|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;128:595-601
© 2004 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Cardiopulmonary support and physiology |
a Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Evanston, Ill, USA
b Washington University, St Louis, Mo, USA
c Lexicon Genetics, Inc, The Woodlands, Tex, USA
d Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
e Feinberg School of Medicine of Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill, USA
Received for publication November 26, 2003; revisions received January 20, 2004; accepted for publication February 23, 2004.
* Address for reprints: Todd K. Rosengart, MD, 2650 Ridge Ave, Burch 100, Evanston, IL 60201, USA
trosengart{at}enh.org
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: C57 BL/6 mice deficient in the Egr1 gene (knockout) and their wild-type litter mates underwent ligation and excision of the femoral artery with or without the previous administration of 2.7 x 109 particle units of an adenoviral vector coding for the vascular endothelial growth factor gene (VEGF) or Egr1. Distal hind limb perfusion was serially measured in these animals with laser Doppler perfusion imaging.
RESULTS: Wild-type mice (n = 9) had nearly complete restitution of hind limb perfusion by day 35 after ligation. In contrast, all noninjected Egr1 knockout mice (n = 5) had severe ipsilateral limb necrosis develop between 1 and 4 days after ligation (P < .0001). Egr1 knockout mice injected with VEGF vector (n = 4) demonstrated significantly improved perfusion relative to baseline by postligation day 28, which persisted to postligation day 35 (P < .05). Egr1 knockout animals injected with Egr1 vector (n = 7) demonstrated a partial recovery of hind limb perfusion relative to VEGF vectortreated knockout animals at postligation day 4 (P < .01), which persisted to day 35.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that early growth response 1 plays a pivotal role in reperfusion responses to vascular occlusion in mice and possibly other mammals.
Although a mechanism of ischemic upregulation of growth factor expression as a stimulus for collateral vessel formation intuitively follows from the known biology of these proteins, several lines of evidence contradict this premise. First, it has reasonably been noted that the tissues surrounding a point of vascular occlusion are unlikely to be ischemic, because tissues proximal to the vascular occlusion will be perfused by the patent upstream vasculature and tissues immediately distal to the occlusion point will likely receive blood flow through existing vascular branches originating upstream from the ligation point.9,10 Second, the therapeutic administration of individual growth factors has shown that these proteins acting alone primarily stimulate angiogenesis (capillary development) rather than arteriogenesis (the development of larger collateral vessels).7,8,11-15
The early growth response (EGR) 1 transcription factor represents an intriguing alternative candidate transponder capable of sensing the biophysical stimuli associated with vascular occlusion and translating these stimuli into the activation of appropriate effector molecules capable of inducing angiogenesis and arteriogenesis.16-19 More specifically, the activity of EGR-1 is modulated by changes in vascular wall shear stress such as would occur in the setting of an acute vascular occlusion.20 EGR-1 in turn has been shown to directly or indirectly upregulate the expression of numerous vascular growth factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), that are capable of inducing or supporting angiogenesis and that may in concert be capable of inducing collateral vessel formation.16-21
On the basis of these considerations, we hypothesized that vascular occlusion could result in EGR-1 upregulation, which in turn could induce revascularization through the expression of downstream growth factors. We tested this hypothesis by examining distal reperfusion after femoral artery ligation in wild-type and Egr1 knockout animals.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Gene transfer vectors
The adenovirus Egr1transfer vector (AdEgr) used for these studies was also a gift of J. Milbrandt. The replication-defective VEGF transfer vector (AdVEGF) used in these studies was an E1a, partial E1b, partial E3 adenovirus vector based on human adenovirus serotype 5 prepared as previously described elsewhere.24-26 As a negative control, a similar adenovirus containing no gene in the expression cassette (AdNull) was used. Vector competency was assessed on HT1080 cells (ATCC No. CCl-121; American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, Va), which were treated with 50 particle units (pu)/cell of AdVEGF, AdEgr, or AdNull, or with saline solution. Culture media was collected 48 hours later and subjected to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (VEGF analysis),26 or cells were harvested into Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif), and RNA was purified, reverse transcribed, and subjected to semiquantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with rat Egr1 primers (GenBank Accession No. NM-012551).27
Analysis of Egr1 expression after vascular occlusion
In initial studies, male Sprague-Dawley rats (250-350 g; Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc, Indianapolis, Ind) treated in accordance with institutional animal care and use committee guidelines were anesthetized with ketamine (80 mg/kg) and xylazine (12 mg/kg) administered intraperitoneally. A midline abdominal incision was then made, and the left common femoral artery was identified and ligated. The left iliac and femoral arteries upstream from the vascular ligation point were harvested 30, 60, or 120 minutes later, and the right iliac and femoral arteries were taken as control specimens for Northern blot analysis. The harvested vascular tissues were homogenized in 1.0 mL Trizol reagent (Invitrogen), and the total RNA was isolated according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA was then dissolved in water and quantified, and 10 µg of total RNA was loaded on a 1% formaldehyde agarose gel. After electrophoresis, RNA was transferred overnight by capillary force to a Zeta-probe GT Genomic Tested Blotting Membrane (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc, Hercules, Calif) in 10x standard saline citrate solution. The blot was ultraviolet cross-linked for 2 minutes and then prehybridized with Hybrisol TM I (Oncor, Inc, Gaithersburg, Md) for 30 minutes before addition of phosphorus 32 randomly primed labeling probe for mouse Egr1 (GenBank Accession No. NM-007913). The membrane was hybridized overnight, washed twice at room temperature for 20 minutes with 2x standard saline citrate solution plus 0.2% sodium dodecylsulfate and then twice for 20 minutes with 0.2x standard saline citrate solution plus 0.2% sodium dodecylsulfate at 55°C. The blot was then autoradiographed by exposure to x-ray film (X-Omat AR; Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, NY), and the autoradiograph signal intensities were quantified with ImageQuant (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Inc, Piscataway, NJ).
Genotyping
All subsequent studies were performed in animals selected from the C57 BL/6 knockout mouse colony described previously. Genotyping of these animals was performed from tail tip tissues obtained after briefly placing the animals in an isoflurane chamber, as previously described elsewhere.28
Vascular ligation
Wild-type or homozygous Egr1-deleted (knockout) animals (25-35 g) selected from the C57 BL/6 mouse colony were anesthetized with pentobarbital (60 mg/kg intraperitoneally) after induction with a mixture of isoflurane (3.5 L/min) and 100% oxygen (3 L/min). A midline abdominal incision was then made, and the proximal end of the femoral artery at the inguinal ligament and the distal portion of the saphenous artery were ligated with 4-0 silk. The artery and all side branches were then dissected free, and this entire vascular segment was removed.29 The incision was then closed, and the animal was allowed to recover according to standard protocols.
Laser Doppler perfusion study
Laser Doppler perfusion imaging was used to measure distal hind limb perfusion before the operation and at serial time points after vascular excision. Duplicate laser Doppler perfusion images were obtained in a blinded manner with an LDPI system (Perimed, Jarfalla, Sweden) through clipped and depilated hind limb skin surfaces after placing the mice on a 37°C. heating pad for 10 minutes. Regions of interest (ROIs) encompassing either the entire ligated limb or the contralateral nonligated hind limb were analyzed with accessory software provided by the manufacturer, as previously described elsewhere.29 More specifically, the ROIs were determined from black and white images (without perfusion data) of the ventral surface of the animals by placing a standard, computer-generated circle around the most distal aspect of each hind limb, after which the system software was used to calculate a mean intensity of Doppler signal within the ROI encompassed by the circle. To minimize data variables caused by ambient light and temperature, a perfusion index for each animal was expressed as the average of the ratios of the ROIs for the ligated limb versus the contralateral, nonligated limb.
Adenoviral vector injection
In initial studies assessing in vivo activity of the AdEgr vector, male Sprague-Dawley rats were prepared as described previously, and three 5-µL injections of AdVEGF, AdEgr1, or AdNull (4 x 109 pu/injection, total dose 1.2 x 1010 pu) or an equal volume of phosphate-buffered saline solution were made through a midline laparotomy into the proximal hind limb musculature. The animals were allowed to recover, and the proximal hind limb musculature was then harvested 48 hours later and subjected to semiquantitative PCR analysis as previously described elsewhere.27
Administration of AdVEGF or AdEgr vectors was performed 24 hours before vascular ligation in subsets of wild-type and Egr1 knockout animals. These mice were anesthetized as described previously, and an incision in the abdominal midline was made, allowing exposure of the femoral artery, after which three 5 µL-injections of AdVEGF or AdEgr1 (9 x 108 pu/injection, total dose 2.7 x 109 pu) were made into the proximal hind limb musculature. Animals were allowed to recover for 24 hours, after which an ipsilateral double femoral artery ligation and excision was performed as described previously.
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as mean ± SD. Either
2 analysis or Student t test was used to show significance, as appropriate.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
Egr1 knockout mice injected with AdVEGF before ligation (n = 4) demonstrated an absence of necrosis (P = .0027 vs necrosis in untreated knockouts) and significantly improved perfusion index by postligation day 28 compared with the perfusion index immediately after ligation (P < .05). This improvement persisted to postligation day 35 (0.7 ± 0.2, P < .01) and approximated that observed in ligated wild-type animals (Figure 4). Egr1 knockout animals injected with AdEgr (n = 7) similarly demonstrated an absence of necrosis (P = .0005 vs necrosis in untreated knockouts) and improvement of hind limb perfusion; improvement was less than that observed in AdVEGF-injected knockouts through postligation day 4 (0.2 ± 0.04, P < .01) but then demonstrated a similar pattern of improvement relative to AdVEGF-treated knockouts through day 35 after ligation (Figure 5). Neither AdVEGF- nor AdEgr-treated knockout animals demonstrated morphologic or motor abnormalities by day 35 after ligation (P < .003 vs untreated knockouts).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The studies described in this report follow our previous observation of markedly upregulated expression of Egr1 in a pneumonectomy and contralateral lung growth model.30 The apparent importance of Egr1 expression in this model suggested to us that EGR-1 was critically responsive to changes in shear stress after vascular ligation, analogous to the hemodynamic changes expected with naturally occurring atherosclerotic vascular occlusions. These observations led us to suspect that EGR-1 might represent the previously "missing" signaling factor capable of translating the physiologic sequelae of vascular occlusion into the homeostatic response of collateral vessel formation that follows this biologic perturbation.
EGR-1 processing mechanisms are elegantly designed to translate physiologic factors as stress and hypoxia into modulation of gene expression and biologic responses.16-23 The responsiveness of Egr1 to biophysical stimuli occurs through a series of serum response elements in the Egr promoter region, to which a variety of intracellular proteins, such as serum response factor and ternary complex factor, can reversibly bind. These proteins are typically modified and activated by cytoplasmic kinases, which in turn are modulated by cytoplasmic and cell membrane stimuli, such as cell stretching (shear stress). The serum response elements promote the production of EGR-1, which then binds to the promoter region and enhances the expression of such genes as those for platelet-derived growth factor A and B, transforming growth factor ß, tissue factor, urokinase-type plasminogen activator, and a number of the metalloproteinases responsible for angiogenesis and vascular formation.
Importantly, Egr1 is inducibly expressed in many different cell types relevant to the vascular signaling mechanism presently under consideration, including endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, fibroblasts, and leukocytes. Aside from shear stress and hypoxia, EGR-1 is also upregulated by thrombin, acidic fibroblast growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, epidermal growth factor, and VEGF. The ability of EGR-1 to upregulate and be upregulated by a number of proteins that act through autocrine and paracrine mechanisms creates powerful amplification loops that appear to be ideally configured for a critical neovascularization response to vascular occlusion.
Taken with the previous demonstration that shear stress can upregulate Egr1 expression,18-20 and consistent with the observations that proximal tissues in the setting of vascular occlusion are not ischemic,9,10 the demonstration in the present study that Egr1 expression is upregulated in presumably nonischemic vascular tissues upstream from a vascular ligation site supports our hypothesis that factors other than ischemia may play a role in reperfusion after vascular occlusion. Additional studies would, however, need to be performed to fully test this hypothesis, specifically including the demonstration of upregulation of EGR-1 protein, as opposed to messenger RNA expression, and the demonstration of upregulated Egr1 expression in nonischemic cells in this model.
These studies also suggest that EGR-1 plays a critical role in the normal revascularization response to acute vascular occlusion that may take precedence over other, apparently nonredundant, signaling pathways implicated in the ischemia and revascularization response mechanisms, such as the hypoxia-inducible factor pathway. Previous evidence that EGR-1 can upregulate VEGF expression, for example, is consistent with this finding.16-20 Conversely, although a greater number of animals would need to be examined to resolve any potential differences between the therapeutic effects of VEGF relative to EGR-1, the limb salvage provided by VEGF in the current studies also reaffirms the ability of VEGF, and presumably other downstream growth factors, to induce physiologically meaningful vascularization, in this case, even in the absence of an intact Egr1 pathway.
In light of evidence that EGR-1, like other transcription factors, can activate the expressions of a number of vascular development genes, it is possible that EGR-1 can induce vasculogenesis and collateral vessel formation to an extent that exceeds the angiogenesis generated by administration of single growth factors such as VEGF. Although these considerations are appealing conceptually, additional studies will need to be performed to confirm the role of EGR-1 in native arteriogenesis and to determine whether the use of EGR-1 and related factors might yield important new and more robust vasculogenic therapeutics than the use of single growth factors, such as VEGF, for the treatment of atherosclerosis and vascular occlusive disease.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. S. Sarateanu, M. A. Retuerto, J. T. Beckmann, L. McGregor, J. Carbray, G. Patejunas, L. Nayak, J. Milbrandt, and T. K. Rosengart An Egr-1 master switch for arteriogenesis: Studies in Egr-1 homozygous negative and wild-type animals J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2006; 131(1): 138 - 145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |