| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;128:130-137
© 2004 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
General thoracic surgery |
a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
b Department of Biostatistics, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Mass, USA
c Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Fla, USA
d Department of Medical Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis, USA
e Department of Radiation Oncology, Oakwood Hospital, Detroit, Mich, USA
f Department of Radiation Oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex, USA
g Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn, USA
h Department of Medical Oncology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Mo, USA
i Department of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash, USA
j Department of Medical Oncology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn, USA
Read at the Eighty-third Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Boston, Mass, May 4-7, 2003.
Received for publication May 20, 2003; revisions received November 5, 2003; accepted for publication November 10, 2003.
* Address for reprints: Steven M. Keller, MD, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Montefiore Medical Center, 3400 Bainbridge Ave, Suite 5B, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
skeller{at}montefiore.org
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract Materials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
METHODS: Accurate staging was ensured by mandating either systematic sampling or complete dissection of the ipsilateral mediastinal lymph nodes. The overall survival of patients with left lung non–small cell lung cancer and metastases in only 1 of lymph node levels 5, 6, or 7 and right lung non–small cell lung cancer with metastases in only 1 of levels 4 or 7 was compared with that of patients with N1 disease originating in the same lobe.
RESULTS: The median survival of the 172 patients with single-level N2 disease was 35 months (95% confidence interval: 27-40 months) versus 65 months (95% confidence interval: 45-84 months) for the 150 patients with N1 disease (median follow-up 84 months, P = .01). However, among patients with left upper lobe tumors, survival was not significantly different between patients with N1 disease and patients with single-level N2 disease (49 vs 51 months, P = .63). The median survival of the 71 patients with single-level N2 metastases without concomitant N1 disease (skip metastases) was 59 months (95% confidence interval: 36-107 months) versus 26 months (95% confidence interval: 16-36 months) for the 145 patients with both N1 and N2 metastases (P = .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Survival of patients with left upper lobe non–small cell lung cancer and metastases to single-level N2 lymph nodes is not significantly different from that of patients with N1 disease. The presence of isolate N2 skip metastases is associated with improved survival when compared with patients with both N1 and N2 disease. Survival should be reported by the lobe of primary tumor and metastatic pattern to guide future clinical trial development, treatment strategies, and revisions of the TNM staging system.
Numerous factors seem to impact the survival of patients with resected N2 disease. Among them are the manner in which the N2 disease was identified, the performance of mediastinoscopy, the thoroughness of intraoperative lymph node assessment, the location of the lymph node, and the number of nodal levels containing tumor. Finally, the fundamental definition of the lymph node level location and boundaries will alter survival.
Intergroup Trial 0115 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 3590), a randomized prospective study of adjuvant therapy after complete resection of stages II and IIIa NSCLC, provided the opportunity to investigate the relation of the number of positive N2 lymph node levels and the pattern of nodal metastases to survival in patients who underwent thorough staging of the mediastinal lymph nodes and received uniform therapy.1
|
Materials and methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Patients who had undergone complete resection of pathologic stages II (T1-2 N1 M0) or IIIa (T1-2 N2 M0, T3 N1-2 M0) NSCLC were eligible for study participation. The International Lung Cancer Staging System accepted by the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Union Internationale Contre Cancer during the years 1986 to 1997 was used.2 Lymph node levels were defined according to the American Thoracic Society.3 Level 10 was considered an N1 lymph node.
Complete mediastinal lymph node dissection or systematic sampling was compulsory. The former was defined as resection of all lymph nodes at specified levels, and the latter entailed the removal of a representative lymph node at those same levels. Dissection or sampling of levels 4, 7, and 10 was required during a right thoracotomy and of levels 5 and/or 6 and 7 during a left thoracotomy. To ensure uniform lymph node labeling and staging, each operative note and pathology report was reviewed (S.M.K.).
Mediastinoscopy was required if the preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan demonstrated mediastinal lymph nodes greater than 1.5 cm in short axis diameter. Patients were ineligible if mediastinoscopy revealed multilevel metastases, contralateral mediastinal disease, or extranodal disease. Patients must have undergone either lobectomy or pneumonectomy. Additional eligibility requirements included a postoperative Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and a postoperative forced expiratory volume 1 sufficient to tolerate the proposed radiotherapy.
Patients randomized to the control arm received 50.4 Gy in 28 daily 1.8-Gy fractions. The initial portion of the treatment was administered with AP-PA portals from 36 Gy to 42 Gy. The remainder of the treatment was given to the same target volume, but with a lateral/oblique field arrangement that prevented the spinal cord from receiving more than 45 Gy. The treatment arm consisted of identical radiation treatment administered concomitantly with VP-16 (120 mg/m2 intravenously, days 1-3) and cisplatin (60 mg/m2 intravenously, day 1). Chemotherapy was initiated within 24 hours of radiotherapy and repeated every 28 days for a total of 4 cycles. The frequency of follow-up physical examinations and type of radiologic studies were not specified.
Statistical analysis
Fisher's exact test was used to compare groups with respect to categoric end points (eg, recurrence).4 All P values reported from the Fisher's exact test are 2-tailed. Survival time was computed as follows: Patients' deaths are considered as events, and survival time is the time to death from date of registration. Patients who are alive are censored as of last known follow-up.
Survival distributions for survival time was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method5 and compared with the log-rank test.6 All log-rank test P values reported are 2-tailed.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
N2 disease was documented in 223 patients, whereas 150 patients had tumors limited to the N1 lymph nodes. The patient demographics appear in Table 1. The median survival was 65 months (95% CI, 45-84 months) for the patients with N1 disease and 31 months (95% CI, 22-39 months) for all patients with N2 disease (log rank, P = .003). The overall survival of patients with N1 disease was significantly better than that of the 172 patients with tumor limited to a single N2 station (median 35 months, log rank, P = .02) (Figure 1). Comparison of survival by N status and lobe of primary tumor are given in Table 2. Survival of patients with single-level N2 metastases and primary tumors of the left upper lobe was not significantly different from that of patients with N1 disease (Figure 2).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The manner in which the intraoperative assessment of the mediastinal lymph nodes is conducted influences the identification of metastatic lymph nodes and the total number of N2 lymph node levels that contain tumor.14,15 Systematic sampling seems as effective as complete mediastinal lymph node dissection in accurately determining the N status, but complete node dissection identifies more levels of N2 disease.16 Among the 373 patients in the present study cohort, 187 underwent systematic dissection and 186 underwent complete node dissection. N1 disease was identified in 40% of patients and N2 disease was identified in 60% of patients who had undergone systematic sampling. This was not significantly different from the 41% of patients with N1 disease and 59% of patients with N2 disease found among the 186 patients who underwent complete node dissection. However, among the 222 patients with N2 metastases, multiple levels of N2 disease were documented in 30% of patients who underwent complete node dissection and 12% of patients who had systematic sampling.17
The extent of lymph node assessment may also influence survival independently of the staging effect. Two randomized trials have demonstrated improved survival for patients found to have N1 or N2 disease who underwent complete node dissection when compared with systematic sampling.16,18 Although the current study was not randomized, improved survival was demonstrated for those patients who underwent a complete mediastinal lymph node dissection.17 Although one pitfall of the current study is the under-identification of the number of patients with multiple levels of N2 disease and the different methods used to stage the mediastinum, analysis of the effect of type of nodal assessment by lobe and the number of nodal levels did not change our conclusions.
The number of N2 levels containing tumor may be inversely related to survival.8-11,19-22 Two studies have specifically compared patient survival by the number of involved N2 levels. In both reports, the N2 disease was considered "incidental," discovered at surgery after a chest CT failed to demonstrate enlarged (>1 cm) mediastinal lymph nodes. Andre and colleagues10 documented a median survival of 30 months and a 5-year survival of 34% for 244 surgical patients with single-station N2 disease compared with a median survival of 16 months and a 5-year survival of 11% for 78 patients with multilevel N2 disease. Ichinose and colleagues22 reported a 5-year survival of 43% for 209 patients who had not received induction therapy and who were found to have single-level N2 disease, significantly better than the 5-year survival of 17% for patients with multiple-level N2 disease. Our data do not support the contention that survival of patients with single-level N2 disease is uniformly superior to those with multiple-level N2 disease, but rather it is lobar dependent.
The location of the involved lymph node levels in relation to the primary tumor seems to influence survival. Patients with right upper lobe tumors and metastases to the ipsilateral level 4 lymph nodes have been reported to have improved survival when compared with patients with similar tumors and metastases to the level 7 lymph nodes.23 Patients with left upper lobe tumors and metastases to the level 5 or 6 lymph nodes have survival similar to patients with similar T status and N1 disease.24 In the current report, we are able to confirm that the survival of patients with left upper lobe tumors and single-level N2 disease is similar to that of patients with N1 disease and superior to that of patients with multiple levels of N2 metastases.
Skip metastases have been attributed to subpleural lymphatics that drain directly to the mediastinum. Numerous investigators have documented improved survival in patients with skip metastases when compared with patients with N1 and N2 disease.25-27 In this study, the survival advantage was limited to patients with upper lobe tumors, the lymphatic drainage of which is primarily to the paratracheal lymph nodes (right lung tumors) or aortopulmonary window lymph nodes (left lung tumors). The reason for improved survival remains unclear, although patients with skip metastases may have true regional disease that is adequately treated with surgery.
The lymph node definitions and staging system are designed to form homogeneous prognostic patient groups. As more survival data have become available, the definitions have been altered and the staging has been changed. The survival differences among the various patient subgroups with N2 disease are not adequately reflected in the current definition of N2. The conclusions of this study are based on secondary analysis of data obtained from a randomized trial designed to answer an adjuvant therapy question and must be interpreted as hypothesis-generating rather than definitive. However, we believe that our findings merit consideration in the design of future clinical trials and treatment strategies. Future iterations of the TNM staging system should account for the number of lymph node levels containing metastatic tumor and the metastatic pattern.
Discussion
Dr Garrett L. Walsh (Houston, Tex). The appropriate management of patients with lung cancer with mediastinal disease remains a complex and often confusing clinical problem for thoracic surgeons. The wide spectrum of N2 disease can be appreciated in 2 types of patients: One with bulky, multilevel involvement that is clearly evident on a plain chest radiograph, frequently with a fixed mediastinum on palpation at mediastinoscopy; the other with a clinical stage I or II presentation with a normal chest radiograph and CT scan with a negative PET scan and normal-appearing, easily removable, mobile nodes seen at surgery but with a small microscopic focus of intranodal, single-station disease appreciated only on final pathology. Both scenarios represent stage III disease.
Dr Keller and his colleagues present a very specific subset of patients with completely resected stage II and stage III disease, with appropriately staged mediastinums, who have already survived their operation to be enrolled in the adjuvant Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial. Their analysis demonstrates an improved survival in patients with left upper lobe tumors with single-station N2 disease comparable to patients with N1 disease that may justify reclassifying aortopulmonary window nodes in left upper lobe tumors as N1 disease.
Although this is an important analysis of a randomized trial, the conclusions are not new. Dr Martini pointed out more than 20 years ago that patients with surgically resected single-station N2 disease had an improved prognosis over those with multilevel mediastinal disease. Inferior mediastinal nodes had a worse prognosis over nodes in upper mediastinal locations.
Dr Patterson and the Toronto group at the Society of Thoracic Surgeons meeting in 1986 presented their experience with this specific subset of patients with left upper lobe lesions with positive subaortic lymph nodes. Their 5-year survival with completely resected tumors and single-site N2 disease was also identical to these data presented today (or 42% at 5 years).
Why do patients with left upper lobe lesions seem to do better? Many of the patients in Patterson's review and all of the patients in this study received postoperative radiation therapy. Radiation therapy is known to work better in tissues with an intact blood supply. The patients with left upper lobe tumors in these 2 reports would not have undergone sacrifice of the blood supply of the paratracheal nodes as would occur in right-sided procedures with mediastinal dissections of the level 4 nodes. Could the improvement in survival for left upper lobe tumors in fact be a result of an improved radiation therapy response and local control in mediastinal tissues that have not been surgically violated? I would be interested in Dr Keller's thoughts regarding this potential radiation/biology explanation.
Although not described in the article, were there any other characteristics of the primary left upper lobe tumors identified through multivariate analysis that could contribute to the improved survival, such as more favorable histology, smaller tumors, less visceral pleural involvement, or female gender? Were the aortopulmonary window nodes involved separately in all cases or were some positive by direct extension from the left upper lobe lesions? Was there a comparable number of lobectomies and pneumonectomies performed for left upper lobe lesions compared with other sites?
Although your analysis certainly will be helpful during the postoperative discussion with patients when their final pathology is available, how should we apply this knowledge to the patient who will present to our office next week with a left upper lobe primary with a clinically enlarged 1.5-cm aortopulmonary window node? Let us assume that the patient is not hoarse and that his or her PET scan demonstrates uptake only in the primary tumor and the node but no other sites. Would you perform a cervical mediastinoscopy and/or Chamberlain or VATS or FNA for this patient with clinical stage IIIa or simply proceed to left upper lobectomy and mediastinal node dissection? If a stage III neoadjuvant protocol were available, would this patient be an appropriate candidate or should he or she be excluded on the basis of your survival data?
Although the emphasis has been on the left upper lobe tumors, your table comparing N1 versus single-level N2 by primary tumor lobe also shows no significant difference for right lower lobe lesions. Although the median survival in right lower lobe N1 versus single-site N2 is 17 months apart, the statistics would argue that your conclusions in the abstract should also apply to right lower lobe primaries.
Finally, you state that improved survival in these single-station N2 sites indicates the need to modify the current lung cancer staging system. How would you realistically modify the present staging system to take into account the anatomic or biologic deviations that you have identified and still have a practical and workable system?
Dr Keller. The paratracheal lymph nodes, levels 2 to 4, in the patients analyzed in this study were less than 1 cm in diameter and therefore unlikely to contain metastatic tumor. Therefore, I do not believe that the theoretic advantage of radiating cancer-containing tissues with an intact blood supply is a likely explanation for our results.
We found no difference in gender, histology, or surgical procedure in patients who had left upper lobe tumors compared with patients with other tumors. I do not have information regarding the direct extension of tumor to the lymph nodes versus metastases through lymphatic channels.
These data are not directed at the clinical situation that you described, because all patients had mediastinal lymph nodes less than 1 cm in diameter. However, in my practice, in a patient such as you have described, with a 1.5-cm lymph node that is PET-positive, I would proceed with surgery and not with other diagnostic procedures.
Our results would certainly have been much neater if the left upper lobe was different from all the other lobes. The reason we chose not to emphasize the right lower lobe was because the difference in the median survival, although not significant, was still very large (17 months). Although Dr Patterson and other authors have demonstrated improved patient survival with resected tumors of the left upper lobe and associated N2 metastases when compared with the other lobes, there were no previously published supporting data regarding improved survival of tumors in the right lower lobe.
The staging system might be modified to take into consideration the location of the primary tumor and the pattern of lymph node metastases. For instance, level 5 or 6 lymph nodes would be considered as N1 lymph nodes for patients with left upper lobe tumors. In addition, stratification by lobe of the primary tumor and the presence or absence of skip metastases may provide useful information in interpreting the results of future adjuvant trials.
Dr Richard H. Feins (Rochester, NY). I certainly applaud your continued massaging of the data from this intergroup trial, the only phase III trial for lung cancer that has been reported since the end of the Lung Cancer Study Group.
I would just ask you, from a practical standpoint, what do your data tell you about the conduct of an operation so that one could truly identify which patients have single-station N2 disease and therefore would benefit from resection? For example, is it necessary to perform a complete lymph node dissection with frozen sections of all tissue? Is a mediastinoscopy necessary for everybody? Somewhere we have to come up with a strategy whereby the thoracic surgeon can identify the subgroup of patients who are going to have the improved survival.
Dr Keller. These patients were all enrolled in the original study after surgery; therefore I do not have any data regarding the specifics of their preoperative evaluation other than to say that all the mediastinal lymph nodes were less than 1 cm in size. If the lymph nodes were larger, the protocol mandated mediastinoscopy to demonstrate that tumor was present only at a single nodal level. Analysis of the data clearly demonstrated that systematic sampling at defined lymph node levels stages the patients just as accurately as a complete node dissection. However, a complete node dissection will identify more levels of N2 disease than a systematic sampling.
Dr David H. Harpole, Jr (Durham, NC). I have a comment and then a question. The comment is that I want those in the audience to realize that this is a very key study and that the authors should be congratulated, because there have been very few large multi-institutional cooperative group studies in which a surgeon has had a very significant role. Dr Keller and his group have done a great job of not only getting this trial designed and finished but also examining surgical issues in respect to the results of the trial as opposed to just the usual medical/oncology issues. So I think we all need to appreciate the hard work that went into this.
Now, putting on my clinical trials hat, I have to remind the audience as well that, unfortunately, although as provocative as these data are (and I think there is some truth in these findings, and it is important to follow up on them), when one does a subset analysis on data sets that were not included in the primary and secondary objectives of a trial, the statisticians will tell you that sometimes the data do not necessarily tell the whole truth. The outcomes from the Z30 American College of Surgeons Oncology Group trial, which looks at the randomization of nodal dissection and sampling, will be able to add more information with respect to these left upper lobe lesions.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
Supported in part by grants from the Public Health Service (CA23318, CA66636, CA21115, CA14958, CA49957, CA21076, CA73590, CA25224, CA21661, CA20319), the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, and the Department of Health and Human Services.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E. Ruffini, P. L. Filosso, M. C. Bruna, F. Coni, R. C. Cristofori, C. Mossetti, P. Solidoro, and A. Oliaro Recommended changes for T and N descriptors proposed by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer -- Lung Cancer Staging Project: a validation study from a single-centre experience Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2009; 36(6): 1037 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Mohamed, K. Yasufuku, T. Nakajima, K. Hiroshima, M. Chiyo, S. Yoshida, M. Suzuki, Y. Sekine, K. Shibuya, G. Agamy, et al. Nuclear survivin in pN2 nonsmall cell lung cancer: prognostic and clinical implications Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2009; 33(1): 127 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. J. Cerfolio, A. S. Bryant, and M. A. Eloubeidi Accessing the Aortopulmonary Window (#5) and the Paraaortic (#6) Lymph Nodes in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2007; 84(3): 940 - 945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. A. Whitson, S. S. Groth, and M. A. Maddaus Surgical Assessment and Intraoperative Management of Mediastinal Lymph Nodes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2007; 84(3): 1059 - 1065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. L. Uy, G. Darling, W. Xu, Q.-L. Yi, M. De Perrot, A. F. Pierre, T. K. Waddell, M. R. Johnston, A. Bezjak, F. A. Shepherd, et al. Improved results of induction chemoradiation before surgical intervention for selected patients with stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2007; 134(1): 188 - 193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Lardinois, P. De Leyn, P. Van Schil, R. R. Porta, D. Waller, B. Passlick, M. Zielinski, K. Junker, E. A. Rendina, H.-B. Ris, et al. ESTS guidelines for intraoperative lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2006; 30(5): 787 - 792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. J. Battafarano Optimal management of patients with non-small cell lung cancer with ipsilateral mediastinal lymph node metastases J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2006; 131(6): 1227 - 1228. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Ohta, Y. Shimizu, H. Minato, I. Matsumoto, M. Oda, and G. Watanabe Results of Initial Operations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Single-Level N2 Disease Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2006; 81(2): 427 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. W. Martin, A. M. Correa, W. Hofstetter, W. K. Hong, R. Komaki, J. B. Putnam Jr, D. C. Rice, W. R. Smythe, S. G. Swisher, A. A. Vaporciyan, et al. The evolution of treatment outcomes for resected stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer over 16 years at a single institution J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2005; 130(6): 1601 - 1610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Van Schil, J. Van Meerbeeck, G. Kramer, T. Splinter, C. Legrand, G. Giaccone, C. Manegold, and N. van Zandwijk Morbidity and mortality in the surgery arm of EORTC 08941 trial Eur. Respir. J., August 1, 2005; 26(2): 192 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Casali, A. Stefani, P. Natali, G. Rossi, and U. Morandi Prognostic factors in surgically resected N2 non-small cell lung cancer: the importance of patterns of mediastinal lymph nodes metastases Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2005; 28(1): 33 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. Patel and J. B. Shrager Which Patients with Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Should Undergo Surgical Resection? Oncologist, May 1, 2005; 10(5): 335 - 344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Iwasaki, T. Shirakusa, S. Enatsu, S. Maekawa, Y. Yoshinaga, S. Yoneda, and S. Hoshino Is T2 non-small cell lung cancer located in left lower lobe appropriate to upstage? Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, April 1, 2005; 4(2): 126 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Sondhi, J. R. Goffin, B. J. Cohen, J. B. Wong, and S. G. Pauker DEALE-ing with Lung Cancer and Heart Failure Med Decis Making, January 1, 2005; 25(1): 82 - 94. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Puma Isolated mediastinal skip metastasis in lung cancer: Is it real N2 disease? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2005; 129(1): 235 - 235. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |
