|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:1759-1765
© 2004 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Cardiopulmonary support and physiology |
a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Oxford, United Kingdom
b Department for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
Received for publication June 3, 2003; revisions received August 28, 2003; accepted for publication September 16, 2003.
* Address for reprints: David P. Taggart, MD, PhD, FRCS, Consultant Cardiothoracic Surgeon, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
david.taggart{at}orh.nhs.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: Bilateral continuous transcranial Doppler monitoring of the middle cerebral arteries was performed in 45 patients (15 off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, 15 on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, and 15 open cardiac procedures). All recordings were performed using a multi-range, multifrequency system to allow both measurement of the number and discrimination of the nature of microemboli in the 3 different groups.
RESULTS: The median number (interquartile range) of microemboli in the off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, and open procedure groups were 40 (28-80), 275 (199-472), and 860 (393-1321), respectively (P < .01). Twelve percent of microemboli in the off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting group were solid compared with 28% and 22% in the on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and open procedure groups, respectively (P < .05). In the on-pump groups, 24% of microemboli occurred during cardiopulmonary bypass, and 56% occurred during aortic manipulation (cannulation, decannulation, application, and removal of crossclamp or sideclamp).
CONCLUSIONS: Cerebral microembolization is significantly reduced with avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass. The majority of microemboli occurring during cardiac surgery are gaseous, with a higher proportion of solid microemboli in the on-pump group, and may have a different significance for cerebral injury than solid microemboli. The ability to reliably discriminate gas and solid microemboli may have an important role in the implementation of neuroprotective strategies.
Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) can cause brain injury through several mechanisms, but microembolization is believed to be the most important. Pugsley and colleagues7 demonstrated that postoperative neuropsychologic deficits are related to the number of cerebral microemboli after routine CPB.
High-intensity transient signals (HITS), detected using transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography, result from an increase in the ultrasound signal reflected from the microemboli compared with the surrounding blood and can provide an index of microemboli entering the cerebral circulation. However, an increase in the ultrasound signal can also result from artifacts caused by movement. Until recently, it was not possible to differentiate objectively between artifacts and emboli or to discriminate between solid and gaseous microemboli. With the availability of a multifrequency TCD system (EmboDop; DWL Elektronische Systeme GmbH, Singen, Germany), online artifact rejection and automatic discrimination between solid and gaseous microemboli are now achievable with high sensitivity and specificity.8,9 This technique depends on insonating an embolus using 2 different frequencies. A solid embolus would reflect more ultrasound at the higher compared with the lower frequency, whereas the opposite occurs with gaseous microemboli. This study quantified the number and nature of intraoperative microemboli in patients undergoing various cardiac surgery procedures.
| Material and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CPB
After full anticoagulation with heparin given at a dose of 300 IU/kg to maintain an activated clotting time of 400 to 600 seconds, CPB was instituted using ascending aortic cannulation and a 2-stage right atrial venous cannulation. A roller pump (Jostra HL 20, Hirrlingen, Germany) and hollow-fiber membrane oxygenator (Affinity NT; Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) were used. The extracorporeal circuit was primed with 1000 mL of Hartmann's solution and 2500 IU of heparin. CPB was maintained with nonpulsatile flow with a flow rate of 2.4 L/m2/min at normothermia with the temperature allowed to drift to 34°C. Arterial line filtration was not used. Cardiotomy suction was used. Acid-base was managed with alpha stat control. Myocardial protection was achieved with intermittent antegrade cold crystalloid cardioplegia. On completion of all distal anastomoses, the aortic crossclamp was removed, and the proximal anastomosis was performed with partial aortic clamping.
Off-pump technique
Complete anticoagulation with heparin was achieved as in the CPB group. Regional myocardial immobilization was achieved with a suction stabilizer (Octopus, Medtronic Inc or Guidant; Guidant Corporation, Santa Clara, Calif). The target coronary vessels were snared proximally with a silastic sling. An intracoronary shunt (Guidant Axius) was used only when there was hemodynamic compromise during construction of the anastomosis (usually the distal right coronary artery). Visualization was enhanced by using a surgical blower-mister device (Medtronic Clearview, Medtronic Inc). All patients had composite arterial grafts with complete avoidance of aortic manipulation.
TCD monitoring
Continuous intraoperative monitoring was performed using a multifrequency Doppler system (Embodop, DWL). Dual frequency probes (2.0 and 2.5 MHz) were used to simultaneously insonate the middle cerebral arteries (MCAs) bilaterally. The probes were fixed to the transtemporal windows above the right and left zygomatic arches using a specifically designed head brace. The MCA insonation depth was set between 45 and 55 mm with a sample volume of 13 mm. An additional 2.0 MHz insonation reference gate was set 15 mm superficial to the MCA insonation gate. This reference gate serves for the online rejection of artifacts because the latter are identified when HITS are detected in both gates (MCAs and reference gates) simultaneously or with a time delay of less than 4 milliseconds.
This multifrequency system (2.5 MHz and 2.0 MHz) also differentiates between solid and gaseous microemboli. Solid microemboli reflect more ultrasound at higher than at lower frequencies, contrary to what occurs in the case of gaseous microemboli. The differentiation occurs online during monitoring, and the data are recorded on a computer hard drive that also allows off-line analysis to be performed.
Statistical analysis
Patient characteristics are presented as mean ± SD. Normally distributed data were compared using the Student t test. Categoric variables were compared using the
2 test. The number of HITS is presented as median and interquartile ranges. Because the data are not normally distributed, the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the difference in microembolization among the 3 groups.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
In the on-pump group, the largest proportion of microemboli occurred during aortic manipulation (cannulation, decannulation, and application and removal of crossclamp and sideclamp (Figure 1), accounting for 56% of the total, whereas 24% occurred during CPB (Table 3). The extent of gaseous and solid microembolization during the different stages of OPCABG, ONCABG, and open procedures is shown in Figures 2, 3, and 4.
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cerebral microemboli have been implicated in the pathogenesis of cognitive decline after CPB for more than a decade.7,11,12 Various reports have demonstrated a positive association between the number of intraoperative cerebral microemboli detected by TCD and postoperative neuropsychologic dysfunction. In addition, autopsy studies have reported large numbers of lipid microemboli in the brains of patients dying after cardiac surgery that correlated with the duration of CPB.13
A recent report demonstrated a significant reduction in the incidence of neuropsychologic impairment with avoidance of CPB.14 Our study demonstrates the remarkable reduction in the degree of microembolization, both gas and solid, during OPCABG. This may account for the difference in neuropsychologic impairment reported between patients undergoing on-pump and off-pump procedures.10,14 The clinical consequences, however, may be equally dependent on the nature and number of microemboli identified using TCD.
Particulate microemboli are generally assumed to be potentially the most damaging. Until recently, it was not possible to distinguish between gaseous and solid microemboli. We used a recently validated method9 to identify the variation in the degree and nature of microembolism during different cardiac surgery procedures. In addition, this technique allows automatic online rejection of artifacts, whereas previously the human observer was regarded as the "gold standard." Gaseous microemboli as small as 3 µm and solid microemboli of 80 µm in diameter can be reliably detected.9 The demonstration of the increase in particulate embolic load to the brain of patients undergoing CPB highlights the potential of the latter for causing cerebral injury, which is most likely to be evident in higher risk patients. The avoidance of CPB and aortic manipulation in the latter group has been shown to significantly reduce postoperative neurologic complications.15,16
What is the source of microemboli during OPCABG? Although microemboli can be detected in the cerebral circulation using TCD, the origin of these microemboli remains speculative. In the case of total arterial revascularization using composite arterial grafts (a "no-touch" aortic technique), a likely source of gaseous microemboli is air entering the coronary artery during arteriotomy and being returned to the left ventricle through the Thebesian veins. Another potential source of gas microemboli is through injections into central venous lines. Microemboli in the right side of the heart may then enter the systemic circulation by paradoxic embolism through a patent foramen ovale (present in up to 35% of the healthy population17) or after transpulmonary passage. These mechanisms may also explain why cerebral microembolization occurs during major noncardiac surgery procedures, particularly during major orthopedic operations.18,19
Particulate microemboli may form within the heart, particularly the left atrial appendage and left ventricle. In on-pump cases, they can form within the bypass circuit if anticoagulation is inadequate. Cholesterol microemboli probably arise from the atherosclerotic aorta during manipulation,20 whereas use of the cardiotomy suction and denaturation of proteins may result in lipid microembolization during CPB.21 Furthermore, platelet and blood cell aggregation occurring during CPB may add to this microembolic load. Gaseous microemboli may enter the circulation during flushing and filling of coronary conduits, at initiation of CPB, through the bypass circuit after blood sampling and injection of drugs, and during cardiac ejection after open procedures.22 The increase in absolute numbers of gaseous microemboli during open procedures is consistent with transesophageal echocardiographic findings even after vigorous de-airing procedures.23 It must be noted, however, that differentiation and quantitation of HITS is difficult when a large number of microemboli pass through the sample volume simultaneously such as after removal of the aortic crossclamp or sideclamp.8 This, however, serves to underestimate the benefits of OPCABG in which there is a lack of such embolic showers entering the sample volume simultaneously.
Cerebral injury remains one of the most important causes of adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery. It particularly affects elderly patients and those with other comorbidities and is more common and severe after cardiac operations performed using CPB.14 As a progressively older and sicker population undergoes both cardiac and noncardiac surgery procedures, the scale of the problem is likely to increase. Indeed, we and others have documented that advanced age is the strongest predictor of postoperative neurocognitive impairment.3
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y.-H. Liu, D.-X. Wang, L.-H. Li, X.-M. Wu, G.-J. Shan, Y. Su, J. Li, Q.-J. Yu, C.-X. Shi, Y.-N. Huang, et al. The Effects of Cardiopulmonary Bypass on the Number of Cerebral Microemboli and the Incidence of Cognitive Dysfunction After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2009; 109(4): 1013 - 1022. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Abu-Omar and D. P. Taggart The present status of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2009; 36(2): 312 - 321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Nielsen, J. Funder, M. Jensen, and H Nygaard Influence of venous reservoir level on microbubbles in cardiopulmonary bypass Perfusion, November 1, 2008; 23(6): 347 - 353. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. F. Marasco, L. N. Sharwood, and M. J. Abramson No improvement in neurocognitive outcomes after off-pump versus on-pump coronary revascularisation: a meta-analysis Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2008; 33(6): 961 - 970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Djaiani, M. Ali, M. A. Borger, A. Woo, J. Carroll, C. Feindel, L. Fedorko, J. Karski, and H. Rakowski Epiaortic Scanning Modifies Planned Intraoperative Surgical Management But Not Cerebral Embolic Load During Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2008; 106(6): 1611 - 1618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Hedges and N. S. Redeker Comparison of Sleep and Mood in Patients After On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Am. J. Crit. Care., March 1, 2008; 17(2): 133 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Dittrich and E. B. Ringelstein Occurrence and Clinical Impact of Microembolic Signals During or After Cardiosurgical Procedures Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 503 - 511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Durham and J. P. Gold Late Complications of Cardiac Surgery Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 535 - 548. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Goto, T. Baba, A. Ito, K. Maekawa, and T. Koshiji Gender Differences in Stroke Risk Among the Elderly After Coronary Artery Surgery Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2007; 104(5): 1016 - 1022. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Barili, L. Dainese, G. Polvani, and P. Biglioli Multifactorial Bases of Stroke After Cardiac Surgery Stroke, April 1, 2007; 38(4): 1140 - 1140. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. K. Lal Cognitive Function After Carotid Artery Revascularization Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, February 1, 2007; 41(1): 5 - 13. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. G. Wolf, Y. Abu-Omar, B. P. Choudhary, D. Pigott, and D. P. Taggart Gaseous and solid cerebral microembolization during proximal aortic anastomoses in off-pump coronary surgery: The effect of an aortic side-biting clamp and two clampless devices J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2007; 133(2): 485 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Abu-Omar, S. Cader, L. G. Wolf, D. Pigott, P. M. Matthews, and D. P. Taggart Short-term changes in cerebral activity in on-pump and off-pump cardiac surgery defined by functional magnetic resonance imaging and their relationship to microembolization. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2006; 132(5): 1119 - 1125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yoshitani, F. de Lange, Q. Ma, H. P. Grocott, and G. B. Mackensen Reduction in Air Bubble Size Using Perfluorocarbons During Cardiopulmonary Bypass in the Rat Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2006; 103(5): 1089 - 1093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Maselli, R. Pizio, G. Borelli, and F. Musumeci Endovascular balloon versus transthoracic aortic clamping for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: impact on cerebral microemboli Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, April 1, 2006; 5(2): 183 - 186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kamiya, U. Klima, C. Hagl, F. Logemann, M. Winterhalter, M. L. Shrestha, K. Kallenbach, N. Khaladj, A. Haverich, and M. Karck Cerebral Microembolization During Antegrade Selective Cerebral Perfusion Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2006; 81(2): 519 - 521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Maselli, R. Pizio, and F. Musumeci Multifrequency transcranial Doppler for intraoperative automatic detection and characterisation of cerebral microemboli during port-access mitral valve surgery Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, February 1, 2006; 5(1): 32 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. McKhann, M. A. Grega, L. M. Borowicz Jr, W. A. Baumgartner, and O. A. Selnes Stroke and Encephalopathy After Cardiac Surgery: An Update Stroke, February 1, 2006; 37(2): 562 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Mathisen, M. H. Andersen, P. K. Hol, B. Tennoe, C. Lund, D. Russell, R. Lundblad, S. Halvorsen, A. K. Wahl, B. R. Hanestad, et al. Preoperative cerebral ischemic lesions predict physical health status after on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2005; 130(6): 1691 - 1697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. L. Hanley Religion, politics...deep hypothermic circulatory arrest J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2005; 130(5): 1236 - 1236. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Barak and Y. Katz Microbubbles: Pathophysiology and Clinical Implications Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2918 - 2932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Lewis, P. T. Maruff, and B. S. Silbert Examination of the Use of Cognitive Domains in Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2005; 80(3): 910 - 916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Svenmarker and M. Appelblad Reporting of perfusion-related incidents: pitfalls and limitations Perfusion, September 1, 2005; 20(5): 243 - 248. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kobayashi, T. Tashiro, M. Ochi, H. Yaku, G. Watanabe, T. Satoh, O. Tagusari, H. Nakajima, S. Kitamura, and for the Japanese Off-Pump Coronary Revascularizati Early Outcome of a Randomized Comparison of Off-Pump and On-Pump Multiple Arterial Coronary Revascularization Circulation, August 30, 2005; 112(9_suppl): I-338 - I-343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. D.L. Keenan, Y. Abu-Omar, and D. P. Taggart Bypassing the Pump: Changing Practices in Coronary Artery Surgery Chest, July 1, 2005; 128(1): 363 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Motallebzadeh and M. Jahangiri Distinguishing solid from gaseous emboli during cardiac surgery J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2005; 129(5): 1194 - 1194. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Abu-Omar, P. M. Matthews, and D. P. Taggart Reply to the Editor J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2005; 129(5): 1194 - 1195. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |