|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:1670-1677
© 2004 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Surgery for congenital heart disease |
a Department of Anesthesiology, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
b Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
c Department of Surgery, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
d Division of Biostatistics, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
e Department of Hematology Research, Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn, USA
Received for publication June 24, 2003; revisions received September 26, 2003; accepted for publication October 7, 2003.
* Address for reprints: William C. Oliver, Jr, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
oliver.william{at}mayo.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: Thirty patients less than 16 years of age scheduled for cardiac surgery with aprotinin were enrolled. Aprotinin was administered as a 25,000 KIU/kg bolus, 35,000 KIU/kg cardiopulmonary bypass prime, and 12,500 KIU · kg1 · h1 continuous infusion. Blood samples for aprotinin concentrations (kallikrein-inhibiting units/milliliter) were obtained before aprotinin; 5 minutes post-bolus; 5 minutes after cardiopulmonary bypass initiation; 30 and 60 minutes on cardiopulmonary bypass; on discontinuation of aprotinin; 1 hour after aprotinin discontinuation; and 4 hours after permanent separation from cardiopulmonary bypass. For analysis, patients were grouped according to weight (<10 kg, 10-20 kg, >20 kg). Differences between weight groups were assessed using an exact test for categoric variables and 1-way analysis of variance for continuous variables.
RESULTS: Aprotinin concentrations differed significantly across weight groups. Five minutes after aprotinin bolus and initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass, there was significant correlation between weight and aprotinin concentration (r = .57, P = .003; r = .69, P = .001, respectively).
CONCLUSION: A functional assay reveals significant variability in aprotinin concentration for pediatric patients using current weight-based aprotinin dosing. Additional investigation is necessary to determine target aprotinin concentration dosing regimens to provide better efficacy.
Options for blood conservation are limited for infants and children. Pharmacologic blood conservation measures, such as antifibrinolytic agents, are popular because of the ease of administration and availability. Aprotinin, a serine protease inhibitor with anti-inflammatory and antifibrinolytic properties, significantly reduces bleeding and transfusion requirements in adults who undergo CPB,6 but it is of indeterminate value for pediatric patients.4,7-9 Possible explanations include study design, empiric transfusion practices, and a wide range of aprotinin dosing regimens used as indicated in Table 1. 5,7,9-12 More specifically, aprotinin dosing regimens13 that do not achieve "target" aprotinin concentrations14 believed necessary to inhibit plasmin activity and fibrinolysis may be responsible for little or no hemostatic benefit in some pediatric patients. Aprotinin dosage for pediatric patients undergoing CPB has been extrapolated from dosing regimens used for adults that have not always proven efficacious.10,13 The paucity of proven aprotinin dosing regimens in adults and pediatric patients are partially related to the difficulty of determining aprotinin concentrations to validate and modify previous or current recommendations. Because severe allergic reaction, thrombosis, and renal dysfunction may occur with aprotinin, its use may be unwarranted in certain high-risk infants and children until efficacy is better established.
|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Anesthesia consisted of moderate-dose fentanyl (25-50 µg/kg) supplemented with midazolam, muscle relaxant, and volatile agent. Standard monitoring for patients undergoing cardiac surgery was used and included continuous arterial and central venous pressure monitoring. Fluid administration was minimized before the initiation of CPB. Anticoagulation was achieved with porcine heparin (Elkins-Sinn Inc, Cherry Hill, NJ) administered in an initial dose of 300 U/kg and followed by additional doses to maintain a celite activated clotting time (ACT) of more than 750 seconds (Hemochron 800, International Technidyne Co, Edison, NJ).
The extracorporeal circuit included a membrane oxygenator (SCI-Med, Minneapolis, Minn). The circuit was primed with Plasmalyte, calcium chloride, sodium bicarbonate 8.5%, mannitol 12.5%, and 250 mL of albumin 5%. If circulatory arrest or profound hypothermia was anticipated, washed packed red blood cells (PRBCs) were added to the priming volume to achieve a hematocrit (HCT) ranging from 18% to 23% on initiation of CPB. If the temperature was to remain greater than 32°C, the HCT was kept at more than 25%. Nonpulsatile flow during CPB was maintained at 2.2 L · min1 · m2. A nasopharyngeal temperature probe was used for temperature monitoring. If circulatory arrest was used, 5 mg/kg of thiopental, 0.5 g/kg of mannitol 12.5%, and 0.5 mg/kg of dexamethasone were given immediately before perfusion was interrupted. On rewarming, the HCT was maintained at 21% to 25%. Modified ultrafiltration (MUF) was performed for 15 minutes after separation from CPB in patients weighing less than 20 kg. Patients were enclosed with appropriate full body forced-air cover (Augustine Medical, Inc, Eden Prairie, Minn) to maintain the temperature during MUF. After MUF or separation from CPB, protamine, 0.013 mg/U of heparin, was given to neutralize heparin. Heparin was considered adequately neutralized if the ACT was within 10% of the pre-heparin baseline ACT value after protamine. Excessive blood in the CPB circuit was returned to the patient or processed as intraoperative autologous blood (IAB) with a Medtronic AT-1000 (Medtronic Inc, Parker, Colo) to an HCT of 55%. Shed mediastinal blood was not returned to the patient postoperatively. All surgical procedures were performed by one of the coauthors (F. J. P. or J. A. D.).
Allogeneic PRBCs were administered for a hemoglobin of 10 g/dL or less after separation from CPB. Non-red blood cellcontaining blood products were given in response to evidence of microvascular bleeding and these supporting laboratory studies: thromboelastogram, platelet count, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and fibrinogen concentration. In the intensive care unit (ICU), blood products were given for excessive mediastinal chest tube drainage and the previously mentioned supporting laboratory studies.
Aprotinin was infused through a dedicated central venous catheter. After a test dose, a 25,000 KIU/kg bolus, 35,000 KIU/kg prime, and 12,500 KIU · kg1 · h1 continuous infusion of aprotinin was administered. The infusion was discontinued 2 hours after the patient's arrival in the ICU. Participants had blood samples for plasma aprotinin concentrations (kallikrein-inhibiting units per milliliter) obtained at these time intervals: before aprotinin (baseline); 5 minutes after the bolus; 5 minutes after initiation of CPB; 30 and 60 minutes after initiation of CPB; on discontinuation of aprotinin; 1 hour after discontinuation of aprotinin; and 4 hours after permanent separation from CPB.
Each 800-µL sample for aprotinin concentration was drawn from an arterial catheter and placed in a tube with 100 µL of 3.8% sodium citrate. Samples were immediately placed on ice and separated into platelet-poor plasma and frozen at 70°C until batch testing to determine the plasma aprotinin concentration. The assay is based on the ability of aprotinin to inhibit plasmin activity as the target enzyme as recently demonstrated.15,16 Plasma samples were diluted 50-fold with 0.3 mol/L Tris-HCl, 0.15 mol/L NaCl, pH 7.3. Dilute plasma samples were incubated with 10 µL of 1 U/µL added porcine plasmin (Sigma P-8644, St Louis, Mo) for 30 minutes. Twenty microliters of 1 mmol/L benzoyl-Phe-Val-Arg-p-nitroanilide (Sigma B-7632) were added to the sample as a plasmin substrate, and the spectrophotometric absorbance at 405 to 490 nm was read for 10 minutes at 30-second intervals as an index of plasmin activity. We calculated the amount of aprotinin in the sample from a standard inhibition curve developed by adding known concentrations of aprotinin to pooled citrated normal human plasma (n = 30, all male). Because the concentration of aprotinin added to the normal plasma in our standard inhibition curve was measured in kallikrein-inhibiting units per milliliter, we reported aprotinin concentration in kallikrein-inhibiting units per milliliter. To measure aprotinin in the patient samples, we defined the preoperative sample in the assay set as having 100% (uninhibited) plasmin activity and all other time points as having a fraction of the zero time activity. Because the baseline sample contained 0 KIU/mL aprotinin, the calculated aprotinin concentration value of this sample was adjusted to zero, and an identical adjustment was made to all the sample values of that patient assayed on that day.
The mediastinal chest tube drainage was noted at 4 and 24 hours after arrival in the ICU for each patient. Variables recorded include patient's age, gender, height, weight, preoperative medications, heart defect, surgical procedure, anesthetic medications, total heparin and protamine given, total amount of aprotinin received, duration of CPB, aortic crossclamp and circulatory arrest, minimal temperature, total fluids and transfusion requirements for the intraoperative and initial 24-hour period in the ICU, duration of intubation, and ICU stay.
Statistical analysis
Because of staffing difficulties involving research personnel, 2 of the 30 patients who enrolled preoperatively were not treated according to protocol; consequently, only 28 patients are included in this report. For analysis purposes, patients were grouped according to weight (<10 kg, 10-20 kg, >20 kg). Differences between weight classifications were assessed using an exact test for categoric variables and 1-way analysis of variance for continuous variables. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to assess whether patient age or weight was significantly correlated with aprotinin concentration after the bolus or 5 minutes after initiation of CPB. In all cases, 2-sided tests were used, with P values
.05 considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Through application of our functional assay in patients less than 16 years of age undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB, large variations in aprotinin concentrations were identified at the 8 time periods examined with the current investigation. Previously, Dietrich and colleagues10 characterized plasma aprotinin concentrations only in infants with congenital heart disease undergoing CPB. Forty infants weighing less than 10 kg received either 30,000 KIU/kg or 60,000 KIU/kg of aprotinin intraoperatively as a bolus and pump prime without incorporating a continuous infusion. With similar sampling times in our investigation, peak aprotinin concentrations were only 99 ± 25 KIU/mL for the infants receiving the higher dose of aprotinin. These aprotinin concentrations are lower than the aprotinin concentrations found in patients weighing less than 10 kg in our study. Not surprisingly, the total amount of aprotinin and dosage of aprotinin in our infants weighing less than 10 kg (948,796 ± 266,108 KIU) is considerably higher than that found by Dietrich and colleagues10 (180,000 ± 81,000 KIU). The significance of aprotinin concentrations centers on the fact that in vitro plasma concentrations of aprotinin have been related to antifibrinolytic and anti-inflammatory activity at concentrations of 125 KIU/mL and 200 KIU/mL, respectively.14 Although others have reported the antifibrinolytic activity of aprotinin to occur at a concentration as low as 50 KIU/mL,18 it is certain that the anti-inflammatory activity associated with kallikrein inhibition occurs at a much higher plasma aprotinin concentration than antifibrinolysis. Notably, these "target" aprotinin concentrations are not consistently achieved with current aprotinin weight-based dosing regimens for infants and children.
Highly variable aprotinin concentrations have also recently been reported in adults receiving aprotinin for cardiac surgery requiring CPB.15,16 Beath and colleagues15 attributed fluctuations in aprotinin concentrations in their investigation in large part to the fixed amount of aprotinin administered in accordance with the popularized "Hammersmith" dose regimen.14 Consequently, the degree of variability in aprotinin concentration despite weight-based dosing in our pediatric subjects suggests other factors to explain it. Foremost, hemodilution is recognized as more pronounced in infants and smaller children than in adults because priming volumes may exceed the infant's blood volume by as much as 400%. Dietrich and colleagues10 also ascribed lower plasma aprotinin levels to the degree of hemodilution associated with infants undergoing CPB. In addition, the pharmacokinetics of infants and children vary greatly from adults because of greater volume of distributions and liver or renal immaturity.19 These 2 factors, hemodilution and pediatric pharmacokinetics, need to be considered in the formulation of an aprotinin dosing regimen for infants and children who require cardiac surgery and CPB.
In contrast with experiences of older children receiving aprotinin,8 studies in neonates and infants have been at variance regarding transfusion requirements and blood loss.7 Our study reveals a strong positive relationship between weight and aprotinin concentration before (Figure 2) and during (Figure 3) CPB. Accordingly, infants may not attain aprotinin concentrations believed to confer anti-inflammatory or even antifibrinolytic activity, accounting for some of the discrepancy between older and younger patients regarding benefit. However, no investigation has proven that a specific aprotinin concentration is associated with reduced transfusion and bleeding in patients undergoing CPB. Dietrich and colleagues10 correlated aprotinin concentration with fibrin monomer levels, revealing lower fibrin generation associated with a higher aprotinin concentration that was also associated with significantly lower 6-hour blood loss compared with patients who received lower dose aprotinin. This indicates improved results with achievement of higher blood concentrations of aprotinin.
Although our study was not powered to assess transfusion and blood loss between infants and children as a function of weight, overall there was a tendency for the infants weighing less than 10 kg to bleed more postoperatively. It has been demonstrated that infants weighing less than 8 kg and aged less than 1 month are more likely to bleed excessively than older and heavier children.1,20 Although red blood cell loss may be partially responsible for PRBC transfusions, significant differences in intraoperative allogeneic PRBCs identified in the study are likely the result of greater hemodilution that accompanies infants undergoing CPB. Beyond requiring more intraoperative PRBCs, patients weighing less than 10 kg experienced greater 24-hour mediastinal chest tube drainage than older patients in accordance with the results of Miller and colleagues20 and Williams and colleagues.1 Our study is unable to reach any definitive conclusions about the relationship between blood loss and transfusion and the marked variability of plasma aprotinin concentrations in this pediatric population, although it needs to be answered to fully assess future aprotinin dosing regimens.
Any attempt to develop recommendations for aprotinin regarding infants and children undergoing CPB should include attainment of "target" aprotinin concentrations for inhibition of fibrinolysis. Because of the marked systemic inflammatory response that occurs as a result of CPB in neonates and infants,21 inhibition of the inflammatory response and fibrinolysis may be crucial. Our data indicate that pediatric patients require dosing schedules that account for their weights in relation to the size of the CPB circuits and their pharmacokinetic differences. If the priming dose of aprotinin is administered on the basis of a subject's weight alone, as is currently the practice, aprotinin concentrations will be significantly less than concentrations believed necessary to inhibit fibrinolysis and the inflammatory response. As a result, we are developing a dosing regimen for aprotinin that compensates for the apparent discrepancy between the pediatric patient's blood volume and the priming volume used for CPB to achieve aprotinin concentrations in the range of 200 to 250 KIU/mL.
This study is limited in that we have determined plasma aprotinin concentrations in a very heterogeneous patient population with considerable pharmacokinetic variability that may have distorted the relationship of aprotinin concentrations and certain weight relationships. In addition, the number of patients weighing less than 10 kg was inadequate to develop strong conclusions about this population. Without statistical power to assess differences in blood loss or transfusion requirements in relation to aprotinin concentrations, we are unable to comment about the importance of attaining "target" aprotinin concentrations in this area. Finally, in contrast with our study, Dietrich and colleagues10 used a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as described by Muller-Esterl and colleagues22 rather than a functional assay for determination of plasma aprotinin concentration. The validity of our functional assay has been established in comparison with the ELISA-based aprotinin concentrations with excellent correlation (r2 = 0.94),15 but we did not perform any direct comparisons with the ELISA in this study to further validate the correlation of this functional assay. Recently, Cardigan and colleagues23 compared a functional aprotinin assay with ELISA in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The correlation between the 2 methods of measurement were excellent (r = .87), but the functional assay was significantly higher than the ELISA (234 ± 104 KIU/mL vs 155 ± 88 KIU/mL, respectively, P = .0001). This indicates that the results obtained with the different assays are not interchangeable. The benefit of one assay compared with another cannot be determined yet with regard to determining the most effective dosing regimen for aprotinin use in cardiac surgery and congenital heart repair.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T Okamura, N Ishibashi, Y Iwata, D Zurakowski, and R. Jonas Aprotinin concentration varies significantly according to cardiopulmonary bypass conditions Perfusion, November 1, 2008; 23(6): 355 - 360. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Eaton Antifibrinolytic Therapy in Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2008; 106(4): 1087 - 1100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. B. Mossad, S. Machado, and J. Apostolakis Bleeding following deep hypothermia and circulatory arrest in children. Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2007; 11(1): 34 - 46. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Jaggers and J. H. Lawson Coagulopathy and Inflammation in Neonatal Heart Surgery: Mechanisms and Strategies Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2006; 81(6): S2360 - S2366. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |