JTCS KCI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
G. Phillip Schoettle, Jr
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schoettle, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schoettle, G. P., Jr
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:269-270
© 2004 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Brief communication

Use of a proximal anastomotic device in coronary artery bypass surgery: A word of caution

G. Phillip Schoettle, Jr, MDa,*

a Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Tennessee, Methodist University Hospital, Memphis, Tenn, USA

Received for publication June 4, 2003; accepted for publication July 14, 2003.

* Address for reprints: G. Phillip Schoettle, Jr, MD, Clinical Associate Professor of Surgery, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Methodist University Hospital, 1325 Eastmoreland, Suite 220, Memphis, TN 38104, USA

Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) today are older and have increased comorbidities than those a decade ago.1 In an effort to maintain favorable morbidity and mortality data, many cardiac surgeons have begun to perform CABG with less invasive techniques. Avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass and minimizing aortic manipulation with sutureless aortic connectors are two ways to potentially achieve this goal.2,3 A review of patients with the Symmetry aortic connector (St Jude Medical, Inc, Minneapolis, Minn), however, has shown a high percentage of early graft occlusions.

Clinical summary

I report a retrospective review of two patient groups undergoing CABG. In group A, 323 patients underwent surgery from October 2000 through September 2001. In group B, 305 patients underwent surgery from October 2001 through September 2002. All operations were performed by the same surgeon, and 95% of all procedures in both groups were done without cardiopulmonary bypass.

Group A patients had the proximal vein–aorta anastomoses done in the usual fashion with a partial occlusion clamp on the aorta and hand-sewn grafts. The patients in group B received saphenous vein–aorta connections with the St Jude Symmetry device with no aortic clamping. All patients had operative graft patency confirmed with the use of the Medistem transit time flow probe (Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, Minn). Patients in both groups received continuous postoperative aspirin and received clopidogrel daily for 2 months.

After institutional review board approval was obtained, a catheterization laboratory database was used to determine which patients had undergone repeat cardiac catheterization after the CABG procedure. End points of reoperative CABG and death were reported as observed. The decision to perform repeat cardiac catheterization was made by each patient's cardiologist and most commonly was based on a clinical suspicion of recurrent ischemia.

To date, 40 patients in group A have undergone repeated cardiac catheterization, and of 71 venous grafts studied, 61 were widely patent. Forty-five patients in group B have undergone repeated cardiac catheterization, and of 88 venous grafts studied, 39 were totally occluded. Seventeen had 90% or greater stenosis, and 15 had 50% or greater stenosis (Table 1). These stenoses uniformly occurred at the connector site. Among the patients studied, this represented an 80% rate of occlusion or stenosis with the proximal venous graft connectors.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Comparison of results between patients with (group B) and without (group A) connectors

 
Five patients in group B have required early reoperative CABG, and 30 patients have required percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and stenting to relieve the consequences of venous graft occlusion or stenosis. No patients in group A have required reoperative CABG, and only 6 have had PTCA and stenting, primarily for ungrafted or ungraftable vessels. Four patients in group B have had sudden death, all remote from the original bypass procedure. One patient had documented acute myocardial infarction 6 months after CABG during salvage femoral-popliteal grafting and was unable to be resuscitated. No patient in group A is known to have had postoperative sudden death.

Discussion

During the past decade many cardiac surgeons have adopted new technology in attempts to make CABG less invasive. The Symmetry aortic connector is primarily used to minimize trauma to the aorta from clamping. Potential benefits include a decreased incidence of stroke from aortic embolization and prevention of aortic dissection from the partial occlusion clamp. Other possible benefits are a technically superior proximal anastomosis and rapidity of use with decreased operative time.

After Food and Drug Administration approval in 1998 and training by St Jude Medical in its use (September 2001) I exclusively incorporated the proximal anastomotic device into my CABG practice. After 12 months, it was apparent that the incidence of saphenous vein occlusion or stenosis associated with the proximal connector was not compatible with my previous off-pump CABG experience. The large number of aortic venous graft connector stenoses or occlusions seen in group B have required multiple interventions—either PTCA and stenting, reoperative CABG, or aggressive medical therapy in patients not amenable to repeated intervention. The patients in group A, although subjected to a longer period of observation, have not had an unexpected number of venous graft occlusions, nor have they required the large number of interventions needed by those in group B.

The 4 sudden deaths among the patients with connector use and the documented venous graft occlusions or stenoses leading to early reoperative CABG are cause for concern. I also note that the patients who require PTCA and stents to relieve proximal connector venous graft stenosis are likely subject to the restenosis rate inherent in stented vessels.

The proximal connector device is appealing for the reasons mentioned previously. For facilitated anastomoses to justify the expense and replace traditional hand-sewn grafts, however, they must have equal or better short- and long-term patencies. Despite potential benefits of sutureless aortic connections, this patient review demonstrates unacceptable saphenous venous graft stenosis and occlusion with the use of the Symmetry aortic connector.

References

  1. Ferguson TB, Hammill BG, Peterson ED, DeLong ER, Grover FLSociety of Thoracic Surgeons. A decade of change—risk profiles and outcomes for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures, 1990-1999: a report from the STS National Database Committee and the Duke Clinical Research Institute. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:480–490[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Mack M, Bachand D, Acuff T, Edgerton J, Prince S, Dewey T, et al. Improved outcomes in coronary artery bypass grafting with beating-heart techniques. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;124:598–607[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Eckstein FS, Bonilla LF, Englerger L, Berg TA, Schmidli J, Carrel TP. The St Jude Medical symmetry aortic connector system for proximal vein graft anastomoses in coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123:777–782[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. Demertzis, R. Trunfio, F. Faletra, R. Wyttenbach, and F. Siclari
Sutureless Proximal Anastomosis Using the PAS-Port System: Six-Month Patency and Five-Year Follow-Up in "All-Comers"
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2010; 90(5): 1507 - 1513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. Vicol, S. Eifert, M. Oberhoffer, P. Boekstegers, and B. Reichart
Mid-term patency after magnetic coupling for distal bypass anastomosis in coronary surgery.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2006; 82(4): 1452 - 1456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. G. Kachhy, D. F. Kong, E. Honeycutt, L. K. Shaw, and R. D. Davis
Long-Term Outcomes of the Symmetry Vein Graft Anastomosis Device: A Matched Case-Control Analysis
Circulation, July 4, 2006; 114(1_suppl): I-425 - I-429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
G. Phillip Schoettle, Jr
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schoettle, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schoettle, G. P., Jr
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS