JTCS Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Yasir Abu-Omar
Lognathen Balacumaraswami
David P. Taggart
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abu-Omar, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Taggart, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abu-Omar, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Taggart, D. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cerebral protection

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:1759-1765
© 2004 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery


Cardiopulmonary support and physiology

Solid and gaseous cerebral microembolization during off-pump, on-pump, and open cardiac surgery procedures

Yasir Abu-Omar, MRCSa, Lognathen Balacumaraswami, FRCSa, David W. Pigott, FRCAa, Paul M. Matthews, MD, DPhil, FRCPb, David P. Taggart, MD, PhD, FRCSa,*

a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Oxford, United Kingdom
b Department for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom

Received for publication June 3, 2003; revisions received August 28, 2003; accepted for publication September 16, 2003.

* Address for reprints: David P. Taggart, MD, PhD, FRCS, Consultant Cardiothoracic Surgeon, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
david.taggart{at}orh.nhs.uk


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
BACKGROUND: Neurocognitive dysfunction remains a limitation of cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Intraoperative cerebral microembolization is believed to be one of the most important etiologic factors. Using a new generation of transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, we compared the number and nature of intraoperative microemboli in patients undergoing on-pump and off-pump cardiac surgery procedures.

METHODS: Bilateral continuous transcranial Doppler monitoring of the middle cerebral arteries was performed in 45 patients (15 off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, 15 on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, and 15 open cardiac procedures). All recordings were performed using a multi-range, multifrequency system to allow both measurement of the number and discrimination of the nature of microemboli in the 3 different groups.

RESULTS: The median number (interquartile range) of microemboli in the off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, and open procedure groups were 40 (28-80), 275 (199-472), and 860 (393-1321), respectively (P < .01). Twelve percent of microemboli in the off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting group were solid compared with 28% and 22% in the on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and open procedure groups, respectively (P < .05). In the on-pump groups, 24% of microemboli occurred during cardiopulmonary bypass, and 56% occurred during aortic manipulation (cannulation, decannulation, application, and removal of crossclamp or sideclamp).

CONCLUSIONS: Cerebral microembolization is significantly reduced with avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass. The majority of microemboli occurring during cardiac surgery are gaseous, with a higher proportion of solid microemboli in the on-pump group, and may have a different significance for cerebral injury than solid microemboli. The ability to reliably discriminate gas and solid microemboli may have an important role in the implementation of neuroprotective strategies.


Cerebral injury is a major cause of mortality and morbidity after cardiac surgery and occurs in 2 distinct forms. Overt injury, usually a stroke, occurs in 3% of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), whereas injury leading to cognitive impairment, only evident on detailed neuropsychologic testing,1-3 occurs in up to 80% of all patients soon after surgery and persists in one quarter of these at 6 months.4 Early postoperative cognitive impairment correlates with later progression of cognitive decline and impaired quality of life.5,6

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) can cause brain injury through several mechanisms, but microembolization is believed to be the most important. Pugsley and colleagues7 demonstrated that postoperative neuropsychologic deficits are related to the number of cerebral microemboli after routine CPB.

High-intensity transient signals (HITS), detected using transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography, result from an increase in the ultrasound signal reflected from the microemboli compared with the surrounding blood and can provide an index of microemboli entering the cerebral circulation. However, an increase in the ultrasound signal can also result from artifacts caused by movement. Until recently, it was not possible to differentiate objectively between artifacts and emboli or to discriminate between solid and gaseous microemboli. With the availability of a multifrequency TCD system (EmboDop; DWL Elektronische Systeme GmbH, Singen, Germany), online artifact rejection and automatic discrimination between solid and gaseous microemboli are now achievable with high sensitivity and specificity.8,9 This technique depends on insonating an embolus using 2 different frequencies. A solid embolus would reflect more ultrasound at the higher compared with the lower frequency, whereas the opposite occurs with gaseous microemboli. This study quantified the number and nature of intraoperative microemboli in patients undergoing various cardiac surgery procedures.


    Material and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
Patient groups
A total of 45 patients undergoing first-time cardiac surgery were prospectively recruited for the study. All patients gave informed consent, and full ethical approval was obtained from the local research ethics committee (Oxford Research Ethics Committee number C01.258). The patients were divided into 3 groups. Fifteen patients underwent off-pump CABG (OPCABG), 15 patients underwent on-pump CABG (ONCABG), and the remaining 15 patients underwent valve replacement with or without CABG: aortic valve replacement (12 patients), aortic valve replacement and CABG (2 patients), and mitral valve replacement and CABG (1 patient). Patients with symptomatic carotid disease or atrial fibrillation were excluded.

CPB
After full anticoagulation with heparin given at a dose of 300 IU/kg to maintain an activated clotting time of 400 to 600 seconds, CPB was instituted using ascending aortic cannulation and a 2-stage right atrial venous cannulation. A roller pump (Jostra HL 20, Hirrlingen, Germany) and hollow-fiber membrane oxygenator (Affinity NT; Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) were used. The extracorporeal circuit was primed with 1000 mL of Hartmann's solution and 2500 IU of heparin. CPB was maintained with nonpulsatile flow with a flow rate of 2.4 L/m2/min at normothermia with the temperature allowed to drift to 34°C. Arterial line filtration was not used. Cardiotomy suction was used. Acid-base was managed with alpha stat control. Myocardial protection was achieved with intermittent antegrade cold crystalloid cardioplegia. On completion of all distal anastomoses, the aortic crossclamp was removed, and the proximal anastomosis was performed with partial aortic clamping.

Off-pump technique
Complete anticoagulation with heparin was achieved as in the CPB group. Regional myocardial immobilization was achieved with a suction stabilizer (Octopus, Medtronic Inc or Guidant; Guidant Corporation, Santa Clara, Calif). The target coronary vessels were snared proximally with a silastic sling. An intracoronary shunt (Guidant Axius) was used only when there was hemodynamic compromise during construction of the anastomosis (usually the distal right coronary artery). Visualization was enhanced by using a surgical blower-mister device (Medtronic Clearview, Medtronic Inc). All patients had composite arterial grafts with complete avoidance of aortic manipulation.

TCD monitoring
Continuous intraoperative monitoring was performed using a multifrequency Doppler system (Embodop, DWL). Dual frequency probes (2.0 and 2.5 MHz) were used to simultaneously insonate the middle cerebral arteries (MCAs) bilaterally. The probes were fixed to the transtemporal windows above the right and left zygomatic arches using a specifically designed head brace. The MCA insonation depth was set between 45 and 55 mm with a sample volume of 13 mm. An additional 2.0 MHz insonation reference gate was set 15 mm superficial to the MCA insonation gate. This reference gate serves for the online rejection of artifacts because the latter are identified when HITS are detected in both gates (MCAs and reference gates) simultaneously or with a time delay of less than 4 milliseconds.

This multifrequency system (2.5 MHz and 2.0 MHz) also differentiates between solid and gaseous microemboli. Solid microemboli reflect more ultrasound at higher than at lower frequencies, contrary to what occurs in the case of gaseous microemboli. The differentiation occurs online during monitoring, and the data are recorded on a computer hard drive that also allows off-line analysis to be performed.

Statistical analysis
Patient characteristics are presented as mean ± SD. Normally distributed data were compared using the Student t test. Categoric variables were compared using the {chi}2 test. The number of HITS is presented as median and interquartile ranges. Because the data are not normally distributed, the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the difference in microembolization among the 3 groups.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Perioperative characteristics

 
Only around 10% of all HITS were microemboli, with the remaining 90% being rejected as artifacts. The median (interquartile range) number of microemboli was 40 (28-80) in the OPCABG group, 275 (199-472) in the ONCABG group, and 860 (393-1321) in the open procedure group (P < .01) (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Number and proportion of gaseous and solid microemboli detected in three patient groups

 
Solid microemboli accounted for 12% of all microemboli in the OPCABG group compared with 28% and 22% in the ONCABG and open procedure groups, respectively. The proportion of particulate microemboli was significantly higher in the on-pump groups compared with the OPCABG group (P < .05) (Table 2).

In the on-pump group, the largest proportion of microemboli occurred during aortic manipulation (cannulation, decannulation, and application and removal of crossclamp and sideclamp (Figure 1), accounting for 56% of the total, whereas 24% occurred during CPB (Table 3). The extent of gaseous and solid microembolization during the different stages of OPCABG, ONCABG, and open procedures is shown in Figures 2, 3, and 4.




View larger version (139K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1A. HITS seen after aortic crossclamp removal. The top and bottom traces represent the 2.0 and 2.5 MHz middle cerebral artery gates, respectively. The middle trace represents the 2.0 MHz reference gate. Figure 1B Rejection of artifacts and differentiation into gaseous and solid microemboli during off-line analysis.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Number and proportion of microemboli during different operative events in patients undergoing on-pump surgery

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Gaseous and solid microembolization during the course of OPCABG. LAD, Left anterior descending; OM, obtuse marginal; PDA, posterior descending artery.

 


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Gaseous and solid microembolization during the course of ONCABG. CPB, Cardiopulmonary bypass.

 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Gaseous and solid microembolization during the course of an open procedure. CPB, Cardiopulmonary bypass.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
Our study adds to the understanding of the pathophysiology of microemboli during cardiac surgery by using a new generation of TCD that automatically rejects artifacts and discriminates between gaseous and solid microemboli. Comparison of cerebral microembolization in on-pump versus off-pump procedures has been reported.10 However, this is the first report contrasting the nature of microemboli in ONCABG, OPCABG, and open procedures. In comparison with OPCABG, there is a 7-fold increase in microemboli in ONCABG and a 22-fold increase in open procedures. Furthermore, the proportion of solid microemboli was significantly reduced in the off-pump group.

Cerebral microemboli have been implicated in the pathogenesis of cognitive decline after CPB for more than a decade.7,11,12 Various reports have demonstrated a positive association between the number of intraoperative cerebral microemboli detected by TCD and postoperative neuropsychologic dysfunction. In addition, autopsy studies have reported large numbers of lipid microemboli in the brains of patients dying after cardiac surgery that correlated with the duration of CPB.13

A recent report demonstrated a significant reduction in the incidence of neuropsychologic impairment with avoidance of CPB.14 Our study demonstrates the remarkable reduction in the degree of microembolization, both gas and solid, during OPCABG. This may account for the difference in neuropsychologic impairment reported between patients undergoing on-pump and off-pump procedures.10,14 The clinical consequences, however, may be equally dependent on the nature and number of microemboli identified using TCD.

Particulate microemboli are generally assumed to be potentially the most damaging. Until recently, it was not possible to distinguish between gaseous and solid microemboli. We used a recently validated method9 to identify the variation in the degree and nature of microembolism during different cardiac surgery procedures. In addition, this technique allows automatic online rejection of artifacts, whereas previously the human observer was regarded as the "gold standard." Gaseous microemboli as small as 3 µm and solid microemboli of 80 µm in diameter can be reliably detected.9 The demonstration of the increase in particulate embolic load to the brain of patients undergoing CPB highlights the potential of the latter for causing cerebral injury, which is most likely to be evident in higher risk patients. The avoidance of CPB and aortic manipulation in the latter group has been shown to significantly reduce postoperative neurologic complications.15,16

What is the source of microemboli during OPCABG? Although microemboli can be detected in the cerebral circulation using TCD, the origin of these microemboli remains speculative. In the case of total arterial revascularization using composite arterial grafts (a "no-touch" aortic technique), a likely source of gaseous microemboli is air entering the coronary artery during arteriotomy and being returned to the left ventricle through the Thebesian veins. Another potential source of gas microemboli is through injections into central venous lines. Microemboli in the right side of the heart may then enter the systemic circulation by paradoxic embolism through a patent foramen ovale (present in up to 35% of the healthy population17) or after transpulmonary passage. These mechanisms may also explain why cerebral microembolization occurs during major non–cardiac surgery procedures, particularly during major orthopedic operations.18,19

Particulate microemboli may form within the heart, particularly the left atrial appendage and left ventricle. In on-pump cases, they can form within the bypass circuit if anticoagulation is inadequate. Cholesterol microemboli probably arise from the atherosclerotic aorta during manipulation,20 whereas use of the cardiotomy suction and denaturation of proteins may result in lipid microembolization during CPB.21 Furthermore, platelet and blood cell aggregation occurring during CPB may add to this microembolic load. Gaseous microemboli may enter the circulation during flushing and filling of coronary conduits, at initiation of CPB, through the bypass circuit after blood sampling and injection of drugs, and during cardiac ejection after open procedures.22 The increase in absolute numbers of gaseous microemboli during open procedures is consistent with transesophageal echocardiographic findings even after vigorous de-airing procedures.23 It must be noted, however, that differentiation and quantitation of HITS is difficult when a large number of microemboli pass through the sample volume simultaneously such as after removal of the aortic crossclamp or sideclamp.8 This, however, serves to underestimate the benefits of OPCABG in which there is a lack of such embolic showers entering the sample volume simultaneously.

Cerebral injury remains one of the most important causes of adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery. It particularly affects elderly patients and those with other comorbidities and is more common and severe after cardiac operations performed using CPB.14 As a progressively older and sicker population undergoes both cardiac and noncardiac surgery procedures, the scale of the problem is likely to increase. Indeed, we and others have documented that advanced age is the strongest predictor of postoperative neurocognitive impairment.3


    Conclusion
 Top
 Abstract
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
Cerebral embolization remains a problem during CPB. This can be minimized by performing off-pump surgery with avoidance of aortic manipulation. The ability to reliably discriminate the nature of cerebral microemboli has an important potential role in targeting various prevention strategies to improve neurologic outcome after cardiac operations, particularly de-airing after open procedures.


    Footnotes
 
This project was funded by the British Heart Foundation.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Material and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 

  1. Taggart DP, Browne SM, Halligan PW, Wade DT. Is cardiopulmonary bypass still the cause of cognitive dysfunction after cardiac operations? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;118:414–421[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Browne SM, Halligan PW, Wade DT, Taggart DP. Cognitive performance after cardiac operation: implications of regression toward the mean. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;117:481–485[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Taggart DP, Westaby S. Neurological and cognitive disorders after coronary artery bypass grafting. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2001;16:271–276[Medline]
  4. van Dijk D, Keizer AM, Diephuis JC, Durand C, Vos LJ, Hijman R. Neurocognitive dysfunction after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;120:632–639[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Newman MF, Kirchner JL, Phillips-Bute B, Gaver V, Grocott H, Jones RH, et al. Longitudinal assessment of neurocognitive function after coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:395–402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Newman MF, Grocott HP, Mathew JP, White WD, Landolfo K, Reves JG, et al. Report of the substudy assessing the impact of neurocognitive function on quality of life 5 years after cardiac surgery. Stroke. 2001;32:2874–2881[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Pugsley W, Klinger L, Paschalis C, Treasure T, Harrison M, Newman S. The impact of microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass on neuropsychological functioning. Stroke. 1994;25:1393–1399[Abstract]
  8. Brucher R, Russell D. Automatic online embolus detection and artifact rejection with the first multifrequency transcranial Doppler. Stroke. 2002;33:1969–1974[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Russell D, Brucher R. Online automatic discrimination between solid and gaseous cerebral microemboli with the first multifrequency transcranial Doppler. Stroke. 2002;33:1975–1980[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Diegeler A, Hirsch R, Schneider F, Schilling LO, Falk V, Rauch T, et al. Neuromonitoring and neurocognitive outcome in off-pump versus conventional coronary bypass operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:1162–1166[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Stump DA, Rogers AT, Hammon JW, Newman SP. Cerebral emboli and cognitive outcome after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1996;10:113–119[Medline]
  12. Sylivris S, Levi C, Matalanis G, Rosalion A, Buxton BF, Mitchell A, et al. Pattern and significance of cerebral microemboli during coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:1674–1678[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Brown WR, Moody DM, Challa VR, Stump DA, Hammon JW. Longer duration of cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with greater numbers of cerebral microemboli. Stroke. 2000;31:707–713[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Zamvar V, Williams D, Hall J, Payne N, Cann C, Young K, et al. Assessment of neurocognitive impairment after off-pump and on-pump techniques for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: prospective randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2002;325:1268[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Ricci M, Karamanoukian HL, Abraham R, Von Fricken K, D'Ancona G, Choi S, et al. Stroke in octogenarians undergoing coronary artery surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:1471–1475[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Kim KB, Kang CH, Chang WI, Lim C, Kim JH, Ham BM, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass with complete avoidance of aortic manipulation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:S1377–S1382[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Meacham RR 3rd, Headley AS, Bronze MS, Lewis JB, Rester MM. Impending paradoxical embolism. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:438–448[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Sulek CA, Davies LK, Enneking FK, Gearen PA, Lobato EB. Cerebral microembolism diagnosed by transcranial Doppler during total knee arthroplasty: correlation with transesophageal echocardiography. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:672–676[Medline]
  19. Edmonds CR, Barbut D, Hager D, Sharrock NE. Intraoperative cerebral arterial embolization during total hip arthroplasty. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:315–318[Medline]
  20. Barbut D, Hinton RB, Szatrowski TP, Hartman GS, Bruefach M, Williams-Russo P, et al. Cerebral emboli detected during bypass surgery are associated with clamp removal. Stroke. 1994;25:2398–2402[Abstract]
  21. Brooker RF, Brown WR, Moody DM, Hammon JW Jr, Reboussin DM, Deal DD, et al. Cardiotomy suction: a major source of brain lipid emboli during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;65:1651–1655[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Blauth CI. Macroemboli and microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;59:1300–1303[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Tingleff J, Joyce FS, Pettersson G. Intraoperative echocardiographic study of air embolism during cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60:673–677[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PerfusionHome page
P. Nielsen, J. Funder, M. Jensen, and H Nygaard
Influence of venous reservoir level on microbubbles in cardiopulmonary bypass
Perfusion, November 1, 2008; 23(6): 347 - 353.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
S. F. Marasco, L. N. Sharwood, and M. J. Abramson
No improvement in neurocognitive outcomes after off-pump versus on-pump coronary revascularisation: a meta-analysis
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2008; 33(6): 961 - 970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. Djaiani, M. Ali, M. A. Borger, A. Woo, J. Carroll, C. Feindel, L. Fedorko, J. Karski, and H. Rakowski
Epiaortic Scanning Modifies Planned Intraoperative Surgical Management But Not Cerebral Embolic Load During Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2008; 106(6): 1611 - 1618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
C. Hedges and N. S. Redeker
Comparison of Sleep and Mood in Patients After On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Am. J. Crit. Care., March 1, 2008; 17(2): 133 - 140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. Dittrich and E. B. Ringelstein
Occurrence and Clinical Impact of Microembolic Signals During or After Cardiosurgical Procedures
Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 503 - 511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
S. J. Durham and J. P. Gold
Late Complications of Cardiac Surgery
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 535 - 548.
[Full Text]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. Goto, T. Baba, A. Ito, K. Maekawa, and T. Koshiji
Gender Differences in Stroke Risk Among the Elderly After Coronary Artery Surgery
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2007; 104(5): 1016 - 1022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
F. Barili, L. Dainese, G. Polvani, and P. Biglioli
Multifactorial Bases of Stroke After Cardiac Surgery
Stroke, April 1, 2007; 38(4): 1140 - 1140.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
B. K. Lal
Cognitive Function After Carotid Artery Revascularization
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, February 1, 2007; 41(1): 5 - 13.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
L. G. Wolf, Y. Abu-Omar, B. P. Choudhary, D. Pigott, and D. P. Taggart
Gaseous and solid cerebral microembolization during proximal aortic anastomoses in off-pump coronary surgery: The effect of an aortic side-biting clamp and two clampless devices
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2007; 133(2): 485 - 493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
Y. Abu-Omar, S. Cader, L. G. Wolf, D. Pigott, P. M. Matthews, and D. P. Taggart
Short-term changes in cerebral activity in on-pump and off-pump cardiac surgery defined by functional magnetic resonance imaging and their relationship to microembolization.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2006; 132(5): 1119 - 1125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
K. Yoshitani, F. de Lange, Q. Ma, H. P. Grocott, and G. B. Mackensen
Reduction in Air Bubble Size Using Perfluorocarbons During Cardiopulmonary Bypass in the Rat
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2006; 103(5): 1089 - 1093.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
D. Maselli, R. Pizio, G. Borelli, and F. Musumeci
Endovascular balloon versus transthoracic aortic clamping for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: impact on cerebral microemboli
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, April 1, 2006; 5(2): 183 - 186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. Kamiya, U. Klima, C. Hagl, F. Logemann, M. Winterhalter, M. L. Shrestha, K. Kallenbach, N. Khaladj, A. Haverich, and M. Karck
Cerebral Microembolization During Antegrade Selective Cerebral Perfusion
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2006; 81(2): 519 - 521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
D. Maselli, R. Pizio, and F. Musumeci
Multifrequency transcranial Doppler for intraoperative automatic detection and characterisation of cerebral microemboli during port-access mitral valve surgery
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, February 1, 2006; 5(1): 32 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. M. McKhann, M. A. Grega, L. M. Borowicz Jr, W. A. Baumgartner, and O. A. Selnes
Stroke and Encephalopathy After Cardiac Surgery: An Update
Stroke, February 1, 2006; 37(2): 562 - 571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
L. Mathisen, M. H. Andersen, P. K. Hol, B. Tennoe, C. Lund, D. Russell, R. Lundblad, S. Halvorsen, A. K. Wahl, B. R. Hanestad, et al.
Preoperative cerebral ischemic lesions predict physical health status after on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2005; 130(6): 1691 - 1697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
F. L. Hanley
Religion, politics...deep hypothermic circulatory arrest
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2005; 130(5): 1236 - 1236.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. Barak and Y. Katz
Microbubbles: Pathophysiology and Clinical Implications
Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2918 - 2932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. S. Lewis, P. T. Maruff, and B. S. Silbert
Examination of the Use of Cognitive Domains in Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2005; 80(3): 910 - 916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
S. Svenmarker and M. Appelblad
Reporting of perfusion-related incidents: pitfalls and limitations
Perfusion, September 1, 2005; 20(5): 243 - 248.
[PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Kobayashi, T. Tashiro, M. Ochi, H. Yaku, G. Watanabe, T. Satoh, O. Tagusari, H. Nakajima, S. Kitamura, and for the Japanese Off-Pump Coronary Revascularizati
Early Outcome of a Randomized Comparison of Off-Pump and On-Pump Multiple Arterial Coronary Revascularization
Circulation, August 30, 2005; 112(9_suppl): I-338 - I-343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
T. D.L. Keenan, Y. Abu-Omar, and D. P. Taggart
Bypassing the Pump: Changing Practices in Coronary Artery Surgery
Chest, July 1, 2005; 128(1): 363 - 369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. Motallebzadeh and M. Jahangiri
Distinguishing solid from gaseous emboli during cardiac surgery
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2005; 129(5): 1194 - 1194.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
Y. Abu-Omar, P. M. Matthews, and D. P. Taggart
Reply to the Editor
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2005; 129(5): 1194 - 1195.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Yasir Abu-Omar
Lognathen Balacumaraswami
David P. Taggart
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abu-Omar, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Taggart, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abu-Omar, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Taggart, D. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cerebral protection


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS