JTCS Click here to go to SJM website.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Mehmet Bilgin
Yigit Akcali
Fahri Oguzkaya
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bilgin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Oguzkaya, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bilgin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Oguzkaya, F.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:1580-1583
© 2003 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


General thoracic surgery

Extrapleural regional versus systemic analgesia for relieving postthoracotomy pain: a clinical study of bupivacaine compared with metamizol

Mehmet Bilgin, MDa,*, Yigit Akcali, MDa, Fahri Oguzkaya, MDa

a Department of Thoracic Surgery, Erciyes University Medical Faculty, Kayseri, Turkey

Received for publication November 25, 2002; revisions received January 21, 2003; revisions received February 28, 2003; accepted for publication March 27, 2003.

* Address for reprints: Mehmet Bilgin, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Erciyes University Medical Faculty, 38039, Kayseri, Turkey
bilginm{at}erciyes.edu.tr


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
BACKGROUND: The effects of a local anesthetic delivered through a catheter inserted in the extrapleural region by a surgeon and an analgesic agent given systemically on pain after thoracotomy were assessed.

METHODS: The patients in group I (n = 25) had a catheter inserted between the parietal pleura and the endothoracic fascia by a surgeon, and 0.5% bupivacaine was given through this catheter. Another 25 patients (group II) had metamizol given intravenously. Respiratory function tests, arterial blood gases, range of shoulder motion, and postoperative pain were evaluated for each group. Bupivacaine and metamizol were given just before finishing the thoracotomy and then repeated every 4 hours for 3 days.

RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in arterial blood gases between the groups (P > .05). There were statistically significant differences in the respiratory function tests, range of shoulder motion, and visual analogue scale (P < .05) between the groups. Group I had fewer complications than group II. There was no mortality in either group.

CONCLUSIONS: Bupivacaine given through a catheter to the extrapleural region before finishing thoracotomy is substantially beneficial for the prevention of postoperative pain and reduction of postoperative complications.


Controlling pain after thoracotomy is important for patient comfort and the prevention of possible complications during the postoperative period. Pain after thoracotomy hinders deep breathing and effective cough in patients. Accordingly, lungs cannot expand and this leads to atelectasis and intrapulmonary shunting with complications.

The aim of this study was to assess the analgesic effects of a long-acting local anesthetic (0.5% bupivacaine) given through a catheter inserted in the paravertebral region extrapleurally before finishing thoracotomy versus a systemic analgesic agent (metamizol) and their effects on respiratory functions.


    Material and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This study was performed between January 1998 and December 2001. The patients in group I (n = 25) had a catheter inserted between the parietal pleura and the endothoracic fascia by a surgeon and 0.5% bupivacaine was given, adjusted according to the weight (0.1 mg/kg) and completed to 10 mL with saline, through this catheter. The other 25 patients (group II) had metamizol (1 g) given intravenously. There were 38 male patients and 12 female patients; their average age was 46.75 ± 13.56 years (range 21-70). The patients were randomly selected.

All these doses were repeated every 4 hours. The catheter was removed after 3 days and systemic analgesic, metamizol, was discontinued.

Forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and blood gases were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. Surgical procedures were performed by a standard thoracotomy (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Surgical procedures*

 
Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used for pain scoring. Patients were informed about the procedure before the operation and their consent was obtained. Pain intensity was assessed just after the patient woke up and then at hours 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 48, and 72. Samples for blood gas analyses were obtained at hours 1, 2, 24, 48, and 72. FVC and FEV1 values were measured at hours 24, 48, and 72 and on day 7.

Chest radiographs were obtained in the first 3 days in all patients to evaluate possible complications. Range of shoulder motion (ROM) was measured during the first 5 days.

Surgical technique
Before finishing the thoracotomy, a 16-gauge catheter needle was extended out of the thorax through the posterior axillary line in the eighth intercostal space. The catheter was passed through the needle and after moving it into the thorax, the needle was removed. A small hole was opened on the parietal pleura in the paravertebral region through the third intercostal space. Through this hole an extrapleural tunnel was opened to the eighth intercostal space by sterilized biopsy forceps of flexible bronchoscope. The catheter tip was pulled upward with biopsy forceps. The proximal and distal holes in the parietal pleura were deeply closed with 3-0 absorbable sutures to prevent external drug leaks (Figure 1).



View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. The schematic illustration of paravertebral catheter insertion.

 
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were made by using Student t test (FVC, FEV1, ROM, and blood gases), Mann-Whitney U test (pain intensity at rest and when coughing), and significance test for the difference between the 2 percentages (age). A P value less than .05 was considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in age and sex (P > .05). There was no statistical significant difference in respiratory functions between both groups preoperatively (P > .05). A decrease in FVC and FEV1 values was found in both groups when compared to the preoperative values. On the first day when the mean FVC and FEV1 values were compared with the preoperative values, in group I FVC was 54% and FEV1 was 55% and in group II, FVC was 42% and FEV1 was 38% of the preoperative values. In both groups, FVC and FEV1 values gradually increased in subsequent days. On day 7 postoperatively, group I had 86% and 90% and group II recovered to 70% and 58%, respectively, compared with the preoperative values (P < .05; Table 2). Improvement in postoperative respiratory functions was more rapid in the paravertebral analgesia group when compared with the systemic analgesia group.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. FVC (mL) and FEV (mL) values on postoperative day 1, 2, 3, and 7

 
A statistically significant decrease was observed in these values between the groups for VAS. Pain levels were statistically significant in both groups (P < .05; Table 3). In the paravertebral analgesia group the postoperative pain was less than the systemic analgesia group during either the rest or coughing.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. The mean pain scores of the patients at rest and when coughing according to VAS during the first 72 hours

 
When the patients were asked for abduction until the pain occurred during the postoperative 5 days, the degree of abduction angle (range of motion) was found to be significantly higher in the paravertebral analgesia group (P < .05; Table 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. The mean range of shoulder motion in postoperative 5 days

 
There was no statistically significant difference in arterial blood gases between the 2 groups (P > .05).

In group II 3 patients developed atelectasis, 1 patient had atrial fibrillation, and 4 patients had pneumothorax with a ratio of 15% to 20%. One of the patients who had atelectasis required bronchoscopy and intensive physical therapy. In group I 1 patient had hypotension accompanied by bradycardia after the first dose of bupivacaine. No other complications occurred because of the bupivacaine infusion through paravertebral catheter.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Effective analgesia and blockade of perioperative stress response may improve the outcome and accelerate recovery after thoracic surgery.1 The earliest change in respiratory mechanics during the postoperative period is the decrease in FEV1 and FVC. These changes may be seen before any change in functional residual capacity is observed. Decreased functional residual capacity and alveolar collapse during anesthesia may be further impaired by restrictive ventilation caused by postoperative pain and abnormal respiration pattern.2 When airways are obstructed or atelectasis develops, air flow to this region is impaired. Secretions accumulate and a focus for infections may occur. There is a positive correlation between postoperative pulmonary complications and respiratory function tests.3 Systemic analgesics may be used for pain after thoracotomy.

Currently, epidural anesthesia is the gold standard for postoperative pain management in thoracic surgery but hypotension, muscle weakness, and urinary retention are unwanted effects following epidural blockade.4

Intercostal nerve blocks can be performed either intraoperatively or postoperatively. They provide good relief lasting 6 to 12 hours and need to be repeated.1 An alternate route is the administration of local anesthetic through an intrapleural catheter. This is done by placing a catheter between the parietal and visceral pleura and running the infusion either intermittently or continuously. One of the problems is the loss of local anesthetic solution through the chest tubes; these tubes need to be clamped intermittently for this technique to be effective.1 It is not safe to clamp chest tubes, which provide drainage of hemorrhage and air and lung patency for expansion, during the postoperative period. Also, there are some reports suggesting that interpleural practices are not safe.5

In our study the dose of bupivacaine was less than toxic limits. Patients received a mean daily dose of 38.3 mg bupivacaine, and no systemic side effects were observed except in 1 patient who developed bradycardia and hypotension, which spontaneously resolved within 15 minutes. In the literature no toxicity was found when doses approximately 10-fold higher than ours (360 mg) were administered.6 In the studies where bupivacaine was administered by an interpleural catheter, it was suggested that toxicity resulted from the systemic absorption of bupivacaine because of the rich vascularity of pleura.7 When blood levels exceed 2.0 to 4.0 µg/mg, toxic effects involving the central nervous system and cardiovascular system may occur.7 Dry mouth, reversible myosis caused by stellate ganglion blockade, and ptosis have been reported.8 Many studies have shown that bupivacaine is fairly effective, with no associated toxicity.3,6,8,9

VAS is one of the most reliable methods used for evaluating pain levels.10 As patients were informed about rating their pain levels in the preoperative period, VAS could easily be used. Administering anesthetic agent during the operation in group I patients provided early pain control and reduced despair and nervousness, which is important for pain control.

Local anesthetics will block the volley of nerve impulses in the unmyelinated C fibers and prevent prolonged widespread increase in the spinal cord dorsal horn. This is known as "windup" phenomenon or central sensitization. Even large doses of opioids alone will not be able to prevent this phenomenon or, once it is established, they will not be able to counteract it effectively.1 Early pain control avoids the windup phenomenon and central sensitization.1 Pain relief provided by inserting a catheter in the extrapleural region seems to be more effective compared with metamizol. The pulmonary complications resulted from the lack of effective coughing due to the pain in group II patients.

Another cause of pain after thoracotomy is the organs innervated by sympathetic nerves and visceral pleura.3 The insertion of the catheter next to the sympathetic nerves reduces these types of pain and avoids an arrhythmic pattern observed in the postoperative period due to sympathetic activation. In this study 1 patient in group I had bradycardia, which resolved spontaneously in 15 minutes.

Many factors are involved in the occurrence of the restriction in lungs following thoracotomy. Changes in pulmonary functions result from lung resection, atelectasis, and volume loss due to pneumothorax and also inspiratory muscle dysfunction.6 We had a similar observation in terms of a decrease in FVC and FEV1 values during the postoperative period in both groups. Studies assessing the effects of pain following thoracotomy have shown substantial improvements in postoperative pulmonary functions after intercostal blockade.1

The mechanism of action of extrapleural regional anesthesia depends primarily on diffusion of the analgesic agent into the paravertebral region.11 Local anesthetic agents affect not only ventral nerve roots but also afferent fibers of posterior primary ramus. Posterior ligaments of posterior primary ramus innervate posterior spinal muscles and skin. These ligaments were traumatized during the posterolateral thoracotomy.12 The procedure involving intermittent administration of anesthetic agent to this region through a catheter inserted in extrapleural region creates an anesthetic region in the skin due to the blockade of this region by the anesthetic agent. The depth and width of this anesthetic region depend on diffusion of the agent in the extrapleural region. This finding is one of the method’s objective criteria for providing pain relief after thoracotomy.

Pain relief during the postoperative period may reduce postoperative complications with early ambulation of patients. The painless arm abduction and the elevation degree were greater in group I compared with group II patients. This observation explains the lack of complications in group I; it also resulted in an increase in the patients’ self-confidence because of the fact that they carried their own chest drainage tubes themselves.

This study shows that regional anesthesia provided by a long-acting local anesthetic bupivacaine through a catheter surgically inserted into extrapleural region is effective in postoperative pain control. This safe, cheap, and effective method shows a decrease in possible lung complications and exerts a positive effect on respiratory functions following thoracotomy.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Peetters-Asdourian C, Gupta S. Choices in pain management following thoracotomy. Chest. 1999;115:122S–124S[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Craig DB. Postoperative recovery of pulmonary function. Anesth Analg. 1981;60:46–52[Free Full Text]
  3. Everett JM, Sabanathan S, Mearns AJ, et al. Continuous extrapleural intercostal nerve block after pleurectomy. Thorax. 1991;46:21–24[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Wurnig PN, Lackner H, Teiner C, et al. Is intercostal block for pain management in thoracic surgery more successful than epidural anesthesia? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;21:1115–1119[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Rosenberg PH, Barbro MAS, Scheinen MA, et al. Continuous infusion of bupivacaine for analgesia after thoracotomy. Anaesthesiology. 1987;76:811–813
  6. Deneuville M, Bisserier A, Regnard JF, et al. Continuous intercostal analgesia with 0.5% bupivacainee after thoracotomy. A randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;55:381–385[Abstract]
  7. Tobies JD, Martin LD, Oakes L, et al. Postoperative analgesia following thoracotomy in children: intrapleural catheters. J Pediatr Surg. 1993;28:1466–1470[Medline]
  8. McIlvaine WB, Chang JHT, Jones M. The effective use of intrapleural bupivacaine for analgesia after thoracic and subcostal incision in children. J Pediatr Surg. 1998;23:1184–1187
  9. Sabanathan S, Smith PJ, Pradhan GN, et al. Continuous intercostal nerve block for pain relief after thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;46:425–426
  10. Takamori S, Yoshida S, Hayashi A, et al. Intraoperative intercostal nerve blockade for postthoracotomy pain. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:338–341[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Eng J, Sabanathan S. Site of action of continuous extrapleural intercostals nerve block. Ann Thorac Surg. 1991;51:387–389[Abstract]
  12. D’Amours RH, Riegler FX, Little AG. Pathogenesis and management of persistent postthoracotomy pain. Chest Surg Clin N Am. 1998;8:703–722[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. Kotze, A. Scally, and S. Howell
Efficacy and safety of different techniques of paravertebral block for analgesia after thoracotomy: a systematic review and metaregression
Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2009; 103(5): 626 - 636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. P. Joshi, F. Bonnet, R. Shah, R. C. Wilkinson, F. Camu, B. Fischer, E. A. M. Neugebauer, N. Rawal, S. A. Schug, C. Simanski, et al.
A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials Evaluating Regional Techniques for Postthoracotomy Analgesia
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2008; 107(3): 1026 - 1040.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
F. C. Detterbeck
Efficacy of Methods of Intercostal Nerve Blockade for Pain Relief After Thoracotomy
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2005; 80(4): 1550 - 1559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
E. Marret, B. Bazelly, G. Taylor, N. Lembert, A. Deleuze, J.-X. Mazoit, and F. J. Bonnet
Paravertebral Block With Ropivacaine 0.5% Versus Systemic Analgesia for Pain Relief After Thoracotomy
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2005; 79(6): 2109 - 2113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Mehmet Bilgin
Yigit Akcali
Fahri Oguzkaya
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bilgin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Oguzkaya, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bilgin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Oguzkaya, F.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS