|
|
||||||||
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;128:710-717
© 2004 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease |
Departments of Cardiovascular Surgery and Pediatric Cardiology, Fukuoka Children's Hospital Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
Read at the Eighty-fourth Annual Meeting of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, April 25-28, 2004.
Received for publication April 21, 2004; revisions received July 17, 2004; accepted for publication July 22, 2004. * Address for reprints: Yoshihisa Tanoue, MD, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan (E-mail: tanoue{at}heart.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: Contractility (end-systolic elastance), afterload (effective arterial elastance), and ventricular efficiency (ventriculoarterial coupling, arterial elastance/end-systolic elastance ratio), and the ratio of stroke work and pressure-volume area were approximated on the basis of cardiac catheterization data before the bidirectional Glenn procedure, before and after staged total cavopulmonary connection, and approximately 1 year after the completion of total cavopulmonary connection in 20 patients with pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum and 21 patients with tricuspid atresia.
RESULTS: The end-systolic elastance of the pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum group was significantly inferior to that of the tricuspid atresia group after bidirectional Glenn procedure and total cavopulmonary connection (1 year after total cavopulmonary connection 1.85 ± 0.51 mm Hg · m2 · mL1 vs 2.84 ± 0.96 mm Hg · m2 · mL1, P < .01). The arterial elastance was not different between groups throughout the assessment period and tended to increase in a stepwise fashion after bidirectional Glenn procedure and total cavopulmonary connection. The arterial elastance/end-systolic elastance ratio and ratio of stroke work and pressure-volume area of the pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum group tended to worsen, whereas those of the tricuspid atresia group tended to improve. The difference reached statistical significance 1 year after total cavopulmonary connection (1.15 ± 0.35 vs 0.82 ± 0.23 and 64.2% ± 6.7% vs 71.3% ± 5.7%, respectively, P < .05 and P < .05, respectively).
CONCLUSION: The contractility and ventricular efficiency of patients with pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum are inferior to those of patients with tricuspid atresia after bidirectional Glenn procedure and total cavopulmonary connection. A high-pressure residual right ventricle may impair the left ventricular performance of patients with pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum after bidirectional Glenn procedure and total cavopulmonary connection.
We hypothesize that the detail analysis of the interplay between contractility and afterload provided by end-systolic elastance (Ees), effective arterial elastance (Ea), ventriculoarterial coupling (Ea/Ees), and the ratio of stroke work and pressure-volume area (SW/PVA) manifests the impaired LV performance in patients with PA/IVS. In this study, the LV performances of patients with PA/IVS before and after the bidirectional Glenn procedure (BDG) and a staged total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) were compared with those of patients with tricuspid atresia (TA). TA is also a single-ventricle disease that affects the left-dominant ventricle. The purpose of this study was to analyze the LV performance (contractility, afterload, ventricular efficiency) of patients with PA/IVS who had undergone right heart bypass surgery.
| Patients and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the PA/IVS group, coronary artery obstructive lesions in association with the RVcoronary artery fistulas were present in 6 patients, mitral regurgitation was present in 4, and paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia was present in 1. In the TA group, the ventriculoarterial connections were concordant in 20 patients and discordant in 1, mitral regurgitation was present in 2, partial anomalous pulmonary venous return was present in 1, and an aortopulmonary window was present in 1. Before BDG, a systemic-to-pulmonary shunt was performed in 29 patients (20 patients with PA/IVS and 9 patients with TA), and pulmonary artery banding was performed in 7 of the patients with TA. Mean ages of the patients with PA/IVS were 37.9 ± 37.7 months (6-142 months) at BDG and 60.8 ± 36.2 months (25-153 months) at TCPC. Mean weights at these procedures were 10.3 ± 5.0 kg (5.1-22.6 kg) and 14.3 ± 4.9 kg (8.4-29.7 kg), respectively. Mean ages of the patients with TA were 41.6 ± 38.4 months (6-129 months) at BDG and 64.2 ± 35.9 months (27-142 months) at TCPC. The mean weights at these procedures were 11.9 ± 6.5 kg (5.8-27.5 kg) and 15.6 ± 6.7 kg (9.2-33.6 kg), respectively.
Operative techniques
Anesthesia was conducted by a standard technique with intravenous infusions of fentanyl, inhalation of sevoflurane, and muscle relaxation with pancuronium. Aortic and bicaval cannulations were performed through a standard median sternotomy, and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was instituted with a heart-lung machine consisting of a rotating pump and a membrane oxygenator. When heart arrest was necessary, myocardial preservation was achieved with a cold crystalloid cardioplegic solution12,13 combined with topical cooling. In the patients with PA/IVS with coronary artery obstructive lesions in association with the RVcoronary artery fistulas, the central venous pressure was kept high to avoid decompressing the RV during CPB with a beating heart, and cardioplegic heart arrest was induced immediately after the introduction of CPB if heart arrest was necessary.
BDG
Bidirectional cavopulmonary shunts were made by direct end-to-side anastomosis between the superior vena cava and the pulmonary artery. Bilateral superior venae cavae were present in 2 of the patients with TA, and bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomoses were conducted separately. With respect to concomitant procedures, augmentation of the pulmonary artery was performed in 17 patients (8 with PA/IVS and 9 with TA), mitral valvuloplasty was performed in 6 (4 with PA/IVS and 2 with TA), and an enlargement of atrial septal defect was performed in 20 (13 with PA/IVS and 7 with TA). Additional pulmonary blood flow was maintained in 7 patients with PA/IVS (all systemic-to-pulmonary shunt) and 15 with TA (5 systemic-to-pulmonary shunts and 10 main pulmonary arteries). Mean CPB time of the patients with PA/IVS was 95.5 ± 49.3 minutes (33-148 minutes), and that of the patients with TA was 98.0 ± 37.8 minutes (32-154 minutes). Mean aortic crossclamp time of the patients with PA/IVS was 6.1 ± 11.9 minutes (0-41 minutes), and that of the patients with TA was 6.0 ± 13.6 minutes (0-44 minutes).
TCPC
For inferior cavopulmonary anastomoses, the lateral tunnel technique14 was performed in 1 patient with PA/IVS and 3 patients with TA, and the extracardiac conduit approach with a 16- to 20-mm polytetrafluoroethylene graft15 was performed in 19 patients with PA/IVS and 18 patients with TA. Fenestration was not created in any patient. Augmentation of the pulmonary artery was performed in 12 patients (4 with PA/IVS and 8 with TA), mitral valvuloplasty was performed in 2 (1 from each group), an enlargement of atrial septal defect was performed in 3 (2 with PA/IVS and 1 with TA), and release of pulmonary venous obstruction was performed in 1 patient with TA. Mean CPB time of the patients with PA/IVS was 78.6 ± 28.0 minutes (39-130 minutes), and that of the patients with TA was 98.9 ± 39.3 minutes (42-206 minutes). Mean aortic crossclamp time of the patients with PA/IVS was 5.4 ± 14.1 minutes (0-45 minutes), and that of the patients with TA was 9.6 ± 14.8 minutes (0-47 minutes).
Data analysis
All patients underwent cardiac catheterization before BDG (PreG) and before and after TCPC (PreT, PostT0), and 35 patients (19 with PA/IVS and 16 with TA) similarly underwent cardiac catheterization approximately 1 year after TCPC (PostT1). Biplane left ventriculography was performed, and LV volumes were calculated with the area-length method.16 RV volume was excluded in both groups as a unified method. Calculations of the percentage of normal LV end-diastolic volume (%N-EDV) were conducted on the basis of control data obtained from patients matched by body surface area who underwent follow-up cardiac catheterization after treatment for Kawasaki disease with intact coronary artery at Fukuoka Children's Hospital Medical Center. LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was calculated as follows: LVEF = (1 minimal LV volume/maximal LV volume) x 100%. The calculations of contractility (Ees), afterload (Ea), and ventricular efficiency (Ea/Ees and SW/PVA) were performed on the basis of pressure and volume data obtained from cardiac catheterization by the approximation method, as previously described elsewhere.17-19 Approximations of Ees and Ea were performed as follows: Ees = mean arterial pressure/minimal LV volume, and Ea = maximal LV pressure/(maximal LV volume minimal LV volume). LV volume was divided by the body surface area. Ea/Ees represents the ventriculoarterial coupling between the LV and arterial system described by Burkhoff and Sagawa.20 SW/PVA was calculated as follows: SW/PVA = 1/(1 + 0.5Ea/Ees) x 100%. This theoretic formula was previously described by Nozawa and colleagues.21
Statistical analysis
The results are presented as mean ± SD. Two-factor analysis of variance with repeated measures of one factor (RM-ANOVA) was used for the measured variables of PreG, PreT, PostT0, and PostT1 (4 points). The analysis clarified whether each of the repeated measures and nonrepeated factors were significantly different among or between levels, and also whether interactions between the two factors were significant. This analysis was used to determine whether the variables were statistically different among the four time points and between patients with PA/IVS and patients with TA. The Bonferroni test was used as a post hoc test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PA/IVS is an anatomically heterogeneous congenital heart disease that shows morphologic variations in the size of the tricuspid annulus, the size and shape of the RV cavity, and coronary artery obstructive lesions in association with the RVcoronary artery fistulas. The varying degrees of these morphologic factors dictate whether patients are candidates for biventricular repair or for less corrective procedures such as the Fontan operation. Many studies on PA/IVS have discussed these variations as an indication for surgical strategies such as biventricular repair, one-and-a-half-ventricular repair, single-ventricular palliation, and heart transplantation.3-11 However, patients with markedly hypoplastic tricuspid valves and RVs or with obstructive coronary artery lesions are not candidates for biventricular repair.1-3 The possibility of patients with PA/IVS becoming Fontan candidates is also of great importance.
Coronary artery obstructive lesions in association with the RVcoronary artery fistulas are considered one of the most important factors of impaired LV function in patients with PA/IVS. These coronary abnormalities cause ischemic damage to the LV myocardium. However, LV dysfunction has been demonstrated even in patients with less severe coronary abnormalities.23-25 In this study, there was no significant difference in SW/PVA 1 year after TCPC between patients with PA/IVS with and without important RVcoronary artery fistulas (63.9% ± 6.5% vs 64.3% ± 7.0%, respectively), although the Ees 1 year after TCPC in patients with PA/IVS with important RVcoronary artery fistulas tended to be inferior to that in patients with PA/IVS without coronary artery lesions (1.54 ± 0.41 mm Hg · m2 · mL1 vs 1.99 ± 0.50 mm Hg · m2 · mL1, statistical analysis not performed because of small number of patients). Coronary abnormalities with RVcoronary artery fistulas are, however, not always the main reasons for LV functional disturbances in patients with PA/IVS. Histologic abnormalities of the LV myocardium, cell swelling and increased interstitial fibrosis, have been demonstrated not only in patients with PA/IVS with normal coronary arteries but also in patients with TA.26-29 Small RVs were a consistent feature in patients who had PA/IVS and were Fontan candidates and in patients with TA; however, RV pressure was significantly different between the two groups. Ventricular septum interactions between the RV and the LV greatly influence LV performance.30,31 High-pressure RVs oppress the ventricular septum and then disturb LV function. Although many questions remain unanswered regarding the exact mechanisms of impaired LV function in patients with PA/IVS after right heart bypass surgery, a high-pressure RV might impair LV performance in patients with PA/IVS after BDG and TCPC. Recently, we have performed RV outflow tract reconstruction at BDG to decompress the high-pressure RV in a patient with PA/IVS who was a Fontan candidate and did not have any RVcoronary artery fistulas.
Measurements of ordinary hemodynamic variables, such as mean aortic pressure and LVEF, are not sufficient for assessing ventricular function. Ees is a load-independent parameter of systolic ventricular function and an ideal index of contractility. However, it is difficult (practically impossible) to measure the LV pressure-volume relations that are needed to calculate Ees in clinical situations. We previously reported approximations of Ees and Ea and validated this approximation in a canine right heart bypass model with a conductance catheter in the LV cavity.17,32 This approximation was combined with cardiac catheterization data from single-ventricle patients, and then the ventricular performance of the patients who underwent right heart bypass surgery was analyzed.17,18 With this simple approximation, single LV contractility, afterload, and efficiency in patients with PA/IVS and patients with TA could be evaluated from the conventional cardiac catheterization data used in this study.
In our hospital, all Fontan candidates, not only high-risk candidates such as those with hypoplastic left heart syndrome, undergo the staged Fontan procedure. The advantages of this procedure are as follows: (1) preservation of ventricular function by relieving the volume load on the single ventricle at an early stage33,34; (2) prevention of myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis35; (3) avoidance of deleterious effects as a result of a sudden decrease in ventricular volume35; (4) minimization of afterload mismatch caused by cavopulmonary anastomosis17; and (5) correction of afterload mismatch during the interval between BDG and staged TCPC.18 BDG should be performed in an early stage to prevent myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis.36 In this study, however, the mean age at BDG was around 3 years, and that at TCPC was about 5 years. The reason for the high averages is that the study includes cases from relatively early in our experience.Recently, we began performing BDG at an early stage insofar as possible. Several strategies were considered to improve the clinical results of single-ventricle patients, and the following strategies were pursued: (1) As far as possible, any concomitant procedures were finished during the BDG operation, and inferior cavopulmonary anastomosis was only performed in patients undergoing staged TCPC. (2) As far as possible, a staged Fontan procedure with an extracardiac conduit was performed with a beating heart.37 (3) Large doses of an
-blocking agent (chlorpromazine at 1-2 mg/kg) were used during CPB,38 and a 2-µg/(kg · min) infusion of nitroglycerin and inhalation of 100% oxygen with 5 to 20 ppm nitric oxide were performed on weaning from CPB.39 (4) Long-term oral intakes of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or ß-blocker were adopted as an afterload-reducing therapy. These strategies during right heart bypass surgery are thought to improve the clinical results and long-term outcomes of Fontan candidates.
We clearly demonstrated impaired LV performance in patients with PA/IVS after BDG and TCPC. Nevertheless, these findings have some limitations. First, the approximation of Ees and Ea in this study has inherent limitations and is not equivalent to the measurement by conductance catheter. This study was designed to apply the concepts of Ees, Ea, and Ea/Ees to the patients with PA/IVS and patients with TA by using the conventional cardiac catheterization data before and after the right heart bypass surgery. We believe that the problem of the approximation in this study does not detract from the validity of our conclusions. Second, correlation of LV performance and RVcoronary artery fistulas in patients with PA/IVS should be analyzed. However the detail analysis could not be performed in this study group because of our small number of patients. In this study, there was no significant difference in LV performance between patients with PA/IVS with and without important RVcoronary artery fistulas after right heart bypass surgery. Further comparative studies of patients with PA/IVS with and without important RVcoronary artery are therefore needed. Finally, the long-term changes of LV performance (Ees, Ea, Ea/Ees, and SW/PVA) are the next important area to address. We worry about the poor long-term outcome in LV performance we saw in patients with PA/IVS who underwent right heart bypass surgery.
In conclusion, contractility and ventricular efficiency of patients with PA/IVS are inferior to those of patients with TA after BDG and TCPC. Ischemic damage of the LV myocardium as a result of coronary artery obstructive lesions in association with the RVcoronary artery fistulas is an important factor in, but is not always the main reason for, impaired LV performance in patients with PA/IVS. A high-pressure residual RV might impair LV performance in patients with PA/IVS after BDG and TCPC. Before any definitive conclusions can be made, however, long-term evaluations of LV performance in patients with PA/IVS remain to be performed in future follow-up studies.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
With estimates of ventricular efficiency that you validated in your own previous work, you've elegantly demonstrated that, relative to a cohort of patients with TA, the PA/IVS septum group showed worsening of contractility and ventricular efficiency with time after the BDG and Fontan operations, although the groups performed quite similarly in the pre-BDG state.
I have three questions, which I'll present individually. First, can you comment on why the disparity in the function between the two groups begins only after the BDG? If the effect of the hypertensive RV and its interaction on the LV is a major contributing factor to the decrement in LV function, shouldn't that relationship exist before the BDG? Why would the difference evolve only years later?
Dr Tanoue. As you pointed out, ventricular septum interaction between the right and LV by hypertensive RV should occur before BDG. In this study, however, LV performance before BDG was not different between the patients with PA/IVS and the patients with TA. The influence of the high-pressure RV on the LV performance would be relatively slight in an early age and would increase with growth.
Although many questions remain unanswered regarding the exact mechanism of impaired LV function in patients with PA/IVS after right heart bypass surgery, the long-term evaluations of the LV performance in patients with PA/IVS are significantly important. We worry about the poor long-term outcome in the LV performance we saw in patients with PA/IVS who underwent right heart bypass surgery
Dr Bichell. Second, it has been shown in previous studies that in the single LV, diastolic and systolic functions normalize if the volume unloading procedure, the BDG, is performed when the patient is younger than 12 months, whereas persistent abnormalities in ventricular function exist if the volume unloading is later. It has also been shown that late exercise capacity is better in those who have volume unloading earlier.
Your mean ages were 3 years at BDG construction and 5 years at the Fontan. Have you looked at the ventricular efficiency measurements with respect to the timing of the BDG? In other words, do patients with earlier timing fair better in ventricular function with time?
Dr Tanoue. I agree that right heart bypass surgery should be performed as early as possible. In this series, for historical reason, relatively old series were included, leading to a relatively old average age.
The preservation of the ventricular function by relieving the volume load on the single ventricles should be performed in an early stage. Recently, we have performed BDG in the early stage insofar as possible. In this series, however, only 4 patients from each group underwent BDG at younger than 12 months. So the specifications in timing of BDG and TCPC could not be examined because of our small number of patients.
Dr Bichell. Finally, you allude in the article to RV decompression in patients with PA/IVS who were on the Fontan pathway. Sano's group has published impressive improvements in LV end-diastolic dimension and stroke volume with a complete resection of the free wall of the RV in a different model of RV failure affecting the LV. In PA/IVS, however, decompression of the RV has demonstrably resulted in a worsening of LV function, presumably because of coronary compromise.
Can you comment on your experience with decompressing these little ventricles in the PA/IVS group on the Fontan pathway? What are your recommendations for decompressing them, and what have your results been?
Dr Tanoue. We think the high-pressure RV is one of the most important factors for impaired LV function in patients with PA/IVS. But this remains only a speculation. Recently, we have performed RV outflow tract reconstruction at BDG to decompress the high-pressure RV in a patient with PA/IVS who was a Fontan candidate and did not have any RVcoronary artery fistulas.
Now, only a few patients with PA/IVS who were Fontan candidates have undergone RV outflow tract reconstruction, so we cannot truly analyze the experience and the effect of the RV decompression on LV performance in patients with PA/IVS. We do, however, recommend the decompression of the hypertensive RV in patients with PA/IVS at right heart bypass surgery if there's no RVcoronary artery fistula.
Dr Frank Hanley (Stanford, Calif). I'm left with a bit of uncertainty as to how your conclusions relate to the difference between PA/IVS and TA and whether there is actually some component of a relatively long-standing systemic-pulmonary arterial shunt as a factor. All your patients with PA/IVS had a relatively long-standing systemic-pulmonary arterial shunts. Only half of your patients with TA did. It would seem that you could eliminate that confounding variable either by comparing just the patients with shunts in the TA group with your patients with PA/IVS or alternatively by looking at just the patients with TA and comparing those with and without shunts and seeing whether there is any difference. This would eliminate a chronic systemic shunt as a factor in the depressed long-term ventricular function.
Dr Tanoue. Previous procedures before BDG is an important factor, but that analysis was not performed because of the small number of patients.
Dr Hanley. You have all the data to look at it.
Dr John E. Mayer, Jr (Boston, Mass). What technique of CPB did you use when you constructed your bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt and your Fontan total cavopulmonary anastomosis type of procedure? Did you crossclamp the aorta? If you did, what method did you use for myocardial preservation, or did you do these in beating-heart preparations?
How did you manage CPB in terms of keeping the RV full? Because I think we've anecdotally had experience that even if you don't crossclamp the aorta in patients with RV-dependent coronary circulation, if you don't keep the heart full, you can see the electrocardiograms start to change immediately as soon as you decompress the right heart by taking away the venous return. So could you elaborate on the techniques that you've used for CPB in these cases?
Dr Tanoue. In patients with PA/IVS with important coronary artery obstructive lesions in association with the RVcoronary artery fistulas, the institution of CPB is very dangerous because cardiac ischemia may occur. In our hospital, after institution of CPB, aortic clamping is performed immediately and cardioplegia is infused. We have no experience of the ischemic problem from RVcoronary fistulas.
Dr Mayer. I only ask because I wonder whether in the subset of patients who have RV-dependent coronary circulation the long-term worse LV function is due to the way you've handled the coronary circulation and myocardial preservation at the time of your initial operation. I think, without seeing the individual data points and the relationship of those individual patients to the patients with RV-dependent coronary circulation, that it becomes hard to understand what the impact is on the interaction of those two factors.
Dr Tanoue. In this series, there was no significant difference in SW/PVA 1 year after TCPC between patients with PA/IVS with and without important RVcoronary artery fistulas.
|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Tanoue, T. Maeda, S. Oda, H. Baba, Y. Oishi, S. Tokunaga, A. Nakashima, and R. Tominaga Left ventricular performance in aortic valve replacement Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, August 1, 2009; 9(2): 255 - 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M A Walsh, B W McCrindle, A Dipchand, C Manlhiot, E Hickey, C A Caldarone, G S Van Arsdell, and S M Schwartz Left ventricular morphology influences mortality after the Norwood operation Heart, August 1, 2009; 95(15): 1238 - 1244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Foker, S. P. Setty, J. Berry, P. Jain, K. Catton, A. C. Gittenberger-de-Groot, and L. A. Pyles Treatment of right ventricle to coronary artery connections in infants with pulmonary atresia and intact ventricular septum J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2008; 136(3): 749 - 756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-H. Yang, T.-G. Jun, P. W. Park, K. Sung, W. S. Kim, Y. T. Lee, J. Huh, and I-S. Kang Exclusion of the non-functioning right ventricle in children with pulmonary atresia and intact ventricular septum Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2008; 33(2): 251 - 256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Miyaji, A. Murakami, T.-i. Takasaki, K. Ohara, S. Takamoto, and H. Yoshimura Does a bidirectional Glenn shunt improve the oxygenation of right ventricle-dependent coronary circulation in pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2005; 130(4): 1050 - 1053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |