|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:2058-2064
© 2003 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Cardiothoracic transplantation |
a University Department of Surgery, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom
Presented in part to the European Society of Organ Transplantation, Lisbon, Portugal, October 2001.
Received for publication November 5, 2002; revisions received January 22, 2003; accepted for publication March 11, 2003.
* Address for reprints: Mr Gavin J. Murphy, Specialist Registrar, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Marlborough St, Bristol, United Kingdom
gavinmurphy{at}hotmail.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: Lewis recipients of Fisher 344 rat thoracic to abdominal aorta transplants were administered rapamycin starting at 8, 12, and 16 weeks posttransplant or no treatment. Six grafts in each group were harvested at 24 weeks. Vascular remodeling and collagen accumulation (Sirius red) were measured by computerized histomorphometry of aortic sections. mRNA was extracted from frozen tissue, and the expression of fibrosis-associated genes was studied by means of semiquantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction.
RESULTS: Rapamycin had no effect on the progression of early or established allograft vasculopathy with regard to intimal thickening, remodeling, extracellular matrix accumulation, or profibrotic gene expression, regardless of the time commenced.
CONCLUSION: The attenuation of the fibroproliferative response in rodents by rapamycin is not seen if the onset of rapamycin therapy is delayed.
| Experimental design and methodology |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals were kept in a controlled environment with unlimited access to feed and water. Graft harvest was performed in heavily anesthetized rats, after which the animal was allowed to die by exsanguination.
Drugs
Rapamycin (Sirolimus; Wyeth-Ayerst, Princeton, NJ) was prepared twice weekly as a working solution of 5 mg/mL in distilled water. Solutions were stored at 4°C and protected from ultraviolet light exposure. Drugs were administered orally by gavage.
Experimental groups
All experiments were performed on F344 to LEW allografts, which received cyclosporine (Neoral; Novartis, East Hanover, NJ) 5 mg · kg · day for the first 14 days only to attenuate early acute rejection and induce tolerance. This was followed by a period without immunosuppression. They were then started on rapamycin 0.5 mg · kg · day at the following times posttransplantation: group 1, 8 weeks; group 2, 12 weeks; group 3, 16 weeks; and group 4, no rapamycin.
These time points correspond to macrophage and lymphocyte infiltration and expansive remodeling (8 weeks), early neointimal development and expansive remodeling (12 weeks), and neointimal thickening and almost complete and expansive remodeling (16 weeks) (Figure 1). Six rats in each group were killed at 24 weeks. Rapamycin at 0.5 mg · kg · day has been shown to completely inhibit the development of allograft vasculopathy in this model when administered from the time of transplantation.8
|
Histologic analysis
Segments of the aortic graft were embedded in paraffin wax, and multiple sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin. The level of inflammatory infiltrate was assessed semiquantitatively and categorized as follows: none (no inflammatory cells visualized), mild (endothelialitis, inflammatory cell localized to the endothelium), moderate (dense inflammatory cell infiltrate in the innermost layer of the vessel wall), or severe (dense inflammatory cell infiltrate throughout all layers of the vessel wall).
The vessel circumference and area fraction of the intima and media were quantified using a computer image analysis system. The intima was defined as the area between the endothelium and the internal elastic lamina, and the media was defined as the area between the internal and external elastic laminas. Paraffin-embedded sections were also stained with Sirius red, and the level of ECM staining was quantified using computerized histomorphometry as described previously.11
Substances assessed
To take into account all the factors that influence smooth muscle cell proliferation, migration, and deposition of ECM during neointima formation, the following species were studied with RT-PCR: matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)2, MMP9, transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1, and collagen III.
Analysis of results
The levels of gene expression and histomorphometric measurements of intimal thickening expressed as the intimal media ratio, vascular remodeling expressed as vessel circumference (of the internal elastic lamina), and collagen accumulation expressed as a product of the percentage mean media Sirius red staining and the medial area were compared using nonparametric statistical analysis. Comparisons of the level of inflammatory infiltrate were performed using Pearson's chi-square test. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Version 8.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The rapamycin dose used was smaller than in other studies in which rapamycin was shown to inhibit established (3 mg · kg · day intraperitoneally [IP]) or de novo CAD (0.5-6 mg · kg · day IP) in rat allografts.5,12-15 Rapamycin at the 0.5 mg · kg · day oral dose equates to a serum trough level of approximately 1 ng/mL in LEW rats.16 This dose has been shown in previous studies to significantly prolong rat renal and cardiac allograft survival in the high-responder Brown Norway (BN) to LEW model16 and to significantly inhibit the allograft inflammatory infiltrate, intimal hyperplasia, and vessel remodeling in the F344 to LEW model.8 However, these serum levels do not correlate with suggested therapeutic range levels in humans (5-15 ng/mL)17. Higher oral doses of rapamycin are poorly tolerated by rats, with significant weight loss reported at doses greater than 0.8 mg · kg · day.16 It is possible that the rats may have increased their clearance of the drug over time, and that this study may have benefited from serum rapamycin levels on the day of cull. There was no significant inhibition of MMP9 (a correlate of the severity of the inflammatory infiltrate in this model)18 in rapamycin-treated versus untreated allografts, however, semiquantitative assessment of the inflammatory infiltrate indicated attenuation of the inflammatory response to the treated allografts. This suggests that increased clearance of rapamycin has not occurred. Other criticisms relate to the use of a high-responder model in the analysis of factors affecting the development of CAD,12 because the intense cellular immune response tends to obscure the contribution of other important etiologic mechanisms.
In 1991, Meiser and colleagues13 reported that rapamycin at 1.5 mg · kg · day inhibited CAD in de novo heterotopic rat cardiac allografts in a high-responder BN to LEW model. BN and LEW rats are mismatched at major human leukocyte antigen loci (RT-1n versus RT-11), and the development of CAD in this model occurs in association with an intense cell-mediated response with intimal thickening occurring predominantly between 30 and 40 days. Morris and colleagues5 reported similar findings with femoral artery allografts in the same high-responder combination. In this latter study, the importance of inhibiting the early cellular response was underscored by the diminished efficacy of rapamycin if administration was delayed. Delaying onset of rapamycin treatment by 14, 21, or 30 days inhibited the progression of CAD only at large doses (3 mg · kg · day IP at 14 and 21 days and 6 mg · kg · day IP at 30 days) and was of marginal statistical significance only at this later time point (28% vs 49%, P = .03).5 This study did not, however, consider the effect of rapamycin once intimal hyperplasia had become established as in the current study. Poston and colleagues12 subsequently demonstrated reversal of established allograft vasculopathy in the low-responder Piebald-virol-glaxo to August Copenhagen Irish rat cardiac allograft model, which develops significant intimal thickening between 30 and 90 days posttransplantation. Rapamycin (3 mg · kg · day IP) significantly reversed intimal thickening when administered between 60 and 90 days.12 Significant weight loss was noted in these animals; therefore it is questionable whether the observed effect was because of a direct effect of rapamycin on the fibroproliferative response or simply a result of drug toxicity.
There are few studies that have demonstrated any regression of CAD once it is established. In the weakly immunogenic Wistar Furth to LEW model, retransplantation to the donor strain up to 40 days reversed the inflammatory infiltrate and prevented the development of CAD.19 In high-responder models, however, retransplantation was seen to reduce but not prevent the development of CAD. Moreover, in these stronger models retransplantation after a critical period reversed the associated cellular infiltrate, whereas the intimal proliferation not only did not diminish but continued to worsen.20-22
F344 to LEW rat renal allografts retransplanted to the F344 strain showed reversal of the process up to a certain time interval (12 weeks) after which structural changes, particularly fibrosis, not only did not diminish but continued to worsen.23 In the same rat strain combination, retransplantation of cardiac allografts to the donor strain was seen to reduce levels of mononuclear infiltration but not levels of myointimal proliferation.14 These findings indicate that progressive organ injury (ie, the fibroproliferative response) beyond a certain point may become autonomous and alloantigen independent. Of equal importance is the indication that the initial insults, whether alloantigen dependent or independent, occurring at an early stage posttransplant are crucial in the later development of CAD. This study demonstrates that in F344 to LEW allografts, rapamycin does not seem to affect the fibroproliferative response after 8 weeks. This may be attributable to inadequate immunosuppression in a high-responder model (as indicated by persistently elevated MMP9 mRNA levels in allografts); however, it may also be attributable to a failure of rapamycin to inhibit later stages of the fibroproliferative response. This latter suggestion is supported by the elevated MMP2 and TGF levels in allografts at 24 weeks. In a randomized clinical trial in renal transplant recipients with biopsy-proven CAD,24 cyclosporine dose reduction and the administration of rapamycin did not prevent the progressive decline in renal function. These findings present clinical and experimental evidence that rapamycin does not attenuate the fibroproliferative response in allografts once it is established.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T J Williams and J W Wilson Challenges in pulmonary fibrosis: 7 {middle dot} Novel therapies and lung transplantation Thorax, March 1, 2008; 63(3): 277 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |