computed.

Method 2 determined the differentiability of a probe set by its signal intensity fold change. Nonparametric determination of genes with significantly different fold changes between the pre- and post-CPB and cardioplegic arrest states was performed by computing and ordering by increasing size the median relative signal intensities of each probe set. A particular gene was considered to be up-regulated after CPB and cardioplegic arrest in a given tissue type if a median fold change of 4 (4:1) or more was observed in post- versus pre-CPB and cardioplegic arrest samples. Conversely, a gene was considered down-regulated if the median fold change of post- versus pre-CPB and cardioplegic arrest samples was 0.25 (1:4) or less. Only genes identified by both methods were considered to be differentially expressed and were reported.

Microarray validation
Northern analysis
cDNA probes of human DUSP1 and CYR61 (2 significantly altered genes), and GADP and ß-actin (2 genes that were not altered) were labeled with {alpha}32P-dCTP (New England Nuclear, Boston, Mass) using a random-priming labeling kit (Boehringer, Indianapolis, Ind) and purified from unincorporated nucleotides using G-50 Quick Spin Columns (Boehringer). The blots were hybridized overnight at 48°C using an Ambion Northern Max kit (Ambion, Austin, Tex). After hybridization, the blots were washed twice in 2x standard saline citrate with 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) for 15 minutes each at room temperature and then washed twice in 0.1x standard saline citrate with 0.1% SDS for 15 minutes each at 60°C. Autoradiography was performed for 20 hours at -80°C. Blots were analyzed after digitization and quantification of x-ray films with the Image-Quant software (Molecular Dynamic, Sunnyvale, Calif), quantified as a ratio of the gene mRNA to loading band density, and presented as a median (minimum, maximum) ratio of post- to pre-CPB and cardioplegic arrest mRNA expression.

Real-time polymerase chain reaction
Reverse transcription was performed on 2 µg of total RNA isolated from atrial and skeletal muscle tissues, using an oligo dT primer (Invitrogen) for 90 minutes at 37°C. DUSP1 primers were forward-TGGAGGAAGGGTGTTTGTCC, reverse-CAAGGCAGATGGTGGCTGA, and TaqMan-FAM-CTGCCAGGCAGGCATTTCCCG-TAMRA (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif). CYR61 primers were forward-ATCAAGGACCCCATGGAGG, reverse-AGGCATCGAATCCCAGCTC, and TaqMan-FAM-CCAGGACGGCCTCCTTGGCAA-TAMRA (Applied Biosystems). Amplification conditions were as follows: stage 1, 1 cycle for 2 minutes at 50°C; stage 2, 1 cycle for 10 minutes at 95°C; stage 3, 40 cycles for 15 seconds at 95°C and 1 minute at 60°C. Real-time detection was accomplished using SYBR Green I dye and fluorescence quantified with a GeneAmp Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems). All experiments were performed in duplicate, and post- to pre-CPB and cardioplegic arrest ratios of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products are presented as median (minimum, maximum) ratios.

In situ hybridization
Probes for human DUSP1 and CYR61 were generated from PCR fragments containing T3 (forward) and T7 (reverse) promoter sequences incorporated in the amplicon. Frozen sections of 10 µm were cut in a cryostat and captured onto microscope slides. Sections were fixed and acetylated, and hybridized at 68°C to the probe for 3 nights. Hybridized probes were visualized using alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-DIG Fab fragments and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate/nitro blue tetrazolium substrate (Kierkegard and Perry, Gaithersburg, Md). Sections were rinsed several times in 100 mmol/L Tris, 150 mmol/L NaCl, and 20 mmol/L EDTA pH 9.5, and coverslipped with glycerol gelatin. Control sections were incubated in an identical concentration of the sense probe transcript. In situ hybridization autoradiographs were evaluated qualitatively in random high-power fields.

Immunoblotting
Total lysate from atrial and skeletal muscle tissues was obtained by 30-second homogenization on ice in lysis buffer containing 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, and a protease inhibitor, and centrifuged at 12,000g for 10 minutes at 4°C to separate soluble from insoluble proteins. The supernatant protein concentration was measured spectrophotometrically at 595 nm wavelength using a BCA protein assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, Ill). Total protein was fractionated on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, Bedford, Mass) using a semi-dry transfer apparatus. Membranes were stained with Ponceau S and incubated with 5% nonfat dry milk in 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 100 mmol/L NaCl, and 0.1% Tween 20 (TBST) buffer for 1 hour at room temperature. Membranes were incubated with antibodies (in 2.5% nonfat dry milk in TBST) (anti-DUSP1 1:1000 [v/v] dilution, rabbit polyclonal 1:1000 [v/v], or anti-CYR61 1/1000 [v/v] dilution), and rabbit polyclonal (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, Calif) for 2 hours. After washing with TBST, the membranes were incubated for 1 hour in 2.5% nonfat dry milk in TBST diluted with anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (Jackson Immunolabs, West Grove, Pa), both at 1:3000 (v/v) dilution conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. Peroxidase activity was visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence and exposed to x-ray films (Amersham, Arlington Heights, Ill). Post-CPB to pre-CPB and cardioplegic arrest ratios of protein density are presented as median (minimum, maximum) ratios.

Reporting and functional classification
Genes identified to be significant by microarray analysis with both statistical methods were the object of a literature search and reported, along with their GenBank accession number, according to the current nomenclature of Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man.13 Functional inferences outlined in the right column of Tables 2 to 5 are based on the authors' interpretation of literature referenced in Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man pertaining to each gene.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Genes exhibiting a fourfold or greater increase in expression in post- versus pre-cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic areas atrial samples

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Genes exhibiting a fourfold or greater decrease in expression in post- versus pre-cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest atrial samples

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Genes exhibiting a fourfold or greater increase in expression in post- versus pre-cardiopulmonary bypass skeletal muscle samples

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5. Genes exhibiting a fourfold or greater decrease in expression in post- versus pre-cardiopulmonary bypass skeletal-muscle samples

 

    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
Patient characteristics
Table 1 displays the clinical characteristics of the patients whose tissues were used for the microarray and validation studies. All subjects were Caucasian men aged between 55 and 72 years old, without significant comorbidity, who electively underwent 3 or 4 CABGs with mildly hypothermic CPB and antegrade intermittent (every 20 minutes) hyperkalemic cold blood cardioplegia. Antifibrinolytic drugs were not administered.

Microarray signal-to-noise characteristics
Of 12,625 genes examined, 1,106 and 974 genes were identified by method 1 to have a P value of .0253 or less for their differential expression in post- versus pre-CPB and cardioplegic arrest cardiac and skeletal muscle tissues, respectively (Figure 1). The projected number of genes that could have reached significance because of chance alone was 320 for each tissue type, corresponding to a signal-to-noise ratio of 3.46 in cardiac and 3.04 in skeletal muscle microarrays.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Genes that were differentially expressed with a P value of .0253 or less after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and antegrade cold blood cardioplegia in cardiac (left) and skeletal muscle tissues (right) (of 12,625 genes examined). These genes and the number expected to result from repeat testing alone were identified by method 1 described in the text.

 
Identification of significantly altered genes
Genes whose expression was found to be significantly altered by using both methods are reported in Tables 2 to 5. Of these, there were 32 up-regulated and 26 down-regulated genes in the heart (Tables 2 and 3), and 32 and 7 such genes in the skeletal muscle (Tables 4 and 5). Most up-regulated atrial genes were transcription factors, and most down-regulated atrial genes were immunoglobulins. In skeletal muscle, transcription factors also represented a large proportion of the up-regulated genes, but no specific functional pattern was observed in the down-regulated genes.

Validation
DUSP1
The microarray results for DUSP1 revealed increased expression (median 12-fold; 3.2, 27.1; P = .025) in the atrium, but no significant change in the skeletal muscle after CPB and cardioplegic arrest (median 1.6-fold; 0.3, 6.5; P = .68). Validation studies revealed the median mRNA expression of DUSP1 in post- versus pre-CPB atrial samples to be increased 3-fold (1.7, 7.1; P = .025) and 6.4-fold (1.5, 16.8; P = .05) by Northern blotting and real-time PCR, respectively, with a change in protein level of 4.6-fold (1.3, 5.7; P = .05) by immunoblotting (Figure 2). In skeletal muscle, DUSP1 was not significantly up-regulated, with a median differential mRNA expression of 1.6-fold (1.2, 4.6; P = .08) and 8.2-fold (2.5, 23.3; P = .08) by Northern blotting and PCR, respectively, and a protein level change of 2.1-fold (1.1, 3.0; P = .68) by immunoblotting. In situ hybridization revealed a striking increase in DUSP1 expression in atrial tissues, particularly localized to the endothelium and myocytes (Figure 3). No increase in expression was detected in skeletal muscle samples.



View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Northern and Western blot analyses of mRNA expression and protein level of DUSP1 and CYR61 in atrial (heart) and skeletal muscle (Sk.M.) tissues, pre- and post-CPB and cardioplegia. mRNA expression and protein levels of DUSP1 and CYR61 were significantly increased in post- versus pre-CPB atrial samples, but not in the skeletal muscle.

 


View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Representative in situ hybridization images of DUSP1, pre- and post-CPB in atrial tissues. A post-CPB and cardioplegic arrest increase in DUSP1 expression was localized to the endothelium (arrowheads) and myocytes (small arrows).

 
CYR61
The microarray results for CYR61 revealed increased expression in the atrium (median 4-fold; 1.5, 12.1; P = .025), but no significant change in the skeletal muscle after CPB and cardioplegic arrest (median 4-fold; 0.8, 8; P = .68). In concordance with these results, the median expression of CYR61 in post- versus pre-CPB atrial samples was 2.5-fold (1.8, 5.3; P = .025) and 6.2-fold (1.4, 15.4; P =.025) by Northern blotting and real-time PCR, respectively (Figure 2). The amount of protein was also increased 2.7-fold (1.5, 3.2; P = .05) in atrial tissues. In the skeletal muscle, CYR61 was not significantly up-regulated, with a median differential expression of 1-fold (1, 2.3; P = .16) by Northern blotting, 4.9-fold (1, 15.9; P = .08) by PCR, and 2.7-fold by immunoblotting (0.9, 3.2; P = .68).

GAPD and ß-Actin
Microarray results revealed the differential expression of these genes not to be significantly altered after CPB and cardioplegic arrest in both atrial and skeletal muscle tissues. On Northern blotting, the median differential expression of post-CPB and cardioplegic arrest to pre-CPB samples was 1.2 and 1.1 for GAPD, and 1.0 and 1.1 for ß-actin in atrial and skeletal muscle samples, respectively (P = not significant).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
In this study, the gene expression profile of atrial and skeletal muscle from selected, phenotypically similar patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB and cardioplegic arrest was determined. The microarray-based method was feasible and validated with conventional quantification techniques. A large number of genes showing altered transcription with a subthreshold P value were identified, well in excess of the number projected to have reached this P value threshold by multiple testing alone. We determined that CPB and cardioplegic arrest do not cause an indiscriminate change in gene expression, but rather induce a distinct pattern of changes in specific pathways such as up-regulation of inflammation/transcription activators, apoptotic genes, and stress genes, as well as down-regulation of immunoglobulin genes. These results allow a better understanding of the pathophysiology of CPB and cardioplegic arrest on cardiac and peripheral tissues and introduce a new method for evaluating modalities aimed at minimizing the adverse effects of CPB, cardioplegia, and cardiac surgery by directly measuring the overall gene expression profile and response of target groups of genes.

Several of the genes found to be differentially expressed in this study have been implicated in the pathophysiology of CPB and cardioplegia in humans. FOS and JUN were found to be up-regulated in subendocardial myocytes and endothelial cells of right atrial samples after cold crystalloid cardioplegia.14,15 Nuclear factor-kappa B activation has been proposed as an inducer of transcription in right atrial tissue exposed to ischemia-reperfusion,16 and endothelin 1 receptor blockade has been associated with minimization of left ventricular dysfunction after CPB and cardioplegic arrest in swine.17 A number of neutrophil adhesion molecules such as CD11 and CD44 have been differentially expressed,18,19 and serum levels of IL6, IL8, TNF, IL1B, SCYA2, SELE, and IL13, and CD44 levels have been shown to be increased after CPB.20-26 Elevated serum levels of S100 have been correlated with cerebral damage after CPB and circulatory arrest.27

This study also identifies multiple genes that had not been implicated in the pathophysiology of CPB and cardioplegic arrest, such as DUSP1, TCF8, CYR61, SLC2A3, MYC, TCCR, BTG2, TRIM, ALCAM, EFNB2, and many others (Tables 2-5). Although the clinical significance of these new findings is still unknown, further research may characterize the expression of these genes, quantify polymorphisms, and examine their correlation with surgical outcome.

Limitations
Microarray techniques, despite their immense potential to improve disease understanding, have inherent shortcomings related to the selection of tissues, lack of standardized methods for the statistical analysis of data, presentation of vast amounts of results, and generalizability of the findings.28 Microarray technology also does not allow for the determination of absolute expression patterns and provides a measure of transcribed mRNA rather than a functional gene product. We have attempted to limit these shortcomings by selecting phenotypically and procedurally similar subjects, combining nonparametric statistical methods to minimize false positives, validating the expression patterns, protein levels, and origin of select genes with conventional molecular techniques, and suggesting a potential functional role for genes whose expression was most strikingly altered.

For ethical reasons, we used human atrial biopsies rather than ventricular biopsies to examine the cardiac gene expression changes that result from CPB and cardioplegic arrest. Atrial sampling involves little or no intrinsic risk of morbidity, provides full-thickness samples, and is clinically reproducible. CPB and antegrade cold blood cardioplegia distribute to the right atrium.29 Although atrial myocardium differs from ventricular myocardium with respect to the relative percentage of myocytic, endothelial, connective, and neural elements, these cell types are present in each tissue type and may demonstrate ultrastructural changes in disease.30,31


    Conclusion
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
We believe that this study allows a better understanding of the cardiac and systemic effects of CPB and cardioplegic arrest. We anticipate that these data will serve as a starting point for functional studies and provide a framework for the use of gene expression approaches to better understand and minimize the morbid effects of cardiac surgery on cardiac and peripheral tissues.


    Footnotes
 
This work was funded by grant HL-46716 (Dr Sellke) and R24 DK58739 (Drs Libermann and Kohane) from the National Institutes of Health. Dr Ruel is supported by postdoctoral research awards from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 

  1. Sellke FW, Tofukuji M, Stamler A, et al. Beta-adrenergic regulation of the cerebral microcirculation after hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. Circulation. 1997;96:II304–310
  2. Stamler A, Wang SY, Aguirre DE, et al. Cardiopulmonary bypass alters vasomotor regulation of the skeletal muscle microcirculation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;64:460–465[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Stamler A, Wang SY, Aguirre DE, et al. Effects of pentastarch-deferoxamine conjugate on lung injury after cardiopulmonary bypass. Circulation. 1996;94:II358–363
  4. Friedman M, Wang SY, Stahl GL, et al. Altered beta-adrenergic and cholinergic pulmonary vascular responses after total cardiopulmonary bypass. J Appl Physiol. 1995;79:1998–2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Wang SY, Friedman M, Franklin A, et al. Myogenic reactivity of coronary resistance arteries after cardiopulmonary bypass and hyperkalemic cardioplegia. Circulation. 1995;92:1590–1596[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Sellke FW, Shafique T, Ely DL, et al. Coronary endothelial injury after cardiopulmonary bypass and ischemic cardioplegia is mediated by oxygen-derived free radicals. Circulation. 1993;88:II395–400
  7. Metais C, Li J, Simons M, et al. Serotonin-induced coronary contraction increases after blood cardioplegia-reperfusion: role of COX-2 expression. Circulation. 1999;100:II328–334
  8. Duggan DJ, Bittner M, Chen Y, et al. Expression profiling using cDNA microarrays. Nat Genet. 1999;21:10–14[Medline]
  9. Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Maitra A, Shen-Ong GL, et al. Discovery of novel tumor markers of pancreatic cancer using global gene expression technology. Am J Pathol. 2002;160:1239–1249[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Haslett JN, Sanoudou D, Kho AT, et al. Gene expression comparison of biopsies from Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and normal skeletal muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:15000–15005[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Wilcoxon F. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics. 1946;1:80–83
  12. Liu WM, Mei R, Di X, et al. Analysis of high density expression microarrays with signed-rank call algorithms. Bioinformatics. 2002;18:1593–1599[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?CMD=Limits&DB=omim
  14. Aebert H, Cornelius T, Birnbaum DE, et al. Induction of early immediate genes and programmed cell death following cardioplegic arrest in human hearts. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997;12:261–267[Abstract]
  15. Nelson DP, Wechsler SB, Miura T, et al. Myocardial immediate early gene activation after cardiopulmonary bypass with cardiac ischemia-reperfusion. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:156–162[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Canty TG Jr, Boyle EM Jr, Farr A, et al. Oxidative stress induces NF-kappaB nuclear translocation without degradation of IkappaBalpha. Circulation. 1999;100:II361–364
  17. Pearl JM, Nelson DP, Wagner CJ, et al. Endothelin receptor blockade reduces ventricular dysfunction and injury after reoxygenation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:565–570[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ilton MK, Langton PE, Taylor ML, et al. Differential expression of neutrophil adhesion molecules during coronary artery surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;118:930–937[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Toft P, Nielsen CH, Tonnesen E, et al. Changes in adhesion molecule expression and oxidative burst activity of granulocytes and monocytes during open-heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass compared with abdominal surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1998;15:345–353[Medline]
  20. Brull DJ, Montgomery HE, Sanders J, et al. Interleukin-6 gene -174g>c and -572g>c promoter polymorphisms are strong predictors of plasma interleukin-6 levels after coronary artery bypass surgery. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001;21:1458–1463[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Chello M, Mastroroberto P, Quirino A, et al. Inhibition of neutrophil apoptosis after coronary bypass operation with cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:123–129[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Gormley SM, McBride WT, Armstrong MA, et al. Plasma and urinary cytokine homeostasis and renal dysfunction during cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:1210–1216[Medline]
  23. Kawahito K, Adachi H, Ino T. Influence of surgical procedures on interleukin-6 and monocyte chemotactic and activating factor responses: CABG vs. valvular surgery. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2000;20:1–6[Medline]
  24. Burns SA, Newburger JW, Xiao M, et al. Induction of interleukin-8 messenger RNA in heart and skeletal muscle during pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass. Circulation. 1995;92:II315–321
  25. Matata BM, Galinanes M. Cardiopulmonary bypass exacerbates oxidative stress but does not increase proinflammatory cytokine release in patients with diabetes compared with patients without diabetes: regulatory effects of exogenous nitric oxide. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;120:1–11[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Nathan N, Preux PM, Feiss P, et al. Plasma interleukin-4, interleukin-10, and interleukin-13 concentrations and complications after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2000;14:156–160[Medline]
  27. LeMaire SA, Bhama JK, Schmittling ZC, et al. S100beta correlates with neurologic complications after aortic operation using circulatory arrest. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:1913–1918[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. King HC, Sinha AA. Gene expression profile analysis by DNA microarrays: promise and pitfalls. JAMA. 2001;286:2280–2288[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Stirling MC, McClanahan TB, Schott RJ, et al. Distribution of cardioplegic solution infused antegradely and retrogradely in normal canine hearts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989;98:1066–1076[Abstract]
  30. Gorza L, Mercadier JJ, Schwartz K, et al. Myosin types in the human heart. An immunofluorescence study of normal and hypertrophied atrial and ventricular myocardium. Circ Res. 1984;54:694–702[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Hoffmann U, Axmann C, Grisk A. Myosin isoenzymes in normal and hypertrophied human hearts. Biomed Biochim Acta. 1986;45:985–996[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
J. D. McCully, M. K. Bhasin, C. Daly, M. C. Guerrero, S. Dillon, T. A. Liberman, D. B. Cowan, J. D. Mably, F. X. McGowan, and S. Levitsky
Transcriptomic and proteomic analysis of global ischemia and cardioprotection in the rabbit heart
Physiol Genomics, July 9, 2009; 38(2): 125 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. Ramlawi, J. Feng, S. Mieno, C. Szabo, Z. Zsengeller, R. Clements, N. Sodha, M. Boodhwani, C. Bianchi, and F. W. Sellke
Indices of Apoptosis Activation After Blood Cardioplegia and Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Circulation, July 4, 2006; 114(1_suppl): I-257 - I-263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M.V. Podgoreanu, W.D. White, R.W. Morris, J.P. Mathew, M. Stafford-Smith, I.J. Welsby, H.P. Grocott, C.A. Milano, M.F. Newman, D.A. Schwinn, et al.
Inflammatory Gene Polymorphisms and Risk of Postoperative Myocardial Infarction After Cardiac Surgery
Circulation, July 4, 2006; 114(1_suppl): I-275 - I-281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. V. Podgoreanu and D. A. Schwinn
New Paradigms in Cardiovascular Medicine: Emerging Technologies and Practices: Perioperative Genomics
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 6, 2005; 46(11): 1965 - 1977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
I. E. Konstantinov, S. Arab, J. Li, J. G. Coles, C. Boscarino, A. Mori, E. Cukerman, F. Dawood, M. M.H. Cheung, M. Shimizu, et al.
The remote ischemic preconditioning stimulus modifies gene expression in mouse myocardium
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2005; 130(5): 1326 - 1332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
S. J. Schomisch, D. G. Murdock, N. Hedayati, J. L. Carino, E. J. Lesnefsky, and B. L. Cmolik
Cardioplegia prevents ischemia-induced transcriptional alterations of cytoprotective genes in rat hearts: A DNA microarray study
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2005; 130(4): 1151 - 1151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Seeburger, J. Hoffmann, H. P. Wendel, G. Ziemer, and H. Aebert
Gene Expression Changes in Leukocytes During Cardiopulmonary Bypass Are Dependent on Circuit Coating
Circulation, August 30, 2005; 112(9_suppl): I-224 - I-228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. V. Podgoreanu, G. A. Michelotti, Y. Sato, M. P. Smith, S. Lin, R. W. Morris, H. P. Grocott, J. P. Mathew, and D. A. Schwinn
Differential cardiac gene expression during cardiopulmonary bypass: Ischemia-independent upregulation of proinflammatory genes
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2005; 130(2): 330 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
P. Ellinghaus, R. J. Scheubel, D. Dobrev, U. Ravens, J. Holtz, J. Huetter, U. Nielsch, and H. Morawietz
Comparing the global mRNA expression profile of human atrial and ventricular myocardium with high-density oligonucleotide arrays
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2005; 129(6): 1383 - 1390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. Spentzos, D. A. Levine, M. F. Ramoni, M. Joseph, X. Gu, J. Boyd, Towia. A. Libermann, and S. A. Cannistra
Gene Expression Signature With Independent Prognostic Significance in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2004; 22(23): 4700 - 4710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Ruel, T. A. Khan, P. Voisine, C. Bianchi, and F. W. Sellke
Vasomotor dysfunction after cardiac surgery
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2004; 26(5): 1002 - 1014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Voisine, M. Ruel, T. A. Khan, C. Bianchi, S.-H. Xu, I. Kohane, T. A. Libermann, H. Otu, A. R. Saltiel, and F. W. Sellke
Differences in Gene Expression Profiles of Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients Undergoing Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Cardioplegic Arrest
Circulation, September 14, 2004; 110(11_suppl_1): II-280 - II-286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Marc Ruel
Tanveer A. Khan
John R. Liddicoat
Pierre Voisine
Frank W. Sellke
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruel, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sellke, F. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruel, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sellke, F. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Myocardial protection


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS